No 1007 “En mi opinión” Julio 25, 2015

No 1007   “En mi opinión”   Julio  25, 2015

“IN GOD WE TRUST”  Lázaro R González Miño Editor


10,000 Patriots Deliver Obama a Message in Unison

B. Christopher Agee via

In a show of solidarity against a largely unpopular Iranian nuclear deal, an estimated 10,000 protesters showed up at Times Square this week to express their frustrations.

Western Journalism has already shared a remarks by a number of prominent figures who have major problems with the deal’s language, the manner in which it was negotiated and approved, or both.

Among the featured speakers at the event was former U.S. Rep. Allen West, who gave a fiery speech that rallied conservatives nationwide. View his remarks now by clicking on this link.

Until next time,


Chris Agee

WJ Managing Editor




The Extinction of Markets

Realities and Revelations

, by Michael Pento



Photo by EPA

China’s four-week-long stock market rout wiped out nearly 30% off the Shanghai Composite Index since its highs of June. To stem those losses the Chinese government has formulated an interesting hypothesis: stocks won’t go down if you ban sell orders.

Working off this proposition Beijing has ordered shareholders with more than a 5% interest to stop selling shares; directors, supervisors, and senior management personnel are also barred from reducing their holdings.

China has also launched investigations on those it believes engaged in malicious short selling. The threat of imprisonment has proved an effective deterrent to those who may have been contemplating a short in the Chinese markets.

And even if you don’t fall into either of the above categories of sellers you still will have trouble getting your money out of shares because two thirds of the stocks on the exchange have been halted.

It should come as no surprise that the Communist government of China has fallen off the free market wagon. After all, the government is of the belief that economies grow by building empty cities. So why shouldn’t they think markets work best when not allowing participants to sell?

The reaction on Wall Street has been just as alarming. Deutsche Bank and Bank of America Merrill Lynch have applauded the Chinese governments for doing everything necessary to keep the bubble afloat.

But Wall Street’s counterintuitive and ironic bullishness on China is most evident in the powerhouse investment firm Goldman Sachs. Goldman is urging investors to buy stock in China right now!

In Observing 40 years of statistical history the Goldman team in China believes “…the market is currently experiencing a standard bull market correction, not a transition into a bear market.” This is eerily reminiscent of the Wall Street models that concluded housing prices could never go down on a national basis.

First, I would like to know how anyone could get forty years of honest and consistent data from China. Then tell me where else in that forty year history of data did China expand its debt by $20 trillion dollars in the space of just eight years, as they have today?

Statistical analysis such as this can offer a complement to fundamental analysis in making market predictions. However, this assumes the exchanges where China trades equities bears any resemblance to a market.

A market is a place where a multitude of buyers and sellers freely meet and price is discovered. What China has now created is a roach motel where money moves in but it can’t easily move out-if at all. Therefore, all technical and fundamental analysis goes out the door. And those who choose to participate in this charade are left waiting for Beijing’s next decision on how to direct the market move.

This is the antithesis of capitalism and how free markets work. That’s why it should be shocking to see Wall Street, the supposed bastion of capitalism, embrace such measures. But the sad truth is there are no free markets left in this world, and it’s becoming increasingly evident that most on Wall Street prefer it that way. We have grown so accustomed to market manipulations that we have completely lost sight of how the free market is supposed to function.

In this new market dystopia stocks never go down, companies never fail and countries never default on their debt–central banks just print all the problems away. And where counterfeiting money and lowering interest rates doesn’t solve the problem, governments are trying to demonstrate that market regulations will lead to success.

We can all sleep well knowing that a small group of plutocrats who now control the global economy will make everything turn out right. Genuine market analysis has been supplanted by the need to parse the words of statements from central bankers like students at a bible meeting.

And when you really think about it, why bother analyzing their words anyway. Central bankers don’t understand how markets and economies work; all they have shown the proclivity to do is print more money. So we can all continue in our dystopian slumber.

But the victory over command and control economies by free markets has been decided long ago. However, these hard-fought lessons seem to have been too easily forgotten. Even the Pope has joined on the Capitalist bashing band wagon. Referring to it as ideological idolatry which leads to wage slavery, vast communal dislocation, and commodity-market driven hunger. But perhaps he should take a drive on the Pope mobile down the streets of Cuba or Venezuela to witness the living standards of the poor that exist without the “ideological idolatry” of Capitalism.

The truth is there is no place where people live better than in a free market Capitalist economy. And it is only when you stray from this model, as we have for the past seven years, that you see the spread between the rich and poor blow out.

Freedom should have vanquished Egalitarianism forever with the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. But if those at Goldman still see the merit of investing in a tyrannical command and control economy, perhaps North Korea is the next logical investment to make. I am sure Kim Jong-un has a bridge to nowhere he would be happy to sell them.

Nevertheless, economic freedom and prosperity is rapidly being replaced by markets that are driven by the edicts from autocrats, which is leading to the evisceration of the middle class. People have willingly abandoned most of their freedoms. Why? Because they have been dumbed down dramatically. How else could they have handed over the markets, economies and, most importantly, the structure of the family to governments with such ignorance and alacrity?

The abrogation of markets leads to stagflation, economic collapse and chaos. Sadly, this is the ultimate fate of the entire developed world.




