HPIM0049

No 951 “En mi opinión” Mayo 17, 2015

No 951   “En mi opinión”  Mayo 17, 2015

“IN GOD WE TRUST” LAZARO R GONZALEZ MIñO EDITOR

Los Liberales son como los bebes.

No pueden hacer nada por sí mismos.

No puedes identificar los machitos

de las hembritas.

Cuando hablan de CAMBIOS es porque están llenos de MIERDA.

AMENPER: Cómo ser un buen Liberal políticamente correcto

  1. Tienes que creer que el virus del SIDA se propaga por la falta de fondos federales.
  2. tienes que creer que el mismo profesor que no puede enseñar a un niño de 4to grado a leer está calificado para enseñar a esos mismos niños acerca del sexo.
  3. tienes que creer que las armas, en manos de los estadounidenses respetuosos de la ley, son una amenaza pero que la tecnología de armas nucleares en manos de Irán no es muy importante.
  4. tienes que creer que las temperaturas globales están que menos afectadas por los cambios cíclicos, documentados en clima de la tierra y más afectadas por yuppies que tienen carros grandes.
  5. tienes que creer que los roles de género son artificiales pero ser homosexual es natural.
  6. tienes que estar en contra de la pena capital pero apoyar el aborto.
  7. tienes que creer que las empresas crean opresión y los gobiernos crean prosperidad.
  8. tienes que creer que los cazadores no se preocupan por naturaleza, pero los activistas que destruyen las ciudades sí.
  9. tienes que creer que los programas de beneficio son mejor para la autoestima  y  más importante que la persona haga algo por sí mismo para ganarse la vida.
  10. tienes que creer que las fuerzas armadas, no políticos, inician las guerras.
  11. tienes que creer que la NRA es mala, porque apoya ciertas partes de la Constitución, mientras que la ACLU es buena, aunque es incompatible con ciertas partes de la Constitución.
  12. tienes que creer que los impuestos son muy bajos, pero tasas de ATM son demasiado altas.
  13. tienes que creer que Karl Marx y Vladimir Lenin son más importantes de la historia americana que Thomas Jefferson o Thomas Edison.
  14. tienes que creer que las pruebas estandarizadas para identificar al votante son racistas, pero no las cuotas raciales.
  15. tienes que creer que la razón única porque  el socialismo no  ha funcionado donde que se ha intentado  es porque la gente a cargo no lo ha sabido implantar.
  16. tienes que creer que deben protegerse constitucionalmente los desfiles gays y las escenas del pesebre en la Navidad deberían ser ilegales.
  17. tienes que creer que abogados litigantes son héroes desinteresados y los médicos están sobre pagados.
  18. tienes que creer que no había ningún arte antes de que se subvencionaran con fondos federales.
  19. tienes que creer que el libre mercado que nos da 500 + canales de televisión no puede ofrecer la calidad de los programas que hace PBS.
  20. tienes que creer que los conservadores son racistas, pero que los negros no podían hacerlo sin su ayuda por eso tienen que pagar más impuestos.

 

 

Exclusive: Mike Huckabee Tells Us His Favorite Chuck Norris Joke

Also says how much money it would take to get him to step into the ring with Norris.

Heather Laskin May 15, 2015 at 4:33pm

 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print

During a stop in Phoenix, Ariz., on his campaign trial, 2016 presidential contender Mike Huckabee sat down with Western Journalism’s Norvell Rose to discuss a variety of topics, including his friend and supporter Chuck Norris.

When asked what his best Chuck Norris joke is, Huckabee jovially answered, “Chuck Norris doesn’t ask you to vote for Mike Huckabee; he just tells you that you’re going to. And you will.”                                                                                                                                            Watch: Video Shows NYPD Officer Shooting Alleged Hammer Attacker

“What isn’t a joke,” he continued, “is the love this man has for America. I’ve never seen anybody who is so real, so authentic… This man loves God, he loves his country, he loves those who serve us in uniform…he’s just one of the most remarkable, humble human beings ever.”

Huckabee did quip, though, that while he will tell jokes that include Norris, he would never tell a joke about him, because “He’d take my head off!”

Keeping things light, Rose mentioned the charity fight former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney announced he will have with Evander Holyfield Friday, asking Huckabee whether he would step into the ring with Norris.

 

 

House Won’t Allow ‘Dreamers’ To Enlist In Military

The lower chamber voted 221 to 202.

