HPIM0049

No 913 “En mi opinion” Marzo 27, 2015

No 913 “En mi opinión”  Marzo 27, 2015

“IN GOD WE TRUST”    Lázaro R González Miño    EDITOR

AMENPER: ¿Es la hora de la derecha?

AMENPER@aol.com

Ted Cruz Can Win – Dick Morris TV: Lunch Alert! – DickMorris.com at DickMorris.com  

Si pulsan arriba verán y oirán a Dick Morris hablando sobre Ted Cruz, y dice algo que realmente me parece que puede ser verdad.   Dice que Cruz es una mezcla de Reagan con Clinton, por la habilidad política de Clinton y por el poder de comunicación de Reagan.   Dice que ha asumido una posición que es la que le ha dado resultado a la izquierda sobre todo a Obama. 

La posición de Romney , Bush y los otros el establecimiento Republicano, el cual no creo tan demoníacos como otros pero que hasta ahora no ha dado resultado.  La táctica es no tirarse tan a la derecha para ganar el voto de algunos demócratas y moderados.  Fue la táctica que usó Reagan.

Los Demócratas se han tirado a la izquierda, saben que  de esa manera excitan a los partidarios y los moderados de izquierda también votarán por ellos. 

Los republicanos como Romney y ahora Bush, no creo que les vaya bien.  Así que si un candidato, con el pedigrí  de Cruz, por su trayectoria y educación lo cual le da credibilidad, se tira a la derecha, tiene los votos conservadores que saldrán a la calle motivado, si es el candidato, los moderados de derecha , los centristas y los cansados del liberalismo dentro del partido demócrata también votarán por él. 

Esa ha sido la teoría de la izquierda, ¿Por qué no darle un chance a la derecha?

Como dice Morris esto no quiere decir que Scott Walker no se tome en consideración,  simplemente que hay que observar del desarrollo de los acontecimientos y cómo reacciona la base.

 

Buscamos un candidato decente que no sea un metiroso o un ladron, ni un descarado para para alcalde Miami Dade:

1-         Que no haya sido ni sea político profesional nunca.

2-         Que no se robe los dineros de los contribuyentes.

3-         Que se someta a un tribunal de cuentas al final de su mandato para que testifique que sus propiedades y peculio no sea mayor de los que represento su sueldo de alcalde u otras fuentes legales y agenas a su posición de alcalde.

4-         Que al final de su mandato se someta a una inspección de la diferencia de su dinero y sus propiedades.

5-          Que se comprometa a eliminar el MDX “Miami Dade XpresWay” (Departamento que ha puesto todos los peajes en las carreteras) Y a eliminar todos los Peajes.

6-          Que no engañe a los contribuyentes tratando de robarse dineros públicos diciendo que va a reparar el edificio de la corte.

7-           Que no engañe al contribuyente diciendo que el inversionista no van a pedir dineros públicos y luego le dan dineros públicos.

8-   Que no tenga ni hijos ni amigos “Cabilderos”

9-           Que no traiga amigos de el para que sean “Vice-Alcaldes” (Cargo que ni existía) Y luego les pague $100,000 o más mas gastos.

10-                     Que se comprometa que al final de cada trimestre se reúna con los ciudadanos del condado a responder las preguntas de los ciudadanos sobre su gestión durante este trimestre.

11-                     Que la deuda y los movimientos económicos, compras, gastos, del condado sean expuestos en un sitio público para que los electores puedan tener control de su administración. 

12-                     Que sea juzgado por los tribunales si favorece de forma económica a sus amigos o familiares.

13-                     Que no le tenga miedo a los gánsteres que hasta hora han desgobernado y desguazado el condado Miami Dade y casi todas las alcaldía de las ciudades.

 “EMO” Por favor envíenme todas las características que considera debe tener el alcalde que usted quiere que administre, fiscalice  y controle al Condado Miami Dade.

Envienme ambien los nombres de las personas que ustedes consideren que sea la persona que se puede enfrentar con esta difícil tarea.        

Lázaro R González Miño Editor  “En mi opinion”

 

 

The secret behind how Washington works

Mike Needham

Lazaro R Gonzalez “En mi opinion”..,

It’s a sad reality, but lobbyists hold a lot of influence in Washington. 

