HPIM0049

No 994 “En mi opinión” Julio 9, 2015

No 994    “En mi opinión”   Julio  9, 2015

“IN GOD WE TRUST”  Lázaro R González Miño Editor

La fórmula para resolver toda esta falta de respeto de la mayoría de los políticos, el relajo, el robo, el malgasto, el amiguismo, el nepotismo  y la burla a los ciudadanos no es votando por un individuo que haya vivido profesionalmente chupándose el dinero de los votantes como un vampiro.

Es escoger uno que use la política como instrumento para defender los derechos de los ciudadanos y hacer la patria más grande y fuerte.

Lázaro R González Miño

 

 

Quintin George: Algunas personas pueden mirar hacia el futuro!

HL Mencken nacio en  1880 – murió 1956) fue un periodista, escritor satírico, crítico y demócrata.

Mencken escribió el editorial de abajo mientras trabajaba para el Baltimore Evening Sun, que apareció en la edición de julio 26,1920.

A medida que se perfecciona la democracia, la oficina del presidente representa, cada vez más cerca, el alma interior de las personas. En algún gran y glorioso día, la gente de civil de la tierra alcanzarán el deseo de su corazón, al fin  la Casa Blanca serán ocupados por un francamente tonto, completamente idiota y narcisista. “- HL Mencken, 26 de julio 1920 

Así estaba escrito, y así ha llegado a pasar …

 

 

 

¿Es esto verdad?

ALBANILES RECOJAN QUE SE ACABO LA MEZCLA
TODAVIA NO LO CREO

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/14e6f14be23958c6

AMENPER: El Perro Católico

A una viejita se le murió el perrito, y fue a la iglesia para hablar con el cura párroco.

Padre, le dijo, usted cree que podemos celebrar una misa de difuntos para mi perrito que murió hoy.

El padre le dijo, mira, nosotros no celebramos misa de difuntos para animales. 

Quizás en la iglesia protestante que está en la esquina hagan algo de eso,

 ¿Por qué no vas a verlos?

Está bien padre, dijo la viejita,

¿Usted cree que una donación de $10,000.00 por la misa será suficiente para ellos?

El cura entonces dijo,

¡Un momento!

Usted no me había dicho que el perrito era católico.

 

 

AMENPER: ¿Puede pasar esto?

LeRoy Jacksons, el dueño afroamericano de la panadería “Delicias para hermanos negros” cerca de Marietta, Georgia, se encontró en problemas legales por negarse a hornear un cake para dos clientes miembros del KKK. “No es sólo contra mis convicciones de mi raza hacer negocios con el KKK “, dijo Jackson, “pero no puedo hornear cake con el tema del Ku Klux Klan adornado con la bandera Confederada.

Les dije firmemente, respetuosamente, que no podía atenderlos, pero que deben de ser capaces de encontrar otra panadería en la zona que fuera más receptiva a sus creencias.

Sin embargo, esa respuesta no fue lo suficientemente buena para los simpatizantes de la confederación de la Guerra Civil,  Chester McElroy y Delmont Elkins.

 “No puedo decirte cuan lastimados nos sentimos. “Todo lo que queríamos era un pastel para celebrar el cumpleaños del General Forrest  que se celebra semana próxima y de hecho rechazaron nuestra orden violando nuestros derechos, hay precedentes sobre dulcerías a que se le han presentado demandas por no querer hornear cakes a minorías.

¿Si unos gays pueden forzar un panadero cristiano a  hacer un cake para su boda, no hace esta medida automáticamente que una panadería de negros deben de ser forzadas a hacer un cake para unos supremacistas blancos de los caballeros del KKK?

Los miembros del Ku Klux Klan han presentado una demanda ante el departamento de Justicia por violación a sus derechos humanos.

El fiscal del distrito no ha querido comentar sobre la demanda.

Esta situación puede ser retórica, pero si ocurren alguna vez estos escenarios ya hay desacuerdo sobre cómo deben ser manejados. Así que, ¿qué significa esto para los partidarios de la ley de libertad a los derechos gays?

“EMO” Pero esto si está ocurriendo en los Estados Unidos de America cuna de los derechos y la igualdad. El meollo de este intríngulis es que los negros y los maricones si lo pueden hacer y los blancos no. Asi de fácil tenemos ahora una segregación racial y de preferencias sexuales por parte de los negros y los maricones contra los blancos y las personas que prefieren hacer sexo con personas de diferente sexo al de ellos. Así de fácil.  LRGM.

 

We know these four are ready to rehear the case!

Roberts:  “Just who do we think we are?”  “The Majority’s decision is an act of the will, not legal judgement.  The right it announces has no basis in the Constitution or this Court’s precedents.”

Scalia: “A system of government that makes the People subordinate to a committee of nine unelected lawyers does not deserve to be called a democracy…Thus, when the rights of persons are violated, the Constitution requires redress by the courts.”

Thomas:

“…to allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation.”

Alito:  “I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools.”


Five people should not be able to take away the votes of 50 million Americans.

The Motion for Rehearing could literally protect the voters in nearly 40 states, our state constitutions, the institution of marriage, and our Freedom of Speech and Religion.  Think that is worth a call to Attorney General DeWine?      800-282-0515  

In the 2000 Presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore, I lived in a place called Broward County, Florida.  When they declared the state of Florida–and the election–for Al Gore, I, like so many others, got down on my knees and asked for something that had never been done. I asked for God to CHANGE the outcome of the election.

You know what happened: He answered that “ridiculous” prayer.  And if God can change the outcome of a presidential election, He can change the outcome of a Supreme Court ruling.

This battle is NOT over!  Call Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine now, and post this so your friends who care about marriage and our freedoms can be a part of reversing this illegal decision!

 

 

 

DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION

Seven Of The Most Blatant Lies In Hillary’s CNN Interview

RACHEL STOLTZFOOS

 

Commentators, pundits and journalists the world over were quick to point out that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s first television interview since her April 12th presidential campaign announcement was full of misleading statements and outright lies.

Here are seven of the most questionable statements Clinton made in the 20-minute interview with CNN’s Brianna Keilar:

  1. “People should and do trust me.”

“Would you vote for someone that you don’t trust?” Keilar asked Clinton in a discussion of the polling numbers about voters perception of her trustworthiness following the drama over her private email server as secretary of state.

17 NOPE Animal Pics That Prove Australia Is Absolutely Terrifying!Swifty

What 4 Billionaires Know About America That You Don’tStansberry Research

The Very Last Photos Taken Of Famous People Before They DiedBuzzLamp

by Taboola

Sponsored Links

“Well, they – people should and do trust me,” Clinton responded. “And I have every confidence that that will be the outcome of this election.” (RELATED: Poll: Swing State Voters Don’t Trust Hillary)

Fifty-three percent of American voters said Clinton is not honest and trustworthy in a May Quinnipiac poll. And in a May AP-GFK poll, nearly four in 10 Democrats and more than six in 10 Independents said “honest” is not the best word to describe her.

The likeliest contributors: the thousands of headlines generated from both her “home brew” civilian email server and from news of the Clinton Foundation’s rolodex of foreign donors.

  1. I’m subjected to a “constant barrage of attacks that are largely fomented by and coming from the Right … “

Clinton blamed the email drama and resulting questions in the minds of voters on a vast but baseless right-wing conspiracy. She admitted that Americans should be thinking about those questions.

But she said they were only on the public’s radar because she is subjected to a “constant barrage of attacks that are largely fomented by and coming from the right.”

The New York Times broke the news in March that Clinton exclusively used a personal email account stored on a private server to conduct government business as secretary of state, and since then every major media outlet has followed the story.

  1. “I only used one device.”

Clinton initially told reporters she set up the private server for convenience, because she didn’t want to carry separate devices for her work and her email. “People across the government knew that I used one device,” she reiterated Tuesday. “Maybe it was because I am not the most technically capable person and wanted to make it as easy as possible.”

But in an email to Sidney Blumenthal while she was secretary of state, Clinton mentioned she was without Blackberry coverage after a tropical storm and so had switched to a “new iPad” for her emails.

