HPIM0049

No 954 “En mi opinión” Mayo 20, 2015

No 954   “En mi opinión”  Mayo 20, 2015

“IN GOD WE TRUST” LAZARO R GONZALEZ MIñO EDITOR

 

AMENPER: Hablando de Payasos

La presidenta de la Convención del partido Demócrata Nacional, Debbie Wasserman Schultz ridiculizado el campo potencial de  17 aspirantes en las primarias republicana, los señaló como un “carro de payasos del extremismo” repleto de vendedores ambulantes de desacreditadas políticas.

¿Pero no es el campo lleno de candidatos del GOP un testimonio de una vitalidad que contrasta con los demócratas, donde Hillary Clinton no enfrenta ninguna oposición seria para la nominación?

¿No es esto un ejemplo de democracia representativa en contraste con una coronación monárquica?

Es verdad que algunos de los candidatos son payasos en el sentido de que tienen una aspiración sin oportunidad de ser electos, pero esto es la democracia, hasta los payasos tienen el derecho a aspirar.

Lo principal de la conjetura de Debbie, y esto es realmente lo que ella quería decir, es que las políticas conservadoras están desacreditadas. Y esto no es la realidad, la realidad es que las políticas socialistas son las que están desacreditadas, no sólo domésticamente con la presente administración, pero a nivel global donde quiera que se han implantado.

Al final no importa cuantos se monten en el carro, solamente uno será el candidato, y hay más figuras calificadas para ser presidente en este grupo que en años anteriores.  Y cualquiera de ellos que sea electo el candidato es mucho más capacitado para el cargo que la desacreditada candidata del partido demócrata, ungida y consagrada por la izquierda sin un proceso democrático.

Hay variedad representativa de una pluralidad democrática entre los candidatos republicanos, no son un grupo homogéneo, los hay conservadores, moderados y hasta un libertario, De la democrática discusión saldrá el candidato del partido. Esto es lo que representa la democracia. 

Las declaraciones de nuestra floridana Debbie, demuestra su desprecio al proceso democrático y esto es lo que la convierte en un payaso socialista..

.

Blacks Attack Carson for Being Conservative

By Clarence V. McKee

Pulitzer Prize-winning black columnist Cynthia Tucker is one of the first black liberals to attempt to politically lynch Dr. Ben Carson because his political views are out of tune with the black liberal Democratic chorus.

In a recent column, forced to admit the truth about Carson’s “brilliant” career as a pediatric neurosurgeon and his “awe-inspiring tale of a poor black boy in Detroit who overcame daunting obstacles,” she proceeded to mercilessly plunge the dagger of political correctness into his back.

“But the good doctor’s foray into Republican presidential politics threatens to become his epitaph, to overshadow — perhaps even to overwhelm — his academic and surgical accomplishments. He will likely be remembered as the GOP’s latest black mascot, a court jester, a minstrel show.”

Black “mascot,” “court jester,” “minstrel show”? What a disgusting, despicable, hateful choice of words as she figuratively hoisted Carson up the tree of political correctness with a rope of intolerance. His crime — daring to stray from the Democratic liberal plantation, think for himself and not mimic the liberal Democratic script as blacks are supposed to do.

Tucker is like other “overseers” — black and white — of that plantation. They drive the nails and tighten the rope to crucify and lynch any black conservative who dares challenge the orthodoxy of liberal establishment policies. They judge blacks like Carson not by the content of their character, accomplishments, and deeds but rather by their racist perspective of how they think blacks should think.

Special: Simple Secret to Better Sleep Tonight

As Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., has said, “one of the most threatening places to be in politics is a black conservative.”

Overseers like Tucker don’t dare denigrate Jewish or Hispanic conservative politicians with such language — that’s reserved for blacks like Carson — so he had better get ready for more.

Talk-show host and author Tavis Smiley told Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly that Carson was “a black bull in a Republican china shop,” and that “if he’s not careful, he is going to do himself irreparable damage.”

He went on to say that if he were close to Carson he would “call for intervention to stop him, what he is doing to himself and his reputation.”

How patronizing.

Unlike other ethnic groups, blacks like Tucker enjoy the “political blood sport” of tearing down other blacks just because they have different political philosophies and solutions to our country’s social and urban problems. 

Other groups — at least in public — respect their own. For example, Hispanic journalists and Democrats, to the best of my knowledge, haven’t demeaned Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., or Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, just because they seek the GOP nomination and have a conservative message.

They understand the wisdom of not putting all of their Hispanic political eggs into one Democratic Party basket.

Unfortunately, most of the black liberal democratic establishment appear to have kinder words and empathy for blacks who burned down black and minority-owned businesses in Ferguson and Baltimore than they do for blacks who dare express different political viewpoints and solutions to the very problems creating frustration in places like Baltimore and other cities.

How dare Tucker stoop so low and defame this great man of accomplishment and vision who has given so much back to society including his Carson Scholarship Fund, which has awarded nearly 7,000 scholarships to youth for academic excellence? She should be ashamed.

