HPIM0049

No 917 “En mi opinion” Abril 2, 2015

No 917 “En mi opinión”  Abril 2, 2015

“IN GOD WE TRUST”    Lázaro R González Miño    EDITOR

Should Hillary Be Forced to Handover ALL of Her Emails?
Remember Benghazi!
Nearly three years after the 9/11 Benghazi Terror Attack, too many questions remain intentionally unanswered…  Many of these questions, if answered, could ‘blow the lid ‘on a massive Obama-Clinton cover-up of the highest order.
Doesn’t America — especailly the families of those who were abandoned to slaughter in Benghazi — deserve the truth about what really happened?
Shouldn’t SOMEONE be held accountable?
According to Hillary Rodham Clinton’s lawyer, she has wiped clean her email hard drive, [and with it all of the potentially incriminating documents].
But forensic experts also say that the emails, or parts of the messages, CAN be recovered.
SURVEY QUESTION: Should Hillary Be Forced to Immediately Turnover ALL Emails, including Her Personal Email Server?

Cast Your Vote By Clicking Here

Your participation in this important voter survey is 100% free.
However, if you would like to make a donation to help us to continue to KEEP the HEAT on CONGRESS, please click here.

Help Expose the Truth About Benghazi!

With your gift of ANY amount, we’d be happy to send to you one of our limited edition ‘Remember Benghazi’ bumperstickers. 
 Thank you for all that you’ve already done, and ‘Remember Benghazi!’

 

 

What’s next for the Hillary Clinton e-mail scandal?

Kevin Corke

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4143448493001/whats-next-for-the-hillary-clinton-e-mail-scandal/?#sp=show-clips

Aparentemente el contenido era tan explosivo y dañino para ellos que el NOM le ordeno a Hillary destruir toda esa informacion y dejarlo todo completamente limpio (haciendo un delete 7 veces a lo que ya estaba borrado para no dejar hueya alguna de lo que habia ahi) aun sabiendo que eso podria tener consecuencias tan graves como la carcel para ella.

 

AMENPER: Homosexualidad, Realidad y Fantasía

“Hasta principios de los setenta el establecimiento psiquiátrico de Estados Unidos clasificó la homosexualidad como una enfermedad mental, pero esa designación fue cambiada en medio del aumento de la actividad político y los esfuerzos por homosexuales de  ser vistos como individuos que ejercen distintas preferencias sexuales en vez de personas de conducta aberrante. (Enciclopedia Británica, Vol. 6, 31).”

¿Son los homosexuales aberrantes?, no es lo que yo crea, ni deje de creer, no me importa, no debo ni quiero meterme en la vida de los demás, pero la bulla que hacen va en contra de lo que ellos nos quieren decir.  Esto es, que es una preferencia sexual privada.  Si es algo privado ¿por qué la militancia y el interés de imponer un estilo de vida contrario a la mayoría? Esto no es algo aceptable en una sociedad.

Si van a los carnavales de Coconut Grove, lo que verán es lo contrario a los esfuerzos que dice la Enciclopedia Británica que los homosexuales no quieren ser considerados como personas con una conducta aberrante.

El evento de carnaval contó con azotes públicos, perforaciones en el cuerpo, sexo en público, sado-masoquismo y desnudez pública por los participantes del desfile.  Se vendían letreros para los carros que decían, “Dios se masturba” y comerciantes vendían collares de perro con pinchos y látigos de cuero (no para sus perros). Al margen de la feria pública, un hombre vestido como una monja católica estaba atado a una cruz con las nalgas expuestas, y los espectadores fueron invitados a azotarlo por la donación de dos dólares. ¿No es esta conducta aberrante?

Pero no se puede criticar, aparte de nuestro masivamente sobreexpuesto organizador comunitario, el término “homosexual”  ahora me obliga a tomar mi remoto igual de rápido para cambiar el canal.

Incluso ver una película de los tres chiflados es más satisfactorio que escuchar sobre el primer atleta masculino en un equipo deportivo, no que hizo una hazaña en el terreno, pero que salió del closet y se declaró homosexual.

La agenda homosexual ha generado un cuadro de diálogo (¿o es una diatriba de una sola nota, sin parar, apoyada incondicionalmente por los liberales?) que se ha convertido en tan penetrante e invasiva que es patentemente ofensivo.

Para cualquiera que esté en desacuerdo con el matrimonio del mismo sexo, o las personas de una fe religiosa que considera la homosexualidad como pecado y contra el orden natural, el instinto es retirarse de la sociedad y cerrar todas las comunicaciones con el mundo exterior. Si hacemos eso, sin embargo, nos podrán considerar aún más anti-progresivos.

Lo curioso es que las estimaciones más optimistas que he visto recientemente indican que el total de la población gay en Estados Unidos podría estar entre 3 y 4%- 

Si los canales de televisión viven de la audiencia, ¿por qué la mayoría tiene que sufrir que en cada programa tengamos que soportar la propaganda gay?

Es posible que la respuesta esté en que las artes creativas y los medios de comunicaciones, entretenimiento, teatro, actuación, etc. – tienden a tener una agenda liberal  y muchos gays trabajan en esos campos. Naturalmente me parece que los asuntos gays son importantes para ellos y funciona su camino en el tejido de comedias, dramas y noticias.

Lo están haciendo a un ritmo cada vez mayor y por supuesto, el estilo de vida es representado como normal y los personajes y las relaciones son afirmadas. Los que están en desacuerdo en la trama, se presentan como homofóbicos y racistas. Pero simplemente – ¿desde cuándo desacuerdo significa el odio y la discriminación?

Entonces, el ritmo desmedido de la propaganda provoca la irritación de muchos de nosotros, aunque en realidad pocos lo admiten.

 El mensaje persiste, es políticamente incorrecto para oponerse a la igualdad de la homosexualidad o el matrimonio homosexual.

Déjame ser sincero: como un cristiano, yo creo que la homosexualidad no está en el plan de Dios para la gente; conducta homosexual es un pecado, según la Biblia. Sin embargo, no estoy aquí para condenar a otros de sus propios pecados, bastante tengo con los míos-

Pero decir que Dios nos manda a amar a todas las personas, esto es un cliché-

Dios, ama al pecador pero odia el pecado no puede estar donde hay pecado- El acto homosexual como pecado es una descripción bastante apta y aceptada por todas las religiones, desde las más tradicionales hasta el Islam y los Mormones. 

Lo que los gays quieren, no es que los aceptemos a ellos, lo que quieren es que aceptemos el pecado como si no lo fuera.