  1. “I’ve never had a subpoena.”

Asked why she deleted more than 30,000 emails while under subpoena, Clinton said: “I’ve never had a subpoena.”

In response, the House Select Committee on Benghazi released its March subpoena to Clinton Wednesday, which it sent directly after it became aware of her personal email account and private server. The subpoena demanded she turn over all records and emails in her possession related to Benghazi.

What she may have meant is that she wasn’t under subpoena when she deleted the emails.

Prior to the subpoena, Clinton’s staff had voluntarily turned over more than 30,000 emails to the State Department and deleted the rest, which were deemed personal and irrelevant. The State Department then provided 900 emails to the Select Committee on Benghazi.

  1. “I wanted to go above and beyond what was expected of me” 

“Now I didn’t have to turn over anything,” Clinton said, referring to the emails she turned over last year. “I chose to turn over 55,000 pages because I wanted to go above and beyond what was expected of me because I knew the vast majority of everything that was official already was in the State Department system.”

But new emails surfaced in June that had not been turned over to the Benghazi committee, suggesting either that Clinton lied about turning all the remaining emails over to the State Department, or that the State Department for some reason didn’t turn all the relevant emails over to the Benghazi committee.

  1. Republican presidential candidates are all “in the same general area on immigration.”

Asked about Donald Trump’s comments on immigration, Clinton tried to tie his remarks to the Republican party, saying they’re all “in the same general area on immigration.”

“They don’t want to provide a path to citizenship,” she said. “They range across a spectrum of being either grudgingly welcome or hostile toward immigrants. And I’m going to talk about comprehensive immigration reform.”

The Republican presidential candidates are in very different places on immigraiton. Former Sen. Rick Santorum is expressly calling for reduced legal immigration and rejects a path to citizenship. Sen. Ted Cruz also rejects a path to citizenship.

But the comprehensive plan Sen. Marco Rubio is outlining includes a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. And while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has backed off a previous embrace of a pathway to citizenship, but still advocates at least a path to permanent legal status. Both want to dramatically expand legal immigration. (RELATED: Rubio Doubles Down On Gang Of Eight Bill)

  1. On raising taxes: “I’m going to be telling the American people what I propose.” 

Clinton dodged a direct question about tax increases, saying she will tell the American people what she proposes in an upcoming speech.

“Is raising taxes on the table?” Keilar asked.

“I’m going to put out my policies, and I’ll let other people speak to their policies,” she said.

Hillary’s campaign announced her policy proposals will include tax hikes in June. “We are rolling out major policy proposals over the summer/fall,” her campaign spokesman Brian Fallon tweeted. “Among those proposals will be revenue enhancements.”

Follow Rachel on Twitter
Read more: 
http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/08/seven-of-the-most-blatant-lies-in-hillarys-cnn-interview/#ixzz3fOqupJ4U

 

 

 

 

BREAKING: For The Second Time Today A Major US Computer System Goes Down

First United Airlines and now…

Norvell Rose 

No one in an official capacity is saying it yet — nobody in a position of knowledge and authority has raised the possibility — but given that now two huge computer systems in the United States have suffered major malfunctions in a matter of hours will certainly have some people wondering whether hackers are at work…if cyber attacks could be to blame.

USA Today is reporting that all trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) has been suddenly and mysteriously halted:

Advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Technical issues are blamed for the systems on the NYSE to shut down at 11:32 a.m. ET. Such outages are extremely rare in U.S. markets…

Traders on the NYSE floor were standing around looking at blank trading terminals where no bid or offers were being exchanged.

An expert in the workings of the NYSE just told the Outnumbered show on Fox News that, in his memory, nothing this drastic has ever occurred before at the NYSE. Outnumbered is also saying that the president has been briefed on the situation.

Advertisement

TRENDING STORIES

CNBC also says it was an apparent “technical issue” that caused all trading in all symbols to be halted at around 11:30 a.m. ET:

The NYSE said all open orders would be canceled, according to Reuters. The issues seemed to be limited to the NYSE floor, and the exchange said it did not affect the NYSE Arca and NYSE Amex/Arca Options.

CNBC also reveals that The Wall Street Journal website “experienced an apparent outage” as well.

Earlier on Wednesday, Western Journalism told you how all United Airlines flights were temporarily grounded because of a reported systems malfunction.

CNN Money tells us that flights have resumed after schedules were severely disrupted for more than an hour, and the ripples could be felt for days: “United issued a statement saying it suffered from ‘a network connectivity issue this morning,’ and apologizing to customers for any inconvenience. It said that 4,900 flights were impacted by the problem worldwide.”

According to a report from ABC News, the Department of Homeland Security has weighed in on the technical issues that shut down the NYSE:

The Department of Homeland Security said there is no evidence of a hack, saying evidence is pointing to some kind of hardware or software issue.

ABC News also notes that before trading was halted, the market was trending lower because of investor worries about the deteriorating economy of China.

Western Journalism will provide updates as they become available on these two major computer problems plaguing a major U.S.-based airline as well as the New York Stock Exchange.

 

 

 

Alert: Schools Are Implanting Dangerous Devices In 6th Grade Girls Without Telling Parents

Those pushing the program, however, continue to sing its praises.

  1. Christopher Agee

Concern has been high for years among American parents who feel public schools are inappropriately presenting graphic sexual material to students. Many feel such subjects are best broached at home; however, more and more schools are dismissing parental feedback.

Recent reports reveal how far the trend has gone in more than a dozen Seattle-area middle and high schools. Intrauterine devices, implanted contraceptives criticized by some for their potential health risks to women and possible abortifacient properties, are reportedly being placed inside girls as early as their sixth grade year – without parental notification.

RELATED STORIES

CNS News contacted a representative of Take Charge, a Medicaid program serving Washington state, to learn more about the controversial program. The spokesperson confirmed that “a student who does not want their parents to know they are seeking reproductive health services is allowed to apply for Take Charge using their own income, and if they are insured under their parents’ plan, the insurance would not be billed.”

This program has been derided by many critics as a usurpation of parental rights.

“You need parental okay [sic] to get your ears pierced,” one CNS News reader wrote, “but not to get contraception. I’m ashamed to say that I grew up in the Seattle School District. I guess parents don’t seem to count for anything, anymore, as far as some are concerned.”

TRENDING STORIES

Those pushing the program, however, continue to sing its praises.

“Because we’re at the school,” explained one health educator participating in the Take Charge partnership, “which is so wonderful, we have access to the students, and they have access to us, pretty much any time.”

CNS News’ Kathleen Brown summed up the situation in her article, saying kids “can’t get a Coca-Cola or a candy bar at 13 Seattle public schools, but they can get a taxpayer-funded intrauterine device … implanted without their parents’ consent.”

Should schools facilitate the implantation of IUDs without parental consent? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

 

 

 

Ing. Armando Lopez- Calleja **CARTA PUBLICA DE LOS CIUDADANOS DEL CONDADO MIAMI-DADE

Los vecinos de las ciudades del Condado Miami-Dade estamos firmando esta carta, despues de  ANALIZAR EL ABSURDO AUMENTO DEL PEAJE EN LAS

AUTOPISTAS 836 Y 112, QUE PERMITEN EL TRANSITO A TRAVEZANDO

VARIAS CIUDADES DEL CONDADO MIAMI DADE, HACIA MIAMI BEACH.

En primer lugar se analizó el informe elaborado por el periodista Ing. Armando Lopez- Calleja, el pasado 04 de Agosto del 2013, cuando comenzaron los trabajos para construir

 

los nuevos “Puntos de Control” y los consecuentes aumento de las tarifas del Peaje en ambas autopistas 836 y112.

En el cual se alertó a los gobiernos del Condado de Miami Dade, a los gobiernos de de las ciudades de Miami y Miami Beach, asi como a parte de la Prensa escrita, radial y de la television, mostrandole en dicho informe, las enormes reacaudaciones entre los años 2010, 2011  y   6 meses del año 2012, con el siguente resultado;  Recaudacion en los 2 y ½ años===$5’127.6 millones de dólares.

