HPIM0049

No 911 “En mi opinion” Marzo 25, 2015

No 911 “En mi opinión”  Marzo 25, 2015

“IN GOD WE TRUST”    Lázaro R González Miño    EDITOR

Enero 20, 2017 FIN DEL DISPARATE

Así es cómo los niños reaccionan cuando se ven enfrentados a la violencia contra las mujeres.

Aparte de ser un video realmente encantador, entrega un mensaje potente sobre el maltrato a las mujeres. Así como estos muchachos debían de reaccionar todos. (No se pierdan el video)

http://www.upsocl.com/comunidad/esto-es-lo-que-pasa-cuando-pones-a-un-nino-frente-a-una-nina-y-le-pides-que-le-una-bofetada/

 

 

AMENPER: Cuando lo Razonable se convierte en Utopía.

Estaba oyendo a Ted Cruz en su discurso cuando declaró su intención de aspirar a la presidencia.

Todo lo que dijo Cruz es lo que yo sueño para el país y para mis hijos y nietos.

Entonces ¿Por qué no estaba contento de que alguien como Ted Cruz quiera y pueda ser el presidente?

Esta es la desgracia que vivimos, lo razonable se ha vuelto utópico. 

Ted Cruz no puede ser presidente como no pudo ser presidente Mitt Romney, como le será difícil a cualquier conservador ser presidente.

La maquinaria de la izquierda es poderosa y efectiva.  Los comunistas son el epítome del fracaso en la gestión del gobierno, pero los triunfadores en las campañas de propaganda y desinformación.

En el caso de Ted Cruz, empezarán con decir que no está calificado por no haber nacido en Estados Unido (¿y Obama) seguirán diciendo que no tiene suficiente experiencia, que sólo ha sido senador por dos años (¿y Obama?) después que es muy ideólogo (¿y Obama?) 

Todas esas aseveraciones unidas a un barraje de cómo con sus políticas beneficiará a los ricos y le quitará todos los beneficios a los pobres, la típica lucha de clases. 

Según la mayor cantidad de razonamiento conservador que tenga el candidato republicano, menor posibilidad tendrá de ser electo, porque estamos viviendo en tiempos cuando lo razonable se convierte en utopía.

Pero vamos a imaginarnos como nos pide él, que Ted Cruz sea el presidente el primero de Enero de 2017, y vamos a oír lo que pasaría.

 

En lugar de las pequeñas empresas a salir del negocio en cifras récord, imagínese pequeñas empresas creciendo y prosperando.

Imagínese graduados saliendo de la escuela con cuatro, cinco o seis ofertas de trabajo

Imagine la innovación próspera en Internet sin los reguladores del gobierno y los recaudadores de impuestos con la creación de más oportunidades.

Imagine América pueda finalmente convertirse en enérgicamente autosuficiente con la creación de millones y millones de puestos de trabajo remunerados.

Hoy, hace cinco años el Presidente promulgó Obamacare.  Unas horas después la Universidad Liberty presentó una demanda para tratar de evitar esta fallida ley.

En lugar de la falta de trabajo, en lugar de los millones de personas obligadas  a trabajar a tiempo parcial, en vez de millones de personas que han perdido su seguro de salud, perdieron sus médicos, se han enfrentado a aumentos en  las primas de seguro de salud,

imaginen en 2017 un nuevo Presidente que firma una legislación que deroga cada palabra de Obamacare.

Imagine la reforma de salud que mantiene el gobierno fuera del camino entre usted y su médico y que hace seguro de salud personal y portátil y asequible.

Imagine, en lugar de un código tributario que aplasta a la innovación, que impone cargas sobre las familias que luchan llegar cubrir sus necesidades,

Imagine un impuesto simple que permite a cada estadounidense llene sus impuestos en una postal. Imagine abolir el IRS.

En vez de la anarquía y la Amnistía ejecutivo inconstitucional del Presidente,

imagine un presidente que finalmente, finalmente, finalmente asegura las fronteras.

E imagine un sistema de inmigración legal que le da la bienvenida y celebra a quienes llegan para alcanzar el sueño americano.

En lugar de un gobierno federal que se dedica a los  ataques a la libertad religiosa, y  que va después  Hobby Lobby, que va después contra las Hermanitas de los pobres, que va después contra Liberty University,

Imagine un gobierno federal que representa los derechos de todos los americanos.