James Beattie May 15, 2015 at 5:18pm

 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print

The House rejected a provision Thursday that would have allowed illegal immigrant “Dreamers” to enlist in the military.

The lower chamber voted 221 to 202 to not add the Dreamer language in a comprehensive defense spending bill. All of the ‘no’ votes came from the GOP, though 20 Republicans crossed the aisle to vote for the measure, The Washington Times reported.

RELATED STORIES

“It makes no sense to me that, at the same time the Army is downsizing and issuing pink slips to American soldiers serving in Afghanistan, there are Congressmen who seek to help illegal aliens deprive American citizens and lawful immigrants of military service opportunities,” Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., said in astatement after the vote. Brooks led the charge against against the language:

I’m pleased the House chose to stand up for American citizens and protect the Constitutional duty of Congress to set immigration law.

Today’s vote was the fourth rejection of the President’s unconstitutional DACA program, with Republicans overwhelmingly standing up for the will of the American people and the citizens and lawful immigrants who want to serve our country.

TRENDING STORIES

The language was presented by Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., a former Marine who served in Iraq. While he acknowledged the measure had little chance of clearing the Republican-controlled House, he attacked his opponents in a press release Thursday:

DREAMers are talented and patriotic; they are Americans in every way except on paper, and our country would benefit from having them as part of our Armed Forces.

The strength of our military isn’t just measured by the size of our arsenal or by the sophistication of our weapons but by the quality of our people. I would have been proud to serve beside these young men and women.

“This is yet another example of an anti-immigrant attitude on the part of House Republicans,” said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi,” D-Calif. The $612 billion defense bill was approved 269 to 151 Friday. The Hillbreaks down the details of the bill:

The bill keeps ceilings on defense spending in place under the 2011 budget deal that introduced sequestration spending limits, but would increase funding to the Pentagon’s war fund.

The legislation authorizes roughly $523 billion in base Defense Department spending. Another $90 billion is included in the war fund, formally known as the Overseas Contingency Operations fund.

It includes $38 billion more for the war fund than had been requested by the White House. The extra spending is not offset by spending cuts or tax hikes.

The White House also opposes language in the bill meant to prevent the closing of Guantanamo Bay.

Do you support Mo Brooks? Share your thoughts in the comments section.

 

 

THE GIRL WHO DESTROYED ACORN: Says She Has Scandalous Videos Of TX LAWMAKERS

Written by Doug Giles on May 17, 2015

Summer is usually a relaxing time for family vacations, a little rest and relaxation, a time to recharge one’s “batteries”, hang out with the kiddos and to get in some light summer beach reading.

Ahhh … summer. Pass me an ice cold Corona, por favor.

This summer, however, could be the beginning of the end for several Texas politicos who’ve been doing creepy crap when they were supposed to have been representing the Texans who trusted them and put their haggard backsides into office.

For those of you who don’t follow closely Texas politics, a forthcoming scandal is brewing based upon claims of The American Phoenix Foundation, headed up by ACORN nut-crusher Hannah Giles and her husband Joseph Basel.

Giles and Basel claim to have amassed over 800 hours of damning undercover videos, of both Republican and Democratic Texas lawmakers and lobbyists, doing stuff that wouldn’t make their grandmas very happy.

The undercover op, according to Giles and Basel, is to expose rank hypocrisy, systemic corruption with the added cherry on the top of showcasing inappropriate relationships between Texas lawmakers and lobbyists. Boom.

In other words, it’s House Of Cards stuff, in real time, and on steroids — and the legislatures and lobbyists are already starting to sweat what is forthcoming.

One thing I’d like to underscore from the aforementioned is that it’s not just Democrats getting outed in their videos, it’s Republicans also.

Matter of fact, the impetus behind this undercover sting at the Texas State Capitol came via Hannah’s seeing some big time conservative dipsticks (whom we all know and regularly watch on Fox News bashing Obama) at parties in DC, after her ACORN fame, hanging out and making out with chicks other than their wives while they “championed the cause of conservative/family values.”

Yes, my friends, this will be a bi-partisan ass whuppin’.

Grab some popcorn and a Coke because this is going be a good house cleaning.

It’ll be especially delicious for those of us who’re sick of business as usual while our nation is being screwed by folks who have sworn to represent our interests, and not their desire to “get laid and get paid”.

Which brings me to this point about this forthcoming expose for those of us of a conservative persuasion: Maybe, the reason we continue to scratch our head regarding why the Right so often sides with the Left on policy issues is maybe… just maybe… our rep’s are blackmailable based upon all the booty they’re tappin’ other than their wives? Who knows? We shall see..