Gastos efectuados, ===========$3’902.3 millones de dólares.

Ganancias=================$1’225.3  millones de dólares.

Realmente nuestros empleados del gobierno, aparentemente no se dieron por enterados, ni se inició una investigacion por el Poder Judicial, para buscar transparencia en el trabajo realizado por la Comision MDX responsable del control financiero, tanto para la

construction de las ampliaciones de las autopistas, de los nuevos puntos de control, asi como del abusivos aumento del precio del peaje y por ultimo de su operacion.

Con todo respeto, voy a transcribir unas lineas, del informe respueta del Sr. Mario A. Diaz=Director de informacion Publica, en el 2013 a la comisionada Rebeca Sosa, “En los proximos 5 años, MDX invertirá $836 millones de dolares, solamente en la 836, que

permtirá encarar la congestion en …..”

Quiero aclararle al Sr. Mario, que en cualquiera de los años del 2010, 2011 y 2012 se inviertireon mas de $1.000 millones de dolares, entre las autopistas 836 y 112, luego la cifra que usted indicó, que va a invertir en los proximos 5 años, me parece que esta equivocada y aparentemente demuestra, que sus explicaciones financiera dejan mucho que desear.

Como todos los que tienen que ver con este escandaloso abuso economico, hacia el pueblo trabajador del Condado Miami Dade y de sus ciudades,  pues nos tomamos el trabajo de analizar las recaudaciones entre el año 2008 y el 2013 y hemos sacado los

siguentes numeros, que demuestran lo abusrdo, abusivo, lo irrresponsable e indolente del trabajo de esta “comision” y de los gobernantes de cualquier nivel del gobierno, que han aprobado tan injusta y absurda construccion innecesaria, que le ha costado a los

contribuyentes y que ademas le estan aumentando el precio del peaje, por encima de las enomrmes ganancias obtenidas en en estos ultimos 6 años, con los precios del peaje y las instalaciones actuales, a pesar de haber sido alertados como dije; en el informe del  4 de Agosto del 2013,  no obstante la maquinaria politica y juridical, permitieron que  se continuara con esta torpe e innecesaria construccion, sin que previamente se hiciera una

supervision economica, por el Poder Judicial, que clarificara los manejos economicos de estas altas recaudaciones, sus gastos y conocer el destino de las ganancias. 

A continuacion los resultados economicos alcanzados, segun informe del 4 de Diciembre del 2014, en los  “Puntos de Control” con los precios del peaje  durante esos 6 años analizados y con las instalaciones que existieron hasta el 2013.

Recaudacion total en los 6 años’==$9’644,049,170 dolares

Gastos efecutados ============$7’327,748,641 dolares

Ganancias. =================$2’316,300,529 dolares.

No obstante, les estamos adjuntando el escrito; “BOARD OF DIRECTORES=MDX-13 members:. En el cual se detallan las Recaudaciones, los Gastos y las Ganancias obtenidas

en en los años; 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 y 2013, respectivamente..

Este escrito es el sentimiento de los electores y familiares de las ciudades que respaldamos este informe, para demostrar, que estos nuevos “Puntos de Control” y el consecuente aumento del precio del Peaje, es algo innecesario, por demas injusto, como acabamos de demostrar en este, nuestro mensaje solidario con los electores  del Condado de Miami Dade y de todas los empleados de las oficinas e instituciones que trabajamos fuera de este Condado y que  transitamos a diario por la 836 y la112.

Si consideramos solo 700,000 viajes diarios, como dice el Sr. Mario M Díaz. El incremento de la recaudación, con los nuevos “talls” y el aumento del precio del Peaje,  solo en el 2014 seria de $1,584’100,000 dólares, aunque el número de viajes diarios que

se maneja, es de un millón de viajes, resultando una recaudacion de $2,232’000,000 dólares adicional a la recaudación que se recaudaba originalmente cada año, con  las instalciones y el precio del Peaje. Estas nuevos puntos de control y el aumento del precio

del peaje, la recaudación  llegaría  cada año, hasta unos $3,400’.0 millones de dólares.

POR LO TANTO;  EXHORTAMOS A LA PRENSA ESCRITA, RADIAL Y TELEVISIBA A QUE RESPLDEN POR SUS MEDIOS, LA INMEDIATA CANCELACION DEL COBRO DEL PEAJE EN LAS NUEVOS PUNTOS DE CONTRO Y QUE EL PRECIO DEL PEAJE REGRESE A LOS QUE PAGAMOS ANTES DE QUE SURGIERA ESTE ATROPELLO ECONOMICO EN CONTRA DEL PUEBLO TRABAJADOR Y DE TODOS LOS QUE TRANSITAN POR ESTAS VIAS.

 

Ing. Armando Lopez- Calleja

 

 

 

 

Miami Republicans Cite Attack Of Dissident As Sign Obama Cuba Policy Isn’t Working

ILEANA ROSS LEHTINEN:

The Castro Regime Has Been Emboldened By Obama’s Shameful Disinterest In Human Rights And Liberties In Cuba, Says Ros-Lehtinen: “The Miami Herald”

Two of Miami’s Cuban-American Republican members of Congress condemned an attack on a Cuban dissident as a sign that President Obama is foolish to pursue closer relations with the regime on the island.

The beating of Antonio Rodiles, which Rodiles blamed on Cuban security forces, and mass detention of nearly 100 other dissidents Sunday prompted statements in solidarity from U.S. Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.

“Beating activists committed to the return of democratic rights to the island, such as Rodiles and members of the Ladies in White, show that the Castro regime has no interest in changing,” Ros-Lehtinen said Monday. “The opening of a U.S. embassy in Havana demonstrates that the Obama Administration is willing to turn a blind eye  to the sadistic ways of this brutal regime in order to build a presidential legacy.”

“Since President Obama’s December 17, 2014 announcement, the Castro regime’s brutality against innocent pro-democracy leaders has escalated,” Diaz-Balart said. “Predictably, following the President’s announcement a few days ago that he will press ahead with opening embassies without any conditions, the human rights abuses in Cuba continue unabated. The Castro regime has been emboldened by President Obama’s shameful disinterest in human rights and liberties in Cuba.”

 

 

 

 

We the People / Take action / FORWARD

ABIP USA

Here is the ultimate solution to save the United States:  Impeachment

The Constitutional Accountability Coalition of Tennessee (CACT) in connection with the North American Law Center (NALC).

Read the actual Articles of Impeachment written by the NALC, the readable, formal, legal document that lists the specific charges:

www.cactn.weebly.com/uploads/1/7/7/2/17726361/articles_of_impeachment_of_barack_hussein_obama_3.2_march_2,_2015.pdf

See the Impeach Obama Implementation Plan developed by the CACT, ready to be extended to all 50 states:  www.cactn.weebly.com

Sign the petition.  www.centerforimpeachment.com/

Actions:

  1.  cactn.weebly.com  Learn about the Constitutional Impeachment process and the plan of action.
  2. Look for the chapter for your state on Facebook–or create one.  See the growing list here:  http://cactn.weebly.com/state-chapters.html
  3. Listen and ask questions.  Next conference call:

Monday, July 13, 2015,  7:30pm CENTRAL TIME/8:30pm EASTERN TIME.

Call In Number:  209-647-1600, PIN#:  915138#

See more at: http://cactn.weebly.com/events.html#sthash.vdkIpH2o.dpuf

Our group of Americans have tried now for months to have a strong leader in our House of Representatives file for Impeachment proceedings against one fraud, Barack Hussein Obama.  Our group of Americans are not affiliated with any single political party or political group and are working completely free from any salaries or compensation for our work.

We have decided that the most important voice was the voice of the people and that a combined voice of the good people of the United States could rally some leader from the House of Representatives to overlook the coercion and the pressure from their party to stand up for the citizens of the United States and file Articles of Impeachment against Barack Hussein Obama on our behalf.

We believe in the Constitution, we believe in the voice of Democracy and we believe that the united voice of the good people of the United States cannot be ignored any longer.  Our sole purpose contained herein is to begin the Impeachment process against Barack Hussein Obama.