Como una persona con una inclinación bastante lógica a mi proceso de pensamiento, dejando a un lado la creencia cristiana,  encuentro la homosexualidad a ser la antítesis de la orden natural de las cosas. Hombre y mujer existen para propagar la raza humana a través de una unión sexual; el matrimonio es la representación exterior, aceptable de ese pacto, ese compromiso entre un hombre y una mujer. Acoplamiento con otros de su mismo sexo para el placer de hacerlo es improductivo. Matrimonio no puede y no debe significar la Unión de un hombre con un hombre y una mujer a una mujer. Las palabras tienen significados y “matrimonio homosexual” es un ejercicio en la anarquía lingüística.

Pero ¿Sabes qué? Gente como yo, en desacuerdo con este tipo de comportamiento no va a impedir que otros puedan perseguir su estilo de vida; estoy firmemente en el campo de vive y deja vivir.

No creo que el gobierno debería sancionar las conductas homosexuales porque desafía la naturaleza, eso no es violar la ley, y por lo tanto, no debiera de ser de interés público para la mayoría de la gente.

Pero aquí está mi problema real: Estamos saturado de “todo gay, todo el tiempo”

Parece que todo lo que se oye cuando enciendes la noticia o ves en un horario estelar es los derechos gay, matrimonio gay, alguien notable “salir del closet,” y el nuevo milenio Gay. Ah, olvidé la última, el buen uso de la palabra “gay” se relaciona con un período de la historia americana.

De todos modos, el enfoque en la preferencia sexual como el aspecto determinante de la vida es el sello de la agenda homosexual. Cuanto más hablan de ello, lo más  de moda y más aceptable que esperan que se convierta.

Tengo noticias para ellos: aunque “La parodia del matrimonio homosexual” pronto será la ley de la tierra, quienes no estamos de acuerdo con este estilo de vida seguiremos aquí. y siempre seremos la mayoría, sin hacer bulla porque no tenemos que anunciar nuestra preferencia sexual.

Porque no percibimos nuestra sexualidad como cualquier tipo de una diferencia para bien o para mal.

Lo percibimos como un hecho de la vida.

Soy muy consciente de que personas homosexuales pudieran haberse lavado el cerebro para tener esa misma sensación, pero no veo donde esta afirmación se apoya en el orden natural.

Sé que hay actores gay, también estibadores, ejecutivos de TV, fontaneros y soldados y francamente, a mí realmente no me importa dónde o con quién se duermen, pero por favor deja de presumir de ello.

 

AMENPER: A Rising Tide lifts all Boats

If you know me, by now you know that I am a fervent advocate of the free market, and this is an understatement.

Adam Smith is my idol, I am a believer that the only way to improve the economy of a country is to move toward markets and away from government-managed economies. 

John F Kennedy once said “a rising tide lifts all boats”. This is a good aphorism commonly used to explain the free market economy. When there is a high tide all boats float better and navigate better in the bay.  The substantive aspect is that economic growth which raises the GDP of the entire economy will also raise the incomes of all of the individuals within the economy.

I don´t know how our president Barack Hussein Obama, arrived to the idea that “the market will take of everything is a simple theory, but the problem is it doesn´t work, it´s never worked”.

¿Is he blind, ignorant or his political ideology doesn´t allow him to see the facts?

 What doesn´t work is the government managing the economy, the free market works the way Adam Smith described, and works every time, everywhere.

Edward P. Lezear a former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers (2006-09), and a professor at Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business and a Hoover Institution fellow, wrote an article that appears in today´s journal.  He present us with the facts of how China, Vietnam and India, moving away from government-managed economies to free markets, have improved the standard of living of its worker.

There is always inequality in the free markets; there is always inequality in society. We are all created equals, but individual’s don´t develop with the same character and conduct and the consequences of the acts and responsibility of the individual creates a justified inequality in any society. 

But the fact is that even if inequality, as usual, has grown China, Vietnam and India is of minor consequence. What’s important is that the average citizen of these countries, once among the poorest in the world, has seen income rise substantially, and that is what Adam Smith called the “Wealth of the Nations”, the rising tide that helps all the boats to navigate in the waters of wealth accordingly to their efficiency. 

So the message of Lazear to Obama is ¿Want to reduce inequality? Consult China, Vietnam and India.

 

Want to Reduce Inequality? Consult China, Vietnam and India

In 1981, half of the developing world earned less than $1.25 daily. By 2011, the portion had dropped to 17%.

By EDWARD P. LAZEAR

March 31, 2015 7:29 p.m. ET

President Obama has called income inequality the “defining challenge of our time.” Many progressives blame the market economy and doubt John F. Kennedy’s view that “a rising tide lifts all boats.” In 2011 Mr. Obama chided those who believe “the market will take care of everything.” It’s a “simple theory,” he said. “It fits well on a bumper sticker. Here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It’s never worked.”

The president and those who side with him ignore two fundamental points. First, the past three decades have seen a dramatic improvement in the standard of living of the world’s poor, most notably in China and India. Second, there is little doubt that the cause for the improvement has been a move toward markets and away from government-managed economies.

There are two ways that inequality can be reduced. The rich can be made poorer or the poor can be made richer. While the most extreme redistributionists might prefer the former, most reasonable people—even in Communist China—prefer the latter. And judged this way, the world has done well.

Consider some facts: In 2013, the World Bank reported that the number of people world-wide living on less than $1.25 a day had decreased dramatically since the early 1980s. In 1981 half those in the developing world had income below this threshold. By 2011 only 17% lived on less than $1.25 a day. In China 84% fell below the level in 1981, a proportion that shrunk to 6% by 2011. In India the figure fell to 24% in 2011 from 66% in 1979.

The fact that inequality within India and China has grown is of minor consequence. What’s important is that the average citizen of these countries, once among the poorest in the world, has seen income rise substantially. Though China and India are the most striking examples because of their size, smaller developing countries have experienced similar changes. In 1993, Vietnam had 64% of its then nearly 70 million people in poverty. But by 2008, after implementing market-based reforms, and with a population of 85 million, the percentage of Vietnamese in poverty had fallen to 17%, according to the World Bank.

In China, reduction of state control began in the 1980s under Deng Xiaoping. These included domestic policies that replaced much of the centrally planned economy with market-based activity as well as opening China to international trade and foreign investment. Early reforms occurred in agriculture, where farmers were allowed to retain surpluses from their plots.