If she cares so much about blacks, especially youth, she has a heck of a way of showing it by using her pen to politically deride such a great role model. They will notice how he is being treated by Tucker and most likely her cohorts in the black media and liberal democratic establishments and they’ll think, “If they do that to him after all he has done, why should I not finish school and take the easy way out — sell drugs, make quick money, and produce babies?”

Tucker’s message to them is: “No matter how much you accomplish, just don’t think for yourself and stray from the Democratic plantation or we will get you.”

Don’t hold your breath waiting for the NAACP, the Congressional Black Caucus, or the National Urban League, or most black and white liberal journalists and pundits to condemn such racist and vicious attacks. So the question is, Who will?

After all, it’s easier to attack Carson that admit to the fact that in Baltimore city schools 84 percent of eighth graders score below grade level in reading and 87 percent below grade level in math. That’s not Carson’s fault!
© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved

 

 

AMENPER: Lagartijas Lesbianas

Las lagartijas Whiptail de Méjico son todas hembras, son lesbianas. No es una broma, si no lo quieren creer pueden buscarlo en Wikipedia. Desert grassland whiptail lizard – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Estas especies de lagartijas todas hembras (del género Aspidoscelis) de Méjico y el sudoeste de Estados Unidos logran producir crías sin la ayuda de fertilización masculina.

Aunque esto no es totalmente inaudito entre diversas formas de vida en la tierra, tales como con ciertas plantas, insectos y vida marina, entre otros, lo que es particularmente interesante es cómo los lagartos Whiptail de Méjico se reproducen. Para hacer esto, generalmente interpretarán un tipo de pseudo-copulación donde dos hembras actuarán teniendo sexo como si uno fuera un varón.

Aunque no es estrictamente necesario para reproducir, este sexo simulado se ha demostrado que sirve para aumentar la fertilidad de los lagartos particulares exteriorizando cópula, para producir más huevos que aquellos que no lo hacen. También de interés es que el lagarto exteriorizando el papel femenino en la parte inferior produce huevos más grandes que el que actúa el papel masculino. Quién va a estar en la parte superior o inferior se alterna de apareamiento de apareamiento, con los que actuaban por la parte masculina de una temporada, cambiando a actuar fuera de la parte femenina de la próxima y viceversa.

A pesar de no fecundación externa, la descendencia de los lagartos no son clones realmente perfectos uno del otro. Por el contrario, investigaciones recientes realizadas por estudiantes de zoología ha demostrado que el lagarto de Whiptail produce dos veces el número de cromosomas que otros tipos de lagartos normalmente. Un proceso de recombinación de estos cromosomas entonces ocurre, algo similar a lo que sucede en normal emparejamientos macho/hembra, que luego produce descendencia genéticamente diversa pero siempre del género femenino.

El lagarto, o mejor dicho, la lagarta, se han convertido en el símbolo del lesbianismo y están estudiando los órganos reproductivos para tratar de duplicarlos en los seres humanos para eliminar el sexo masculino.

Los estudios se están realizando en Méjico, pero tan pronto se logren implementar no habrá mayor problema pasar a los espécimenes humanos por la frontera ilegalmente y recibir los beneficios sociales y económicos del gobierno.

 

 

 

 20 DE MAYO 2015

    PARA CUBA YA ES HORA…

 

Hacen 113 años de un día soñado por millones de Cubanos. En La Habana se hizó la bandera de la estrella solitaria y una Cuba libre e independiente disfrutó de nuestro hermoso cielo azul y nuestro fertil suelo convirtiéndose en una República con todos y para todos.

Hoy tenemos que conmemorar aquella hermosa fecha que consiguieron nuestros Mambises con sus sacrificios y con su sangre.

Ahora, 113 años después los que nacimos en esa bella Isla tenemos que reconocer que no nos queda mas que un camino: mirar hacia adelante.

No podemos continuar enmarcados en el pasado, muchos hermanos han fallecido en los años anteriores, unos de un lado otros del otro. Es nuestro deber hacia ellos, es nuestra obligación enfocar nuestra vista hacia el futuro. Que el pasado no nos divida sino que el futuro nos una.                                                                             Al escribir estas lineas Raúl Castro Ruz ocupa el cargo de Presidente de la República de Cuba. Espero que en alguna forma estas lineas lleguen hasta él.

Cuba es de todos. Y todos incluye a los descendientes de los que hoy dirigen los destinos de nuestra querida Isla. El próximo mes de Junio cumpliré 81 años en esta vida. En una decisión especial me he puesto a la altura de las circunstancias y me encuentro con paz spiritual sabiendo que dejo a mis hijos el legado de un hombre trabajador y honesto. Raúl Castro Ruz tiene en sus manos legar a sus hijos y descendientes la oportunidad de poder disfrutar en el futuro de vivir en una República “con todos y para todos”.

Para Cuba lo mejor que podemos hacer es mirar solamente hacia adelante. Nadie, ni los de allá ni los de acá tenemos el derecho a truncar el futuro de nuestros descendientes.

