No 1163 “En mi opinión” Febrero 28, 2016

No 1163   “En mi opinión”   Febrero 28, 2016

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R Gonzalez Miño  Editor

Lázaro R González Miño  para  Alcalde de Miami

Escribanos a:,

      Para ver los números anteriores pueden entrar en los siguientes sitios:


Estimados amigos Como les comunique en mis previos mensajes que los enemigos del derecho de expresar nuestras ideas causaron daños en los sistemas de comunicarse con ustedes. La solución total está muy lejos de alcanzarse y estoy pesimista de que podamos tener de nuevo un periódico como el que veníamos imprimiendo digitalmente casi diariamente. Uno de los más fuertes golpes fue que Gmail nos cerró nuestra cuenta de e-mails sin darnos ninguna justificación. Y hemos regresado al portal de Hotmail para empezar a tratar de al menos de empezar a imprimirlo y enviarlos a ustedes. Por su puesto este golpe es el más fuerte porque Gmail era donde casi todos ustedes, agencias de noticias y otros contribuidores me enviaban sus trabajos a nuestro periódico. Hasta este momento casi nadie se ha comunicado conmigo para saber que ha pasado y de qué forma me pueden enviar sus participaciones. Esperemos que todo lo logremos estabilizar, todo depende de DIOS y de ustedes que son el alma de este periódico.  Les deseo todo lo mejor para ustedes.  Lázaro R González,  Editor   “En mi opinion”






Justice Scalia spent his last hours with members of this secretive society of elite hunters

The Washington Post

Amy Brittain, Sari Horwitz3 hrs ago

Columbine survivor, now a lawmaker, pushes to legalize guns in schools


© AP Photo/Jim Mone, File FILE – In this Oct. 20, 2015 file photo, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia speaks at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.

When Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died 11 days ago at a West Texas ranch, he was among high-ranking members of an exclusive fraternity for hunters called the International Order of St. Hubertus, an Austrian society that dates back to the 1600s.

After Scalia’s death Feb. 13, the names of the 35 other guests at the remote resort, along with details about Scalia’s connection to the hunters, have remained largely unknown. A review of public records shows that some of the men who were with Scalia at the ranch are connected through the International Order of St. Hubertus, whose members gathered at least once before at the same ranch for a celebratory weekend.

Members of the worldwide, male-only society wear dark-green robes emblazoned with a large cross and the motto “Deum Diligite Animalia Diligentes,” which means “Honoring God by honoring His creatures,” according to the group’s website. Some hold titles, such as Grand Master, Prior and Knight Grand Officer. The Order’s name is in honor of Hubert, the patron saint of hunters and fishermen.

Cibolo Creek Ranch owner John Poindexter and C. Allen Foster, a prominent Washington lawyer who traveled to the ranch with Scalia by private plane, hold leadership positions within the Order. It is unclear what, if any, official association Scalia had with the group.

“There is nothing I can add to your observation that among my many guests at Cibolo Creek Ranch over the years some members of the International Order of St. Hubertus have been numbered,” Poindexter said in an email. “I am aware of no connection between that organization and Justice Scalia.”

An attorney for the Scalia family did not respond to requests for comment for this article.

Two other private planes that landed at the ranch for the weekend are linked to two men who have held leadership positions with the Texas chapter of the Order, according to a review of state business filings and flight records from the airport.

After Scalia’s death, Poindexter told reporters that he met Scalia at a “sports group” gathering in Washington. The U.S. chapter of the International Order of St. Hubertus lists a suite on M Street NW in the District as its headquarters, although the address is only a mailbox in a United Parcel Service store.

The International Order of St. Hubertus, according to its website, is a “true knightly order in the historical tradition.” In 1695, Count Franz Anton von Sporck founded the society in Bohemia, which is in modern-day Czech Republic.

The group’s Grand Master is “His Imperial Highness Istvan von Habsburg-Lothringen, Archduke of Austria,” according to the Order’s website. The next gathering for “Ordensbrothers” and guests is an “investiture” March 10 in Charleston, S.C.

The society’s U.S. chapter launched in 1966 at the famous Bohemian Club in San Francisco, which is associated with the all-male Bohemian Grove — one of the most well-known secret societies in the country.

In 2010, Poindexter hosted a group of 53 members of the Houston chapter of the International Order of St. Hubertus at the Cibolo Creek Ranch, according to a Houston society publication. A number of members from Mexico were also part of the ranch festivities that included “three days of organized shoots and ‘gala’ lunches and dinners.”

Poindexter told CultureMap Houston that some of the guests dressed in “traditional European shooting attire for the boxed bird shoot competition” and for the shooting of pheasants and chukar, a type of partridge.

For the hunting weekend earlier this month, Poindexter told The Washington Post that Scalia traveled to Houston with his friend and U.S. marshals, who provide security for Supreme Court justices. The Post obtained a Presidio County Sheriff’s Office report that named Foster as Scalia’s close friend on the trip.

Sheriff Danny Dominguez confirmed that a photograph of Washington lawyer C. Allen Foster is the same man he interviewed at the ranch the day of Scalia’s death.