Intelligence Expert Nails Reasons For Investigation Into Hillary Emails


With news of the possible criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email use, one intelligence expert took to Twitter to sum up the situation.

The New York Times reports that two Inspector Generals have called for a criminal probe into Hillary Clinton’s email use after news that she used her private email instead of a secure government email to send and receive classified information, which would be illegal.

There’s a lot of confusion surrounding Clinton’s emails and their significance, but Marc Ambinder, a journalist who literally wrote the book on classified intelligence, fired off a string of tweets worth reading.
Read more:





Claims administration covering up scheme to arm ‘rebels’

Published: 3 days ago


NEW YORK – Defense filings in the Department of Justice prosecution of arms dealer Marc Turi allege the Obama administration is willing to prosecute an innocent man to cover up the role former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton played shipping weapons to Libya illegally in 2011.

A telephone interview with Turi’s defense counsel, Jean-Jacques Cabou of the law firm Perkins Coie LLP, led WND to an extensive review of the legal motions filed by the government and the defense in the Turi criminal case.

Cabou declined to answer specific questions WND posed, saying that rather than try the case in the media, he preferred to allow the legal motions filed by the defense to speak for themselves.

The background of the Turi prosecution, while complicated, is at the heart of an allegation made by Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano in a recent syndicated column. Napolitano charged Hillary Clinton, while secretary of state, lied when Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., asked her in a Senate committee hearing if the State Department had run guns illegally to Libyan rebels.

In the column, Napolitano said an interview of Turi by Fox News intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge and Fox News senior executive producer Pamela Browne led him to review emails to and from State Department and congressional officials during the years when Clinton was secretary of state.

Napolitano concluded it’s “beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty” that Hillary had conducted a “secret war” shipping arms to Libya illegally in 2011.

What Napolitano assumed as true was the central argument advanced by the Obama administration in the Turi prosecution: The weapons Turi shipped to Qatar were intended not for the use of the Qatar Army but to be diverted to Libya for use by the al-Qaida-affiliated militia attempting to overthrow Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi.

But Napolitano apparently missed the fact that if Turi is guilty as charged, Clinton is arguably innocent of illegally shipping weapons to Libyan al-Qaida-affiliated militia and of lying to Paul.

The fact that remains indisputable in this complex controversy is that weapons and ammunition in boxes marked “Qatar Army” were intercepted off the shore of Libya in 2011. Video published July 6 by WND showed Moussa Ibrahim, then Gadhafi’s information minister and official spokesman, displaying to reporters a seized cache of weapons and ammunition clearly marked as originating from the Qatar Army.

Court motions filed by Turi defense attorney Jean-Jacques Cabou contend that should Turi be acquitted, an elaborate plot will be exposed in which the Obama administration set up Turi to take the blame if the illegal shipment of weapons to Libya via Qatar in 2011 ever came to light.

The central question then at the heart of the Turi criminal prosecution is whether or not the Obama Department of Justice can prove Turi shipped the weapons to Qatar in 2011, and if he did, whether he knew they were intended to be diverted to Libya for the use of the al-Qaida-affiliated militia, in direct violation of State and Treasury Department prohibitions.

The DOJ indictment

On Feb. 11, 2011, the Department of Justice charged Turi, individually and through his company, Turi Defense Group, with attempting between February and July 2011 “to broker a substantial quantity of weapons – machine guns, sniper rifles, assault rifles, anti-tank rockets, rockets, and other high explosives and ammunition – to individuals in Libya, with knowledge such activities were prohibited by United States law enacted to protect the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States.”

The indictment charged that after the State Department denied Turi a brokering license to supply weapons to Libya, he submitted brokering applications to the State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, “falsely listing Qatar and United Arab Emirates as the end users for weapons that were actually intended for individuals in Libya.”

This, the indictment charged, was in direct contravention of U.N. Security Council Resolution 170, passed Feb. 26, 2011. The resolution imposed an arms embargo on all member states to prevent “the immediate prospect” of a Gadhafi-led attempt “to slaughter rebel forces in Benghazi that would likely result in massive civilian casualties.”

The indictment cited U.S. law, 22 C.F.R. § 29.5(d), which specifies, “No brokering activities or brokering proposal may be carried out with respect to countries which are subject to United Nations Security Council arms embargoes.” It also cited features of the Arms Export Control Act, Title 22, U.S. Code, Section 2778, allowing the State Department, in concurrence with the Defense Department, to develop a list of weapons prohibited to ship to Libya, many of which were found in the 2011 seizure.

The indictment listed a series of communications between Turi, an Egyptian arms dealer residing in the United Kingdom identified only by the initials “Y.A.” and an individual working from Cyprus identified as “A.Y.” who was affiliated with a company importing and exporting Russian-origin petroleum products. Both figures were named as the “primary intermediaries” interceding between Turi and the Transitional National Council, TNC, in Libya, to arrange for the arms.

The DOJ indictment charged Turi had “made a material untrue statement and omitted a material fact required to be stated” when he applied to ship weapons to Qatar and the UAE.

“Marc Turi and Turi Defense Group then knew the actual intended end user” of the prohibited weapons being sent to Libya, the indictment said.

Turi’s defense

In various court motions, defense attorney Jean-Jacques Cabou asserted Turi shipped no weapons to Qatar.