 

 

“Judicial Wash” Laura Fennig <lfennig@cosaction.com>

Lazaro R Gonzalez.  Editor.  “En mi opinion”–

Thank-you to everyone who took a moment to contact North Dakota senators regarding a reconsideration vote on HCR 3014. In the past 12 hours, their inboxes have been flooded with hundreds of emails in support of the Convention of States Resolution.

As the senators prepare for a reconsideration vote this afternoon, please stop all emails to North Dakota legislators, unless a resident of the state.

The Senate will convene at 1:00 pm CT. You can watch the proceedings broadcasted live here.
Thank-you for your quick response. I hope to have the pleasure of announcing the FOURTH state to pass the Convention of States application, this afternoon!

Yours in the fight,

Laura Fennig
Grassroots Director
Convention of States Action
lfennig@cosaction.com
www.conventionofstates.com

Convention of States Action · 100 Congress Ave, Suite 2000, Austin, TX 78701, United States
This email was sent to lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com. To stop receiving emails, click here.

Created with NationBuilder, the essential toolkit for leaders.

 

 

 

AMENPER: El Anti Obama

Cuando estaba oyendo a Ted Cruz, me vino a la mente una discusión bíblica sobre el libro de Apocalipsis que es popular por lo místico del contenido.  Los libros de Apocalipsis y Génesis son libros que se suponen que sean alegóricos, o sea que el contenido es virtual, es como un mensaje no una realidad.  Hay muchos que consideran a Génesis como literal, pero nadie considera Apocalipsis como una realidad pero como una alegoría, porque el libro mismo lo declara así. 

El personaje principal sobre el que se ha escrito mucho y presentado en varias películas de ciencia ficción es el Anticristo, una figura similar a Cristo pero lo opuesto, una figura del mal opuesta al bien, que muchos lo consideran como un símbolo pero la mayoría afirman que será una persona.

Lo que me recordó Ted Cruz al Anticristo, es que Cruz es el Anti Obama.  Un Anticristo a la inversa, el bien contra el mal.

Es una figura con características parecidas a Obama pero para el bien. 

No fui el único que notó esto, el día siguiente vi comentarios y artículos sobre estas características entre ambos.

Como Obama, Cruz es un elocuente, senador de primer término en el senado, formado en derecho constitucional, que desdeña a sus colegas que lo critican como carente de experiencia ejecutiva para dar el salto a la casa blanca. Presidente Obama demostró que era posible en el 2008, y ahora Ted Cruz intentará mostrar que un republicano puede hacerlo después de anunciar su campaña por la casa blanca el lunes.

Como Obama que era relativamente un desconocido unos años antes, y que no le daban oportunidad de ganar ante Hillary Clinton, así la candidatura de Cruz y la persona de Cruz, no se le considera que tenga oportunidad ante los otros candidatos.

También tiene la oposición de los que dicen que no está calificado por haber nacido en Canadá, algo que Obama también enfrentó por su alegado nacimiento en Kenia.

Seguro que a Cruz no le gustará esta comparación porque sus visiones del mundo son tan divergentes como dos hombres en los extremos opuestos de la política. Sin embargo,  Obama y Cruz son sorprendentemente similares en sus pedigríes y estilo político. Eran clase media elevada pero hicieron su carrera en la “Ivy League” y más allá,  ambos son ideólogos, Obama del socialismo, Cruz de la causa conservadora.

Se convirtieron en abogados pero principalmente como una plataforma de lanzamiento a la política.

El Presidente era un senador del estado, Sr. Cruz el procurador general de Texas ambos ganaron las elecciones en su estado como senadores federales.  

Cruz es un polemista mejor y el Sr. Obama un mejor fabricante de discurso, pero ambos son mejores habladores que oyentes. Sobre todo, son militantes políticos populistas, en una época que recompensa a los candidatos empresariales. Ambos vieron el Senado como un peldaño en el camino a la casa blanca.

 Obama funcionó como el verdadero creyente liberal contra la guerra para ganar la nominación de su partido. Sr. Cruz planea ejecutar como los conservadores creen en la verdad, y su trayectoria ha sido valiente en el campo del partido republicano.

Como Obama,  Cruz correrá tanto contra Washington y el “establecimiento” de su propio partido.