Si Raúl Castro Ruz realmente vela por el futuro de sus descendientes tiene que estar consciente de que este es el momento para asegurar que ellos puedan tener un futuro en la Cuba del futuro.

Esto lo he escrito sin odio y sin rencores. Cuba merece que los que hemos tenido la dicha de haber nacido en su suelo pensemos en el mejor futuro para sus hijos.

Para Cuba ya es hora. Es hora de que el gobernante actual Raúl Castro Ruz abra el camino para que en Cuba se establezca un Gobierno de Reconciliación Nacional donde cada Cubano se sienta en paz y sin temores. Que el Cubano pueda recibir un salario justo por su trabajo y pueda ver crecer a sus hijos disfrutando de paz y armonía. Que la mujer Cubana se sienta feliz de ver crecer a sus hijos hacia un futuro próspero.

Un gobierno que dirija a los Cubanos hacia un futuro donde puedan disfrutar de los beneficios del siglo XXI. El siglo XX ya es parte de la Historia y los Cubanos unidos tenemos que obtener los beneficios que se merecen los nacidos en esa hermosa Isla.

Miremos hacia adelante, para Cuba ya es hora. Que se establezca un Gobierno de Reconciliación Nacional que brinde a Cuba la paz y armonía que se merece.

20 de Mayo del año 2015.

 

Dr. Carlos J. Bringuier

 

 

 

AMENPER: Los Valores Morales Judeo-Cristianos…

Cuando hablamos de la moral Judeo Cristiana, el término se ha convertido en algo particularmente asociado con políticos conservadores de Estados Unidos

Esto se debe a que los conservadores creen en la moralidad que está asociada a la conducta humana desde el comienzo de la civilización greco-romana. Esto es una realidad evidente, tanto si miramos la filosofía griega o la filosofía judeo cristiana, la moral está  profundamente impregnada con la historia del mundo.

Etimológicamente, el término ‘moral’ proviene del latín “mos”, que significa costumbre o hábito y es una traducción del griego ethos, que significa más o menos la misma cosa y es el origen del término “ética”. En el uso no técnico contemporáneo, los dos términos son más o menos intercambiables

La tradición judeo-cristiana sostiene una creencia en la moral universal, no relativa, aunque hay muchas aplicaciones más amplias. En nuestras escuelas militares estadounidenses, comúnmente se enseña que las reglas modernas para la guerra, basadas en la filosofía judeo cristiana, como la protección de los cautivos y no combatientes-.  La jurisprudencia americana se basa firmemente en la ética Judeo-cristiana

Independientemente de las preferencias doctrinales de los padres fundadores, ellos aplicaron  valores Judeo-cristianos que caracterizaron su cosmovisión y “proporcionan un consenso moral… y la creencia en una verdad intrínseca subyacente”

Palabras de la declaración de independencia, “Sostenemos que estas verdades son evidentes, que todos los hombres son creados iguales, que son dotados por su creador con ciertos derechos inalienables…” Esto revela la idea Judeo-cristiana de igualdad universal. La Constitución de Estados Unidos refleja supuestos Judeo-cristianos del bien y del mal en materia de justicia, el imperio de la ley y el fair play que comúnmente se llevaron a cabo por la sociedad colonial, incluso teniendo en cuenta sus diferencias teológicas. Estos documentos fundacionales que han guiado y formado a los Estados Unidos por más de 200 años y numerosos escritos y discursos de los miembros de la Convención Constitucional exponen la presuposición Judeo-cristiana de la soberana autoridad moral como la fuente del valor de la vida humana, sus derechos y lo que ellos consideraban el marco jurídico del modo adecuado para organizar una sociedad,

Esto lo vemos también mucho antes en los filósofos griegos, la teoría ética de Aristóteles es (como la de Platón) ‘eudaimonist’ (es decir, que tiene como objetivo nuestra moralidad, nuestra felicidad). Aristóteles nos dice que su teoría aplica el mismo enfoque descriptivo, paciente y cuidado para su examen de filosofía moral en la Νικομαχοι Εθικη (ética a Nicómaco). Aquí él discutió las condiciones bajo las cuales puede atribuirse responsabilidad moral a las personas individualmente, la naturaleza de las virtudes y los vicios involucrados en la evaluación moral y los métodos de alcanzar la felicidad en la vida humana. La cuestión central para Aristóteles es la cuestión del carácter o personalidad — qué se necesita para un individuo humano a ser una buena persona.

Cada actividad tiene una causa final, en el cual tiene como objetivo, el bien que Aristóteles sostuvo es que puesto que no puede haber una regresión infinita de conductas meramente extrínsecas, debe existir un bien supremo al que toda actividad humana debe apuntar en última instancia

Qué es lo que se necesita para un individuo humano a ser una buena persona.

Y los filósofos griegos no eran ni judíos ni cristianos.

Cuando ahora nos quieren imponer una doctrina de relatividad moral, en que cada persona tiene su verdad moral y podemos hacer los que nos venga en gana, no están violando unas basuras religiosas como ellos dicen, están violando los principios de la civilización.