Cabou strongly suggests the whole point of prosecuting Turi was to blame him for the weapons transfer, which he called a covert Obama administration gun-running operation that went wrong when Libya intercepted the weapons.

He noted Gadhafi spokesman Ibrahim suggested publicly that NATO countries were violating the U.N. resolution in an attempt to arm the Libyan al-Qaida-affiliated militia – then designated by the U.S. and the U.N. as “rebels” – in their attempt to oust Gadhafi.

In an initial motion to dismiss the case, filed July 23, 2014, Cabou noted that “in early 2011, while under contract with the Government for work in those countries, Mr. Turi requested State Department approval to conduct brokering discussions with allied entities and governments in Africa, including the National Transition Council of Libya, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar.”

Cabou pointed out that such requests “are common in Mr. Turi’s business and are typically referred to as request for approval,” stressing that the outcome was that the State Department approved Turi’s requests for approval in Qatar and the UAE but turned down his request for Libya.

In bold print, the next sentence of the motion made Cabou’s key point: “In the end, however, no weapons were ever transferred pursuant to these requests. As is often the case in international arms trade, these deals did not come to fruition.”

Cabou continued to note that later in 2011, the U.S. government began investigating Turi for “still unknown reasons.”

“From then until now, the Government has searched Mr. Turi’s home, seizing computers and other electronic media, stopped him as he re-entered the country at Chicago O’Hare International Airport, seizing even more computers, and flown agents around the world to interview Mr. Turi’s associates in the brokering business and the intelligence community,” Cabou’s motion said.

“The REAL Benghazi story: What the White House and Hillary Don’t Want You to Know”

‘Hillary shipped the weapons, not Turi’

In a motion filed Aug. 11, 2014, Cabou made clear his counter-claim that the government was seeking to frame his client by allowing him to think the Obama administration was in favor of a “plausible deniability” covert deal in which the illicit weapons would be shipped to Qatar and packaged as “Qatar Army” weapons manufactured outside the United States that were diverted to Libya without State Department approval.

In another sentence written in bold type for emphasis, the defense motion dated Aug. 11, 2014, stressed: “Public documents reveal that arms were in fact transshipped through Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to Libya, and that the U.S. Government may have provided support for those transactions.”

Cabou then demanded the discovery of government documents or other evidence that could prove the U.S. government had pursued a brokered-weapons deal through Qatar that involved “nearly identical” transactions to those the DOJ was accusing Turi of having executed.

In a letter dated Aug. 6, 2014, addressed to the U.S. attorney’s office in Phoenix, Cabou asked specifically for the following: “Any documents or other evidence relating to instances in which the United States assisted or considered assisting in any way, overtly or covertly, in the transportation, provision, acquisition, transfer, or transport of Defense articles to or from any person, entity, group of people, quasi-governmental entity, or government within the territory of Libya, Syria, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey or Jordan (these countries collectively here the ‘Covered Countries’) within the timeframe of 2010 to the date of the request.”

Cobou’s letter to the U.S. attorney in Arizona detailed that for Libya, Qatar and the UAE, “we have a good-faith basis to believe Defense Articles eventually did covertly enter Libya from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates and that the United States may have been involved.”

The term “Defense Articles” was a legal term used by Cabou to refer to weapons prohibited for transfer to Libya in 2011 under U.N. Security Council Resolution 170 and U.S. law that appears remarkably similar to the weapons display to the international press in 2011.




Philip Riggio



¿Y de quién procedían esos dólares? ¿Del hombre que respira debajo del agua (gracias, Héctor Lavoe)?… 

…De la hiperimpresión de NUESTRA Hacienda y la hiperrehipotecación de NUESTRO banco central, del valor de lo que creíamos los norteamericanos tener en la cartera.  Razónde los precios por las nubes (900% desde 1945) y de no tener Juan del Pueblo para el peaje.


A diferencia de los de América Latina, el gobierno nuestro sale con la suya porque por ahí se cree que el dólar norteamericano siempre valdrá para algo (libertades reconocidas, todas ellas, al ciudadano por la Declaración “Bill” de Derechos). 


Parece que del público estafado y robado solos Richie Blondet, mi jimagua y yo lo sabemos.  No que no se haya escrito sobre el tema.

Quien no se diere cuenta que demande al colegio (atención, clase política: cosa de hace 101 años, de los que el GOP tenía 48 en la Casa Blanca).

2015-07-24 17:26 GMT-04:00 juan molerio <>:

Fernando, mi análisis es el siguiente:

  – En Cuba siempre el pueblo ha estado durante 56 años, ayer mejor que hoy, y hoy mejor que mañana.

  – La URSS le regalaba todos los años a Cuba, 5,000 millones de dólares. ¿Que hacia Cuba? invertía ese dinero en formentar guerrillas en África y América Latina. ¿Con ese dinero mejoraba a su pueblo? ¡No! Prefería invertirlo en otras cosas por una sola razón maquiavélica. “Si el pueblo tiene una forma de vida normal, empezará a pensar en política”. “Si el cubano se levanta en la mañana pensando como buscar algo de comida para su familia, todo el tiempo lo tendría ocupado y no pensaría en política”.

  – Al terminar la ayuda de la URSS, la obtuvo de Venezuela. Un país rico y sin bloqueo. Tomando el ejemplo de Cuba, como está Venezuela ahora?