Finally, my advice to the Texas Corrupt-O-Crats who’ve been ridin’ dirty on the Texas taxpayers’ dime is: You’d better get your house in order because it’s about to collapse … as in big time.

 

 

Fernando: US Intelligence Officer: “Every Single Terrorist Attack In US Was A False Flag Attack”

May 15, 2015 by Arjun Walia.

Apart from documents that have outlined supposed terrorist threats, like Al-Qaeda, and their connection to US intelligence agencies, like the CIA, there are a number of whistleblowers that have come out adding more fuel to the fire. Because not many are even aware of these documents, letting people know about a truth that can be hard for people to accept, let alone ponder the possibility is very important. It’s just one aspect of the veil that’s been blinding the masses for quite some time now.

 

The latest whistleblower is David Steele, a 20-year Marine Corps intelligence officer, and the second-highest-ranking civilian in the U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence. He is a former CIA clandestine services case officer, and this is what he had to say:

 

“Most terrorists are false flag terrorists, or are created by our own security services. In the United States, every single terrorist incident we have had has been a false flag, or has been an informant pushed on by the FBI. In fact, we now have citizens taking out restraining orders against FBI informants that are trying to incite terrorism. We’ve become a lunatic asylum.”

What Is A “False Flag Attack?”

A great example of a false flag attack is 9/11, something that many people believe to be a creation of US intelligence agencies, or some entity above the government (one that controls what Eisenhower called “the military industrial complex”). The idea is that these so called terrorist attacks are created by this group, in order to justify the infiltration of other countries, and to justify a heightened state of “national security.” As a result, in the eyes of the citizenry, war and mass murder are justified, when the intentions behind these actions are something the citizenry has no idea about. This is why we see a false sense of patriotism programmed into many people, especially in the United States. Men and women join this massive military machine with good hearts, thinking that they are serving their country and fighting terrorism, when they are doing the complete opposite. They are only participating in a fabricated war based on lies and misinformation.

 

“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al-Qaeda, and any informed intelligence officer knows this. But, there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an intensified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive TV watchers to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the United States.” – Former British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook

 

Today, we might be seeing the same thing with ISIS. Although there are no verified documents like there are when it comes to Al-Qaeda, given what that information shows us, combined with Wikileaks documents and statements from insiders, we could be looking at the same thing.

Not long ago, FBI whistleblower stated that:

 

“The US is reviving terror scare with ISIS to promote the terror war industry.”

You can read more about that story here

Again, 9/11 is a great example and you can find out more information about that here

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/05/15/us-intelligence-officer-every-single-terrorist-attack-in-us-was-a-false-flag-attack/

 

 

Pepe Cancio: The next President?‏

The next President?

http://www.podblanc.guru/little-black-ghetto-bastards-of-baltimore_66722675c.html

 

 

 

Nestor Dan: The Wall Street Journal: Springtime for Dictators

WSJ: Springtime for Dictators

Posted: 13 May 2015 05:57 PM PDT

By Daniel Henninger in The Wall Street Journal:

Springtime for Dictators

Not everyone gets an hour-long audience with the pope, as Raúl Castro did this past Sunday at the Vatican. But Raúl Castro isn’t everyone. Raúl is the president of Cuba and the heir to his brother’s half-century-old Communist dictatorship. And right now, Raúl is hot.

Raúl Castro is taking meetings with everyone from President Barack Obama in Panama last month to Pope Francis in Rome last weekend. Then he returned to Havana for a meeting with President François Hollande of France, who flew in to see him and Fidel. How good can it get?

“President” Castro is in some sense an honorific title. When Raúl ran for president of Cuba for the first time in 2008, he was the only candidate. And while the Communist Party isn’t the only party in Cuba, the others can’t campaign, and political speech is forbidden. One might argue that the Castros’ Cuba is the model for how Vladimir Putin has reset the Russian political system.

A beaming, star-struck Mr. Hollande on Monday received a one-hour audience (there is no other word) with the 88-year-old Fidel. The French president said, “I had before me a man who made history.”

“Bienvenido!” said Pope Francis to Raúl Sunday when they met at the Vatican. “Welcome!” The Vatican press office didn’t release details of the meeting, other than to describe it as “very friendly.”