From Houston, Scalia and Foster chartered a plane without the marshals to the Cibolo Creek Ranch airstrip. In a statement after Scalia died, the U.S. Marshals Service said that Scalia had declined a security detail while at the ranch.

The friend, Louisiana-born Foster, is a lawyer with the Washington firm Whiteford, Taylor & Preston. He is also known for his passion for hunting and is a former spokesman for the hunting group Safari Club.

In 2006, Foster was featured in The Post when he celebrated his 65th birthday with a six-day celebration in the Czech Republic. He flew his family and 40 Washington friends there to stay in Moravia’s Zidlochovice, a baroque castle and hunting park. The birthday bash included “tours of the Czech countryside, wine tasting, wild boar and mouflon (wild sheep) hunts, classic dance instruction and a masked costume ball.”

A secretary at Foster’s law firm said he is traveling in Argentina. The firm’s director of marketing, Mindee L. Mosher, said Foster was traveling and she would try to contact him. A woman answering a phone associated with Foster hung up when asked for comment.

Planes owned by Wallace “Happy” Rogers III and the company of A.J. Lewis III left from San Antonio and arrived at the ranch just after noon Feb. 12. The planes departed the ranch about 30 minutes apart Feb. 14, according to flight records provided to The Post by FlightAware.

Rogers owns the Buckhorn Saloon and Museum in San Antonio. He has donated $65,000 to Republican candidates since 2008. Lewis is the owner of a restaurant supplier company, also based in San Antonio. He has given $3,500 to GOP candidates since 2007.

Rogers and Lewis have both served as prior officers in the Texas chapter of the International Order of St. Hubertus, according to Texas business records. Rogers spoke to a Post reporter briefly on the phone and confirmed that he was at the ranch the weekend of Scalia’s death, He declined to comment further.

Lewis did not respond to several attempts for comment.

The Presidio County Sheriff’s Office released an incident report to The Post on Tuesday that revealed Foster’s name as Scalia’s traveling companion and provided details about the discovery of his body.

Poindexter and Foster told the sheriff that Scalia had traveled to Texas the day before to go hunting. Poindexter told the sheriff that they “had supper and talked for a while” that evening.

Scalia “said that he was tired and was going to his room for the night,” the sheriff wrote in his report.

When Scalia didn’t show up for breakfast that morning, Poindexter knocked on his door and eventually went in and found the Justice dead in his bed, Poindexter said.

Law enforcement officials told The Post that they had no knowledge of the International Order of St. Hubertus or its connection to Poindexter and ranch guests. The officials said the FBI had declined to investigate Scalia’s death when they were told by the marshals that he died from natural causes.

Alice Crites in Washington and Eva Ruth Moravec in San Antonio contributed to this report.





Estropear: GOP Senado que realmente hace su trabajo, realiza anuncio masivo Acerca de Barack Obama

 Compartir en Facebook Tweet E-mail Imprimir

Los republicanos en el Comité Judicial del Senado han hecho un anuncio de colaboración que no van a llevar a cabo audiencias o una votación sobre cualquier candidato a la Corte Suprema presidente Barack Obama debería nombrar en 2016.

“Creemos que el pueblo estadounidense necesita para decidir quién se va a hacer esta cita en lugar de un presidente debilitado”, dijo el senador John Cornyn Martes.

El senador Lindsey Graham dijo que los miembros de la comisión judicial habían alcanzado un “consenso” que no habría audiencias o una votación sobre cualquier otro candidato de Obama para reemplazar el juez Antonin Scalia.

Publicidad – La historia continúa más abajo


Ben Carson da a Obama una dosis de su propia medicina Race Card … liberales aúllan

FOTO: Mira la Cosa extraña en el fondo durante el discurso de Obama de Guantánamo

GOP senadores diga a Obama lo que puede hacer con su candidato Escoto

“Mi decisión es que no creo que deberíamos tener una audiencia. Debemos dejar que el próximo presidente recoger el juez de la Corte Suprema “, dijo.

los miembros del comité republicanos dejaron su reunión y fueron directamente a un almuerzo con el resto de los republicanos del Senado para llegar hasta la velocidad.

Publicidad – La historia continúa más abajo

Nueva “píldora sin límites” Toma GNC por la tormenta y vende de Bajo 72 Ho

Este hombre lleva a cabo más oscuros secretos de Obama

Si comes esto, estás células cancerosas en crecimiento

Patrocinado por Revcontent

La muerte de Antonin Scalia ha dejado un vacío de poder dentro del poder judicial de nuestro gobierno, que será crucial en las decisiones críticas para el futuro considerable. El GOP se determina aplicar tácticas nominado Obama, que sin duda causar Escoto se incline hacia la izquierda.

La Casa Blanca ha dicho que si el Senado no toca el tema de un candidato Obama, sería negligente en su deber, pero los republicanos del Senado sería poco probable que confirmar cualquier candidato Obama elegiría.

Sin embargo, los republicanos están luchando contra la Casa Blanca con … la Casa Blanca.