  – Ahora que Venezuela está en quiebra y no la puede  ayudar, por la presión social y económica, ¡Sí podía haber cambios! El ejemplo lo tenemos con África del Sur. Cuando se le aplicó un bloqueo real y verdadero, ¿Qué le pasó? Cuando se hace real y no de mentirita, ¡funciona!

  – Obama y su cuerpo de inteligencia se percataron de la situación, le dieron la mano y le dio la espalda a la oposición. ¡ Es lógico para él!

El que no se de cuenta, es porque “No hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver”.



 “No se puede caminar contemplando las estrellas cuando se tiene una piedra en el zapato.”

 “Cuando el dinero habla, la verdad calla.”

  Proverbios chinos

El Padre Eduardo M. Barrios nos demuestra su fe religiosa, basada en el dogma católico que cree en milagros.    Escribe de la población de Cuba como si fuera una entidad independiente que pudiera tener la libertad de ejercer su voluntad para no necesitar las”remesas” enviadas por sus familiares, no desear emigrar al extranjero para poder gozar de mejor futuro, y/o tener “incentivo” para buscar trabajo, en un país donde son esclavos y no trabajadores.    También el buen Padre nos describe a Cuba como independiente para actuar, ignorando que Cuba es solo un nombre de un país que existió y que desde el año 1959 solo es una tierra cuyos únicos dueños son los Castro, acompañados por sus más fieles seguidores.    El Padre no menciona en su escrito al castrato, que serian los únicos con poder suficiente para lograr reducir las fuerzas armadas, no depender de potencias foráneas para subsistir, y convertir su economía en una “pragmática”, donde pueda ser controlada por el individuo.    El “deshielo” entre Cuba y los EEUU que luce el defender, no lograra, y ni siquiera favorecerá el logro de los loables cambios que él desea.    Por suerte en la misma edición de El Nuevo Herald, el Sr. Guillermo I Martínez nos da una dosis de realidad en su escrito “Cuento de hadas”.       Es obvio que Martínez no cree ni en “hadas”, ni en “milagros”.    Explica con gran elocuencia y detalles las razones del porque este nuevo “acercamiento” no hará diferencia en el bienestar del pueblo.    En el caso de Cuba, el orden de los factores si altera el producto.    Apoyar económicamente a los tiranos no es el camino,  alentar y promover los deseos de independencia de la población, subversivamente si fuera necesario, y fomentar el aislamiento económico solo disminuyéndolo a cambio de un verdadero cambio en los derechos civiles del ciudadano y hacia un mercado libre pudiera, con el tiempo, evitar la continuación de la tiranía.    “Tirarles la toalla”, solo mantendrá en el poder a los Castro, sus militares y herederos.

Fernando J. Milanés, MD




Breaking: Hillary Could Soon Get Blindsided By A Criminal Investigation From An Unlikely Source

The emailgate scandal suddenly gets much more serious.

Norvell Rose 

The scandal surrounding emailgate — then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email account managed on a personal server — has just been escalated to a higher level that could prove extremely damaging to Mrs. Clinton’s hopes for the White House.

The New York Times reports that the Justice Department has been asked to open “a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday.”



And it’s not a Republican politician or a conservative watchdog group that’s requesting the criminal probe of Mrs. Clinton’s email practices. It’s two inspectors general working for the federal government who have reportedly asked for the inquiry into whether Hillary included classified information — sensitive government secrets — in the emails she sent. Mrs. Clinton has denied that she ever included any classified material in her many thousands of official emails when she was the country’s top diplomat.

However, as The Times article points out, when Mrs. Clinton turned over to the State Department the digital communications she had held and controlled on her private server, the review of those emails raised serious and troubling questions.

In the course of the email review, State Department officials determined that some information in the messages should be retroactively classified. In the 3,000 pages that were released, for example, portions of two dozen emails were redacted because they were upgraded to “classified status.” But none of those were marked as classified at the time Mrs. Clinton handled them.


So now, President Obama’s new Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, will have a huge say in whether a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s controversial email practices will be undertaken. Such a criminal probe would almost certainly further damage Mrs. Clinton’s already shaky image for being an honest and trustworthy person.

Just a couple of days ago, Western Journalism reported on a new poll from Quinnipiac that showed Mrs. Clinton losing serious ground to potential Republican challengers in three key swing states. The survey confirmed what other polls have found in recent weeks — the frontrunner for the 2016 Democrat nomination for president is not seen as particularly honest and trustworthy.

Mrs. Clinton recently drew a fair share of snickers and snide comments when she boasted to a CNNinterviewer, “People should and do trust me.” Should Obama’s attorney general decide that a criminal probe is warranted into Hillary’s emails and their possibly classified content, even the presidential candidate herself would be hard-pressed to make that statement again with a straight face.

Should a criminal investigation be launched over Hillary Clinton’s controversial email practices? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.



Cruz Goes On Fox News, Drops This Incredible Truth Bomb On ‘Washington Cartel’ And Trump

On this issue, he pointed out, both he and Trump represent the field’s minority.

  1. Christopher AgeeJuly

While some in the Republican presidential primary field have trashed Donald Trump for his controversial remarks on issues like immigration, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz explained in a recent interview that he was observing his party’s 11th commandment.

Often cited by Ronald Reagan, Republicans obeying the rule agree to never “speak ill of any fellow Republican.”