Decades of big-government policies have concentrated power and money in Washington. The federal government today intrudes into nearly every American’s daily life. Government is so big that special interests know that if they call in the right favors, they can use government power or taxpayer money for their own benefit.

To execute these special interest favors, there’s a standing army of 12,000 lobbyists based on K Street in downtown Washington. They’re whispering in the ears of the Congressmen you elected to get big-government handouts for their clients. You and I pay the price with our taxes and with our freedom.

It’s high time the American people had a “lobbyist” working on their behalf.

Who will lobby on behalf of the American people? Heritage Action. To win conservative victories, Heritage Action brings together decades of combined Capitol Hill expertise, 10,000 elite Sentinel activists, 300,000 grassroots advocates, and more than 40 years of policy expertise from The Heritage Foundation. This is the kind of force necessary to stand up to the K Street lobbyists — and Heritage Action delivers results. 

We’re in the trenches day-in and day-out, fighting for the principles you believe in: free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Our Washington lobbyists meet with lawmakers on Capitol Hill, in sync with our grassroots activists who pressure these same lawmakers in their home districts.

This work is of the utmost importance. It has worked time and again to halt bad liberal policies and move Congress in the right direction.

It also requires steadfast energy and conviction. And it requires your support. And for the next few days, your support will go twice as far.

Please contribute to our Win Conservative Victories Matching Challenge to support this vital work.

We can’t do this without you.

Contribute to win conservative victories now!    

Thank you,

Michael A. Needham
Chief Executive Officer
Heritage Action for America

 

 

The Huge Move Scott Walker Says He’d Make on ‘Day One’ If Elected President

Jason Howerton

  • Share This
  • Tweet This

Though he has yet to formally announce his candidacy for the 2016 presidential election, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker told radio host Hugh Hewitt on Wednesday that as president he would void any deal President Barack Obama makes with Iran if it allows the country to continue uranium enrichment.

In this May 3, 2014 file photo Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker speaks in Milwaukee. (AP Photo/Jeffrey Phelps, File)

His answer was clear when asked if he would reject that deal as president: “Absolutely. Day one.”

“The concept of a nuclear Iran is not only problematic for Iran and certainly for Israel, but it opens the doors,” he added. “I mean, the Saudis are next, you’re going to have plenty of others in the region. … There is no love lost between the Saudis and the Iranians. And so they are going to want to have a nuclear weapon if the Iranians have a nuclear weapon. This is something that just escalates before our eyes.”

Walker also said the fact that the Obama administration went into negotiations with Iran “conceding that they are going to allow enrichment to go forwards” indicates the administration doesn’t share his same concerns about a nuclear Iran.

“A nuclear Iran is a problem for the entire world, not just for Israel,” the governor concluded.

Listen to the segment via “The Hugh Hewitt Show” below:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/25/the-huge-move-scott-walker-says-hed-make-on-day-one-if-elected-president/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Firewire&utm_campaign=Firewire%20-%20HORIZON%203-26-15%20FINAL

Calls For Obama’s Impeachment Could Well Grow Louder With Army’s Decision To Charge Bergdahl

The Obama administration had hailed Bergdahl as having served with “honor and distinction…”

NORVELL ROSE — 

When President Obama agreed in mid-2014 to exchange five top Taliban leaders in U.S. custody for an American soldier held by a terror group in Afghanistan, prominent critics of the deal charged that the commander-in-chief had committed “high crimes and misdemeanors” and should be impeached.

At the heart of those early calls for impeachment were claims that Obama had broken federal law against supporting terrorists. A June 2014 post on WND quoted Fox News’ Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano:

“’We have a federal statute which makes it a felony to provide material assistance to any terrorist organization. It could be money, maps, professional services, any asset whatsoever, include human assets,’ [Napolitano] said.”

Advertisement-content continues below

Colonel Allen West, a former member of Congress, called on Capitol Hill lawmakers “to draft articles of impeachment as no one is above the law in America.”

Joining in the stinging criticism of Obama’s questionable “Taliban Five” trade deal was the former assistant U.S. attorney who successfully prosecuted Islamic radicals behind the first bombing of the World Trade Center.

Andrew McCarthy argued that “transferring the five terrorists to Qatar in exchange for the release of Bergdahl ‘violates the law against material support to terrorism.’”