En 1992, el entonces senador. Joe Biden, vicepresidente de Obama ahora, argumentó en el Senado que si se produjera una vacante del Tribunal Supremo, que no debe ser llenado hasta después de las elecciones de ese año.


BREAKING: GOP Senate Actually Does Its JOB, Makes Massive Announcement About Barack Obama

Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee have made a collaborative announcement that they will not hold hearings or a vote on any Supreme Court nominee President Barack Obama should name in 2016.

“We believe the American people need to decide who is going to make this appointment rather than a lame-duck president,” Sen. John Cornyn said Tuesday.

Sen. Lindsey Graham said that members of the judiciary committee had reached a “consensus” that there would not be hearings or a vote on any Obama nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia.

Advertisement – story continues below


“My decision is that I don’t think we should have a hearing. We should let the next president pick the Supreme Court justice,” he said.

Republican committee members left their meeting and went straight to a lunch with the rest of the Senate Republicans to get them up to speed.

Advertisement – story continues below

New “Limitless Pill” Takes GNC By Storm & Sells Out In Under 72 Ho

This Man Holds Obama’s Darkest Secrets

If You Eat This, You’re Growing Cancer Cells


The death of Justice Antonin Scalia has left a power vacuum within the judicial branch of our government, which will be crucial in critical decisions for the considerable future. The GOP is determined to stonewall an Obama nominee, who would certainly cause SCOTUS to lean far to the left.

The White House has said that should the Senate not take up the issue of an Obama nominee, it would be derelict in its duty, but Senate Republicans would be unlikely to confirm any nominee Obama would choose.

However, Republicans are fighting the White House with … the White House.

In 1992, then-Sen. Joe Biden, now Obama’s vice president, argued on the Senate floor that if there were to be a supreme court vacancy, it should not be filled until after that year’s election.







‘We need to get off our derrieres. … Hope is not a strategy’

Published: 12/26/2013 at 8:04 PM


The retired U.S. military commander who previously urged Americans to confront President Obama’s “tyranny” now recommends employing Egypt’s model to accomplish that aim.

The Egyptian model, Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely explained on the Internet radio show WBTM, “We Become The Media,” is 33 million people saying no to their leaders. In Egypt, as a result, Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi was removed from office.

Vallely, the founder of Stand Up America, an organization that provides education resources for leaders and activists based on the values of the Founding Fathers, has called for a massive march on Washington.

He was asked whether America can be restored as the shining city on the hill when the electoral process is “known to be corrupt.”

Vallely said the absence of leadership in the White House and Congress makes it difficult.

“I’m not even sure our traditional process will straighten our government out in time to save us.”

Processes such as impeachment won’t be employed, he said.

Pointing to Egypt, he said millions of Americans need to “stand up” to Washington “within the next 12 months.”

He said doing nothing is not an option, because Washington won’t fix itself, and “hope is not a strategy.”

“We need something … a no confidence vote,” he said.

Legislation might be needed, he added, to create a national recall process.

“We need to get off our derrieres, march at the state capitol, march in Washington,” he said. “Make citizens arrests.”

He said “conducting treason … violating the Constitution, violating our laws” should not be overlooked.

“When you have a president and his team who don’t care about the Constitution, they will do anything they can to win,” he said.

Vallely has been immensely popular among tea party organizations that seek to restore the rule of law to Washington.

Among other things, they cite the Obamacare law and the 15 or more times Obama has changed it without consulting Congress.

In a statement earlier to WND, Vallely said a vote of no confidence could be used.

“Clearly America has lost confidence and no longer trusts those in power at a most critical time in our history,” Vallely said. “It is true that not all who ply the halls of power fit under that broad brush, but most of them are guilty of many egregious acts and we say it is time to hold a vote of no confidence. It’s time for a ‘recall.'”

Vallely believes the “credibility of our current leadership is gone.”

Now, he said, “we listen to their excuses, finger-pointing, lies and all manner of chicanery.”

He admitted there is no legal authority in a vote of no confidence, but he argued it will “take back the power of discourse.”

“What else is our nation to do now that the ‘rule-of-law’ has effectively been thrown out the window by the Obama administration? How are we to trust our government anymore, now that lying and fraud are acceptable practices?” he asked.

Vallely believes impeachment likely wouldn’t lead to conviction and doesn’t solve the problem, anyway.

“Harry Reid still controls the Senate, so like in Clinton’s day, forget about a finding of guilty,” he wrote. “Incidentally, if Obama was found guilty and removed from office, Joe Biden would step in, Valerie Jarrett still wields all the power, and likely we get more of the same.”


“Assume that a statute said you had to provide two forms of ID to vote. Can the president require three forms? Can the president require one form? Can you suspend all requirements? If not, why not?” he said. “If you can turn off certain categories of law, do you not also have the power to turn off all categories of law?”

Gowdy cited Obama’s decisions to ignore certain immigration laws, even though Congress did not approve the changes. He also cited arbitrary changes to the Obamacare law and Obama’s “recess appointments” of judges even though the U.S. Senate was not in recess.