Nosotros nos quedamos con este estilo político porque lo que ofrece  Sr. Cruz son las esperanzas que pondrá en el campo del partido republicano sobre las cuales. los otros candidatos tendrán que definir su posición en la campaña.

En materia de política, es difícil encontrar un tema en que no estamos de acuerdo con él.

En su discurso de anuncio en Liberty University, dio apoyo a un impuesto único, y eliminar al IRS, (apúnteme en eso).

Dijo que él podrá derogar “cada palabra” del Obamacare, todos los candidatos del partido republicano prometen lo mismo, pero la diferencia es que el senador cubano-americano de 44 años de edad de Texas luce ser el único que realmente cree lo que dice y el único que luchará por ello. Lo demostró cuando se presentó en el Senado como el hombre que estaba dispuesto a cerrar al gobierno para que derogara el Obamacare en 2013.

Esto no tenía ninguna oportunidad de éxito y dio lugar a críticas al partido republicano, pero le dio visibilidad entre los estadounidenses frustrados que acertadamente creen que Washington es un desastre.

El senador también se declaró opuesto a la política de Obama en Siria y los bombardeos sin tropas en el campo de batalla.

Lo que nos dicen los pesimistas es que con los votos conservadores solamente no se puede ganar las elecciones generales, lo cual es posible, pero también tenemos que tener en consideración que una gran mayoría de la población silente, está cansada de la política liberal.  Ahí es donde el Anti Obama puede lograr votos.

Hay la distracción del nacimiento en el extranjero y la falta de experiencia.  Pero si un populista de la izquierda como Obama pudo obviar esto, quizás un populista de la derecha pueda también hacerlo.

De cualquier manera, la estrategia de ser el primero es adecuada, esto nos da tiempo a ver cómo se desarrollan los acontecimientos y cómo se presenta Cruz en los debates.

El campo está abierto, Bush no parece que tenga el apoyo de los conservadores, y si los conservadores no le pueden dar la presidencia a un candidato, si pueden quitársela.

Rand Paul por su libertarismo no podrá pasar la prueba de la política internacional.  Quedan Rubio y Scott Walker como los únicos candidatos viables. 

Se imaginan, dos cubano-americanos luchando por ser candidatos presidenciales.  

 

 

THE FURNACE

Harry Reid, Senior DHS Official Implicated in Scheme to Approve Visas for Non-Qualified Foreigners

  • Share This
  • Tweet This

The number two official at the Department of Homeland Security on Tuesday was accused of creating an appearance of “favoritism and special access” in decisions on whether to grant visas to certain foreigners — including in one case pushed by Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and his staff — according to a report released by the DHS Office of Inspector General.

The OIG report said Deputy DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas took extraordinary steps in three cases to help these non-citizens win green cards, under a program that gives people access to these cards if they invest $500,000 in the United States. That program hands out so-called EB-5 visas, but it has been under scrutiny for the last several months for possible abuse.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is among several well-known Democrats who were involved in a scheme to get green cards to favored investors. Image: AP Photo/Molly Riley

Specifically, reports surfaced that the program was being used to get visas to foreigners who were not qualified, but couldn’t get visas any other way.

Today’s OIG report confirmed some of those suspicions. It said that when Mayorkas was the director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, he went too far by intervening in decisions to grant visas in three specific cases that otherwise would have gone the other way.

“In three matters pending before USCIS, Mr. Mayorkas, now deputy secretary of DHS, communicated with stakeholders on substantive issues outside of the normal adjudicatory process, and intervened with the career USCIS staff in ways that benefited the stakeholders,” the report said. “Mr. Mayorkas’ conduct led many USCIS employees to reasonably believe that specific individuals or groups were being given special access or consideration in the EB-5 program.”

The report stressed that these actions were confirmed by “an extraordinary number of DHS employees.”

One of those cases involved an investor in a Las Vegas hotel and casino in Reid’s home state of Nevada.

“At the request of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Mr. Mayorkas intervened to allow expedited review of investor petitions involved in funding a Las Vegas hotel and casino, notwithstanding the career staff’s original decision not to do so,” OIG said. “The career staff noted that the purported urgency was of the applicant’s own making and that the decision to expedite fell outside EB-5 program guidelines.”