Los griegos no eran cristianos, pero sus principios morales están vinculados intrínsecamente con los valores judeo cristianos que son los que están establecido como principios desde la fundación de esta nación.

Los valores judeo-cristianos aplican para ateos y creyentes no importa de qué denominación o creencia.

Son los valores morales del mundo civilizado, los mismos que ahora se están destruyendo, los que constituyeron la nación más exitosa de la historia moderna.

 

 

Employees Are Fleeing The Clinton Foundation Because Chelsea Is So Awful, Report Says

KAITLAN COLLINS

 

Employees are fleeing the Clinton Foundation because Chelsea Clinton is so disagreeable to work with, a new report in Page Six alleges. An insider claims her personality is causing “extremely high turnover” and turning the nonprofit into a “bloated slush fund.”

Ads by ZINC

“A lot of people left because she was there. A lot of people left because she didn’t want them there,” the anonymous source said. “She is very difficult.”

The 35-year-old daughter of Bill and Hillary came on board as vice chairman in 2011, and since then several senior level staffers have left.

Clinton — who apparently has a personal staff almost as big as her dad’s — reportedly pushed out one CEO after he tried to hire his own communications professional and “actually tried to run the place.” Shortly after, Clinton hired her McKinsey colleague Eric Braverman to take the CEO’s spot.

A WWII Story Energy Investors Should ReadThe Oxford Club

3 Things That Golf Pros Do That Amateurs Don’tHank Haney University

13 Rappers With Pasts That Will Shock YouSuggest

by Taboola

Sponsored Links

 

(Photo: Getty Images)

“He [Bruce Lindsey] didn’t understand that that wasn’t what he was supposed to be doing. He was pushed out.”

A spokesperson and founding CEO have also left. Matt McKenna took a job with Uber and Ginny Ehrlich went to the Robert Johnson Wood Foundation.

“It’s sad to see what’s happening. The operational planning has gone downhill,” another source said.

 

 

Facing $1 billion deficit, Arizona sharply limits welfare

By Associated Press 

PHOENIX (AP) — Facing a $1 billion budget deficit, Arizona’s Republican-led Legislature has reduced the lifetime limit for welfare recipients to the shortest window in the nation.

Low-income families on welfare will now have their benefits cut off after just 12 months.

As a result, the Arizona Department of Economic Security will drop at least 1,600 families — including more than 2,700 children — from the state’s federally funded welfare program when the budget year begins in July.

The cuts of at least $4 million reflect a prevailing mood among the lawmakers in control in Arizona, that welfare, Medicaid and other public assistance programs are crutches that keep the poor from getting back on their feet and achieving their potential.

“I tell my kids all the time that the decisions we make have rewards or consequences, and if I don’t ever let them face those consequences, they can’t get back on the path to rewards,” Republican Sen. Kelli Ward, R-Lake Havasu City, said during debate on the budget. “As a society, we are encouraging people at times to make poor decisions and then we reward them.”

Cutting off these benefits after just one year isn’t fair, said Jessica Lopez, 23, who gave birth to her son while living in a domestic violence shelter and has struggled to hold onto jobs because she has dyslexia and didn’t finish high school.

“We’re all human,” said Lopez, who got $133 per month for about a year until she qualified for a larger federal disability check. “Everybody has problems. Everybody is different. When people ask for help, we should be able to get it without having to be looked at wrong.”

Most states impose a five-year limit on welfare benefits. Thirteen states limit it to two years or less, and Texas has a tiered time limit that can be as little as 12 months but allows children to continue to receive funding even after the parents have been cut, welfare policy analyst Liz Schott said.

Long-term welfare recipients are often the most vulnerable, suffering from mental and physical disabilities, poor job histories and little education, she said. But without welfare, they’ll likely show up in other ways that will cost taxpayers, from emergency rooms to shelters to the criminal justice system, Schott said.

“The reason they are on public assistance is because many of them are not really succeeding in the workforce,” said Schott, a senior fellow at the Center of Budget and Policy Priorities, a non-partisan research organization.

Arizona’s Legislature cut the budgets of an array of programs to meet the governor’s no-tax-increase pledge. The bill that included the welfare cuts received overwhelming support earlier this spring from Republicans, with just one Democrat voting in favor.

The Legislature also passed a law seeking to force anyone getting Medicaid to have a job, and cutting off those benefits after five years. And Republican leaders are suing their own state to block a centerpiece of President Barack Obama’s health care law, which expanded Medicaid to give more poor people health insurance.

If they prevail, more than 300,000 poor Arizonans could lose their coverage.

Republican Gov. Doug Ducey’s office called all these cuts necessary to protect taxpayers and K-12 classrooms — even though the source of the money is the federal government.

Arizona’s welfare is entirely federally funded through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, but that money comes in a block grant, and Republicans want to use it instead for agencies such as the state’s Department of Child Safety.