His proposal is for Congress to take the White House to court over the president’s actions, through a resolution proposed by Rep. Tom Rice, R-Ga., that would authorize the House to sue the Obama administration. It has 30 co-sponsors.

Rice said that because of “this disregard of our country’s checks and balances, many of you have asked me to bring legal action against the president.”

“After carefully researching the standing the House of Representatives has and what action we can take, I have introduced a resolution to stop the president’s clear overreach,” he said.

A Fox News interviewer asked Gowdy if Obama could refuse to enforce election laws.

“Why not?” asked Gowdy, “If you can turn off immigration laws, if you can turn off the mandatory minimum in our drug statutes, if you can turn off the so-called Affordable Care Act – why not election laws?”

Gowdy noted that a liberal law professor, Jonathan Turley, agrees.

WND reported Turley’s concerns earlier this month.

Turley has represented members of Congress in a lawsuit over the Libyan war, represented workers at the secret Area 51 military base and served as counsel on national security cases. He now says Obama is a danger to the U.S. Constitution.

He was addressing a House Judiciary Committee hearing Dec. 4. Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., asked him: “Professor Turley, the Constitution, the system of separated powers is not simply about stopping one branch of government from usurping another. It’s about protecting the liberty of Americans from the dangers of concentrated government power. How does the president’s unilateral modification of act[s] of Congress affect both the balance of power between the political branches and the liberty interests of the American people?”

Turley replied: “Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The danger is quite severe. The problem with what the president is doing is that he’s not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system. He’s becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. That is the concentration of power.”

Turley explained that the “Newtonian orbit that the three branches exist in is a delicate one but it is designed to prevent this type of concentration.”

“There are two trends going on which should be of equal concern to all members of Congress,” he said. “One is that we have had the radical expansion of presidential powers under both President Bush and President Obama. We have what many once called an imperial presidency model of largely unchecked authority. And with that trend we also have the continued rise of this fourth branch. We have agencies that are quite large that issue regulations. The Supreme Court said recently that agencies could actually define their own or interpret their own jurisdiction.”

Turley was appointed in 1998 to the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest at Georgetown. He has handled a wide range of precedent-setting and headline-making cases, including the successful defense of Petty Officer Daniel King, who faced the death penalty for alleged spying for Russia.

Turley also has served as the legal expert in the review of polygamy laws in the British Columbia Supreme Court. He’s been a consultant on homeland security, and his articles appear regularly in national publications such as the New York Times and USA Today.

WND reported that it was at the same hearing that Michael Cannon, director of Health Policy Studies for the Cato Institute, said there is “one last thing to which the people can resort if the government does not respect the restraints that the Constitution places of the government.”

“Abraham Lincoln talked about our right to alter our government or our revolutionary right to overthrow it,” he said.

“That is certainly something that no one wants to contemplate. If the people come to believe that the government is no longer constrained by the laws, then they will conclude that neither are they.”

Cannon said it is “very dangerous” for the president to “wantonly ignore the laws, to try to impose obligations upon people that the legislature did not approve.”

Several members of Congress also contributed their opinions in an interview with talk-show host Sean Hannity.

See the Hannity segment:

Vallely explained that a “no confidence” vote now “would also tell the world that we recognize the mess this administration has wrought upon the world and we do not support his actions. Despite what supporters of Obama say about our standing in the world, the world is laughing at us. We are not pleased!”

Without that action, he writes, “Obama will just continue to subvert the Constitution he took an oath to faithfully protect.”


Traducion al Espanol:



‘Tenemos que bajar nuestros derrieres. … La esperanza no es una estrategia’

Publicado: 12/26/2013 en 20:04



El comandante militar de EE.UU. retirado que previamente instó a los estadounidenses para hacer frente a la “tiranía” del presidente Obama ahora recomienda emplear el modelo de Egipto para lograr ese objetivo.

El modelo egipcio, mayor general Paul E. Vallely explicó en el programa WBTM radio por Internet, “llegamos a ser los medios”, es de 33 millones de personas que dicen que no a sus líderes. En Egipto, como resultado, musulmanes presidente Mohamed Morsi de la Hermandad fue removido de su cargo.

Vallely, el fundador de Stand Up America, una organización que proporciona los recursos de educación para los líderes y activistas en base a los valores de los padres fundadores, ha llamado a una marcha masiva en Washington.

Se le preguntó si Estados Unidos puede ser restaurada como la ciudad que brilla en la colina cuando el proceso electoral es “conocido como corruptos.”

Vallely dijo que la ausencia de liderazgo en la Casa Blanca y el Congreso hace que sea difícil.

“Ni siquiera estoy seguro de que nuestro proceso tradicional se enderezará nuestro gobierno a tiempo para salvarnos.”

No se emplean procesos como el juicio político, dijo.

Señalando a Egipto, dijo a millones de estadounidenses tienen que “defender” a Washington “dentro de los próximos 12 meses.”

Dijo que no hacer nada no es una opción, porque Washington no va a fijar en sí, y “la esperanza no es una estrategia.”

“Necesitamos algo … un voto de no confianza”, dijo.

La legislación podría ser necesario, agregó, para crear un proceso de recuperación nacional.