It is not only party unity, Cruz told Fox News Channel host Sean Hannity Wednesday, that keeps him from criticizing Trump.

“He’s a friend of mine,” he said of the real estate tycoon. “He and I have sat down and visited many, many times.”

As for the attention – both positive and negative – his comments have received, Cruz chalked it up to Trump’s willingness to address uncomfortable truths.



“And he’s taking on the Washington cartel,” he added.

Cruz went on to charge that several others in the primary field are not so open to hearing a conservative immigration message.

Trump has focused on “illegal immigration and sanctuary cities” in recent speeches, Cruz explained, adding that “a great many of the candidates in 2016 for the Republican nomination have been vocal aggressive advocates of amnesty.”

On this issue, he pointed out, both he and Trump represent the field’s minority.

“When we come to the first debates in a couple of weeks,” he asserted, “I’m going to be one of the very few major candidates on that stage who has never embraced amnesty.”

Instead of throwing stones at a fellow GOP candidate, Cruz said he would prefer to focus on real proposals to address our immigration problem, including his plan to strip federal funding from sanctuary cities and impose a mandatory five-year minimum sentence for anyone convicted of illegal re-entry into the U.S.

Is Trump right on immigration? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.





‘Why would you risk your credibility by getting involved in this nonsense?’

Published: 19 hours ago


CHELSEA SCHILLING About | Email | Archive


 Subscribe to feed

CNN anchor Jake Tapper ripped into Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio Thursday, excoriating Arpaio for daring to call President Barack Obama’s birth certificate a forgery.

On “The Lead,” Tapper said, “You’ve trafficked in this rather preposterous notion that Obama was not born in the United States and that he may have forged his birth certificate that he released.”

He continued, “Why would you risk your credibility on issues you care about – like illegal immigration, like law enforcement – by getting involved in this nonsense?”

“What do you mean ‘risk’?” Arpaio asked. “I’m the chief law enforcement officer elected by the people. I have a right to investigate and speak out. I’m not talking about where he came from. I don’t care where he came from. We’re working on a fraudulent, forged government document. That’s what we are doing.”

Tapper interjected, “You’re maintaining that the birth certificate that the president of the United States revealed and released to the public, you’re maintaining that that is fraudulent?”

“That’s right,” Arpaio responded.

Get everything you always wanted to know about Obama’s eligibility in the classic “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” — now just 99 cents!

The CNN host asked, “Is there anyone, any credible law enforcement person outside of you and your organization and your contractors, who has any agreement with you on this?”

“No, they haven’t looked at it,” Arpaio said. “What are you kidding? I’m probably the only law enforcement official who has looked into it. Nobody looks into it. They shy away from it.”

Once again, a flustered Tapper interrupted: “Because the president was born in Hawaii.”

“I don’t care where he was born,” Arpaio replied. “I’m talking about a fraudulent government document, a birth certificate. That’s all I’m concerned with. That’s a violation of the law.”

Tapper further questioned the sheriff, asking if he came to his conclusion because “there are glitches in some of the printing.”

Sheriff Joe said he wouldn’t “get into all the technical details” at that moment, but he added: “I’ve been around a long time. I’m not stupid enough to even talk to you about it if I didn’t think there was a lot of smoke and fire there.”

The WND Superstore has the resources you need to understand the critical constitutional issue ignored by Washington and establishment media — the essential qualifications for the person responsible for the nation’s security.

As WND reported on July 5, Arpaio affirmed he is “pretty well convinced” Obama’s birth certificate, as released by the White House in 2011, is a “fraudulent, fake document.”

“I’ve been in law enforcement 55 years,” stated Arpaio. “I think I know a fraudulent, fake document. I’m not a computer expert. I rely on my people. But I’m pretty well convinced it’s a fake document.”

The sheriff was being interviewed for “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” broadcast on New York’s AM 970 The Answer and Philadelphia’s NewsTalk 990 AM.

Listen to “Aaron Klein Radio” clip of Joe Arpaio discussing Obama’s birth certificate:

During the interview, Arpaio brought up the birth certificate.

Arpaio’s office has been investigating the birth certificate since 2011.

Arpaio’s statements prompted Klein to ask for an update on his team’s investigation into the long-form birth certificate document, posted April 27, 2011 as a PDF file on the White House website.


Arpaio told Klein that “once again nobody wants to look at it right now.”

“So it’s not my problem. I did my job.”

Obama’s qualification for president as a “natural born citizen” has been challenged in court since before he was first elected in 2008. The White House finally relented in 2011 and posted a birth certificate, but Arpaio’s investigative team concluded it is a forgery.

Arpaio’s appointed lead investigator on the birth-certificate case, Mike Zullo, has been promising the release of “universe-shattering” information regarding the document.

“When this information is finally exposed to the public, it will be universe-shattering. This is beyond the pale of anything you can imagine,” he told WND in a December 2013 interview.

Now an ebook on! Be sure to read “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” to get up to speed on this issue!

Zullo has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s birth certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the document had been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a genuine paper document.

See some of Zullo’s evidence:

Zullo has noted that Reed Hayes, a document examiner who has served as expert witness for Seattle law firm Perkins Coie – the firm that flew an attorney to Honolulu to personally deliver two paper copies of the birth certificate to the White House – has concluded in a signed affidavit that the document posted on the White House website is “entirely fabricated.”