Take action today by joining our petition! 

We must unite with the goal to save the USA. 

Please forward this information to others.

 

 

 

JIMMY CARTER: FROM LUST IN HIS HEART TO GAY MARRIAGE

Quintin George

Though he admitted he doesn’t have any supporting Scripture, former President Jimmy Carter says he believes Jesus would approve of gay marriage.
Appearing on HuffPost Live, Carter, an evangelical Christian, was asked by host Marc Lamont Hill whether Jesus would support same-sex marriage.
“I believe he would. I believe Jesus would,” Carter answered, but admitted, “I don’t have any verse in Scripture.”

“No no no, just intuitively, yeah,” Hill chimed in.
Carter’s opinion on same-sex marriage can be seen around the 15:30 mark of the HuffPost Live video.
“I believe that Jesus would approve of gay marriage, but I’m not … that’s just my own personal belief,” Carter said. “I think Jesus would approve of any love affair that was honest and sincere (for example,adultery,  man on dog or goat, etc…), and was not damaging to anyone else. And I don’t think that gay marriage damages anyone else.”

Carter said he wouldn’t be in favor of the government forcing a local church to perform a same-sex marriage.
The only issue where his faith has conflicted with politics, he said, is on abortion.
“I have had a problem with abortion, and this has been a long-time problem of mine,” he said. “I have a hard time believing that Jesus, for instance, would approve abortions unless it was in case of rape or incest or the mother’s life was in danger.”
Carter said that when he took the oath as president, he was bound to uphold the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision that abortion was legal.

Quintin George

The Most Idiotic Comment in Presidential History

Ben Shapiro | Jul 08, 2015

On Monday, President Obama spoke about his new strategy to take on the terrorist entity Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. In doing so, he explained that the battle against that terrorist group — a group he had once termed “JV” — would amount to a “generational struggle.” Why would defeating a ragtag army of primitives take generations? Because, Obama explained, “This is not simply a military effort. Ideologies are not defeated by guns. They’re defeated with better ideas.” To cap off this airsickness bag of gobbledygook, Obama then concluded, “We will never be at war with Islam.”

So let’s get this straight. A group Obama said he would degrade and destroy can only be degraded and destroyed with ideas. Its own ideologies — its animating force, according to Obama — have nothing to do with Islam. The cretinism here resembles a perfect Jenga tower of fatuity: Remove one phrase, and the whole structure tumbles

Americans should gawk at the sheer wonder of Obama’s applesauce here. Obama’s bad acid trip bumper sticker foreign policy — “Better Ideas Beat Bad Ideologies” over a Grateful Dead peace symbol — reeks of third grade oral presentations. It takes more than great ideas to beat ideologies — it takes heavy weaponry. The victims of the Holocaust didn’t sit around thinking to themselves, “Golly, if only we’d been able to come up with a better idea than Nazism, that Hitler sure would have stopped all this nonsense.” America didn’t end World War II by dropping informational leaflets. We dropped warning leaflets, then bombs. Large ones. Atomic ones. No armed ideologues in history have been defeated solely by better ideas — at least not before decades of murder, repression and evil.

So what did Obama actually mean? It simply lacks credibility to read the president’s comments at face value: No sentient human being could be this dull. He meant that ideologies aren’t defeated by American guns, because American guns are backed by American ideas. And American ideas are by nature bad, evil, racist, xenophobic, homophobic, centophobic, and, presumably, arachnophobic. Sure, American ideas backed with guns won World War II — but hey, pretty much any ideas backed with guns would have defeated Nazism, amirite? (Well, except for the ideas of the British, the French, the Czechs, the Polish…)

When it comes to fighting the ideology of ISIS, however, Obama finds Americanism insufficient, since Americanism creates ISIS ideology through Islamophobia. That’s why Americans with guns can’t defeat ISIS, says Obama: Americans with guns create ISIS. Only internationalism can win the day!

So far, that internationalism has been a massive failure. Of course, internationalism is always a massive failure, because it isn’t an idea, any more than “diplomacy” is an idea. Both are tools, to be used by those who actually have something to say, something to fight for. But President Obama despises traditional Americans who have something to say or fight for. They are the problem. He is the cure. And he would rather disarm those Americans and their rotten ideas than let them loose with guns against those who slaughter babies.

None of this should be surprising from President Obama. He’s been clear about his anti-Americanism since “Dreams From My Father”; in that masterwork of falsely nuanced detritus, Obama lambasted the “powerful” for their “dull complacency and … steady, unthinking application of force, of … more sophisticated military hardware.”

Give Obama this: He didn’t lie to us. 66 million Americans blinded themselves to his ideology, proving conclusively that bad ideologies are not always defeated by better ideas. Sadly, Obama’s own rotten-to-the-core ideology continues to win victories, and the world continues to lose because of it.

Shocking New Study Reveals Just How Many Muslims Support ISIS (And It’s Frightening)

This isn’t the first time a study seemed to show that Muslims agree with or lean toward Islamic extremism.

Warner Todd Huston 

Yet another poll of “regular” Muslims seems to show that a shockingly high number actually agree with Muslim extremism. This time, a poll finds that a whopping 42 million support the creation of a worldwide caliphate, an Islamic order that would outlaw all other religions.

Many non-Muslims console themselves with the assumption that “most Muslims” don’t support extremism or terrorism. But nearly every time a poll is taken, this notion that Muslims stand four square against extremism is shot down.

Advertisement

RELATED STORIES

According to Ryan Mauro of the Clarion Project, this new study should serve as a warning about Muslim extremism. With these results, “ISIS is only a fraction of what it could potentially become,” Mauro said.

“If we don’t act quickly, this is still going to grow,” he continued, “and what we’re looking at today is going to look like the good old days compared to the future.”

This isn’t the first time a study seemed to show that Muslims agree with or lean toward Islamic extremism.

Advertisement

TRENDING STORIES

A recent study of British Muslims found that fully a third felt that the British government was at fault for the radicalization of young Muslims, not Islam, not ISIS, and not al Qaeda.

Britain isn’t alone. A new study of U.S. Muslims conducted last month by the Center for Security Policy found that a large number of American Muslims felt that sharia law was better than the U.S. Constitution. They also felt that they should be allowed to ignore the Constitution and instead be judged by “sharia courts” in America.

Not long ago, another poll by the Pew Research Center found that 88% of Muslims in Egypt and 62% of Muslims in Pakistan favor the death penalty for people who leave the Muslim religion.

The same poll found that honor killings were acceptable to many Muslims and that putting adulterers to death was a perfectly sane punishment.

Finally, during the “draw Mohammad” controversy, not to mention the murders of 12 staff members ofCharlie Hebdo magazine in Paris, large numbers of Muslims around the world agreed that freedom of speech should be illegal and that any harsh words against Islam should be made a crime.

 

Who’s The Next Greece?
New Research Report Explains Financial Fallout From Greek Chaos
By PAT BOONE, Legendary Entertainer

Greece’s “No!” vote means the Euro currency and Europe’s entire economy may now slip into chaos – and drag us all down with them! Capital controls were imposed last week to prevent bank runs from bankrupting and destroying its financial institutions.

“A time bomb is ticking in heavily-indebted Greece. If it goes off – with Greece repudiating its international debts and exiting the Euro currency in a ‘Grexit’ – the damage could be severe worldwide,” says THE GREEK SHOWDOWN, a new Research Paper by Craig R. Smith & Lowell Ponte.

Greece has just reached the breaking point. A breaking point the United States could soon reach as well. Our banks are already required to report you to the government for making any unusual withdrawal and could refuse to let you withdraw your account in cash.

Last year at the meeting of the G-20, the world’s ruling economic powers, President Barack Obama agreed that this ominous new “bail-in” principle would apply to the United States and other advanced nations.

Who will be the next Greece?

Will it be Portugal, Italy, Spain? Or will it be closer to home? Could it be Puerto Rico, Illinois or New Jersey – who are all facing bankruptcy – like Detroit?

Don’t be left standing in a bank line for your money. This FREE Research Paper will help you to put a sound financial strategy in place ahead of time!