“Tenemos que salir de nuestras derrieres, marcha en la capital del estado, marcha en Washington”, dijo. “Hacer que los ciudadanos detenciones.”

Dijo que “la realización de la traición … viola la Constitución, viola nuestras leyes” no debe ser pasado por alto.

“Cuando se tiene un presidente y su equipo que no se preocupan por la Constitución, que van a hacer todo lo posible para ganar”, dijo.

Vallely ha sido inmensamente popular entre las organizaciones del partido de té que buscan restaurar el estado de derecho a Washington.

Entre otras cosas, citan la ley Obamacare y los 15 o más veces Obama ha cambiado sin consultar al Congreso.

En una declaración anterior a WND, Vallely dijo que un voto de no confianza podría ser utilizado.

“Está claro que Estados Unidos ha perdido la confianza y ya no confía en aquellos en el poder en el momento más crítico de nuestra historia”, dijo Vallely. “Es cierto que no todos los que surcan los pasillos de ajuste de potencia bajo esa brocha gorda, pero la mayoría de ellos son culpables de muchos actos atroces y decimos que es hora de realizar una votación de no confianza. Es hora de una« recuperación. ‘ “

Vallely cree que la “credibilidad de nuestro actual liderazgo se ha ido.”

Ahora, dijo, “escuchamos sus excusas, acusaciones, mentiras y todo tipo de argucias.”

Admitió no hay autoridad legal en un voto de no confianza, pero argumentó que será “recuperar el poder del discurso.”

“¿Qué otra cosa es nuestra nación a hacer ahora que el” imperio de la ley “ha sido efectivamente tirado por la ventana por la administración Obama? ¿Cómo vamos a confiar en nuestro gobierno nunca más, ahora que la mentira y el fraude son prácticas aceptables?” preguntó.

Vallely cree probable que el juicio político no daría lugar a la condena y no resuelve el problema, de todos modos.

“Harry Reid todavía controla el Senado, así como en la época de Clinton, olvidarse de un fallo de culpable”, escribió. “Por cierto, si Obama fue declarado culpable y removido de su cargo, Joe Biden intervendría, Valerie Jarrett todavía ejerce todo el poder, y es probable que obtener más de lo mismo.”


“Supongamos que una ley decía que había que proporcionar dos formas de identificación para votar. ¿Puede el presidente requerir tres formas? ¿Puede el Presidente requerirá una forma? ¿Se puede suspender todos los requisitos? Si no es así, ¿por qué no?” él dijo. “Si se puede desactivar ciertas categorías de la ley, ¿no es también el poder para desactivar todas las categorías de la ley?”

Gowdy citó decisiones de Obama ignorar ciertas leyes de inmigración, a pesar de que el Congreso no aprobó los cambios. También se refirió a cambios arbitrarios en la ley Obamacare “y el nombramiento de receso” de Obama de jueces a pesar de que el Senado de EE.UU. no estaba en receso.

Su propuesta es que el Congreso tome la Casa Blanca a los tribunales por las acciones del presidente, a través de una resolución propuesta por el Rep. Tom Rice, R-Ga., Que autorizaría a la Casa de demandar al gobierno de Obama. Cuenta con 30 copatrocinadores.

Rice dijo que debido a “la indiferencia de pesos y contrapesos de nuestro país, muchos de ustedes me han preguntado a emprender acciones legales contra el presidente.”

“Después de investigar cuidadosamente el pie de la Cámara de Representantes y qué medidas podemos tomar, he presentado una resolución para dejar clara extralimitación del presidente”, dijo.

Un entrevistador de Fox News le preguntó si Obama Gowdy podría negarse a cumplir las leyes electorales.

“¿Por qué no?” Gowdy preguntó, “Si usted puede desactivar las leyes de inmigración, si se puede desactivar el mínimo obligatorio en nuestros estatutos de drogas, si se puede desactivar la llamada Ley de Asistencia Asequible – ¿por qué no las leyes electorales”

Gowdy observó que un profesor de derecho liberal, Jonathan Turley, está de acuerdo.

WND reportó preocupaciones de Turley a principios de este mes.

Turley ha representado a los miembros del Congreso en un pleito sobre la guerra de Libia, representado a trabajadores en la base militar secreta Area 51 y sirvió como asesor en asuntos de seguridad nacional. Ahora dice que Obama es un peligro para la Constitución de EE.UU..

.. Se dirigía a una audiencia del Comité Judicial de 4 de diciembre Presidente Rep Bob Goodlatte, R-Va, le preguntó: “Profesor Turley, la Constitución, el sistema de poderes separados, no se trata simplemente de detener una rama del gobierno de usurpar otra . Se trata de proteger la libertad de los estadounidenses de los peligros del poder gubernamental concentrada. ¿Cómo modificación unilateral del presidente del acto [s] del Congreso afectan tanto el equilibrio de poder entre las ramas políticas y los intereses de la libertad del pueblo estadounidense? “

Turley respondió: “Muchas gracias, señor Presidente El peligro es bastante severa El problema con lo que el presidente está haciendo es que no se trata simplemente de que presenta un peligro para el sistema constitucional Se está convirtiendo en el mismo peligro la Constitución fue diseñada para evitar…. Esa es la concentración de poder “.