In 1986 China’s “Contract Responsibility System” was enacted, which allowed enterprises to retain profits above quota requirements. In the same year China established “the General Principles of Civil Law,” which provided the basic rules for a market economy. These included recognition of private-property ownership through shares that could be transferred, creditor rights that required the repayment of private debts, and intellectual-property protection that defined authorship and patents.

In 1979 China established a law for foreign joint ventures and in 1986 applied to rejoin the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. In 1988 the government began allowing large private firms to operate in the economy; even state-owned enterprises became autonomous entities, responsible for their own profits and losses. In that same year, according to the International Monetary Fund, 53% of retail sales in China occurred at market prices.

India undertook major reforms in the early 1990s after obtaining a bailout from the IMF, conditioned on economic liberalization, which included reductions in tariffs, deregulation and lower taxes. By 1996 the average tariff in India was 26%, down from 87% in 1990. Licensing requirements, which restrict entry and resource mobility, were eliminated in most industries.

In 1992 India liberalized capital markets and opened them to overseas investors. Reserve requirements, which were well above those for most developed countries, were reduced in the late 1990s and banks were given more flexibility in setting their own loan rates. The share of bank assets held by private banks grew to 17% in 1998 from 11% in 1992.

In Vietnam, collective farming ended in 1986 and control over state-owned facilities was loosened. In 1989 reforms liberalized all prices, including interest and foreign-exchange rates. The consequence has been a sharp reduction in poverty and impressive growth rates that, according to the World Bank, have averaged more than 6% over the past decade.

The improvement in the standard of living of the poor in China, India and elsewhere is a direct result of allowing markets to work. Still, these countries are very different from rich, developed countries and it might be argued that their lessons are not relevant for wealthier countries. Perhaps not, but there is no compelling evidence that the poorest citizens of rich countries fare better when there is more government control of the economy.

Does this mean that we should ignore inequality? Not at all. Equality of opportunity is a basic goal of every fair society, as is help for those who fall on hard times. But the bulk of those who have moved out of poverty in the recent past have done so because their governments have turned away from state control and toward markets, not the reverse

 

Noticias

Miami-Dade Expressway Authority anuncia Toll Freeze

(Fuente: CBS4)

Tags relacionados:

 Dolphin Expressway, Don Shula Expressway, Gratigny Parkway, Autoridad de Autopistas de Miami-Dade, peajes de Miami-Dade, Snapper Creek Expressway, Freeze peaje, carreteras de peaje

MIAMI (CBSMiami) – Buenas noticias para los conductores que usan las autopistas de Miami-Dade.

La Autoridad de Autopistas de Miami-Dade (MDX) ha anunciado una congelación de peaje.

Al anunciar sin nuevos aumentos de la presidenta de la junta, Maritza Gutiérrez, dijo MDX planea completar las mejoras y proyectos de modernización que figuran en su plan de cinco años con el plan de financiación vigente.

“Estas mejoras son nuestra promesa a la comunidad para proporcionar la movilidad que tanto necesitan y contribuir al crecimiento y el bienestar económico del Condado de Miami-Dade. Al tomar de la mesa la posibilidad de futuros aumentos de peaje, la conversación se mantiene de lo que es importante … para hacer lo MDX ha hecho siempre, entregar lo prometido “, dijo Gutiérrez en un comunicado.

La junta fue objeto de fuertes críticas el año pasado cuando aumentaron los peajes hasta en un 50 por ciento.

MDX opera y mantiene cinco autopistas: SR 112 / autopista del aeropuerto, SR 836 / Dolphin Expressway, SR 874 / Don Shula Expressway, SR 878 / Snapper Creek Expressway, y SR 924 / Gratigny Parkway.

 

News

Miami-Dade Expressway Authority Announces Toll Freeze

(Source: CBS4)

Related Tags:

 Dolphin ExpresswayDon Shula ExpresswayGratigny ParkwayMiami-Dade Expressway Authority,Miami-Dade TollsSnapper Creek ExpresswayToll FreezeToll Roads

You’ve Earned Points for Reading! Claim points in our Reward Center, and earn more tomorrow. Claim Points

Follow CBSMIAMI.COM: Facebook | Twitter

MIAMI (CBSMiami) – Good news for drivers who use Miami-Dade’s expressways.

The Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) has announced a toll freeze.

In announcing no new increases the board’s chairwoman, Maritza Gutierrez, said MDX plans to complete upgrades and modernization projects listed on their five-year plan using the current financingplan.

“These improvements are our promise to the community to provide much needed mobility and to contribute to the growth and economic well-being of Miami-Dade County. By taking off the table the possibility of future toll increases, the conversation is kept of what’s important… to do what MDX has always done, deliver what has been promised,” said Gutierrez in a statement.

The board came under heavy criticism last year when they increased tolls by as much as 50-percent.

MDX operates and maintains five expressways: SR 112/Airport Expressway, SR 836/Dolphin Expressway, SR 874/Don Shula Expressway, SR 878/Snapper Creek Expressway, and SR 924/Gratigny Parkway.

 

STILL TALKING: Despite Deadline US and Iran Continue Nuclear Talks

This deal is going to be a nuclear disaster for the rest of the world.

LAUSANNE, Switzerland — Iran and six world powers resumed nuclear talks on Wednesday, hours after an earlier deadline passed without an agreement.

President Barack Obama was briefed overnight by video teleconference on the latest from the negotiations, where diplomats from Iran and the so-called P5+1 countries — the U.S., China, Russia, Germany, France and Britain — are trying to hammer out the framework of an agreement that would limit Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for an easing of sanctions.

While Tuesday at midnight local time was the self-imposed deadline, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that “enough progress” had been made to “merit staying” in Switzerland for talks until Wednesday.

Secretary of State John Kerry started his day Wednesday by meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Javad Zarif.

Read more: NBC News

 

 

We Are Being Betrayed! Obama Advisor On Iran Talks Worked For Pro-Iran Lobby!

The fox is in the hen house.

L. TODD WOOD 

As more and more evidence regarding the Iran talks comes out in the public press, I am convinced that the Obama administration is betraying the national security of the United States to Iran. From the chants of “Death to America” during the talks from the Iranian Supreme Leader to the obvious great lengths the Obama administration is going to in order to provide Iran with a path to a nuclear weapon to threaten the U.S. and our allies, the writing is on the wall.

Today we have even more news that has come to light of Iranian subterfuge in conjunction with the White House in order to weaken the national security of the United States. I’ve written time and time again about our Manchurian president. This is more damning evidence.

It seems that one of the advisors to the White House and Secretary Kerry on the Iranian talks formerly worked for a lobbying group that promoted Iranian interests.