“The bipartisan, balanced budget passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor protects Arizona’s most vulnerable, while avoiding a tax increase,” said Daniel Scarpinato, governor’s office spokesman.

Democratic Rep. Andrew Sherwood, D-Tempe, said the Republicans made these cuts hastily, voting in the middle of the night in March to avoid transparency.

“This is a very small investment, but it is critical to people who need it the most,” Sherwood said. “You’re talking about desperate families, those who are unemployed and underemployed. Single mothers and parents with kids.”

Former President Bill Clinton signed the block grant law in 1997, making good on a campaign promise to “end welfare as we know it.” The federal government still requires states to make sure recipients have a job, are looking for work, going to school or trying to go to school, but states retain broad discretion in imposing restrictions.

 

 

WND: OBAMA TO UNLEASH ‘COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS’ ON CRIME-FILLED CITIES. Critics decry president’s handout to ACORN-style agitators

The Department of Justice announced it will send millions of dollars to various community-activist groups to combat urban crime and reduce tensions between racial minorities and the police.

But critics believe such policies will only fuel further unrest by funding many of the so-called “community organizers” responsible for creating anti-police sentiment in American cities.

To spread awareness of the new campaign, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch toured Cincinnati Tuesday and identified the city as a model for how police departments around the country should operate.

Until recently, Cincinnati operated under a “Collaborative Agreement” after a 2001 police shooting. The agreement allowed various community organizations, including the Cincinnati Black United Front and the American Civil Liberties Union, to work directly with the police through a court-brokered agreement.

New guidelines on how officers were to interact with the public, especially blacks, were often imposed over the objections of police themselves.

Matthew Vadum’s “Subversion, Inc.,” takes readers on a riveting journey inside the tangled web of ACORN corruption. It’s available now at the WND Superstore.

President Obama, himself, toured the crime-plagued city of Camden, New Jersey, Monday to promote the new report from his “21st Century Policing Task Force,” designed to increase public trust in the police.

The report calls for “mitigating implicit bias” as a “part of training at all levels of a law enforcement organization to increase awareness and ensure respectful encounters both inside the organization and with communities.”

It particularly condemned “the use of disrespectful language and the implicit biases that lead offices to rely upon race” in the context of the law enforcement policy known as “stop and frisk.”

The president also restricted the availability of military hardware previously provided to local law enforcement. Critics, including Cheryl Chumley, author of “Police State USA,” charge such actions are less about “saving innocent lives” and more about “creating a social justice movement that’s likely to clamp police from doing their jobs even while it federalizes the nation’s forces.”

The Justice Department also announced $163 million in grants to be distributed for the purpose of “building trust with the community.” As part of its effort to execute the recommendations of the president’s task force, the Justice Department is looking for 10 localities to participate in a “collaborative reform” process to serve as a model for the rest of the country, emphasizing “procedural justice” and “implicit bias training.”

‘Racial agitators’

A list of grants awarded by the Justice Department in 2013 indicate federal funding has been and will continue to be directed toward activist groups described by critics as “racial agitators.”

For example, “Community Policing Development Awards” were given in 2013 to programs including “Building Trust With Communities of Color” from the Vera Institute of Justice, the “Race and Social Justice Initiative” at the Portland Police Department and “Racial Reconciliation, Truth-Telling, and Police Legitimacy” at John Jay College.

Matthew Vadum, an expert in left-wing activist groups and the author of “Subversion, Inc.,” warns such federal funding invariably finds its way into the hands of progressive activists who personally profit from increased community tensions.

“President Obama is no stranger to irony, or hypocrisy for that matter,” Vadum said in an interview with WND.

“After attacking police as stupid, racist, vicious and thuggish almost non-stop throughout his presidency, now he suddenly cares about police officers and the communities they serve. Now he wants to throw millions of taxpayer dollars at ACORN-like groups and professional left-wing agitators whose calling in life is to generate civil unrest,” he said.

“This means that people like the president’s point man on race relations, riot organizer Al Sharpton, will get his hands on lots of government money. This money won’t actually help anyone except for the often-violent Saul Alinsky-inspired community organizers who have been living high off the hog ever since one of their own took up residence in the White House.”

‘Wrong solutions to a problem he created’

Civil-rights activist Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, author of “Scam: How the Black Leadership Exploits Black America,” argues the Obama administration will use grants to reward political allies instead of fighting crime and helping the black community.

Peterson told WND: “Barack Obama and his cronies helped create this problem and now they’re offering all the wrong solutions. The $163 million will not go to fix inner city issues; the bulk of the money will be used to pay off Barack Obama’s political cronies.

“Obama knows the money won’t be used to rebuild the black community – the only thing it will do is empower his far-left political allies. This is an example of redistribution of wealth. ACORN, Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, the NAACP and corrupt black churches will benefit from this plan.”

Talk-radio host, lawyer and widely respected commentator Larry Elder, author of “Dear Father, Dear Son,” believes one of the most overlooked aspects of the president’s task force is its focus on Baltimore as an example to follow.