“Nevertheless, Mr. Mayorkas pressured staff to expedite the review,” it added. “He also took the extraordinary step of requiring staff to brief Senator Reid’s staff on a weekly basis for several months.”

Image: DHS OIG report

It cited two others examples, one in Los Angeles, and one related to an investment in an electric car company for which now Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) was the board chairman. That same deal also had the involvement of Anthony Rodham, Hillary Clinton’s brother.

OIG said that while Mayorkas did recuse himself from some decisions, his involvement in these three cases created the perception of favoritism.

“Mr. Mayorkas’ actions in these matters created a perception within the EB-5 program that certain individuals had special access and would receive special consideration,” it said. “It also lowered the morale of those involved.”

Mayorkas responded to the OIG report by saying he disagrees with it, but said he would “certainly learn from it and from this process.” He also said the EB-5 process was “broken” when he took it over, and said he did his best to improve it, but he didn’t address the specific charges in the OIG report, other than to say he approves of a new effort at DHS to ensure the program is “free from the reality or perception of improper outside influence.”

DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson defended Mayorkas as “an exceptionally conscientious, honest and patriotic public official,” and indicated there would be no punishment.

“I continue to have full confidence in Ali Mayorkas,” he said. “He is doing an outstanding job as Deputy Secretary.”

While DHS seems unwilling to take any further steps, the Republican-led Congress may feel differently. Back in February, a key Senate Republican said he would consider reforms to the EB-5 program in light of those reports.

The report is likely to lead to further distrust of the Obama administration’s handling of immigration. Republicans have already accused the Obama administration of pursuing immigration reform in order to favor certain companies, and more broadly, to help Democrats win elections.

 

 

 

AMENPER: Impuestos y Regulaciones

En otra señal de que se ha puesto los guantes para los últimos dos años de su mandato, el presidente Obama sugiere que puede elevar los impuestos por acción ejecutiva. Es el mismo método que utilizó para su controvertida reforma de inmigración.

La oficina de presupuesto del Congreso, dice que la acción ejecutiva de inmigración del Sr. Obama aumentará el déficit federal por $ 8,8 billones durante los próximos diez años. Ahora, podemos ver también otros aumentos tributarios unilaterales

El número de las principales regulaciones federales emitidas en los primeros cinco años de la administración de Obama fue 153.2% mayor que durante los primeros cinco años del gobierno de Bush, según datos de la Fundación Heritage.

Exilando el juicio humano en los últimos cinco años, esta administración ha cambiado las leyes y la constitución del papel de herramienta útil a tirano sin cerebro.

Este régimen no es más que lo que el sistema soviético de planificación central fue-

Es el ridículo y la comedia de la lógica estéril de la ley-

Letreros de advertencia de veneno en  la arena común-

Cinco años en gastos en revisión de pesticidas sin  decidir nada.

Permitiendo a los hombres de cincuenta años entablar una demanda por discriminación.

La EPA  mirando la posibilidad de obligar a los barbecues en los patios a instalar sistemas de traping de grasa, así como filtros de “catalizador” para las emisiones de la parrilla.

Esto está totalmente en consonancia con la agenda demócrata para controlar cada aspecto de nuestras vidas.

También parece ser parte de una campaña más amplia para girar a los estadounidenses a convertirse en vegetarianos y llevarnos a todos a aceptar el calentamiento global.

El gobierno a través de la primera dama Michelle, recomendó recientemente que todos debiéramos eliminar la carne de nuestras dietas y como saben los izquierdistas insisten en que la producción de carne y como la cocinamos,  es una importante contribución al cambio climático- Comernos una parrillada puede ser la causa del próximo ciclón.

Todo esto recuerda los chistes viejos que solíamos escuchar sobre la vida en Cuba o el bloque del este.

Sentido común es a la ley como el agua para los cultivos. No debe extrañar que ley se haya vuelto frágil y la sociedad junto con ella.

La administración Obama está explotando agresivamente regulaciones para lograr su agenda política

Y  hay mucha más regulación  en el camino, estan planificandose otras 125 principales normas sobre la lista de tareas de la administración, incluyendo docenas vinculadas a la ley de regulación financiera Dodd-Frank y la funesta des-protección al paciente, el Un-affordable Care Act, conocida como Obama-don´t-care.