Breitbart reports:

The White House released a list of its high-ranking officials who took part in a video conference with President Obama late Tuesday. Among them appears Sahar Nowrouzzadeh, who apparently has formerly worked for the National Iranian-American Council.

The White House brief, which was disclosed by The Daily Beast, listed Sahar Nowrouzzadeh as the National Security Council Director for Iran. Nowrouzzadeh appears to be a former employee of the alleged pro-Tehran regime lobbying group, NIAC (National Iranian-American Council).

NIAC has been investing heavily in attempts to influence the talks in favor of an agreement with the state sponsor of terror. In recent days, its director, Trita Parsi, has been spotted having amiable conversation with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s brother.

The fox is in the hen house! Our president knows it! In fact, he probably authorized it!

Congress MUST take action to stop the consequences of this surrender to the Shia Islamist theocracy of Iran. They are a state sponsor of terror worldwide. If the president vetoes any legislation, Congress must override the veto and protect American security!

My children, your children, and our grandchildren’s future depends on it! Make your feelings known to your representatives in Washington!

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/betrayed-obama-advisor-iran-talks-worked-pro-iran-lobby/#kSQeCHfSd8j6joxE.99

 

UNA CUMBRE MAS…?

aaemerio101@aol.com

To: aaemerio101@aol.com

EL FUTURO Y LA CUMBRE.

 Lo que esperamos de la próxima Cumbre de Panamá esta en razón directa a las relaciones bilaterales de Cuba y EEUU., porque  ya se sabe el carácter de sometimiento casi total del grupo latino mayoritario de los paises de la zona.

 Ideológicamente, a estos gobernantes latinos los aterrorizan. El que traicione las directrices y pretenda renunciar a la ¨protección¨de la seguridad que le dicta la disciplina del aparato, o por dignidad renunciare a unos cuantos barriles de petróleo que les envían a cambio del apoyo incondicional, quedaría fuera del grupo. Estos pequeños paises estan siendo  comandado por una mano oculta, que apoyándose también en el narcotráfico ha logrado alcanzar un grado de aparente eficiencia tal, en este mundo libre, que ya es difícil superar con  propaganda política. Pero no imposible con la Verdad.  

 

   Si escuchamos los discursos de ¨Podemos¨en España, llenos de demagogia, debemos darnos cuenta de que todo es una copia al carbón para envenenar a los pueblos en la lucha de clases y luego beneficiarse del Divide y Vencerás.Si pueden Dividir a España, entonces Podemos podrá vencer a España. Así empezó en Cuba, así continuó en Venezuela; y otros en este hemisferio han tratado pero han rectificado o son frenados en sus extremismos pretendiendo, moderadamente, algo parecido en su difícil y casi obligada situación. Y lo importante es que estamos llegando a la cúspide de la curva. Así pasó en Europa del Este hace varios años. Ahora llegaremos también, tarde ó temprano. Porque igual que un Polaco (Walessa) o un Checo (Vaclahabe) surgieron, así surgirán también en esta parte del planeta. Mientras tanto, la Unión Europea observa y se decide a defender la verdadera Social Democracia, diciéndole NO! al Socialismo de Estado, algo que todos debemos agradecer y aplaudir.

La gran diferencia entre el mundo europeo y el mundo latino(en America) es que nos llevan muchos años en cuanto a civilización y, aunque han cometido barbaridades, tambien se han desarrollado política, económica y socialmente muchos años antes que nosotros. Pero eso no es todo. Han demostrado tener mayor cordura, ajuste y lolerancia. Con reales convicciones han  logrado su cohesion y  llegar a constituir la nación más fuerte y avanzada del Mundo.

En conclusion, esperemos que, en esta Cumbre de Panamá, surja la inteligencia de la democracia y se muestre en su máximo esplendor. Y sobre todo se reconozca la grandeza y admiración de trabajar todos unidos en pos de lo que ha hecho grande a nuestros vecinos del Norte, EE.UU y, también Canada, que nunca se menciona. Todo lo demás sería hablar de un pasado Rojo que no volverá.

 

IRS SWINE: Commissioner Claims $10.9 BILLION Budget Is Too Small To Avoid ‘Abysmal Level Of Service’

 

I’m not sure who is worse, this commissioner or the Islamic State? Both seem like terrorists to me.

The Internal Revenue Service’s $10.9 billion annual budget is so puny that it’s ignoring 60 per cent of phone calls from people who are working on their tax return who have questions in advance of the April 15 filing deadline.

John Koskinen, the agency’s commissioner, said Tuesday during a speech at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. that $346 million in budget cuts this year has caused a noticeable negative impact on taxpayer service.’

‘This year we were forced to substantially reduce hiring of extra seasonal help we usually bring in during the filing season,’ Koskinen said. ‘As a result, the phone level of service is now below 40 per cent.’

‘That means that six out of every 10 people who call can’t reach a customer service representative,’ said Koskinen. 

‘This truly is an abysmal level of service.’

Koskinen wasn’t ceding new ground in Americans’ hate-hate relationship with the IRS. He was arguing that Congress should give his agency more money.

‘We are aware of taxpayers lining up outside some of our offices many hours before they open,’ he said.

‘You would think, in fact, we must be selling something like the Apple watch when you look at the lines. This is not a new story this year; it’s just gotten worse.’

Overall, Koskinen complained, ‘the IRS is now the lowest level of funding since 2008,’ resulting in ‘fewer audits and collection cases’ and costing the U.S. Treasury at least $2 billion in revenue.

 

 

Judicial Watch: New Documents Show Homeland Security Released 165,900 Convicted Criminal Aliens throughout U.S. as of April 26, 2014

Documents show Al Jazeera wanted to film people with “significant diseases”

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 76 pages of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) documents revealing that as of April 26, 2014, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had released 165,900 convicted criminal aliens throughout the United States, including many convicted of such violent crimes as homicide, sexual assault, kidnapping, and aggravated assault. (Reports recently detailed that ICE released another 30,000 in the most recent fiscal year, which brings the grand total of known criminals released by the Obama administration to 195,900.)

The documents were released through a July 21, 2014, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No. 1:14-cv-01237)) filed by Judicial Watch after DHS failed to respond to a May 15 FOIA request seeking:

Any and all records of communications including, but not limited to, emails and memoranda, to or from personnel in the office of the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (including its component offices, such as the Office of Public Affairs), from May 1 to May 15, 2014, concerning, regarding, or related to the report published by the Center for Immigrations Studies concerning the release of 36,000 criminal aliens.