Elder noted that according to the report, Baltimore Police Commissioner Anthony Batts commissioned a study to evaluate the police department and the community’s views of the agency.

The DOJ report states the Baltimore study “uncovered broken policies, outdated procedures, outmoded technology, and operating norms that put officers at odds with the community they are meant to serve.”

“It was clear that dramatic and dynamic change was needed,” the report continued. “Ultimately, the Baltimore police created the Professional Standards and Accountability Bureau, tasked with rooting out corruption, holding officers accountable, and implementing national best practices for polices and training. New department heads were appointed and a use of force review structure based on the Las Vegas model was implemented.”

Elder said that if the Obama administration is looking for “models” for the rest of the country to follow, its own task force highlights the efforts of a city which only now is recovering from race riots and tensions between the black community and police.

He also thinks the Obama administration’s grant program will simply be a waste of money.

Elder observed acidly: “As to the $163 million, a cynic would call it hush money. I guess it’s cheaper than giving them ‘space to destroy.’”

The real solution to urban hopelessness, says Peterson, is for blacks to take responsibility for their own families and their own communities.

By redistributing more of other people’s money, concludes Peterson, President Obama is simply ensuring the culture of dependence endures.

“Blacks have been used for the past 50 years,” Peterson charged. “The liberal Democrats keep them angry at whites, and they use them to get more money to fund their useless pet programs and political aspirations. Shame on Barack Obama and shame on the Department of Justice.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/obama-to-unleash-community-organizers-on-crime-filled-cities/#CYaKwkkDiOqIkmub.99

 

 

 

NJ Lawmakers Vote to Discriminate Against People Who Want to Have Sex with Animals…

by Gary DeMar 

Lawmakers in New Jersey did a discriminatory thing. I realize that for most (probably all, although there are some liberal trolls) the readers of Godfather Politics will approve of what New Jersey has done. But take note of the fact there is no moral, logical, constitutional, traditional, legal, or scientific basis for its decision given the way our courts are ruling.

The Associated Press is reporting that the “state Senate [of New Jersey] unanimously approved a measure that would bar people from having sexual contact with animals.”

How is this possible in a time when sexual choice is the prevailing moral ethic? What people choose to do sexually is nobody else’s business.

What if people are born that way? Isn’t this the argument of those working overtime to normalize same-sex everything? Bruce Jenner wants to become a woman because he believes he is a woman on the inside.

President Obama issued a statement “indicating that he and First Lady Michelle Obama would commemorate “International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia.”

“Michelle and I join our fellow Americans and others around the world in commemorating the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia . . . [on] May 17. We take this opportunity to reaffirm that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights are human rights, to celebrate the dignity of every person, and to underscore that all people deserve to live free from fear, violence, and discrimination, regardless of who they are or whom they love.”

How discriminatory! Bestialphobic!

Zoophilia Matters”

The omni-sex crowd should be outraged that there is no mention of the love that some men and women have for and with their pets. Note what President Obama declared: “regardless of who they are or whom they love.”

I think it’s time to boycott New Jersey for discriminating against people who want to engage in a sexual relationship with animals.

On what moral or legal basis can people be denied to have sex with their pets or any animal? An appeal can’t be made to the legal tradition since the courts have ignored history. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the following in April about same-sex marriage:

Marriage today is not what it was under the common law tradition, under the civil law tradition … Marriage was a relationship of a dominant male to a subordinate female.

Why isn’t this also true for human-animal sex? Actually, given the operating assumptions of evolution, we humans are also animals. The Bloodhound Gang got it right:

You and me baby ain’t nothin’ but mammals
So let’s do it like they do on the Discovery Channel.

Let’s not forget that the Bible, disdained and rejected for its views on same-sex sexuality, also prohibits bestiality: ” Also you shall not have intercourse with any animal to be defiled with it, nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it; it is a perversion.” (Lev. 18:23). If the Bible is to rejected for its outdated views on same-sex sexuality, then it’s only consistent to reject its prohibition against sex with animals.
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/22472/nj-lawmakers-voted-to-discriminate-against-people-who-want-to-have-sex-with-animals/#UdmSg7AvSyuO8R8k.99

ISIS Caliph: Islam the ‘Religion of War’

Posted on May 16, 2015 by Tad Cronn 

How many times have you heard that Islam is a “religion of peace,” usually said shortly after something explodes?

Or the baloney about the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria being neither Islamic nor a state? (One gets the impression that President Obama would like to add “Nor are they in Iraq or Syria” if he thought he could get away with it.)

Well, finally, a major political figure has come forward speaking the truth about modern Islam.

It’s the Caliph of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who lectured the world’s Muslims in an online post: “O Muslims, Islam was never for a day the religion of peace. Islam is the religion of war.”

There you have it straight from the camel’s mouth.

But there was more as the caliph urged Muslims to get off the bench.

“Where are you in relation to your prophet (peace be upon him) whom you claim to emulate, and who spent his whole life … as a mujahid for the cause of Allah, fighting for his enemies?” al-Baghdadi wrote. “His lateral incisor tooth was broken in battle, his forehead was wounded, two rings from his chainmail cut his cheeks, his helmet was broken on his head and blood ran down his face.”