The White House also has never verified the authenticity of a letter purportedly sent by President Obama to the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu in which he declares the center to be “the place of my birth.”


A letter purportedly signed by Barack Obama indicating the president’s claim he was born at the Kapiolani Center for Women and Children in Honolulu.

There also remains a mystery as to why Obama is using a possibly fraudulent Connecticut-based Social Security Number, when he and his parents never resided in the Constitution State.


Feels good to unmask an incompetent.

Miriam Dopico


Good job Senator!!

“No aceptamos donaciones de dinero”

“Solo aceptamos su voto para poder sacar a

toda la basura que nos desgobierna”





Briefly: both Trey Gowdy and Stop Hillary PAC are coming under intense fire because they are standing up to the Hillary machine. I need your help now more then ever. 

That’s why I hope you will set aside what you are doing right now and 
sign your pledge to show your support and stand with Trey Gowdy and Stop Hillary PAC. 

I really hope you will do this by midnight tonight.

Here is what I’m asking you to do (it will only take a few moments): 

    1.  If you haven’t already…please read the email below. I sent it to you this morning — it is of critical importance.
    2.  Sign the petition to stand with Trey Gowdy and Stop Hillary PAC. It’s vital we build public support for Congressman Gowdy. 
    3.  Please chip in what you can afford. Weather its $25, $50, $100, or even $250. Every dollar we bring in is going to help make sure that Hillary is never elected president.

Thank you for your attention to this important email. 

For America!
Senator Ted Harvey

P.S. Your signed petition and your donation will make a huge difference in this fight to defeat Hillary. SHE MUST BE STOPPED! 

 serious situation developing




***Emergency UPDATE — Hillary loyalist now attacking Rep. Gowdy AND Stop Hillary PAC***

Lazaro R,

Trey Gowdy is coming under intense fire for forcing Hillary Clinton to testify…now he’s in political danger.

And those political enemies are now attacking Stop Hillary PAC too.

We don’t have a moment to lose.

Here’s the situation: As you know, Trey Gowdy has summoned Hillary Clinton to appear before the Select Committee on Benghazi for a fully transcribed, under oath interview, AND Hillary has refused!

After her refusal, the full weight of the Clinton machine is out to crush Rep. Gowdy. 

In the last few days Hillary apologist and loyalist are relentlessly attacking Gowdy trying to discredit his investigation. Just look at these few examples: 

   >>>  David Brock of the Pro-Hillary Super PAC is spending millions and accusing Gowdy of “politicizing” the Benghazi murders to “score partisan points.  
   >>>  Democrats on the Benghazi Committee are using taxpayer dollars to attack Trey Gowdy calling his investigation a “politically motivated, $3.7 million fishing expedition.”  
   >>>  And Hillary defenders on the Committee have now turned their attacks towards Stop Hillary PAC — and the almost one million supporters of Stop Hillary PAC — attempting to intimidate and silence your voice and your support for Congressman Gowdy’s good work.  

Lazaro R, in my experience as an elected official – for over ten years — I know this…when your opponents attack you like this, it’s time to Double Down!

The truth is, Hillary will do ANYTHING to avoid tough questioning and face accountability for her actions. 

South Carolina Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy has done an expert job leading the Congressional Select Committee on Benghazi, but as he faces his largest attack yet from Hillary Clinton, her campaign apparatus, and the left wing elite media. I’m asking you to double down on your support.

That’s why I’m leading the charge to rally public support for Trey Gowdy. Will you please stop what you are doing right now, and double-down on your pledge of support by clicking here? 

Lazaro R, we’re only going to get the truth about the attack on Benghazi through Hillary’s testimony under oath. It’s the only way to secure the public interest and ensure the committee has the unvarnished truth. Hillary knows that could spell the end of her run for President and her political career — and possibly her freedom! So, she’ll fight tooth and nail to keep from being forced to appear.

Gowdy’s affirmed — in light of her wiping clean the email server — that Hillary MUST appear separately to discuss EACH of these events — Benghazi AND her “illegal” email practices.

She’s broken the law, and she won’t hesitate to do it again.

Remember what happened to those that dared to uncover the truth about the Monica Lewinsky/Bill Clinton affair and Clinton’s lies under oath about it? The Clintons and their friends in the media methodically destroyed the careers and reputations of those that dared to lead the impeachment proceedings, including Congressmen Bob Livingston, Bob Barr, Henry Hyde, Newt Gingrich, Helen Chenoweth, and Dan Burton.

Bottom line?

If Americans want Congressman Gowdy to uncover the truth about Benghazi and Hillary’s role in it, Gowdy will need America’s public support. So please, take just a second of your time to Double Down and sign your pledge. 

We must let Gowdy know he has the support of Americans across the country, and that we’ll fight back when faced with the mudslinging onslaught that is already racing towards him.

If Congressman Gowdy can finally uncover the truth, then perhaps we can stop Hillary once and for all…because, she MUST BE STOPPED. 

That’s why your personalized pledge is so important. Please click here immediately to Double Down against the attacks. 

And in order to achieve that goal, WE NEED YOU ON OUR TEAM TODAY. 