Turley explicó que la “órbita newtoniana que existen en las tres ramas es delicado pero está diseñado para evitar que este tipo de concentración.”

“Hay dos tendencias que van en lo que debería ser de igual importancia para todos los miembros del Congreso”, dijo. “Uno es que hemos tenido la expansión radical de los poderes del presidente en virtud de que tanto el presidente Bush y el presidente Obama. Tenemos lo que muchos vez llamó a un modelo de presidencia imperial de la autoridad en gran medida sin control. Y con esa tendencia también tenemos el continuo aumento de esta cuarta rama . tenemos los organismos que son bastante grandes que las regulaciones de emisión. El Tribunal Supremo dijo recientemente que los organismos en realidad podría definir su propia cuenta o interpretar su propia jurisdicción “.

Turley fue nombrado en 1998 para el prestigioso Cátedra Shapiro de Interés Público de Georgetown. Él ha manejado una amplia gama de sentar precedentes y casos de titulares de decisiones, incluyendo la exitosa defensa del suboficial Daniel Rey, que se enfrentaron a la pena de muerte por supuesto espionaje para Rusia.

Turley también ha servido como el experto legal en la revisión de las leyes de la poligamia en el Tribunal Supremo de Columbia Británica. Ha sido consultor en la seguridad nacional, y sus artículos aparecen regularmente en publicaciones nacionales tales como el New York Times y EE.UU. Hoy en día.

WND informó que estaba en la misma audiencia que Michael Cannon, director de Estudios de Políticas de Salud para el Instituto Cato, dijo que es “una última cosa a la que la gente puede recurrir si el gobierno no respeta las restricciones que los lugares Constitución de la gobierno.”

“Abraham Lincoln habló sobre nuestro derecho de alterar nuestro gobierno o nuestro derecho revolucionario de derrocarla,” dijo.

“Eso es ciertamente algo que nadie quiere contemplar. Si las personas llegan a creer que el gobierno ya no está limitado por las leyes, entonces van a la conclusión de que tampoco son”.

Cañón dijo que es “muy peligroso” para que el presidente “arbitrariamente ignorar las leyes, para tratar de imponer obligaciones a las personas que el legislador no estaba de acuerdo.”

Varios miembros del Congreso también contribuyeron con sus opiniones en una entrevista con el programa de entrevistas Sean Hannity.

Vea el segmento Hannity:

Vallely explicó que un voto de “no confianza” ahora “también podría decirle al mundo que reconocemos el lío este gobierno ha causado en el mundo y no apoyar sus acciones. A pesar de lo que los partidarios de Obama dicen acerca de nuestra posición en el mundo, la mundo se está riendo de nosotros. no estamos satisfechos! “

Sin esa acción, escribe, “Obama simplemente seguir subvertir la Constitución que tomó un juramento para proteger fielmente.”

Obtenga más información en




Pescador Irlandés

Quintin George


A mis compañeros de pesca: Un nuevo truco para atrapar un pez!


La lluvia caía a cántaros. Y allí de pie delante de un gran charco

fuera del pub,

Era un viejo irlandés, empapado, con un palo, con un trozo de cuerda

colgando en el agua.

Un transeúnte se detuvo y preguntó: “¿Qué haces?”

“Pesca”, respondió el anciano.

  Sentir lástima por el viejo, el caballero dice: “Entra a cabo de la

lluvia y tomar una copa conmigo “.

En el calor de la publicación, ya que disfrutar de su whisky, el caballero

no puede resistirse a preguntar,

“Entonces, ¿cuántos no has cogido hoy?”

“Usted es el octavo”, dice el anciano.




The two hipocrite faces of the vice-oresident Joe Biden.;


A Video Of Joe Biden Just Surfaced That Changes Everything about SCOTUS Appointment


Ever since the passing of Supreme Court Justice Anton Scalia, Democrat leaders in Washington D.C. have been advocating Obama do something to take care of  the now vacant seat Scalia once held. Republicans have argued vociferously they would resist any nomination made by the President, while Democrats say it is the responsibility of the President to make an appointment for the vacancy ASAP.

Even Vice President Joe Biden has made it clear he thinks the President ought to act quickly to place a new justice on the bench. This is quite ironic as video from 1992 seems to negate Biden’s current stance .

In it he stands on the floor of the Senate and urges George Bush to hold off on nominating a new justice as the tumult of the election year would make it to difficult to accept.

Biden says:

“It is my view that if a Supreme Court justice resigns tomorrow or within the next several weeks, or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of a majority of his predecessors and not, and not, name a nominee until after the November election is completed,…The Senate, too, Mr. President, must consider how it would respond to a Supreme Court vacancy that would occur in the full throes of an election year.”

Biden went on to say that the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings.

“Instead, it would be our pragmatic conclusion that once the political season is underway, and it is, action on a Supreme Court nomination must be put off until after the election campaign is over,” Biden said. “That is what is fair to the nominee and essential to the process. Otherwise, it seems to me we will be in deep trouble as an institution.”