Críticamente se necesitan reformas del proceso regulatorio. Sin una acción decisiva, los costos del “Red tape” seguirá creciendo y la economía — y los estadounidenses promedio — sufrirán los resultados.

 

 

 

AMENPER: Water is contaminated

AMENPER@aol.com

We all drink water every day…

But did you know that the water in your town or city could contain Fluoride, Heavy Metals, and Prescription Drugs?

Over 205 million Americans are drinking contaminated water…and chances are you’re one of them.

I know it may sound scary but these nasty chemicals have been linked to bone disease, hip fractures, lower IQ…and even cancer in some cases.

…Worst of all, the EPA doesn’t even deny that these exist!

Thankfully there is a little-known breakthrough method that eliminates these hazardous chemicals from your water in just seconds.

Don´t drink water, drink wine

 

 

Obamacare’s Fate? Here’s What A Key Supreme Court Justice Just Said That Could Be A Huge Clue

A swing vote that could deliver a death blow to ObamaCare..

NORVELL ROSE —

As the U.S. Supreme Court considers a case whose outcome could prove to be a death blow to Obamacare — the case known as King v. Burwell challenging whether enrollees through the federal signup site, healthcare.gov, are entitled to premium-reducing subsidies — one key justice has casually dropped what could be a huge clue to his thinking.

And this potential clue suggests to some court watchers that Justice Anthony Kennedy — who often casts the high court’s swing vote — may be siding with plaintiffs who want to gut a key part of Obamacare and likely bring the law crashing down.

The Daily Caller reports that Justice Kennedy said something intriguing, and quite possibly revealing, in testimony before the House Appropriations Committee.

Justice Anthony Kennedy’s comments in a run-of-the-mill budget meeting Monday may have signaled how he intends to vote in this year’s biggest Obamacare lawsuit over the legality of federal premium subsidies.

Kennedy…made comments that could suggest he’s leaning in favor of the plaintiffs in King v. Burwell. The question in the pivotal case is whether the text of Obamacare restricts the law’s popular premium subsidies to state-run exchanges….

Kennedy’s remarks to the committee related to the Obama administration’s argument that all ObamaCare subsidies must be maintained because to declare the federal marketplace customers ineligible would be disastrous for the law’s future.

Advertisement-content continues below

The Daily Caller article notes that the administration “seems to be trying to convince the Court that ruling otherwise would be catastrophic for the health-care law, and therefore for the Court’s image.”

In other words, Obama, his legal team, and his liberal allies want the high court to go beyond considering what the law actually says and to give weight to what impact striking down the controversial provision would have on the millions of people who would be affected.

Responding to a question during Monday’s hearing, Justice Kennedy seemed to say that’s a faulty and largely irrelevant argument, that the Supreme Court should not be concerned with the impact of a decision or with the ability of Congress to “fix” a flawed law.

“We have to assume that we have three fully functioning branches of the government that are committed to proceed in good faith and with good will toward one another to resolve the problems of this republic,” Kennedy argued.

In fact, the head of the agency responsible for implementing Obama’s healthcare takeover scheme, HHS Secretary Sylvia Burwell, has said there is no backup plan for fixing the law should the Supreme Court rule against it in the subsidies case.

The justices are expected to issue their ruling in the latest challenge to ObamaCare in June. That’s when we will learn if what Anthony Kennedy said to lawmakers in the hearing on the Supreme Court’s budget was, in fact, a clue to how he will vote.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamacares-fate-heres-what-a-key-supreme-court-justice-just-said-that-could-be-a-huge-clue/#f10x305DDpxB1fiR.99

 

 

 

AMENPER: Obama’s Trantrum…..La perreta de Obama

 

Simply looking at the events, anyone can see that Iran will be the enemy in the next world nuclear war. However, at the moment, relations with Iran are much better than relations with allies in the region, both the other Arab States as well as Israel.

The administration has already a declared Israel as an enemy, and if Hillary Clinton is elected president, likely Israel will not exist for the next war.

The U.S. has started providing Iraq with aerial intelligence in the stalled battle to oust Islamic State from Tikrit, drawing the American military into closer coordination with Iranian-backed militias spearheading the offensive.

Military officials said they aren’t working directly with Iran. But the intelligence will be used to help some 20,000 Iranian-backed Shiite militia fighters who make up the bulk of the force that has been struggling for weeks to retake the strategic city.