Here’s how you can help: 

   1.  First, go here and sign the pledge to “Stand with Gowdy and Stop Hillary PAC.” It’s vital we build public support for Congressman Gowdy.  
   2.  Tell your friends! Please forward this email to every friend or family member that agrees with you that we MUST stop Hillary tomorrow by supporting Congressman Trey Gowdy today. Also, post on facebook, twitter, and every other social media outlet to spread the word.  
   3.  Make a donation. We simply cannot achieve our goals without building a substantial war chest. Hillary and pro-Hillary PACs have already raised over 50 million to propel her to office. We can’t match that dollar for dollar but we don’t need to in order to win. So please, once you’ve signed — make a donation today. If you can afford a donation of $50, $100, $250, $500 or more, I would encourage you to do so today. However, even a smaller symbolic donation of $20.16 will go a long way in helping pay for our efforts.  

Please, don’t delay, join our team by signing the pledge to Double Down. Stand with Gowdy and Stop Hillary PAC against the attacks and make a donation today.

For America!
Senator Ted Harvey

P.S. The Gowdy Committee is our best hope to finally get the answers Americans deserve, but he needs our help now more than ever. Chip in just $5 (or more if you can afford it) so we’ll have the funds to fight back against the Clinton media machine.







Why Donald Trump Is Leading The Republican Field

Brian Darling  |

Trump: Relationship ‘Very Good’ with Hispanics

There is a simple reason why Donald Trump is leading the race nationally amongst the numerous Republicans vying for the nomination of their party. Voters are despondent, and angry, and looking for somebody different.

Republicans are mad that the Republican controlled Congress has produced nothing. They recognize that the Republican leadership has been ineffectual. They see Donald Trump fighting and fighting hard.

Same seems to be true on the Democratic side where Hillary Clinton has been forced to re-launch her campaign two times, because she is such a boring candidate who does not say anything to excite rank and file Democratic voters.

Donald Trump has tossed aside the Queensbury rules of combat for a political version of a bloody MMA battle. This has caused chaos in the Republican field that will hurt Gov. Jeb Bush more than any other candidate. As we get closer to debates, it is clear that Trump will train his fire on Jeb and it is not going to be pretty. Expect Jeb to have to tap out of this political fight when it becomes a Trump versus Bush debate battle.

While Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is pulling huge crowds and showing that Clinton has a glass jaw, Republicans leaders in Washington have done as much as they can to help put Hillary, or another Democrat, into the White House.

Polls indicate that since the Republican sweep to victory in 2014, President Obama’s popularity is rising. That helps Hillary.

During that time, Republican rage at leadership is also rising. A recentPew Research Center study found that “the Republican Party’s image has grown more negative over the first half of this year. Currently, 32% have a favorable impression of the Republican Party, while 60% have an unfavorable view. Favorable views of the GOP have fallen nine percentage points since January.” This is because a Republican controlled Congress has helped President Obama close out his second term with some historic victories.

While Republicans in the Capitol are floundering, Donald Trump has electrified the polls with some harsh populist rhetoric against all things Washington, DC.

It has not taken long for the establishment to fire back at The Donald. Rick Wilson wrote a snarky piece in <href=”#ixzz3gf4SG0cz”>Politico where he argued “greetings, Donald Trump super fans. I am a member of the GOP establishment. I’m writing to tell you that, no matter how much you wish it otherwise, the Donald Trump candidacy is almost over.” Wilson makes a weak case that somehow support for Trump translates into support for Hillary, because Trump can’t win.

Not to be outdone, Victor David Hanson at National Review Online has an equally ridiculous piece comparing Donald Trump to President Obama. “In his current unbridled commentary and without worry over party politics, Obama has perhaps gone the full Trump — though in the opposite fashion of tossing out politically correct themes of the progressive Left, which lead to little concrete action. So Obama is Trump’s doppelgänger. The two see the world in similarly materialist — though, again, opposite — terms.”

John Feehery at The Hill went in another direction by comparing Trump to Joe McCarthy. “McCarthy wasn’t wrong about communist influence in the State Department or in Hollywood. There were plenty of spies in both places, as records would later show. But his approach to weed them out was paranoid, undisciplined and erratic. And when he decided to take on the Army, he made a huge strategic mistake. Donald Trump reminds me a bit of McCarthy.” I am sure a George Wallace or Adolph Hitler analogy is in the establishment hip pocket for the next round of attacks.

Despite the establishment attempt to bully voters, the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll puts Trump at the top with 24%. The numbers indicate that he has siphoned off Tea Party support from Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY), Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Marco Rubio (R-FL). Gov. Christie’s support was cut in half because he seems to be a less conservative version of the outspoken New York/New Jersey guy. It looks like New York is tougher than New Jersey in this battle of the tough talking politicos.

Democrats should not be so excited about Trump screwing up the Republican field, because they have their own problem – Hillary Clinton. The latest Quinnipiac poll indicates that the coronation of Hillary may be on hold because she is losing in head to head battles in the swing states of Colorado, Iowa and Virginia. Her favorability ratings are bad and she is looking over her shoulder at Sen. Sanders who is gaining fast.

Democrats are not ripping Sanders, because they are in denial that Hillary is a terrible candidate. They forget that she gave away the nomination in 2008 when she ran a terrible campaign. Her strategy right now is to embrace the socialism-lite and hope that the Sanders campaign peters out on its own.