Photographs of the meeting between the president of Cuba’s inhabitants and the leader of the world’s Catholics suggest they hit it off, with both men aglow in smiles. In fact, Raúl seems to have thought he’d died and gone to heaven. Baptized into Marxism while in college, he announced he might rejoin the Catholic Church. But let Raúl explain his sudden reconversion:

“I read all the speeches of the pope, his commentaries, and if the pope continues this way, I will go back to praying and go back to the church. I’m not joking.” Who could doubt it?

When he says, “if the pope continues this way,” we assume the Cuban president is referring to Francis’ criticisms of capitalism, as when he wrote in 2013: “Some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world.” Francis described this theory as an “opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts.”

Raúl was so excited after his meeting with the pope Sunday that he said when Francis visits Cuba this September, “I promise to go to all his Masses.”

Let us return to earth.

For starters, we posit a hypothetical: Let us assume that instead of being the pope, Francis was just a guy in Cuba named Jorge Mario Bergoglio, living in Havana. If this guy no one had heard of summoned the courage to say something in public as harsh about Castro’s communist system as the pope did about capitalism, Raúl would do any number of things to Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

Raúl would have the Cuban police grab him off the street and drive him far outside Havana, where they would beat him up and abandon him. Or they would dump Jorge in prison, where he’d get beaten some more and better not get sick because medical treatment for political dissidents is hard to come by. Or a mob might show up to scream obscenities at him anytime he showed up in public.

Shaming, harassment and humiliation is what Raúl and Fidel have done to, among many others, theLadies in White, who are wives of jailed dissidents, and who march in Havana to—of all things—Sunday Mass. What they find on the way to Mass is not fellow communicant Raúl but his mobs or police, which routinely attack them.

We know this because Raúl’s brutal modus operandi for critics of Cuba’s system is described at length in reports by the U.S. State Department and Human Rights Watch. But the Castros’ celebrity status with international elites transcends anything they do, and so Cuba is a member of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights.

Sophisticated opinion holds that Barack Obama’s December “opening” to Cuba means the market and tourists will change the place—for example, Raúl’s release of 53 political prisoners. According to Hablemos Press, which operates inside Cuba, some of those 53 have been rearrested. Other post-“opening” dissidents have been beaten. How come? They tried to meet with an opposition group,Movement for a New Republic.

Last weekend German Chancellor Angela Merkel went to Russia to honor the Russian soldiers who died in World War II. But while in Moscow, Ms. Merkel, who grew up in East Germany, said directly to Vladimir Putin: “I would like also to recall that the end of World War II did not bring democracy and freedom for all of Europe.”

Would that one of these men of the world had the guts to say that to Fidel’s face in Havana.

 

 

FIRST AMENDMENT

The Left’s war on Fox women

By Kirsten Powers

 Published May 15, 2015 

 FoxNews.com

Facebook271 Twitter177 livefyre897 Email Print

One of the worst aspects of the illiberal left is its heinous sexism against women with whom they disagree.

Megyn Kelly, a former lawyer, is a serious and highly successful television journalist. When her contract was up for renewal in 2013, the New York Timesreported that both CNN and NBC wanted to hire her away from Fox, a strange thing to desire if Fox News is not a “legitimate” news outlet.

But to the illiberal left, Megyn Kelly is not a reporter or a commentator or a woman to be respected for her achievements. She is a Fox “babe” to be characterized by her looks.

The Huffington Post linked to a New York Times story about Kelly adding the headline, “Megyn Kelly, ‘Attractive-Looking Blond’ Anchorwoman, Leads the Pack at Fox News,” twisting a flattering quote from the story to make it seem as if the only positive attribute she possessed were her looks.

To the illiberal left, Megyn Kelly is not a reporter or a commentator or a woman to be respected for her achievements. She is a Fox “babe” to be characterized by her looks.

Over at the feminist website Jezebel, where they are all about being “pro-woman,” one writer said she liked Kelly the way she did “Ursula from the Little Mermaid,” adding that she “sort of” loved her despite Kelly being “largely a horrible, terrible person with many horrible, stupid thoughts and opinions.” This was the same “feminist” site that had previously described the prime-time host and former corporate litigator as a “Fox Newsbot.”

It is also a website that the illiberal left considers a “legitimate” news source, as there were no complaints when MSNBC hired former Salon.com columnist Irin Carmon, who also happened to be a former blogger for Jezebel, to be a national reporter to cover politics and women’s issues.