Call 800-289-2646 or click here for a FREE, postpaid copy of THE GREEK SHOWDOWN!

Quintin George: President Obama brings a mouth to a knife fight

By Benny Avni

‘Ideologies are not defeated with guns; they’re defeated by better ideas.”

Add that, along with “leading from behind” and disappearing “red lines,” to the list of gems that will forever define President Obama’s era in national security.

That line, from Obama’s televised Pentagon visit Monday on his administration’s anti-ISIS strategy, quickly became a social-media meme.

Can we beat ISIS by presenting “a more attractive and more compelling vision”? That’s how Obama put it while assessing progress in our undeclared, undefined non-war against a nonstate that has nothing to do with Islam (and yet kicks our ass all over the place).

Come on. This isn’t Debate Club.

ISIS is about mass executions, throat-slashing, flesh-burning or pool-drowning in steel cages. They’re not into contests that can be resolved in a West Side Story-type dance-off between the Jets and the Sharks.

We can’t bring a mouth to a knife fight.

Nor should we. Even on acid, philosophy’s most ardent relativists would find it difficult to put ISIS’s nihilist, fascist, murderous and backward ideology on par with America’s vision of liberty.

In the real world, ISIS isn’t conquering vast territories in Iraq, Syria, North Africa and South Asia by presenting a compelling vision. The majority of residents in those occupied territories obey ISIS only because their other option is a slashed throat.

When ISIS’s battle-crazed, testosterone-driven men show up in Iraqi and Syrian towns, must our side win the hearts of the local women and girls? No, because what they really need is someone to help them fend off rapists.

True, there are a lot of Arabs, Westerners and others who join ISIS or commit jihad in its name willingly. But they do so because it’s a victorious movement on the march.

The way to counter that message is not by telling those (mostly) young men and women that the West has better “ideas,” but by dealing decisive military defeats to ISIS and expose its weakness.

Yet while Obama claims he’s ready to pull no punches in the battle of ideas, he applies all kinds of brakes, limitations and “yes buts” when it comes to the military battlefield.

Last week, US planes finally attacked Raqqa, Syria, where ISIS headquarters are located. While a positive turn, it was far from decisive. And unless sustained, it’s unlikely to make much of a dent in the Islamists’ march across the Mideast and beyond.

But in his Pentagon address, Obama promised no major changes. Instead, he spoke a lot about what we’re not going to do.

So no quick victories — or, as Obama put it, “This is a long-term campaign.”

(Translation: Let the next president deal with it). No Americans in combat roles — or, in Obama parlance, this battle is “the job of local forces on the ground.”

(Translation: Let extremist Iran lead the fight against extremist ISIS.)

And while defending America against would-be ISIS-inspired attackers, the president would like you not to link them to “real” Islam. (What kind of battle of ideas is it if our side is barred from studying the Islamic passages that guide the enemy’s ideology?)

And most fundamentally, what evil ideologies can’t be defeated militarily? What of the Nazis, the Japanese imperialists and the rebelling Confederates, to name a few, which the US military beat almost exclusively with blazing guns?

Yes, for more than half a century, America had engaged in a seemingly-endless ideological contest with Communists.

But ultimately President Ronald Reagan, while negotiating and engaging with Moscow, stopped “competing” ideologically. Instead he called the Soviet Union an “evil empire” and built up our military, acquiring ever-more and ever-better guns, showing the men in the Kremlin that they’ll never compete militarily.

In other words, he won the Cold War with no limits on the military and, well, forget about that battle of ideas.

Obama isn’t the first US president who shies away from foreign wars. Sooner or later, as the menace from Islamists of all stripes grows, America will be forced to join the battle. The longer we make up excuses for not doing so, the more difficult that future battle will be.

 

En español Google Traducido:

Consejo Personal Una de Multi-Millonario Para Sobrevivir a la moneda Coming Collapse:

“Esto es lo que estoy haciendo para proteger a mi familia y mis finanzas –

Te recomiendo hacer lo mismo. “

Estimado compañero americano,

¿Cree usted que los problemas financieros de los Estados Unidos a partir de 2008 se han fijado?

¿Crees que tendremos otra crisis bancaria en los próximos años, o un problema con nuestra moneda?

Si usted está preocupado acerca de estas posibilidades, usted no está solo.

Después de todo: Lo que estamos presenciando hoy en Estados Unidos no tiene precedentes.

Nuestro gobierno se ha embarcado en un experimento bruto fuera de control, la ampliación de la oferta de dinero 400% en sólo seis años, y más del doble de nuestra deuda nacional desde 2006.

Tomó nuestra nación 216 años para acumular la primera $ 8,5 billón en deuda … entonces sólo 8 años más para duplicar esa cantidad.

Y esta es precisamente la razón por tantas preguntas sobre la economía y nuestro futuro se mantienen. Por ejemplo …

¿Por qué ha habido muy poco la inflación hasta el momento? ¿Cómo vamos a posiblemente pagar todas estas deudas?

Y, por supuesto, tal vez la pregunta más importante de todas: ¿Por qué no tiene nada “malo” que pasó después de nuestro gobierno imprime más de $ 4000 mil millones de nuevos dólares de la nada y pidió prestado $ 9400 mil millones más?

Bueno, como alguien que ha estado investigando de cerca esta situación desde hace años, que ha construido un negocio de $ 100 millones para la capitalización de experiencia en finanzas y contabilidad … Yo estoy aquí para decir con 100% de certeza:

Estados Unidos está en para algunos cambios importantes en nuestra economía, nuestro país y nuestro modo de vida en los próximos cinco años.

La forma en que vive, trabajo, viajes, retírese, invertir … todo va a cambiar. Parte de ella en formas la mayoría de la gente nunca esperaría.

En algún momento de los próximos años, vamos a experimentar una “nueva” crisis de proporciones épicas.

Vamos a tener una importante caída de la bolsa – y será peor que la que experimentamos hace siete años.

Vamos a tener una crisis monetaria también – porque los inversionistas y gobiernos de todo el mundo se dará cuenta de que el dólar estadounidense no es el refugio seguro que era antes.

Antes de lo que mucha gente piensa, ya veremos el dólar perder su estatus de “moneda de reserva”, y esto hará que sea mucho más difícil para nuestro gobierno a pedir dinero prestado, y tenemos nuestro ejército estacionado en más de 150 países.

Como mi amigo James Rickards (quien es un abogado financiero y consultor para el gobierno de Estados Unidos) escribió en sus guerras libro Moneda:

“Si la moneda se derrumba, todo lo demás va con él … acciones, bonos, commodities, derivados y demás inversiones están un precio en la moneda de una nación. Si destruyes la moneda, se destruyen todos los mercados y de la nación.”

 

Vamos a tener grandes cambios a nuestro sistema de jubilación y de la Seguridad Social. Somos propensos a ver enormes aumentos de impuestos e incluso un “impuesto sobre el patrimonio”, que cobra una cuota en todos sus ahorros y activos de valor.

Vamos a ver todo tipo de nuevas leyes y normas sobre lo que puede hacer con su dinero, al igual que la Cámara de Representantes proyecto de ley HR 2847, que entró en vigor el 1 de julio de 2014. Esta ley hace que sea extremadamente difícil, si no imposible , para el americano medio para conseguir un poco de su dinero de dólares y en monedas más estables a través de los bancos extranjeros. En los meses y años por venir vamos a ver más y más de estos “controles de capital” colocados en nuestros ahorros personales … que vamos a tener una inflación masiva – cuando los billones y billones de dólares recién impresos empiezan haciendo su camino en la economía.

También vamos a testigos de cambios importantes en la estructura misma de nuestra sociedad. Destruir el dinero de una naciones de este modo destruye negocios, amistades y familias, que simplemente no entienden y no están preparados para lo que va a suceder.

Créeme, no me tomo estas predicciones ligeramente – y no tengo ningún interés en tratar de asustar.

Simplemente estoy siguiendo mi investigación hasta su conclusión lógica.