Soon enough, though, al-Baghdadi reverted to more typical Muslim form, blaming all the violence of ISIS on Christians and Jews “waging war” against Muslims.

If only. We might actually want to try that sometime. It worked out pretty well during Jefferson’s day in stopping the Barbary pirates.

Al-Baghdadi and his followers are a bunch of loathsome animals who have murdered, raped and pillaged their way across the Mideast, but they know the score.

This is war.

Not just against the United States, but against the entire Western World and, ultimately, civilization itself.

If our leaders don’t wake up to that fact soon, the future of mankind may come to resemble its dark Stone Age past.


Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/22423/isis-caliph-islam-the-religion-of-war/#WS98dluHUKd4BEXm.99

HILLARY CLAIMED: She Used 1 Email But That’s Not What New Emails Show

Hillary is caught lying again…what else is new? After blatantly denying the use of a second email address, this has now been found. Check it out…

One of Clinton’s attorneys, David Kendall, even denied the existence of a second email address in a statement issued to Rep. Trey Gowdy the same month:

“As explained in my March 4th, 2015 email to your Staff Director and certain others, “hrod17@clintonemail.com” is not an address that existed during Secretary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State,” the statement read.

Then, this came out. Behold: An email from “hrod17@clintonemail.com,” dated April 8, 2011.

The New York Times, while digging into emails Clinton sent about Libya, found a series of emails contradicting the Clinton camp’s statements.

Matt Kibbe – FreedomWorks via mta-c3pbr.cluster3.convio.net

)
  Lazaro R,

Mitch McConnell is prepared to give Obama exactly what he wants. He’s calling for a clean Reauthorization of the PATRIOT Act. Lazaro R, we can’t let that happen, we need to stand with Senators Lee, Paul, and Cruz. We need to reform the PATRIOT Act and stop Obama’s spy program!

We need to stop Obama’s unconstitutional spying, and we need to make sure McConnell knows he must defend your Constitutional rights.

Senators on both sides of the aisle agree that the government needs a warrant to read your emails or access your personal data. End. Of. Story.

But Obama doesn’t care and unfortunately, Mitch McConnell is standing with him, not you. Lazaro R, that’s why you need to call your Senators right now, you need to tell them to stand up to Obama. Tell them to stand up to McConnell. And tell them that when they reauthorize section 215 of the PATRIOT Act it MUST end warrantless mass surveillance.

Make the call

Show the world you believe that freedom works.

Matt Kibbe 
Founder and President, FreedomWorks

 

FreedomWorks.org/Protect-Your-Rights

Fidel Castro y el Che, detenidos El Archivo General de México guarda el informe secreto sobre la captura en junio de 1956 del líder cubano y de Ernesto Guevara Historia

Jorge A. Villalón

Fidel Castro y el Che, detenidos

El Archivo General de México guarda el informe secreto sobre la captura en junio de 1956 del líder cubano y de Ernesto Guevara

JAN MARTÍNEZ AHRENS MÉXICO 19 MAYO 2015 – 05:19 CEST

 

ampliar foto

Castro (izq.) y el Che en cárcel tras ser detenidos en 1956, en México.

Fue rápido. La Dirección Federal de Seguridad sabía bien lo que hacía. Dentro del Packard verde, modelo 1950, iban cinco hombres. En el cruce de la calle de Mariano Escobedo con Kepler, tres bajaron. Uno era alto y corpulento, de paso firme. A distancia se advertía que era el líder. Cuando iba a perderse en las sombras, los agentes que le seguían se lanzaron a por él. El hombre alto, al verlos venir, echó mano a su automática. Pero antes de que pudiera sacarla, ya tenía una pistola besándole la nuca. Si en aquel instante el policía hubiese apretado el gatillo, la historia de América habría cambiado. Aquella noche del 21 de junio de 1956, en esa esquina de la Ciudad de México, Fidel Alejandro Castro Ruz acababa de ser detenido sin un disparo. Tenía 29 años y una revolución por hacer.

La célula cubana había caído. En pocos días fueron apresados 22 castristas. El nudo de la trama se ubicaba en el número 49 de la calle de Emparán, donde vivía la opositora peruana Hilda Gadea. Su esposo fue el más desafiante ante la policía y, a diferencia de sus compañeros, se declaró marxista-leninista. Era asmático, argentino y pobre. Se llamaba Ernesto Guevara de la Serna.

Después de tres días de interrogatorios, el cerebro de la redada, el capitán Fernando Gutiérrez Barrios, redactó su informe sobre la “conjura contra el Gobierno de la República de Cuba”. El texto, de cinco folios mecanografiados y guardado en el Archivo General de México, se ha convertido, desde que fue desclasificado, en un documento clave para comprender la génesis de la revolución castrista, pero también el ambivalente papel de México en el hervidero de la época y que el propio Gutiérrez Barrios encarnó como nadie. El capitán, que sería jefe de los servicios de inteligencia, conjugó a lo largo de su imperio la represión feroz a la izquierda mexicana con la acogida de destacados exiliados y prófugos de dictaduras. Algo que, a la postre, acabó haciendo con aquel carismático cubano que había caído en sus manos.