The ICE documents confirm a May 2014 Center Immigration Studies (CIS) report showing that in 2013 ICE freed 36,007 convicted criminal aliens, who had nearly 88,000 convictions, including 193 homicide convictions, 426 sexual assault convictions, and 303 kidnapping convictions.

As has been previously reported, and is evidenced in these documents, the 36,007 criminal aliens freed by ICE in 2013 were just the tip of the iceberg. In a DHS “Overview of ICE” document marked “FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY,” the following figures are reported through April 26, 2014 [NOTE: “Final Order” indicates the illegal aliens were ordered to leave the country, but have not done so and remain free]:

·         Non-Detained Final Order Convicted CRIMINAL       165,950

·         Non-Detained Final Order NON CRIMINAL               706,950

·         Non-Detained Final Order TOTAL                              872,900

The documents also detail the difficulty caused by local policies that interfere with federal enforcement of immigration law and provide “sanctuary” for illegal alien criminals.

An email dated May 2, 2014, highlights how such a policy in Montgomery County, Maryland, prevented immigration officials from gaining access to an illegal alien “in state custody on rape charges”:

ERO [Enforcement and Removal Operations] officers were also denied access to interview the alien at police station last Friday due to Montgomery County prohibitions against immigration enforcement.

The documents also include a May 14, 2014, email from House Homeland Security Subcommittee Counsel Valerie Baldwin to ICE Executive Associate Director Thomas Holman expressing the subcommittee’s frustration over ICE stonewalling of information concerning the criminal alien release policies:

Gentlemen, At the ICE hearing and throughout the data call on ICE’s budget request, we’ve requested data on the make-up of the non-detained ATD [Alternatives to Detention] docket, specifically as it relates to violent crimes. I’m wondering why the Washington Times and Washington Post have more information on the ATD population than the Chairman and the other members of the subcommittee. Please respond with an answer today.

Immediately following the release of the CIS report, former Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Congressman Lamar Smith (R-TX), issued a statement terming the action, “the worst prison break in American history.”

Also included in the documents is a reference in the May 12, 2014, ICE Public Affairs Office “Daily Close of Business Report” describing a request from the Al Jazeera Network to film the disease quarantine room at Miami International Airport.  According to the ICE “Business Report:”

General – Miami: Request to Film at Miami International Airport, Al Jazeera Network

Bureau manager called, requested to film the quarantine room for any passenger suspected of being ill with any significant diseases. PAO [Public Affairs Officer] referred the call to CBP [Customs and Border Patrol].

The Al Jazeera Network request coincided with the first reports of the Ebola virus spreading throughout West Africa. On October 9, 2014 in a story entitled  “Experts: ISIS Could Use Ebola In Bio-Terror Attack Against US,” CBS Network affiliate WNEW reported, “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria terrorists may use ‘carriers’ to spread the Ebola virus as part of a low-tech biological terror tactic, according to national security and health experts.”

“It’s appalling that we’ve had to sue in federal court to get key information about the Obama administration’s release of 165,950 convicted criminal aliens,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These documents show the Obama administration is lying when it says that its ‘enforcement priorities’ include deporting illegal aliens who have committed heinous crimes. And lawless localities that help protect illegal alien rapists and other criminals show that politicians at all levels put politics above the rule of law and the public safety.  Where do the innocent victims of the illegal alien criminals this president’s appointees have set free go for justice?”

 

Obama Highway Plan Paves Way For New Tolls Nationwide

Liberals love their taxes.
Check it out:

A little-noted provision of President Obama’s highway funding proposal would lift the federal prohibition against states imposing new tolls on existing interstate highways.

The GROW AMERICA Act would eliminate restrictions held in place since the creation of the Federal Interstate System, according to a summary of the plan’s provisions, allowing states that receive permission from the Secretary of Transportation to toll existing Interstate highways “in order to make improvements or to manage congestion.”

Since its creation in 1956, interstates have been funded primarily through fuel taxes, with tolls banned on all sections of highway built after that date, according to The Alliance for Toll-Free Interstates (ATFI). The only exception is a 1998 program available to three states, none of which have taken advantage of it to date.


Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2015/04/obama-highway-plan-paves-way-for-new-tolls-nationwide/

 

 

A Russian ‘Doctor of Military Sciences’ says Moscow should just nuke Yellowstone if tensions boil over

By Amanda Macias 6 hours ago                            

        

Earlier this week, the Russian president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems outlined two geophysically weak US regions to attack in order to combat NATO’s aggression toward Russia.

In his article, Konstantin Sivkov justifies the option of “complete destruction of the enemy” because NATO has been “moving to the borders or Russia.”

Sivkov, listed as a “Docter of Military Sciences,” described scenarios that involved dropping a nuclear weapon near Yellowstone’s supervolcano or the San Andreas Fault.

Catalyze the eruption of Yellowstone’s supervolcano

View gallery

(Screen grab/Discovery Channel)Computer generated image of an eruption in Yellowstone.In the past 2.1 million years, Yellowstone’s volcano has violently erupted three times and “blanketed parts of the North American continent with ash and debris,” according to the US Geological Survey

Some scientists argue that Yellowstone’s active supervolcano is long overdue for a colossal eruption. 

“Geologists believe that the Yellowstone supervolcano could explode at any moment. There are signs of growing activity there. Therefore it suffices to push the relatively small, for example the impact of the munition megaton class to initiate an eruption. The consequences will be catastrophic for the United States, a country just disappears,” he said, according to a translation by Sydney Morning Herald.

According to a Discovery Channel documentary, an eruption of this magnitude would bury North America, drape the atmosphere in a sulfur haze, dim sunlight, and plunge the world into a volcanic winter. 

Trigger a mega tsunami to ruin America’s infrastructure

View gallery

(Screen grab/YouTube)Again computer generated image.Another option would be to drop a nuclear bomb near California’s San Andreas Fault. “A detonation of a nuclear weapon there can trigger catastrophic events like a coast-scale tsunami which can completely destroy the infrastructure of the United States,” he said, according to the Sydney Morning Herald’s translation.

Since last year’s illegal annexation of Crimea, Russian President Vladimir Putin has responded to international criticism and economic sanctions placed on his country by flexing his nation’s military muscle around the world.

The crisis in Ukraine reflects a turning point in NATO’s stance on Putin and emphasizes a growing concernstemming from the origins of NATO, which was formed for collective territorial defense.