Advertisement-content continues below

Commentator Matt Barber (whose columns frequently appear on Western Journalism) added his voice to the chorus calling for impeachment. Via CNS News:

Whether Obama is intentionally trying to overthrow his own government is open for debate. But that he is, ‘adhering to [America’s] Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort,’ is without question.

Those calls for Obama’s impeachment came after controversial details of the deal were made public last summer, but long before the Army’s investigation of the Bergdahl case was complete…and longer still before today’s announcement that the military is charging Bowe Bergdahl with desertion.

When President Obama formally and proudly announced Bergdahl’s release after five years in captivity, there was a high-profile Rose Garden celebration of sorts featuring Bergdahl’s parents. Fox News reminds us:

“Bob Bergdahl, who had studied Islam during his son’s captivity appeared with a full beard and read a Muslim prayer, while Bergdahl’s mother Jani embraced the president.”

Then the administration set about trumpeting its triumphant accomplishment in the media.

Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice — known for her adamant assertion that the Benghazi attack was caused by an Internet video — went so far as to praise Bergdahl on national television, hailing the newly freed soldier as having “served the United States with honor and distinction.”

Rice’s declaration that the release of this “honorable” soldier marked a “joyous day” seems all the more removed from reality now that the Army has determined to prosecute Bergdahl for willfully leaving his post in Afghanistan.

Appearing on “The O’Reilly Factor” close to two months ago, retired Army officer, Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer, claimed the Pentagon had determined to charge Bergdahl; but the White House was desperately trying to keep that fact from going public because it would embarrass Obama.

Some of Bergdahl’s platoon-mates in recent months have been outspoken in their claims that Bowe Bergdahl voluntarily walked away from his unit and put his fellow soldiers lives at risk when they conducted dangerous missions to try to locate him.

At a Wednesday afternoon briefing about the Bergdahl case, an Army spokesman said there are two charges being lodged: “desertion with intent to shirk important or hazardous duty” and “misbevaior before the enemy” that endangered his fellow soldiers.

The next step in the case is for the Army to hold a preliminary hearing at Fort Sam Houston, Texas. If taken to a court martial and found guilty, Bowe Bergdahl could face life in prison.

The consequences for Barack Obama, beyond potential embarrassment and renewed political grief, are yet to be determined.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/calls-obamas-impeachment-well-grow-louder-armys-decision-charge-bergdahl/#6J0RWkfCvQkBrGxZ.99

WHOOPI THE BIRTHER: Whoopi Wants to See Cruz’s Birth Certificate, But Not Obama’s

Whoopi Goldberg and the ladies on The View flip their lid when they find out Ted Cruz was born in Canada. Double standards much?

Whoopi Goldberg chimed in by saying Cruz is “one of the people that said, well, the president, huh, you know, I want to see your birth certificate. And you’re a mixed gentleman, right? You are mixed. I want to know, are you talking for the Cuban side or the white side? What are you talking for? See, now, when we turn it around, it’s not very nice. So Luckily we have better stuff to concentrate on than where you were born, Ted. But do know that we are aware of some of the things you’ve said.”

“WND” Russia and China could start $100 trillion collapse (CIA intel warns)

12:33 PM (22 hours ago)

POLITICS

Famous Actor Says Obama Admin. ‘Must’ Do This Immediately Now That Bergdahl Has Been Charged With Desertion

Mar. 26, 2015 8:00pm Jason HowertonShare This

  • Tweet This

After the U.S. Army announced Bowe Bergdahl would be charged with desertion on Wednesday, actor Gary Sinise said the Obama administration “must explain” the controversial Bergdahl trade that set five Taliban commanders free.

Gary Sinise (File)

More importantly, he said the administration owes an explanation to the family members of soldiers who lose their lives searching for him. Members of Bergdahl’s platoon have claimed that “soldiers from his own unit died trying to track him down.”

Bergdahl has been charged with Article 85 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, “desertion with intent to shirk important or hazardous duty,” and with Article 99, “misbehavior before the enemy by endangering the safety of a command, unit or place.”

Bergdahl disappeared from his base in Afghanistan in 2009. He was held captive by Taliban militants for years until the Obama administration agreed to release five Taliban commanders to secure his release in May 2014.