Castro había llegado a México en julio de 1955. Desde que descendió las escalerillas del DC-6 bimotor, su objetivo había sido preparar el regreso. Para ello había tejido una red de 40 fieles. Era el núcleo duro de una revolución. Una organización secreta que reclutaba y se entrenaba para el asalto final. “El objeto es capacitarse militarmente para integrar mandos que dirijan en su país a los descontentos”, señala el documento. Los instructores eran el mismo Castro, y el antiguo coronel de la República española Alberto Bayo Giraud. Las clases se impartían en el rancho Santa Rosa, en Chalco, e incluían “prácticas de tiro, topografía, táctica, guerrilla, explosivos, bombas incendiarias, voladura con dinamita…”.

El informe, en el que se atisba cierta admiración por el “dirigente máximo” cubano, muestra que Castro era el eje de toda la maquinaria. Él clasificaba a los reclutas por su rendimiento, disciplina y cualidades para el mando. Incluso, en un anticipo del control omnímodo que luego practicaría en Cuba, reglamentó con detalle la vida en el interior de la “casa residencia”. “[Castro les] hace ver que para estar preparados a una acción armada se necesita una disciplina estricta”.

De poco sirvió la advertencia. Gutiérrez Barrios, de un manotazo, había dejado todo al descubierto: pisos francos, armamento, correspondencia, claves, fondos, contactos, financiadores…, hasta los incómodos cuestionarios que los revolucionarios debían cumplimentar dando cuenta de sus compañeros. Con este material en su poder, el futuro de Castro y su revolución dependía del maquiavélico capitán. Y este jugó sus cartas. En sus conclusiones descartó cualquier nexo con el Partido Comunista, minimizó la importancia de las armas requisadas (“pocas y fáciles de adquirir”) y enfatizó que se trataba de un “grupo opositor independiente” que solo buscaba derribar a Fulgencio Batista: “Dicen contar con el 90% de la población de su país y señalan que el pueblo cubano […] ha recibido gran cantidad de armamento”.

Un mes después, Fidel y el Che quedaban libres. Gutiérrez Barrios sería en adelante su amigo. México también. A primera hora del 25 de noviembre de 1956, bajo una lluvia fría, el Granma zarpaba desde Tuxpan rumbo Cuba. Daba comienzo la revolución.

 

 

Jorge Alberto Villalón Y.

Insiders Just Revealed Some Pretty Nasty Accusations Against Chelsea Clinton

“A lot of people left because she was there. A lot of people left because she didn’t want them there.”

Randy DeSoto May 19, 2015 at 6:11pm

As if the Clinton Foundation was not getting enough negative coverage in the news recently, the New York Post’s Page Six reports that the organization has been experiencing a high turnover because one of the Clintons is unpleasant to work for.

Chelsea Clinton, 35, came on board as a vice chairman of the board in 2011, and the foundation since that time has seen an exodus of some top talent.

RELATED STORIES

“A lot of people left because she was there. A lot of people left because she didn’t want them there,” a inside source told Page Six. “She is very difficult.”

Ms. Clinton spent her teen years with the White House staff surrounding her, and perhaps she grew comfortable with that level of service. Her staff of five is only one fewer than her father’s at the foundation.

The former foundation CEO and current chairman of the board, Bruce Lindsey, was pushed upstairs in 2013 to solely being chairman so Chelsea could bring in her law firm colleague Eric Braverman.

Advertisement

TRENDING STORIES

“He [Braverman] was her boy, but he tried to hire his own communications professional and actually tried to run the place. He didn’t understand that that wasn’t what he was supposed to be doing,” a source told Page Six. “He was pushed out.”

Other high level executives followed.

From Page Six:

For Bill Clinton loyalists who grew the foundation from nothing, the high turnover and the ethical questions over its funding are demoralizing. “It’s sad to see what’s happening. The operational planning has gone downhill,” said a source.

Instead of being something Hillary can point to with pride, the foundation has become a bloated slush fund that some critics say deserves an official investigation. And Chelsea’s fingerprints are all over it.

As reported by Western Journalism, 52 Republican lawmakers–with Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., at the lead–signed a letter to the IRS calling for the tax-exempt status of the Clinton Foundation to be investigated. The letter reads, in part:

Proceeding under the cloak of philanthropy, the Foundation appears to have facilitated major private business transactions between foreign entities and also failed to report substantial foreign donations during Secretary Clinton’s tenure at the State Department. These actions have created an appearance of impropriety and go behind the Foundation’s pledge to act primarily in furtherance of charitable causes for which it was granted tax-exempt status.

“FREEDOM IS  NOT  FREE”

“En mi opinión”

Blooger:  https://www.blogger.com/home

https://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s