So here we have it, now Iran is our ally, this is probably what the Iranian is offering Obama in the Nuclear Deal.  The problem is that with this “concession” Iran will end controlling Iraq and positioning itself to become “Imperial Iran”, in control the total Middle East including Israel… and the global caliphate will follow.

Usually somebody of lesser importance, a person like me, is able to present the facts as they are.  Mainstream publications are usually careful how to present the facts.  But this situation is so bizarre, that we see today’s editorial of a paper with the reputation of the Wall Street Journal, which looks like one of my E Mails, even the title looks like one of my E Mails,.”Obama’s Israel Tantrum” (La Perreta de Obama con Israel)

 

 

 

AMENPER: Enfrentándose al Alzheimer

Cuando llegamos a los ochentas, nos preocupamos por la salud mental.

Oímos los peligros de la demencia senil y del terrible alemán, Alzheimer.

Entonces empezamos a leer los artículos sobre esta enfermedad, tratamos de aprender los síntomas para saber si estamos comenzando a padecer de esta condición por nuestra edad.

Estaba leyendo un artículo que informaba de los principales síntomas que debíamos tener en consideración, que son los principios del Alzheimer.

Los principales síntomas que debíamos detectar son los que siguen:

 

Ocasionalmente olvidar donde dejó las cosas que usa regularmente, tales como gafas, teléfono celular o llaves.

Olvidar los nombres de conocidos o bloqueo de una memoria con una similar, como llamar a una persona con el nombre de otra.

En ocasiones olvidar una cita.

Tener problemas  los detalles de una conversación.

Entrar en una habitación y olvidando que viniste a hacer.

Distraerse fácilmente.

No ser capaz de recuperar información tienes “en la punta de la lengua”.

 

Esto me creó una preocupación alarmante, porque tengo todos estos síntomas, y no puedo negarles que he tenido unos momentos de depresión, pensando que ya el alemán me atacó.

Pero cuando le dije mi preocupación a mi señora, ella me confortó y me hizo sentirme mejor.

Me dijo, oye, tú tienes esos mismos síntomas desde que tenías 25 años.

Así que si he vivido con este problema desde hace 55 años, creo que puedo vivir con ellos unos 20 años más.

 

 
       

DailyCaller

Rubio: Obama Sent ‘Entire Political Machine’ After Bibi, ‘Business-like’ Relationship ‘Absurd’ [AUDIO]

White House Lashes Out At Israel For Giving Congress Details On Iran Talks

Boston Globe Snubs Hillary, Calls For Warren Run

McCain To Obama On Israel: Stop Whining, You Big Baby

by Taboola

Cornell University Wants Students to Celebrate Islamist Terrorism and Start an ‘ISIS Club’

Warner Todd Huston

Our colleges and universities are hotbeds of anti-Americanism and here we have yet another example of it. But this time its even worse because Cornell University wants students to start a club to celebrate terrorism. A Cornell dean wants kids to start an ISIS club.

You read that right. A Cornell dean wants students to start a terrorist club at the school!!

Joseph Scaffido, Assistant Dean at Cornell University, is captured on hidden camera advising a Project Veritas investigative journalist on how to start and fund a pro-ISIS club on campus, how to obtain funding to send care packages to ISIS and Hamas, and astonishingly, how to bring a member of ISIS to Cornell to run a “training camp.”

The story is brought to us by Project Veritas.

Assistant Dean Tells a Project Veritas Investigative Journalist that the University Would Allow an ISIS Terrorist to Hold a “Training Camp” on Campus, Saying: “It Would be Like Bringing in a Coach to do a Training on a Sports Team”

Assistant Dean for Students Freely Gives Advice on how to Obtain University Funding to Send Care Packages to ISIS and Hamas

Award-winning journalist and New York Times’ best-selling author James O’Keefe released a powerful new video today showing an Assistant Dean at Cornell University advising a Project Veritas investigative journalist on how to start and fund a pro-ISIS club on campus. Joseph Scaffido, Assistant Dean for Students at Cornell, is perplexingly sympathetic to the proposed pro-ISIS and pro-Hamas group.