No, Mr. President — Gitmo Should Be a Source of Pride for America

Quintin George



Fri 2/26/2016 8:32 PM

by JOE CONNOR February 26, 2016 4:00 AM 

The Guantanamo Bay detention camps have been attacked by many, including our own president, as contrary to American values, as not “who we are” and “recruitment tools for ISIS.” Those of us who have been there have observed the terrorists in court at Camp Justice. We have witnessed the great lengths to which our judiciary goes to provide due process to the likes of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), the red-bearded, evil, boastful mastermind of the 9/l1 attacks that murdered 2,976 individuals and shattered countless lives.

 Gitmo is a symbol of American goodness and greatness.

 Please, Mr. President: I am honored to be part of a small group of 9/11 family members chosen to observe the pretrial proceedings. Objections to this facility and these proceedings, in my opinion, are unfounded. Gitmo represents the very best of America.

Eight of us arrived at Andrews Air Force Base, on the morning of Saturday, February 13, hopeful but apprehensive about our trip to Guantanamo to face the murderers of our family members. Aside from the deaths of our loved ones, we all brought something in common: the pursuit of justice. After a most rewarding week, we parted perfectly unified, with the utmost respect for the prosecutors, for our fantastic military, for American justice, and for one another. We took home with us hope, a steelier resolve for justice than ever, spiritual connections, and a renewed sense of pride in America. 

Those are the American values that I was raised with but that have been lost on this president.

Read more at:






Thursday Night Revealed Four Big Avenues of Attack on Trump. Quintin George:


February 26, 2016
Morning Jolt
… with Jim Geraghty
Thursday Night Revealed Four Big Avenues of Attack on Trump 

Last night’s debate may not be decisive. But it did give the two major non-Trump candidates at least four fruitful avenues of attack on the front-runner.

1. Trump’s Audits. “As far as my return, I want to file it, except for many years, I’ve been audited every year. Twelve years or something like that. Every year they audit me, audit me, audit me.”

After the debate, in an interview with CNN, he added, “But the one problem I have is that I’m always audited by the IRS, which I think is very unfair. I don’t know, maybe because of religion, maybe because I’m doing something else, maybe because I’m doing this, although this is just recently. Well maybe because of the fact that I’m a strong Christian, and I feel strongly about it. And maybe there’s a bias.”

How is it that Trump has never mentioned the fact that he’s being audited by the Internal Revenue Service every year for twelve years before? How is it that Mr. “Two Corinthians” never bothered to mention that he believes he’s being targeted — since before the Obama administration! — by the IRS over his religious beliefs?

And last night he started hedging on whether he’ll be able to release his returns until this audit is complete.

One simple theory as to what’s going on, stemming from a dismissed Trump libel lawsuit: the mogul’s net worth is way less than he’s been saying. Or maybe Trump is just a pathological liar (QG.emphasis!)

2. Trump University. The background:

Never licensed as a school, Trump University was in reality a series of real estate workshops in hotel ballrooms around the country, not unlike many other for-profit self-help or motivational seminars. Though short-lived, it remains a thorn in Trump’s side nearly five years after its operations ceased: In three pending lawsuits, including one in which the New York attorney general is seeking $40 million in restitution, former students allege that the enterprise bilked them out of their money with misleading advertisements.

Instead of a fast route to easy money, these Trump University students say they found generic seminars led by salesmen who pressured them to invest more cash in additional courses. The students say they didn’t learn Trump’s secrets and never received the one-on-one guidance they expected.

Here’s something that particularly emits an odor:

But the first major shot at Trump University came from Texas in January 2010. That’s when Abbott’s assistant attorney general in the Consumer Protection and Public Health Division, Rick Berlin, began a probe of whether the operation violated Texas’ Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act.

In a “civil investigative demand” mailed to university corporate offices at Trump’s 40 Wall Street address, Abbott’s office sought financial records; promotional and advertising material, such as that used to promote Trump University seminars in Texas; talking points and sales scripts used by seminar leaders to encourage people to purchase the paid programs; and names of all Texans who “purchased your workshop or mentoring program” from January 2008 to the present.

Rather than respond and turn over the requested documents, Trump University agreed to cease doing business in Texas.

Later that year, Trump University stopped operations altogether.

If everything’s on the up-and-up, why do you run out of town at the first inquiry from law enforcement? If the accusations about Trump University are true, Trump isn’t he big man who stands up for the little guy; he’s the fat-cat who plays the little guy for a sucker.

3. The guy on the stage claiming to be toughest on illegal immigration is the only guy on stage who’s hired illegal immigrants.

. . . a long-forgotten, long-fought lawsuit contending Trump used illegal immigrants for the demolition work that preceded the construction of Trump Tower. Eighteen years ago, Wojciech Kozak helped build Trump Tower, the skyscraper jewel in Donald J. Trump’s real-estate empire. Today, Mr. Kozak recalls that time with nightmare memories of backbreaking 12-hour shifts and of being cheated with 200 other undocumented Polish immigrants out of meager wages and fringe benefits.