The outspoken liberal feminist and supporter of Democrats has a fellowship at Yale University on Reproductive Justice. (Imagine if Fox News hired a conservative “pro-life” blogger and gave her the title of national reporter and had her covering women’s issues.)

The website Capital New York ran a January 2015 profile on Carmon, in which they asked her, “Was it a tough adjustment going from opinionated blogging with a strong voice to reporting for cable news?” Carmon explained that, “Well, we get to do some opinionating and strong voice-ing on the air around here . . . but I’ve always seen myself as a reporter first. . . .”

At Fox News there is a sharp distinction between commentators and opinion hosts and reporters. In the media corners of the illiberal left, not so much.

Carmon explained that, “there’s so much more space now for reporting with a passionate point of view, which is where I see my own work, than there was even a few years ago when I was starting out.”

If Carmon is an example of a woman the illiberal left considers a legitimate journalist, Megyn Kelly is someone the illiberal left tries to delegitimize through the oldest sexist trick in the book—objectifying her as a woman. In 2010, the New Republic’s Jonathan Chait posted a screenshot of Kelly seemingly in mid-sentence under the headline, “The Quintessential Fox News Image.” He wrote: “Everything you need to know about Fox News is captured in this screenshot: the American flags, the fearmongering image in the upper-right corner, the blond anchor with a facial expression that somehow combines sneering with absolute terror.” Kelly wasn’t sneering or looking frightened, though she is blonde and is on Fox which to the illiberal left means she’s a nameless “blond anchor” and candidate for being objectified and dehumanized.

Liberal journalist Lee Siegel wrote for Men’s Journal explaining to liberal men what they were missing about “the blondes of Fox News.” He explained how fun it was to watch them, as “Fox women are studies in passive-aggressive revolt against their ideological masters.” These “masters” are white men who the “Fox women” secretly believe are “fools.” His article was headlined, “The Right, Hot, and Bothered Blondes of Fox News: One man’s guilty obsession with Megyn Kelly and the blondes of Fox News.” He explained his liberal brethren needed to appreciate that, “Most blonde anchors on Fox are dyed blondes,” and a woman who dyes her hair blonde has “on some level, subordinated her will to male desire.” But there’s more. The Fox News blonde “is also dangerous. She has another identity concealed by the one she submissively shares with you. Lurking within every Fox blonde is a CNN brunette.” He closed with, “Fox blondes hold out the promise of rational intelligence and sexual gratification—two precious and tragically incompatible human qualities. Of all the shameless lies Fox tells, that beautiful illusion may be the most potent.”

VH1.com ran a July feature, “Meet the Blondes of Fox News” featuring a picture of Megyn Kelly, Dana Perino, and Elisabeth Hasselbeck along with a photo gallery of a few of Fox’s female journalists. “If you thought Fox News Channel was just a boys club, think again,” VH1 exclaimed. (Who ever thought that?) They went on to explain that yes, Fox hires women, “but they’re not necessarily adding sensibility to Fox News’ reporting. We’re all for strong women in the newsroom, but we’re not sure if Fox News’ blondes fit that bill.” In particular, they explained that “Fox News’ blonde bombshells” such as Megyn Kelly “can’t be taken seriously” and included Greta Van Susteren, who holds a law degree from Georgetown and whose show “On the Record” has been top in its time slot for more than a decade, and Laura Ingraham, who holds a law degree from the University of Virginia, in their roundup of dumb blondes.

Allure, a women’s beauty magazine, ran a poem by one of their editors, David DeNicolo, under the headline “Fox News Anchors: Hot or Not? With its bevy of babes, the network should be called the Foxy News Channel.” DeNicolo rhymed about the legs and hair and “gleaming smiles” of Fox News anchors and then, “Sure, Rachel Maddow has the smarts, But can she work her giggly parts?”

Jonathan Chait at New York magazine wrote: “If you have never seen Fox News before, here is a four-minute clip that captures the essence of the network so perfectly that you need never watch anything on it again. It’s all here. At the center, you have an old conservative white guy who is enraged about a fact that exists only in his addled brain. At his side, there’s a blonde sidekick who nods along with him but doesn’t get in the way.” The alleged cipher and “blonde sidekick” was Monica Crowley, a conservative radio host who holds a Ph.D. from Columbia University in International Affairs.

So pervasive is the smear that all the female commentators and anchors on Fox are dumb blonde chicks that it was actually fact-checked by Politi-Fact. That’s not a joke. They analyzed the female hosts’ and anchors’ hair color and found the assertion “mostly false,” because Fox had its fair share of black-haired and brunette women.