“He wants to restore the Russian empire … I don’t know where he’ll stop,” Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) said of Putin earlier this month during a speech at the Center for Strategic International Studies.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/russian-doctor-military-sciences-says-181400470.html

 

 

Western Center for Journalism (newsletter@wcjournalism.org)

UPDATE: Republican Elites Are Plotting To Enshrine Barack Obama’s Dictatorial Takeover Of The Internet Into Law!


No… your eyes are not playing tricks on you. In typical fashion, RINO elites are floating what they’re calling a “compromise” to Barack Obama’s dictatorial takeover of the Internet, but they’re only calling it a compromise because they believe they can pull the wool over your eyes… and when they’re done, they’ll actually wind up enshrining Barack Obama’s takeover of the Internet into law.
And while we can only speculate over what is fueling this attempt to betray you,The Atlantic, when they reported what is going on right now… behind the scenes, probably said it best:
“The GOP is ready to compromise on the basic principle of net neutrality… indeed, a big part of the GOP shift on net neutrality is a response to pressure from the powerful interests…
TRANSLATION: If there is money to be made from campaign donations from powerful special interests, RINO’s will use every deception conceivable to enable Barack Obama’s tyranny, 
but they’re only attempting to betray you because they’re under the idiotic impression that they can deceive you; and that means that we can bust their idiotic “compromise” trial balloon right here and right now if our elected officials hear from you TODAY! 


Barack Obama Just Did “Something That All Of The Despots In The World Have Tried To Do But Failed To Do.” -Dick Morris”
But please… keep reading… because what you’re about to see may be the most shocking thing that you’ve read in years.
Almost two weeks after voting on secret regulations to facilitate Barack Hussein Obama’s takeover of the Internet, Barack Obama’s FCC finally released 400 pages of these so-called Net Neutrality regulations to the public and it’s far worse than we could have ever imagined.
Based on references in the regulations alone, it is clear that Barack Obama’s takeover of the Internet was actually written — in large part — by radical Marxist-leaning organizations; and it has also come to light that radical socialist-leaning organizations funded by Billionaire Socialist George Soros and others have spent approximately 200 MILLION DOLLARS ($200,000,000.00) to make Barack Obama’s tyrannical and dictatorial takeover of the Internet a reality.
But there is hope when it comes to stopping this master plan to transform the United States into a socialist utopia.
As of this writing, Representative Marsha Blackburn and 43 other Republicans have signed onto legislation (H.R. 1212: The Internet Freedom Act) that will totally reverse this dictatorial Obama-FCC dictate… 
but this legislation is stalled in committee because John Boehner and Mitch McConnell are in no rush to bring it to the floor of the House and the Senate for a vote… and that needs to change right now. 

It’s No Conspiracy Theory. The Socialists Are At The Gates And So-Called Net Neutrality Is Part Of A Master Plan To Transform The United States Into A Socialist Country.
Millions of dollars of funding from Socialist Billionaire George Soros? … Neo-Marxists calling the shots? … While it may sound like a conspiracy theory, it is all, unfortunately, true… As a matter of fact, it’s actually much worse than you may think.
The organization whose net neutrality arguments are cited at least 46 times in the Obama-FCC dictatorial regulations is ironically named Free Press. Free Press is funded by George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and other left-wing groups like the Ford Foundation; and it was founded by Robert McChesney, an avowed Socialist who is presently a communications professor at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
And to McChesney so-called Net Neutrality is simply a means to an end. Specifically, it’s the first step to be taken to fundamentally transform the United States into a socialist tyranny. 
Don’t take our word for it. Read what McChesney says about it for yourself:

According to DiscovertheNetworks.org, McChesney “told the website SocialistProject that ‘unless you make significant changes in the media, it will be vastly more difficult to have a revolution.'”
 Back in 2009, McChesney wrote that “any serious effort to reform the media system would have to necessarily be part of a revolutionary program to overthrow the capitalist system itself… to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles… We need to do whatever we can to limit capitalist propaganda, regulate it, minimize it, and perhaps even eliminate it.”
 DiscovertheNetworks.org again: “In a November 2000 Monthly Review article titled ‘Journalism, Democracy, and Class Struggle,’ he [McChesney] wrote: ‘Our job is to make media reform part of our broader struggle for democracy, social justice, and, dare we say it, socialism.'”
 Phil Kerpen, president of the free-market group American Commitment says that Chesney’s goal is “to empower the federal government to ration and apportion Internet bandwidth as it sees fit, and to thereby control the Internet’s content.”
 And McChesney said, back in 2009, when the concept of Net Neutrality was focused on more traditional means of communication: “At the moment, the battle over network neutrality is not to completely eliminate the telephone and cable companies. We are not at that point yet. But the ultimate goal is to get rid of the media capitalists in the phone and cable companies and to divest them from control.”
Make no mistake, so-called Net Neutrality was always about giving the government total control over the media and there’s only one way to stop it now that Barack Obama’s FCC has essentially decreed it — by dictatorial fiat — to be the law of the land.
The Republican-controlled Congress must bring H.R. 1212 to the floor of the House of the Senate and pass it TODAY. 

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. 

Send My Faxes


What Would You Say If The Government Had The Authority To Order Your Local AM Radio Station To Stop Broadcasting The Rush Limbaugh Show?
If everything we have said thus far sounds far-fetched, consider just one example of what is in these 400 pages of Obama-FCC regulations.
Here’s what the FCC says about First Amendment rights in Section 544:
“The rules we adopt today do not curtail broadband providers’ free speech rights. When engaged in broadband Internet access services, broadband providers are not speakers, but rather serve as conduits for the speech of others.”

Here’s a question: Do local AM radio stations not “serve as conduits for the speech of others.” Come to think of it, is your radio not a “conduit” for the speech of others?
Now, let’s be clear. These 400 pages of Obama-FCC regulations only apply to the Internet (at least for now), but the analogy should serve to illustrate EXACTLY what Barack Obama, George Soros and the FCC are thinking when it comes to your First Amendment rights. 
If you’re not a “speaker,” the First Amendments doesn’t apply to you. And who determines whether or not you’re a “speaker” Why… none other than Barack Hussein Obama.
The thinking is straight out of George Orwell’s Animal FarmBarack Obama doesn’t need to control your speech if he can control the “conduits” of your speech.
And that’s exactly what he intends to do. If you like your Internet, you can keep your Internet and if you like your First Amendment rights, you can keep your First Amendment rights… You can say whatever you want but lots of luck when it comes to anyone actually hearing what you have to say or you hearing what others have to say to you because Barack Obama will control the “conduits” of speech.
Rush Limbaugh perhaps said it best: “[D]o you want the people who gave you ObamaCare running your Internet service? Do you want them in charge of what you can get and when you can get it and how much it’s gonna cost you?”
If you want the United States to remain a free country, the time to take action is now. 
Floyd Brown
The  Western Center for Journalism is a 501©3 educational organization. Contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions are allowed.