Yo hice lo mismo cuando yo era uno de los primeros analistas para predecir con precisión el colapso de los mayores bancos hipotecarios del mundo – Fannie Mae y Freddie Mac.

Yo hice lo mismo cuando yo cavé en las finanzas de GM y me di cuenta de este otrora gran institución norteamericana pronto ir a la quiebra también. Yo hice lo mismo Inmuebles Crecimiento General (el mayor propietario de la propiedad comercial en América).

La primera vez que presenté mi caso y expuesto los hechos acerca de estas instituciones en conferencias económicas, la gente se enoja.

No podían refutar mi investigación … pero no estaban dispuestos a aceptar la enormidad de las conclusiones tampoco.

Y ahora, los mismos problemas financieros que he estado siguiendo de banco a banco … y de empresa a empresa en la última década han encontrado su camino en el Tesoro de Estados Unidos.

La siguiente fase de esta crisis va a poner en peligro nuestra propia forma de vida.

Los ahorros de millones serán eliminados. Este desastre cambiará su negocio y su trabajo. Va a afectar dramáticamente su cuenta de ahorros, las inversiones y la jubilación.

Se va a cambiar todo acerca de su forma normal de vida: ¿Dónde usted las vacaciones … donde usted envía a sus hijos o nietos a la escuela … cómo y dónde usted hace compras … la manera de proteger a su familia y el hogar.

Mira …

Sé que mucha gente ve el mercado de valores se recuperó, el repunte de los precios de bienes raíces, y quieren creer que todo es “volver a la normalidad.”

Pero te prometo, nada es “normal” lo que está pasando en América hoy. Todo es humo y espejos – el resultado de un experimento fuera de control gubernamental con nuestra oferta de dinero.

Después de todo, ¿cómo puede ser “normal” cuando …

* Aproximadamente el 75% de los estadounidenses están viviendo de cheque a cheque, con esencialmente cero ahorros, según un estudio reciente realizado por Bankrate.

* La “tasa de actividad” (básicamente, el porcentaje de personas sin discapacidad que realmente están trabajando) ha caído cada año desde 2007 y se encuentra en su nivel más bajo desde la década de 1970. (Fuente: La Oficina de Estadísticas Laborales de EE.UU.)

* ¿Cómo pueden las cosas ser realmente “normal” en Estados Unidos, cuando el número de personas en cupones de alimentos se ha duplicado, básicamente, desde que Barack Obama asumió el cargo … y cuando la mitad de todos los niños nacidos hoy estará en cupones de alimentos en algún momento de su vida ?

Sí, leyó usted bien: Aproximadamente el 50% de todos los niños nacidos en Estados Unidos hoy estará en cupones de alimentos en algún momento de su vida. ¿Le suena “normal” para usted?

* Puede nuestro país realmente estar de vuelta a la “normalidad”, cuando, según las cifras más recientes de la Oficina del Censo, un increíble 49% de los estadounidenses están recibiendo beneficios de al menos un programa de gobierno cada mes?

* O cuando el 52% de todos los trabajadores estadounidenses ganan menos de 30.000 dólares al año?

* Puede que las cosas sean realmente “normal” en Estados Unidos cuando en un punto, un solo organismo controlado por el gobierno de Estados Unidos (la Reserva Federal) estaba comprando hasta el 70% de los bonos emitidos por el Tesoro de Estados Unidos – simplemente creando dinero de la nada ?

* O cuando el “demasiado grandes para fracasar-bancos” que consiguió rescatados en 2007 en realidad son 37% más grandes de lo que eran en aquel entonces?

* ¿Y cómo pueden las cosas ser normal cuando la oferta monetaria de nuestro país se ha incrementado en un 400% desde 2006 – todos sólo impresa de la nada. Mira este cuadro a continuación … debe asustar a la mierda de ustedes …

Esto demuestra que lo que ha ocurrido en los últimos años con el dólar es algo directamente de la Alemania de Weimar … o los últimos 20 años en Zimbabwe.

http://files.stansberryresearch.com/images/Chart1.png

Como he dicho, nadie puede decir cuándo exactamente la próxima crisis está por venir. No yo … nadie más. Pero te aseguro que lo que está pasando hoy en día seguro que no es “normal”.

Y está garantizado para terminar en un desastre.

Es por ello que recientemente he creado un Plan de 300 páginas, que detalla los pasos exactos que estoy tomando para prepararse para esta crisis inevitable. Le recomiendo a usted a tomar estos sencillos pasos también.

 

 

 

Liberal Trophy Girl Amy Schumer Forced To Apologize… To Liberals

Liberals always need something to complain about…

Steven Crowder 

Liberals invariably eat their own if they choose to not follow lockstep, and they are doing that with Amy Schumer, who is the new “it girl” in comedy, movies, whatever.

Listen, I’m not a Schumer fan from a comedic standpoint. But professionally she deserves respect; and I certainly don’t think she’s a bigot of any kind.

Advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Yet, because liberals always need something to complain about, there is “debate” on the left as to whether or not she should get a pass from the outrage police. Some say that it’s ok that she makes “racist” jokes because she’s a feminist, while others attack the very notion that she is a feminist because there are apparently rules and guidelines to follow. Then you have her “blind spot” on race. A recent article from The Guardian states:

For such a keen observer of social norms and an effective satirist of the ways gender is complicated by them, Schumer has a shockingly large blind spot around race. Her lacklustre stint hosting the MTV Movie awards (a rare misstep) featured lazy jokes about Latina women being “crazy” that left Jennifer Lopez as unimpressed as the online commentariat. While a much-lauded sketch from the show featured an ad for a training centre where old people learn not to be racist, Schumer’s stand-up repeatedly delves into racial territory tactlessly and with no apparent larger point. Her standup special features jokes like “Nothing works 100% of the time, except Mexicans” and much of her character’s dumb slut persona is predicated on the fact that the men she sleeps with are people of colour. “I used to date Latino guys,” she says in an older stand-up routine. “Now I prefer consensual.”

This led to her defending herself on Twitter, as well as a defense from a guy who calls himself the “Dean of Comedy” on Twitter, even though he’s not funny so much as a liberal activist. Still, it’s not enough for liberals. A Washington Post article says:

Advertisement

TRENDING STORIES

And there’s generally a common refrain in how these jokes are justified: the individual telling them can’t possibly be capable of racism because she’s dating or has dated men of color. The declaration serves as both inoculation against charges of racism, or so the thinking goes, but also as an assertion of agency, which is perhaps why Handler spent so much real estate in her book “Uganda Be Kidding Me” discussing her black former boyfriend “Tyrone” and how she relished her father’s obvious discomfort when she brought him home.

Isn’t it easier just to laugh?

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

 

Translate Google into English.

“EMO” Yesterday I send to you a proposition which I wish to respond with Your opinions:

For 27 years I live in this county of Miami since I came from prisons in Cuba without exception politicians: they have allegedly been elected to any office, to solve the tremendous problems of misappropriation of public funds, they have frustrated the aspirations most citizens. I can present thousands of blatant examples: “The Marlins Stadium, the tunnel port, transport, continuous and abusive nerve to the Highway Authority ghost of Miami, problems with the police, steadily increasing taxes on anything, etc etc, etc. I think we are the county pays more expensive gasoline. All politicians have disappointed the hopes of the citizens.

All political WITHOUT EXCEPTION made fun of voters, no matter whether they are commissioned, or whatever MAYORS HAVE ALL ABOUT RESULTS Vaquetas.

I WANT TO STOP THIS ease and CHANGE THINGS TO DO WHAT IS CITIZENS WANT. We’ll fix all that we have to fix, starting with “eliminating MXDX” “The penny through PENELAS” and all the other crap that many have been made.

I think I’m the best person I can be found to solve these problems. In prison in Cuba I learned to fight even if not win, which here have the chance to win.

I propose to elect me as Mayor of Miami in the 2016 elections.

Everyone knows I’m a person “conservative and respectful of those who deserve it”

I offer to fix everything much as possible from my position as Mayor and I promise that anyone gets in the task of making a more functional and honest denounces county with evidence of their work against things better in Miami and improve substantially.