The American people are sick and tired of the lame establishment policies of both parties. Hillary and Jeb’s attempt to retain control for our nations’ two royal families – the Clintons and the Bushes – may be on hold. Get some popcorn and enjoy the next few months while the voters of both parties root for the underdog socialist and bombastic billionaire.

Trump and Sanders may not win, but they sure will make it interesting. They also show that the American public is ok with some non-traditional candidates who are scrapping with two well-funded establishment elites.




Watch Trump Dismiss This Liberal’s Inane Question

GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump batted down and dismissed questioning from MSNBC host Jose Diaz-Balart Thursday during a press conference in Laredo, TX at the U.S./Mexico border.

Diaz-Balart began asking Trump about his comments from his kickoff announcement address, but soon into his question, the real estate mogul began railing against the media for taking his points out of context.

“Mr. Trump, you know 53,00o hispanics turn 18 years of age in this country every month, born in the country of voting age,” Diaz-Balart, also a host for Telemundo, told Trump. “54 million plus hispanics —  many feel that what you said when you said that the people who cross the border are rapists and murderers –.”

“No, no, no. We’re talking about illegal immigration and everybody understands that,” Trump said. “And you know what: that’s a typical case — wait, that’s a typical case of the press with misinterpretation. They take a half a sentence — they take a half a sentence, then they take quarter of a sentence and put it all together. It’s a typical thing.”  Source: The Daily Caller

– See more at:

Suspendida la pena de muerte sobre Asia Bibi

Luis Losada – CitizenGO

Estoy emocionado, Lazaro R. Tras seis años en el corredor de la muerte, por fin una buena noticia. El Supremo de Pakistán determinó este miércoles suspender cautelarmente la pena de muerte sobre Asia Bibi y decretar la libertad provisional.

Además, considera que el fallo de la Corte de Apelaciones contiene irregularidades o fallos y abre expediente para estudiarlos.

¡¡¡Si se puede!!! Si participaste en esta campaña, Lazaro R, gracias y enhorabuena.

Te recuerdo la campaña:

Es un paso muy importante, pero todavía no podemos cantar victoria. El Supremo de Pakistán todavía debe emitir su sentencia definitiva, que esperamos sea exculpatoria.

Además, aunque Asia se encuentra en libertad provisional, va a permanecer en la cárcel hasta que se produzca el fallo por razones de seguridad. El islamismo radical la quiere matar. Ya han ofrecido 5.000 dólares por su cabeza.

Pero lo de este miércoles ha sido un exitazo. Estoy emocionado, Lazaro R. Supongo que tu también. Sin duda la movilización social a nivel internacional ha ayudado. El mismo miércoles organizamos un acto frente a la embajada de Pakistán. Puedes ver aquí las fotos y el video del acto.

Esta buena noticia demuestra que la movilización tiene sus frutos. Cuando los ciudadanos de manera organizada decidimos alzar nuestra voz, somos imparables, Lazaro R.

Por eso es tan importante participar. Y lo de Planned Parenthood es INACEPTABLE. No sé si has tenido de ver el segundo video. La “doctora” Mary Gatter, Presidenta del Consejo de Directores Médicos de Planned Parenthood Federation of America aparece negociando con los órganos de los bebés abortados. Como si fuera una broker. ¡Repugnante!

Puedes verlo aquí:

Y lo peor, Lazaro R. Dice abiertamente: “Quiero un Lamborghini” (coche de lujo)

¿Médicos?, ¿labor humanitaria? Son presuntos delincuentes, Lazaro R, que lo único que pretenden es hacer NEGOCIO con los órganos de los bebés abortados.

‘Venderán’ que hacen labor asistencial y que ayudan a las madres a decidir sobre su maternidad… bla, bla, bla. La realidad es que tienen el PEOR comportamiento de la especie humana. El peor. Sólo de escribirlo, me hierve la sangre…

¿Tú crees que estos establecimientos pueden seguir abiertos? Pide al Departamento de Justicia que intervenga

Ya sabes que estos tipos reconocen que la comercialización de órganos de bebés abortados es práctica habitual en todas sus filiales. ¿Te imaginas? ¿También en las de nuestro país?

Planned Parenthood y sus filiales no pueden permanecer ni un minuto más abiertas. ¡Tenemos que cerrarles! Pide al Departamento de Justicia que intervenga:

Gracias, Lazaro R, por estar siempre ahí. Gracias por defiende las causas justas. Juntos construimos un mundo más digno para todos. ¡Si se puede!

Un fuerte abrazo,

Luis Losada Pescador y todo el equipo de CitizenGO

  1. Tengo más buenas noticias. ¿Te acuerdas que el Senado de California pretendía retirar la estatua defray Junípero Serra del Capitolio? Pues bien, el gobernador ha dicho que estará ahí “hasta el final de los tiempos”. ¡Bien!

PD2. Por favor, Lazaro R, firma y comparte. Tenemos que cerrar Planned Parenthood. ¡Podemos! ¿Puedes publicar la campaña en tu muro de Facebook? Mil gracias anticipadas.

PD3. Te presento a parte del equipo de CitizenGO 😉

Lázaro R González para Alcalde del Condado de  Miami  Elecciones de Noviembre 8 del 2016.  Use la boleta en blanco.

No aceptamos contribuciones monetarias. Necesitamos que se lo informe a todos los familiares, vecinos, amigos, compañeros de trabajo y a todos.



“En mi opinión”



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s