 

 

Solo les importa el costo político.

Cierta ingenua actitud cívica lleva a creer a muchos que la dirigencia política espera disponer de propuestas viables para tomar las determinaciones necesarias que contribuyan a mejorar la calidad de vida de todos.

Si bien algunos casos aislados corroboran que es una excepción, la inmensa mayoría de los políticos no siguen la dinámica que la gente imagina. Ellos, por naturaleza, solo intentan sumar votos, usando la demagogia como arma predilecta, para posicionarse de cara a la siguiente elección.

Mucha gente bien intencionada, supone que la clase política no resuelve los problemas porque nadie les acerca proyectos para llevar adelante, o porque no disponen de los conocimientos suficientes para abordar esas obviedades.

Aducen que abunda una inocultable mediocridad imperante y una ignorancia inadmisible de parte de quienes conducen los destinos de todos, sin advertir que sucede algo mucho más simple y evidente. Solo se trata de una postura muy ruin, plagada de gran desinterés y una mezquindad a prueba de todo.

En realidad, lo habitual es que no lo hagan porque no les reditúa desde lo electoral, no les trae votos, o lo que es peor aún, porque de hacerlo, de acceder a la inquietud, pagarían elevados costos políticos privándose de ciertos apoyos esenciales para seguir en la carrera elegida.

Visto así, todo parece ser demasiado negativo. Ellos no quieren soluciones y no harán nada que les implique “pagar” esos costos. Frente a esto, aparece la resignación y la impotencia se multiplica. Por eso la ciudadanía debe revisar su propia conducta, su recurrente reacción frente a lo cotidiano.

Los políticos tradicionales saben que la sociedad se mueve por espasmos para luego someterse mansamente, sin dignidad. Ellos saben que si tienen un poco de paciencia, todo pasará y retomarán el control, como siempre

Es menester convertir esa aparente mala noticia, en una ocasión conveniente. Se debe intentar capitalizar ese hecho y revertirlo para transformar el obstáculo en ventaja, la debilidad en fortaleza, utilizándola como una herramienta eficaz que permita impulsar el cambio anhelado.

Entender como razona la política, como piensan los dirigentes, ayuda a superar esa infantil conducta ciudadana que solo consigue aumentar la eterna impotencia, la frustración de rutina, consigue enfadar a todos y no permite direccionar las energías hacia lo posible y positivo.

Si bien no todos los asuntos son susceptibles de este procedimiento, bien vale la pena intentarlo allí cuando sea posible. Incorporar esta visión, ayudará a que la sociedad sea mucho más efectiva en sus demandas y definitivamente convierta sus habituales molestias en una gran oportunidad.

También le será útil a la política, cuando comprenda que ciertos ardides propios de su actividad, ya no tienen la misma vigencia y son insuficientes para disimular las genuinas preocupaciones que la gente esboza con razón.

La labor consiste en evaluar previamente todo, con profundidad en el análisis, pero al mismo tiempo con serenidad e inteligencia. La idea es encontrar una forma de plantear la cuestión de fondo para colocarla, luego, en términos concretos y para que su eventual desatención le genere a la política un costo electoral tal que no le permita ignorar el asunto jamás.

Para que el dirigente tenga que actuar, para que comprenda que no tendrá otra chance que ocuparse, para que el letargo, la abulia y la negligencia no lo invadan, resulta clave acertar en la selección del camino a recorrer. Por eso esta etapa de adaptación ciudadana puede llevar tiempo y esmero.

No siempre el abordaje será eficaz. Es probable que ciertos reclamos no encuentren nunca el modo adecuado de “construir” argumentos que signifiquen un circunstancial costo político tan importante que haga revisar la sostenida decisión del mandamás de turno.

Con un diagnostico certero, la ciudadanía puede llevar adelante un plan con expectativas de éxito, reclamar con absoluta contundencia y poner en apuros a toda la dirigencia. Cuando el asunto toma relevancia, cuando la escala del problema es indisimulable, el político tomará nota de lo que ocurre, se interiorizará a fondo y finalmente hará algo al respecto.

Si la estrategia seleccionada no es la pertinente y la implementación es débil, timorata y deficiente, no se puede esperar otra cosa que más de lo mismo. Por eso es central concentrar los esfuerzos en lo correcto. No pasa solo por quejarse y explicitar la bronca. Es bastante más complejo que eso.

Esta no es una fórmula mágica, pero tiene más probabilidades de vulnerar las férreas defensas que la política contemporánea coloca para evitar los embates ciudadanos. Los dirigentes prefieren la calma de los escritorios, la comodidad de las campañas electorales superficiales y no desean enfrentar a un electorado astuto y perseverante que los fastidie a diario.

El desafío es entender como funciona y hacer entonces los deberes como corresponde. Si los ciudadanos de este tiempo quieren cambiar la perversa inercia vigente, deberán pensar primero y actuar después, teniendo en cuenta como se mueven quienes toman las decisiones importantes. Existen ejemplos cotidianos, aunque no tan frecuentes como sería necesario.

Después de todo, los políticos son absolutamente predecibles y esa es una ventaja enorme para los ciudadanos. Hay que recordar que solo registran aquellos asuntos cuya falta de resolución les implica pagar costos políticos.

Alberto Medina Méndez
albertomedinamendez@gmail.com

Robert Menendez Indicted On Fourteen Counts, Including Conspiracy And Fraud

CHUCK ROSS

Chuck Ross is a reporter at The Daily Caller.

New Jersey U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez has been indicted by the Justice Department for crimes including conspiracy to commit bribery and fraud, The Wall Street Journal reports.

The fourteen-count indictment brings an end to the FBI’s two-year investigation into the Democrat’s relationship with Salomon Melgen, a Florida eye doctor and prominent Democratic donor.

While specifics have not been released, it is believed that the indictment centers on political favors Menendez provided Melgen in exchange for gifts and money.

Menendez has intervened on Melgen’s behalf in at least two instances — once involving Medicare payments to Melgen’s Florida practice and another over a port security deal in the Dominican Republic.

In June 2012, Menendez contacted Marilyn Tavenner, then the acting director of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, on behalf of Melgen, whose company was at the center of billing dispute with the agency. Menendez followed up with a phone call to Tavenner. In August of that year, he reached out to Nevada U.S. Sen. Harry Reid to broker a meeting with Health and Human Services Sec. Kathleen Sebelius.