The only way we can do that is if you contact their friends or acquaintances and send the information I send them to you and in turn they also send them to their friends. And they send me all your criteria to me to base the work on what voters think are necessary fix first. That way we can establish a communications network on what is what voters want solved and how.

It is time that voters are truly the ones to decide what the priorities are. If the mayors and commissioners do not represent the needs of citizens such politicians should not be the ones who make the decisions and squander our money on junk that only benefits them.

For starters I can post a summary of all the things that have worked more in the county and what is the way that you think should be done.

As many of you know, I am not a rich person, since I retired and I do not have money to pay political campaign. So I think “If I receive directly their opinion of what you wont here on my desire to run for mayor”

Recolectare no money, I do not postulare on the ballot of candidates (Because I do not have available the nearly thousand dollars you pay to be an official candidate) I will be a candidate on the ballot blank. What is that? It is a space provided on the ballot after all the names of the candidates in which you can type the name of the person that you think should be elected mayor. Although not an official candidate.

If I get from you a good response, quality and quantity as well start from the campaign.

I ask that you send me a list of all the things you think are wrong and send me a list of how you can solve all the disasters that we have in the county.

Send me your opinion on my candidacy for Mayor in 2016 and suggestions for solving the problems are many and difficult to solve, but together we can do. Please send your comments and suggestions and this idea is not good the number of people who do not participate will be the index I’m not the right person to get out of this dunghill.

This is a very important task and we have over a year to do that we can do.

I remember when we present the RECALL against Mayor Carlos Alvares, with very few economic resources and we were short by 3,600 ballots to remove it in an election. Then came Brahman and his super wallet and bag. But those who lit the fuse to remove it was us. That is what we do to these manganzones we sit in political positions to enrich themselves and to squeeze. And we can not afford.

A hug to all of you, good luck and God let us do what we want to make things better for all, my best wishes to all.

Lázaro González Miño R lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com possible “if you support me”

Mayor of Miami County.

Please send me your opinion on what you sent them in this appeal. Tell me what you believe, to express their views freely. I need to know what you all think about what I have expressed in this message.

Note: It says that if a friend took the rooster to the fence, we will never know if he can win … JMF.

 

 

 

 

Quintín George:

July 08, 2015
 
How Many Deported Violent Criminals Re-Enter the U.S. Each Year? 

Now can we move past “is Donald Trump xenophobic” and get to a real discussion about deported criminals coming back into the country, sanctuary cities, border security, and our lax policies on illegal immigrants?

Because it’s not just San Francisco…

[Francisco] Sanchez, an undocumented immigrant, has been deported several times to his native Mexico and Immigration and Customs Enforcement blamed the San Francisco police for not honoring an immigration detainer earlier in the year.

Sanchez has five previous convictions for re-entry after deportation, according to court records. He was on probation in Texas at the time of the shooting and served federal time for sneaking back into the country.

In an exclusive jailhouse interview, a KGO-TV reporter asked the alleged gunman, ‘Did you keep coming back to San Francisco because you knew that they wouldn’t actively look for you to deport you?’

Sanchez responded, ‘Yes.’

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had said in a statement that Sanchez was turned over to the San Francisco Police Department this past March on an outstanding drug warrant, and that the department requested that police notify Immigration and Customs Enforcement prior to his release so ICE officers could make arrangements to take custody.

…it’s Laredo, Texas

Court records show murder suspect Juan Francisco De Luna Vasquez — wasconvicted twice of entering the country illegally. [Emphasis added.]

Vasquez was arrested Thursday after police found the body of his wife in the 800 block of Lane Street.

He was caught by police after he fled the scene.

Police say he also had a prior record with charges of assault and terroristic threats against his wife in 2006.

They say Thursday’s suspected homicide is the third violent encounter reported between the couple.

… it’s in Washington state…

Family members suspect jealousy may have led to the gruesome slayings of an Othello teen and her 3-year-old son found shot and severely burned in a remote part of Franklin County.

Maria G. Cruiz-Calvillo, 18, and Luis F. Lopez-Cruz were identified Mondayas the bodies found last week inside a vehicle that was set on fire in a ravine near the intersection of Scootney and Ridge roads.

Luis likely was still alive when the car went up in flames, according to Dan Blasdel, Franklin County coroner.

Luis would have turned four years old on Thursday.

Prudencio Juan Fragos-Ramirez, 25, of Connell, reportedly had recently started dating Cruiz-Calvillo and is suspected of killing the pair.

Fragos-Ramirez was arrested hours into the investigation at his home less than a mile from where the bodies were found. He appeared Monday in Franklin County Superior Court, where Judge Carrie Runge set bail at $1 million.

Runge ordered Fragos-Ramirez, who has previous convictions for DUI and driving while suspended, held for up to 72 hours while prosecutors determine what charges to file. Prosecutors say Fragos-Ramirez was deported in 2014 and got back into the country illegally. [Emphasis added.]

… and it’s Arizona:

A woman with two children was driving a 2002 Oldsmobile Bravado west on Papago near the intersection of Amarillo Valley Road around 2 p.m. Saturdaywhen it collided with an eastbound 2003 Ford Explorer driven by Manuel Perez-Vasquez.

Perez-Vasquez reportedly fled the scene with at least one passenger from the Explorer but later returned.

Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu said Perez-Vasquez had been deported to Mexico six times since May 5, 2012. [Emphasis added.]

A 5-year-old boy in the Oldsmobile received a significant laceration to the head, according to PCSO. He was transported to a hospital by air ambulance, and an injured 2-year-old girl was transported by ambulance.

Detectives from the PCSO Vehicular Crimes Unit determined Perez-Vasquez traveled left of center, causing the collision. Perez-Vasquez allegedly showed signs of drug impairment and was placed under arrest on suspicion of driving while impaired by drugs and leaving the scene of an injury collision, a felony. He allegedly confessed to smoking marijuana before the collision.

Besides their obvious political leanings, the national media likes personality stories and binary issues — e.g., “Edward Snowden, hero or traitor?” Thus, the immigration discussion in the 2016 race has so far been limited to, “Is Donald Trump racist? Will his statements hurt the Republicans?” etc. Major news outlets have yet to take an actual look at the tougher questions — how many violent criminals come across our border? Do federal and local authorities communicate effectively on life-and-death issues? What’s the point of a deportation policy if they keep coming back? Have sanctuary cities created a safe haven for violent criminals, and if so, doesn’t that mean those policies have to stop?

Who’s Getting Hurt by the Trump Surge?

Is Donald Trump taking supporters away from Ted Cruz? I report, you decide:

Trump jumped from 3 percent at the end of May to 12 percent at the end of June in CNN’s national poll, putting himself in second place. In those same two surveys, Cruz dropped from 8 percent to 3 percent. Marco Rubio dropped from 14 percent to 6 percent, and Scott Walker dropped from 10 percent to 6 percent.

In Fox News’s national poll, Trump leapt from 4 percent to 11 percent in a three-week stretch in June. Meanwhile, Cruz dropped from 8 percent to 4 percent; Rubio gained a point, and Walker dropped from 12 percent to 9 percent.

“Oh, silly Jim, national polls mean nothing at this point!” Okay then, look at Iowa.Quinnipiac finds Trump at 10 percent among Iowa caucus-goers; he wasn’t even listed as an option in that group’s May survey. In that time, Cruz dropped from 12 percent to 9 percent. Mike Huckabee dropped from 11 percent to 5 percent; Rubio dropped from 13 percent to 7 percent.

In New Hampshire, CNN’s latest poll puts Trump at 11 percent — again, good enough for second place. Ted Cruz is at 3 percent in that survey. That was the first time CNN polled the Granite State since last September, when they didn’t even bother to ask about Trump. They did ask about Cruz then, and they pegged his support at 6 percent.

The newest Gravis Marketing poll in New Hampshire puts Trump at 12 percent, good enough for what the pollster calls “top-tier status” in the crowded field. Cruz is at 4 percent. The previous Gravis poll in the state in April didn’t list Trump as a candidate…and it had Cruz at 10 percent.

(It’s difficult to measure Trump’s effect in South Carolina, because no one has polled the state since early June.)