Sinise’s tweet demanding the Obama administration explain its decision to trade terrorists for Bergdahl was met with a lot of support — and some vitriol.

 

Revealed: Chicago-Area Cousins’ Alleged Plot to Bring ‘Flames of War to the Heart’ of America and ‘Cause as Much Damage and Mayhem as Possible’

Jason Howerton

CHICAGO (AP) — An Illinois Army National Guard soldier vowed to bring “the flames of war to the heart” of America if he was unable to get to the Middle East to join the Islamic State group, and his cousin bragged that he could kill at least 150 people in a terrorist attack in the U.S., federal prosecutors said Thursday in announcing their arrests.

Hasan R. Edmonds, the 22-year-old guardsman, was arrested Wednesday night at Chicago Midway International Airport while trying to board a plane for the first leg of a journey that eventually would take him to Egypt. Jonas M. Edmonds, 29, was arrested earlier that day at his home, the U.S. attorney’s office in Chicago said in a statement. Both men are U.S. citizens from the Chicago suburb of Aurora.

According to an unsealed federal complaint, Jonas Edmonds planned to carry out an attack in the U.S. after Hasan Edmonds left the country. Without naming it, complaint says they contemplated an armed attack against a U.S. military facility in northern Illinois where Hasan Edmonds had trained.

In Internet messages to an undercover FBI agent in January, Hasan Edmonds said that if he was unable to make it to the Middle East, he would help bring “the flames of war to the heart” of America and “cause as much damage and mayhem as possible,” prosecutors allege.

On Tuesday, the cousins drove to a military installation with an undercover agent to discuss an attack, according to the complaint, which does not name the facility. Hasan Edmonds described the types of rooms inside and talked about which ones should and shouldn’t be hit.

Hasan said in messages earlier this year that his knowledge of the U.S. military and American psychology would prove helpful in terrorizing Americans, prosecutors contend. He suggested not just killing people, but capturing and holding others.

“If we can break their spirits, we will win,” he said, according to the complaint.

Another time, he spoke admiringly of the recent terrorist attack in Paris on the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, which killed 12 people.

 

Scott Walker: I’ll VOID Obama’s Iran Deal on Day One as President
Go HERE Right Now to Pledge Your Support for Scott Walker 2016
Dear Lazaro R,

With Obama set to ink a nuclear deal with the Iranian mullahs as soon asSunday, conservative Gov. Scott Walker has vowed to VOID the Obama deal on “Day One” if elected President.

In an interview on The Hugh Hewitt Radio Show, Scott Walker warned that a nuclear Iran would spark a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, in addition to endangering U.S. and Israeli security.

“The Saudis are next, you’re going to have plenty of others in the region” Walker said.  “There is no love lost between the Saudis and the Iranians. And so they are going to want to have a nuclear weapon if the Iranians have a nuclear weapon. This is something that just escalates before our eyes.”

“A nuclear Iran is a problem for the entire world, not just for Israel,” said Gov. Walker.  Listen to the Full Interview 

Click Here to Pledge Your Support for Conservative Scott Walker 2016

Go, Scott, Go!

Bob Adams

Treasurer

Go Big, Go Bold PAC

P.S. As you know, Scott Walker is considering a run for President. As conservatives, we must do everything we can to encourage Scott Walker to take the next immediate step.  Please Pledge Your Support for Scott Walker by Clicking Here!

 

 

Exclusive: Afghanistan Chief Executive Vows US ‘Blood and Treasure’ Won’t Go to Waste

News: In an exclusive interview with The Daily Signal, Afghanistan’s chief executive promised a “new chapter” in relations with the United States and vowed that his country has to become self-reliant after more than 13 years of American nation-building.

Indiana Protects Religious Liberty. Why That’s Good Policy.

Daily Policy Focus: It protects the fundamental freedom of Indiana citizens from unnecessary and unreasonable government coercion.

DeMint at Yale: Academic Censorship as a Political Weapon

Commentary: The easiest way to win an argument is to tape your opponent’s mouth shut. Too many educators today think this is a good idea. They think that their own righteousness sanctifies these tactics.

Read the Remarks and Watch the Speech

Enero 20, 2017 FIN DEL DISPARATE

“En mi opinión”

 “FREEDOM IS  NOT  FREE”

Blooger:  https://www.blogger.com/home

https://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s