What might have been more elevating was recognizing the achievements of Fox News’ female anchors, reporters, and commentators. Mentioning for instance that Gretchen Carlson is an Emmy Award–winning reporter who used to work for CBS, or that Kimberly Guilfoyle of “The Five” is a former assistant district attorney, or that Jeanine Pirro is a former judge and district attorney. But acknowledging the talent and achievements of the people who work at Fox News contradicts the illiberal left’s propaganda that Fox News is somehow illegitimate. It is only “illegitimate” because the illiberal left wants to silence dissent and seeks to do so not through besting its opponents in argument and debate but through the lowest form of scurrilous sexism or simple refusal to tolerate other points of view.

 

 

Mohammed Morsi, Muslim Brotherhood Leader, Sentenced to Death by Egyptian Court

Looks like Egypt is trying to clean their hands of the Muslim Brotherhood.

An Egyptian court sentenced ousted President Mohammed Morsi and more than 100 others to death Saturday over a mass prison break during the 2011 uprising that toppled Hosni Mubarak and later brought Islamists to power for the first time in Egypt.

As is customary in passing capital punishment, Judge Shaaban el-Shami referred his death sentence on Morsi and others to the nation’s top Muslim theologian, or mufti, for his nonbinding opinion. El-Shami set June 2 for the next hearing.

Morsi, Egypt’s first freely elected leader, was ousted by the military in July 2013 following days of mass street protests by Egyptians demanding that he be removed because of his divisive policies. Morsi’s successor, Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, was the military chief at the time and led the ouster. El-Sissi ran for president last year and won the vote in a landslide.

Also sentenced to death with Morsi in the prison break case were 105 defendants, most of them were tried and convicted in absentia. They include some 70 Palestinians. Those tried in absentia in Egypt receive automatic retrials once detained.

Supporters of Morsi and his now outlawed Muslim Brotherhood chanted “down, down with military rule” as el-Shami announced the verdict in the courtroom, a converted lecture hall in the national police academy in an eastern Cairo suburb.

Prosecutors have alleged in the case that armed members of the Palestinian Hamas group entered Egypt during the 18-day uprising through illegal tunnels running under Gaza’s border with Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula. Taking advantage of the uprising’s turmoil, the militants fought their way into several prisons, releasing Morsi, more than 30 other Brotherhood leaders, and some 20,000 inmates, prosecutors say. Several prison guards were killed and parts of the stormed prisons were damaged.

 

 

 

ISIS Leader: Islam Is A Religion Of War, Not A Religion Of Peace

Baghdadi’s whereabouts are unknown after reports of airstrikes by U.S.-led coalition forces.

James Beattie May 15, 2015 at 4:33pm

 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print

Image for representational purposes only.

The leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) recorded an audio message that asserted his faith was never a “religion of peace” but rather a “religion of war.”

RELATED STORIES

BBC News reported Thursday that the message from Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi encouraged Muslims to emigrate to the “caliphate” in the areas of Syria and Iraq. “A references to the Yemen conflict means it is recent,” the report said. The report also pointed out that the voice appeared to be the ISIS leader’s but could not be confirmed.

BasNews noted the message was translated into five different languages.

“And we call upon every Muslim in every place to perform hijrah (emigration) to the Islamic State or fight in his land wherever that may be,” Baghdadi said in the message. “Has the time not come for you to know that there is no might nor honour nor safety nor rights for you except in the shade of the Caliphate?”

TRENDING STORIES

“O Muslims, Islam was never for a day the religion of peace. Islam is the religion of war.”

So return to your lands, and remain in your homes, and seek shelter — after first seeking shelter with Allah — with your people in the Islamic State, for you will find therein, by Allah’s permission, a warm embrace and a safe refuge

“Their war is nothing but an attempt to prove themselves once again to their masters from amongst the Jews and Crusaders,” Baghdadi added. “It is nothing but a desperate attempt to turn the Muslims away from the Islamic State.”

I will not forget to mention the captives in the prisons of the apostate tyrants everywhere,

Baghdadi’s whereabouts are unknown after reports of airstrikes by U.S.-led coalition forces earlier this month, in which deputy ISIS leader Abu Alaa al-Afri was said to be killed.

“FREEDOM IS  NOT  FREE”

“En mi opinión”

Blooger:  https://www.blogger.com/home

https://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s