“‘We worked in horrid, terrible conditions,” Mr. Kozak said of the six months he spent in 1980 wielding a sledgehammer and a blowtorch in demolishing the Bonwit Teller Building on Fifth Avenue to make way for Trump Tower. “We were frightened illegal immigrants and did not know enough about our rights.” Trump insisted he never knew the workers were in the country illegally. The case was finally settled in 1999 and then sealed. Both sides described the resolution as “agreeable.”

If Rubio and Cruz are smart, they’ll start pointing out that this isn’t ancient history; Trump is still using illegal immigrants on his hotel project in Washington, D.C.:

“It’s something ironic,” said Ivan Arellano, 29, who is from Mexico and obtained legal status through marriage. He now works as a mason laying the stonework for the lobby floor and walls of what will become the Trump International Hotel. “The majority of us are Hispanics, many who came illegally,” Arellano said in Spanish. “And we’re all here working very hard to build a better life for our families.”

Interviews with about 15 laborers helping renovate the Old Post Office Pavilion revealed that many of them had crossed the U.S-Mexico border illegally before they eventually settled in the Washington region to build new lives.

This goes to credibility. Trump denounces illegal immigration in the abstract but finds it convenient and cheap when he needs work done.

4. Trump claims he can’t find Americans willing to do the work. If you grind your teeth every time you hear someone like Karl Rove use the phrase, “jobs Americans won’t do,” why would you give Donald Trump a pass?

But the attacks are beginning to pile up, with a New York Times story this week saying Mr. Trump‘s Florida country club has hired hundreds of foreign seasonal workers, rejecting applications from Americans.

Mr. Trump said his Mar-a-Lago Club has no choice but to go to foreign workers, saying he can’t find enough Americans willing to work the hot season.

“Everybody agrees with me on that. They were part-time jobs,” he said. “Otherwise we might as well have just closed the doors.”

Really? Florida has about a half million unemployed people right now. That figure has come down about 60,000 in the past year, but you’re telling me Trump couldn’t find a single Floridian to do this work?

The 2016 Election Is about Work and the Value of Workers

From a great essay by our old friend, Mark Hemingway:

But if there’s another piece of advice here that absolutely disqualifies [Hillary] Clinton for the presidency, it’s “do what you love.” The truth is, that is simply not an option for most people. When it’s 39 degrees and raining in February, do you think the guy who picks up your trash is staring at your acrid, bacteria-laden refuse at 6 a.m. and saying, “Thank God, I love what I do”?

Indeed, it is precisely this cultural disconnect about the value of work that explains why there’s an open revolt in both parties and the future seems so uncertain.

If any one issue defines this election, it’s economic stagnation. Many Trump supporters in the GOP feel left behind by the twenty-first-century economy. They’re angry about it, because our “follow your bliss” culture doesn’t begin to appreciate coal miners or people who work in brake disc factories, even as it obsessively venerates empty celebrity and people like social media executives and hedge fund managers who are filthy rich in spite of the fact their contributions to society aren’t very tangible.

Hillary Clinton’s “do what you love” advice reminded me of Chelsea Clinton’s comment:

I’ve tried really hard to care about things that were very different from my parents. I was curious if I could care about [money] on some fundamental level, and I couldn’t. That wasn’t the metric of success that I wanted in my life.

Oh, shut up. You know who can’t bring themselves to care about money? Phenomenally wealthy people who will never have to work a day in their lives. Whether you’re just trying to make enough money to have food for the week, or you’re sweating your kids’ college educations and whether you’ll be able to afford retirement, those of us who “care” about money in the sense that we’re worried if we’ll have enough do so because we have to, Chelsea. It’s not greed. It’s not selfishness. It’s not misplaced values.

Really, the Clintons are insufferable.

ADDENDA: On this week’s pop-culture podcast, a discussion of the Oscars and how Hollywood prefers to blame American society for its own racial inequalities and disputes; true crime television and the nightmare of taxpayer-funded serial killers; Facebook and America’s “Envy Culture”; how Millennial whining can spur valuable life lessons, and why we expect to see people assaulting each other over access to electrical sockets at the upcoming Conservative Political Action Conference.



Para Alcalde del Condado Miami Elecciones del 2016

Escriba el nombre de Lázaro R González en

el espacio de la boleta electoral en blanco

Si usted desea que tengamos un Alcalde en El Condado Miami que responda a los intereses de los ciudadanos que viven en este condado, usted no puede votar por los despirfarradores que han desgobernado a nustro condado. No p[odemos continuar con un ejercito de descarados que gastan el dinero del condado en cosas que no se deben hacer si realmente usted  quiere acabar el relajo, el robo, el abuso, el descaro, la mala administración y quiere que su gobierno condal le responda a usted y no que esto no sea un feudo de los políticos ladrones y descarados inescrupulosos, no permita más abusos, usted tiene una opción Lazaro R Gonzalez.

Envie nuestros mensajes a sus amigos y conocidos.

 “No pedimos donaciones de dinero”


En mi opinión


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s