This is what our students are being taught, America. They are being taught that terrorists and haters of America are good people.

http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/cornell-university-wants-students-to-celebrate-islamist-terrorism-and-start-an-isis-club/

 

POLITICS

EXCLUSIVE: Democratic Senators Beg For Another Obamacare Delay

Daily Caller

EXCLUSIVE: Democratic Senators Beg For Another Obamacare Delay

PATRICK HOWLEY

PATRICK HOWLEY

Patrick Howley is an investigative reporter for The Daily Caller.

A group of Democratic senators is urging the Obama administration to delay a key portion of Obamacare because the results could be “harmful and disruptive.”

In a letter exclusively obtained by The Daily Caller, Senate Democrats pleaded with Health and Human Services secretary Sylvia Matthews Burwell to delay an Obamacare rule change that puts companies with 51 to 100 employees in the costlier “small group” market instead of the “large group” market. The rule change, which will result in higher premiums for many companies, goes into effect in 2016.

The letter was signed by Democratic Sens. Claire McCaskill, Heidi Heitkamp, Chris Coons, Joe Manchin, Joe Donnelly and Jon Tester and independent Sen. Angus King, who caucuses with the Democrats.

“We are writing to share our concerns regarding scheduled changes to the definition of the small group market under the Affordable Care Act (ACA),” the senators wrote in the letter, dated March 12.

“Under the law, employers with 51 to 100 employees will be included in the ACA’s definition of small group market starting in 2016. Instead of providing stability, we believe expanding the definition will force those historically defined ‘large group plans’ into the ‘small group market,’ where they could experience higher premiums, less flexibility, and new barriers to coverage. We therefore encourage you to delay the effective date in the definition change for two years so the market can more smoothly transition to the new rules.”

11 Disney Girls All Grown UpCelebSeven

Top Ten Cheap All-Inclusive ResortsTripCurator

14 Biggest Cheaters In Sports History…#6 Will Shock You!LockerRoomVIP

by Taboola

Sponsored Links

“We appreciate the Administration’s efforts to ensure the law is implemented in the least disruptive, most beneficial manner. For example, the Administration has delayed implementation of the employer shared responsibility requirements. At the same time, the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) has experienced delays in implementation. As enacted, the ACA was to have provided this market segment two full years of experience under the employer mandate and in SHOP exchanges before re-categorizing their plans into the small group market. Because these two very significant building blocks have not occurred as anticipated, we believe continuing on with the redefinition of small group next year would be particularly harmful and disruptive.”

Follow Howley on Twitter

 

 

Jeb Bush Against Obamacare: Is He Credible?

 by Mark Horne 

He is now calling it a “monstrosity,” but the history of Jeb Bush against Obamacare is mostly silence and massive corporate profits.

image: http://cdn1.politicaloutcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/peoplevobamacare.jpg

Jeb Bush did once rail against Obamacare. But he waited until it had passed and was headed for Obama’s desk and infamous pen. On March 22, 2010, Jeb Bush railed against the Affordable Care Act as a “huge new entitlement” while appearing on Fox News. I’m sure his audience loved what he had to say. I would have if I had been watching that night.

But before the law was passed by the House and Senate, Bush said almost nothing. I don’t mean he didn’t say anything. I mean the little he did say almost seems like nothing in terms of substance. Byron York has done the homework at the Washington Examiner. Gary Bauer of American Values has accused Jeb Bush of being AWOL on Obamacare and York says that Bauer was “basically right.”

In 2009 and early 2010, as Obamacare made its troubled way through Congress, Bush — a respected former two-term Republican governor of Florida with solid conservative credentials — remained mostly silent about the biggest public policy fight in a generation.

Bush statements that even tangentially touched on the Affordable Care Act were few and far between. In March 2009, for example, as the battle was just beginning, Bush penned an op-ed calling for conservatives to be the “loyal opposition” in the face of far-reaching Democratic initiatives. He added: “Simply opposing the massive encroachment of government into health care won’t solve the problem of affordability of health insurance for many Americans.”

A couple of months later, in May 2009, when Bush joined fellow Republicans Eric Cantor and Mitt Romney on a “listening tour” Bush said: “It’s time for us to listen first, to learn a little bit, to upgrade our message a little bit and to not be nostalgic about the past. You can’t beat something with nothing, and the other side has something. I don’t like it but they have it and we have to be respectful and mindful of that.”

That’s pretty much it for 2009 and early 2010, as the health care battle raged on Capitol Hill.