Hillary’s CNN Interview Was Terrible… But Will It Matter?

Politico’s Dylan Byers:

The first national interview of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign did not go well. She dodged questions about Bernie Sanders’ appeal, refused to say whether she would seek to raise taxes, dismissed data showing that the majority of Americans’ don’t trust her, and was repeatedly forced to defend her lack of transparency at both the State Department and the Clinton Foundation.

‘I didn’t hear a more open or transparent Hillary Clinton,’ Keilar said after her interview. ‘I heard her not engaging on the issue of Bernie Sanders. He’s a self-described Democratic socialist. I asked her why is he garnering this support, this enthusiasm, that you don’t seem to among Democrats. She wouldn’t engage on that. Even on this concern of if she were to face off against Jeb Bush, and there would be this dynastic race between a Bush and a Clinton… she wouldn’t engage on that. She was very quick to move on.’

I thought CNN’s Brianna Keilar was not great but not as bad as some feared she’d be. It’s not that Keilar didn’t ask about important topics or press Hillary on uncomfortable issues; it’s that she rarely if ever had tough follow-ups after Hillary’s substance-free, word-salad filibustering.

A couple of times Hillary just flat-out lied, and it would have been nice if Keilar had called her out on it immediately.

“You said they did the same thing. That they used a personal server and while facing a subpoena deleted emails from them?”

“You know, you’re starting with so many assumptions. I’ve never had a subpoena. There’s nothing, again. Let’s take a deep breath here. Everything I did was permitted by law and regulation.” [Emphasis added.]

Here’s the statement from Representative Trey Gowdy’s committee, back on March 4:

“The Select Committee on Benghazi today issued subpoenas for all communications of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton related to Libya and to the State Department for other individuals who have information pertinent to the investigation. The Committee also has issued preservation letters to internet firms informing them of their legal obligation to protect all relevant documents.”

Maybe I have the soft bigotry of low expectations. Then again, the first questioner at Hillary’s press conference about her server asked, ‘If you were a man, today, would all of this fuss being made be made?” So we’ve seen much, much worse from reporters questioning Hillary Clinton.

The Boss was less impressed.

ADDENDA: Darin LaHood won the GOP primary last night, pretty decisively.

Space is limited for the National Review/Google “Power Women” event, so RSVP soon (nro@nationalreview.com). I’m told they’re look forward to a lively discussion and debate. Cameras and press are welcome, but must be credentialed.

 

 

 

 

“EMO” Ayer les envie una proposición que deseo me respondan con su opinión:

Desde hace 27 años que vivo en este condado de Miami desde que vine de las cárceles de Cuba y sin excepción los políticos que: Supuestamente han sido electos para cualquier cargo, para resolver los tremendos problemas de malversación de los fondos públicos, han frustrado las aspiraciones de la mayoría los ciudadanos. Puedo presentar miles de ejemplos descarados:  “El Estadio de los Marlins, El tunnel de puerto, El transporte, el descaro continuado y abusivo de la fantasma Autoridad de Carreteras de Miami, Problemas con la policía, aumento constante de impuestos en cualquier cosa, etc, etc, etc. Creo que somos el condado que más cara paga la gasolina. TODOS LOS POLITICOS HAN DEFRAUDADO LAS ESPERANZAS DE LOS CIUDADANOS.

TODOS LOS POLITICOS SIN EXCEPCIÓN SE HAN BURLADO DE LOS VOTANTES, NO IMPORTA SI SON COMISIONADOS, ALCALDES O LO QUE SEA TODOS HAN RESULTADOS UNOS VAQUETAS.

YO QUIERO DETENER ESTE DESPARPAJO Y CAMBIAR LAS COSAS PARA QUE SE HAGA LO QUE DESEAN LOS CIUDADANOS. Vamos a arreglar todos lo que debemos arreglar, empezando “eliminando al MXDX” “El medio centavo de Pénelas” y a todas las otras muchas porquerías que se han hecho.

Yo creo que soy la persona mejor que se pueden encontrar para resolver estos problemas. En la cárcel en Cuba aprendí a pelear aunque fuera imposible ganar, cosa que aquí si tenemos la posibilidad de ganar.

Yo les propongo que me elijan como Alcalde del Condado de Miami en las elecciones del 2016.

Todos saben que soy una persona “conservadora y respetuosa de las personas que lo merecen”

Yo les ofrezco arreglar todo lo más que se pueda desde mi posición como alcalde y le prometo que cualquier persona se interponga en la tarea de hacer un condado más funcional y honesto lo denunciare con pruebas de su trabajo en contra de que las cosas mejoren en Miami y que mejoren sustancialmente.

De la única forma que podemos hacerlo es si ustedes contactan a sus amigos o conocidos y le envían las informaciones que yo les envíe a ustedes y a su vez ellos también se las envíen a sus amigos. Y todos me envían sus criterios a mí para basar el trabajo sobre lo que consideran los votantes que son necesarios arreglar primero. De esa forma podemos establecer una red de comunicaciones sobre qué es lo que los votantes quieren resolver y cómo.

Llego el momento en que sean verdaderos los votantes los que decidan cuales son las prioridades. Si los Alcaldes y comisionados no representan las necesidades de los ciudadanos esos políticos no deben ser los que tomen las decisiones y despilfarren nuestro dinero en basura que solo los beneficia a ellos.

Para empezar me pueden enviar un resumen de todas las cosas que han funcionado más en el condado y cuál es la forma que ustedes creen se deben hacer.

Como muchos de ustedes saben, no soy una persona rica, ya me he retirado y no dispongo dinero para pagar campaña política. Por lo tanto pienso “Si recibo directamente su opinión de lo que aquí le planteo, sobre mi deseo de postularme para alcalde”

No recolectare dinero, No me postulare en la boleta de candidatos (Porque no tengo disponible los casi mil pesos que hay que pagar para ser un candidato oficial) Seré un candidato en  la boleta en blanco. ¿Qué es eso? Es un espacio que se deja en la boleta después de todos los nombre de los candidatos en el cual usted puede escribir el nombre de la persona que usted considera debe ser el alcalde electo. Aunque no sea un candidato oficial.

Si yo recibo de ustedes una buena respuesta, en calidad y cantidad pues empezaremos desde ya la campaña.

Les pido que me envíen una relación de todas las cosas que ustedes creen que están MAL y envíenme también una relación de cómo se pueden resolver todos los desastres que tenemos en el condado.

Envíenme su opinión sobre mi postulación de Alcalde para el 2016 y sus sugerencias para resolver los problemas que son muchos y muy difíciles de resolver pero juntos lo podemos hacer.  Por favor envíenme sus opiniones y sugerencias y esta idea no es buena la cantidad de personas que no participen será el índice que no soy la persona indicada para salir de este muladar.

Esta es una tarea muy importante y tenemos más de un año para hacer que podamos hacerlo.

Me recuerdo de cuando presentamos el RECALL Contra el Alcalde Carlos Alvares, con poquísimos recursos económicos y nos quedamos cortos por 3600 boletas para sacarlo en una elección. Después vino Brahman y con su super billetera y lo saco. Pero los que encendimos la mecha para sacarlo fuimos nosotros. Eso se lo podemos hacer a estos manganzones que tenemos sentados en las posiciones políticas para enriquecerse y exprimirnos. Y no lo podemos permitir.

Un abrazo a todos ustedes, muy buena suerte y que DIOS nos deje hacer lo que deseamos para que las cosas mejoren para todos, mis mejores deseos a todos.   

Lázaro R González Miño lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com Posible “si ustedes me apoyan”

Alcalde del Condado Miami.

Por favor envíenme su opinión sobre lo que les envió en esta exhortación. Díganme lo que crea, expresen su opinión libremente. Yo necesito saber qué es lo que todos ustedes piensan sobre lo que les he expresado en este mensaje.

Nota: Dice un amigo que si no llevamos el gallo a la valla, no sabremos nunca si puede ganar…  JMF.

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

“En mi opinión”

Blooger:  https://www.blogger.com/home

https://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s