8 Wi-Fi Tips You Should Be Using But Probably Aren’tSheKnows

13 Stars You Didn’t Know Were Banned from SNLAnswers.com

21 Best Photobombs EverBUZZLAMP

by Taboola

Sponsored Links

Both Sebelius and Reid were interviewed by the FBI during the course of the investigation.

Melgen’s practice, which brought in $21 million in Medicare payments in 2012, is currently under investigation for overbilling.

Menendez, 61, took numerous trips on Melgen’s private jet and stayed at his private resort in the Dominican Republic. He also received $600,000 of the $700,000 Melgen donated to the Majority PAC, a political action committee controlled by associates of Harry Reid.

In 2013, after the FBI opened its investigation, Menendez repaid Melgen $58,500 for two private flights he did not disclose on financial statements. His aides claimed  it was an oversight.

When it was reported early last month that the indictment was imminent, Menendez denied wrongdoing and vowed to fight the charges.

Follow Chuck on Twitter

Tags: Robert Menendez

 

 

Jorge A Villalon: Hands Up, Don’t Discriminate Against Gays!

Ann Coulter |

 

Happy National Hate Week! Today, we are all hating on Indiana. Who will be the left’s Emmanuel Goldstein next week?

Evidently, the sole function of the media these days is to subject the public to a steady stream of manufactured events: “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot”; nuclear power kills; Lena Dunham’s rape by a college conservative at Oberlin; the “mattress girl” raped at Columbia University; Jon Stewart is funny; a fraternity gang-rape at the University of Virginia; and a law protecting religious freedom will lead to separate water fountains for gays in Indiana.

The whole country has to keep being dragged through these liberal hate campaigns, but as soon as the precipitating event turns out to be a gigantic hoax, the truth is revealed like a bedtime story being read to a child: The ending is whispered and the narrator tiptoes out of the room.

Here is a time-saver: Whenever one of these conscience-shocking stories is promoted to front-page status by The New York Times and involves:

— police brutality;

— the environment;

— a campus rape; or

— gays…

 

You can be pretty confident it is a hoax. As the saying goes, it did not happen until it is reported by The New York Times and not even then.

Many months, several million wasted taxpayer dollars and one cop’s career later, even Eric Holder’s Justice Department finally admitted that the whole “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” story was bunk.

After the Fukushima nuclear meltdown in Japan four years ago, Bill Nye “the (self-proclaimed) Science Guy” gravely informed CNN viewers, “This is all bad and very scary. … You know, it is nothing but danger. It’s nothing but very serious, very, very long-term problems.”

Wired magazine recently reported that, in the four years since the disaster, more than 96 percent of food, fish and agriculture throughout Fukushima has contained less than one-sixth of the radiation permitted in food imported to Europe.

Lena Dunham, star of HBO’s “Girls,” was forced to retract her autobiographical account of having been raped by a campus conservative named “Barry.”

The alleged rapist of Columbia University’s mattress girl finally released her alluring texts to him, and now we all know she was a desperate, spurned lover, not a rape victim.

Sabrina Rubin Erdely’s much-celebrated Rolling Stone story about a fraternity gang rape at the University of Virginia turned out to be based on one poor, sad girl seeking attention by creating a fake online boyfriend and fantasizing her own gang rape.

And this week, we all have to be in a panic about Indiana passing a measure that enshrines a basic principle of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence, because of the utterly apocryphal assertion that the law will be used to turn gays away from restaurants.

The idea that generally applicable laws may, in certain circumstances, be required to accommodate individual religious beliefs has been around for centuries. That is why priests do not have to reveal penitents’ confessions to the police and Quakers do not have to join the military.

Having won the war on gay marriage (by judicial fiat), now some liberal zealots insist on going house-to-house and shooting the survivors. They seem to seek out Christian businesses to provide floral arrangements and cakes for gay weddings so they can call the cops if the Christians try to pass.

A roomful of gays would say, “Why don’t you guys just go to one of the nine out of 10 florists who would be happy to have your business?” (My guess is, if the zealots looked really hard, they might even be able to find a gay florist!)

That is all the religious freedom laws do: Encourage steely-eyed activists to stop requiring every last Christian to celebrate gay marriages.

Right now, in states that do not have religious protection laws, Christians are being compelled, by general non-discrimination laws, either to participate in gay marriages — or go out of business.

With the law, the Christian gets a legal argument. He might win in court or he might lose, but he’d at least have an argument, thus encouraging the kill-the-survivors nuts to go to another shop for their gay weddings and stop doing their victory dances on top of Christians.

It is utter nonsense that any shopkeeper, least of all a nice Christian, would turn away a customer for any reason other than a deeply held religious belief, such as not wanting to participate in a gay wedding, a Planned Parenthood gala or any event involving Bill Clinton.

Do not assume that because liberals are in an absolute panic over Indiana’s law, they must have a point. To the contrary, the more hysterical they are, the more you should assume the whole story is a sham.

When the journalist Richard Bradley raised questions about Erdely’s Rolling Stone gang-rape story, Anna Merlan responded at Jezebel, calling his questions a “giant ball of sh*t,” in an article titled “‘Is the UVA Rape Story a Gigantic Hoax?’ Asks Idiot.”

Even after Rolling Stone had retracted the story and Charlottesville chief of police Timothy J. Longo confirmed that the man Jackie accused of precipitating the gang rape did not exist, his department merely “suspended” the investigation. I am going to call Chief Longo with a complaint that I was raped by a unicorn to see if we can get him to actually “close” a case.

It is one thing to treat disturbed girls falsely crying rape with kid gloves. (Though the boyfriend of the Duke Lacrosse false-rape accuser, Crystal Gail Mangum, might have wished she had been held a little more accountable: Mangum was never prosecuted for her lies and she later murdered her boyfriend, thus dashing her hopes for a primetime show on MSNBC.)

But why do we have to treat liberal fantasists in the media as if they are children, too? Believing there is a monster under the bed is cute. Falsely accusing cops of murder, men of rape and an entire state of homophobia is not.

Every single cause championed by liberals is based on a fake story. They make up events that didn’t happen and get apoplectic over things that never will happen. The definition of “liberal” is quickly becoming: people who believe their fantasies should be facts.

 

 

Jorge Alberto Villalón Y.

Enero 20, 2017 FIN DEL DISPARATE

“En mi opinión”

 “FREEDOM IS  NOT  FREE”

Blooger:  https://www.blogger.com/home

https://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s