Throughout those years, Bush sat on the Board of Directors for Tenet Healthcare, one of those hospital companies that is doing quite well due to Obamacare. Bush just left the company in preparation for his Presidential run.

Byron writes,

I asked [Bush spokesman Tim] Miller whether Bush’s near-silence on Obamacare was the result of his place on the Tenet board. “Absolutely not,” Miller said. “He forcefully advocated against it in board meetings, to the point that it bubbled up in public. When asked about it, he was very clear that he was in opposition to it.”

What Miller meant by “bubbled up in public” was a line in a New York Times article in 2014 — years after Obamacare became law — which reported: “Tenet’s chief executive, Trevor Fetter, said Mr. Bush had made no secret of his objections to the health care overhaul at company meetings. But [Fetter] suggested that Mr. Bush understood the difference between ‘personal views and what is best for the company.’ Mr. Fetter predicts that in 2014, the Affordable Care Act will deliver up to $100 million in new earnings for Tenet.”

In 2010, Jeb Bush did campaign for several Republicans running for the House or Senate who promised to repeal Obamacare.

So that’s it. Bush has made massive profits from Obamacare and there are friends of his who claim he spoke against it at the time. He helps some anti-Obamacare candidates for the 2010 election. And he spoke out against it himself after it was passed.

Is this the record we want from the person we hope will be elected President in 2016?
Read more at http://politicaloutcast.com/2015/03/jeb-bush-against-obamacare-is-he-credible/#d3KIb2x0Xj9eCYs0.99

 

 

 

THE MIRROR

Glenn Beck Asks Ted Cruz To Go Easy On Rand Paul And Scott Walker

Betsy Rothstein

On Tuesday, conservative media mogul Glenn Beck (who declared that he’s done with the GOP) did an “interview” with 2016 presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz. The Republican Texas senator announced his candidacy Monday after an evening of bedtime stories with Breitbart News‘ Matthew Boyle. (RELATED: Breitbart News Snuggles Up To Sen. Ted Cruz)

I use the word “interview” loosely because it was light on journalistic questions and more like a crazy personal plea from Beck for Cruz to not fuck things up for the other Republican candidates (read: more viable candidates) that Beck would really like to see advance in the race.

What it amounted to was a public embarrassment for what passes for journalism in 2015.

And good for Cruz — he made no real promises.

17 Bizarre Moments From History That You Won’t Believe Actually Occured!Swifty

The #1 Reason to NEVER drink milk (are you drinking these 2 types of milk?)Fat Burning Kitchen Guide Book

‘Warren Buffett Indicator’ Signals Collapse in Stock MarketNewsmax

by Taboola

Sponsored Links

Glenn Beck: “So, Ted, let me ask you this, and this is a hard question. I like Rand Paul. I like Scott Walker. I’d like to see those guys advance. There are progressives in the Republican Party, i.e. Jeb Bush, that just need to be stopped. Or we’re just going to end up with Jeb Bush. Is it at all part of your strategy or will you consider not going after Rand, and Scott Walker, Rand in particular, to keep the guys who love the Constitution in play so focus your energy on the people who are the progressives?”

Sen. Ted Cruz: “I very much like and respect Rand Paul, I very much like and respect Scott Walker. They’re both good guys. My focus is not going to be going after anybody. My focus is going to be making the affirmative case that number one … what I think primary voters are looking for is someone who is a consistent conservative who said the same thing yesterday today and tomorrow and who will stand up and do what he said he would do and I think to win, the only way that we’re going to win is if you have a full spectrum conservative who has a proven record standing for principle — whether it’s on Obamacare, whether it is stopping the debt ceiling, whether it is stopping Obama’s executive amnesty. Whether it is defending the First Amendment, free speech, religious liberty, defending the Second Amendment, defending our privacy, defending the Tenth Amendment and stopping Common Core, standing with the nation of Israel, standing up to Iran and preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. And I’ll tell you as I look at the potential field, I see a lot of people who I like and respect who are friends of mine. But as you look at those issues that I listed off, and you ask of all the senators and governors looking at this field, looking at this race, how many of them have actually stood up and led and engaged meaningfully on the great issues today?”

 

 

 

Lazaro R Gonzalez “En mi opinion”  “The  Comvetion of states”

Freedom is not for the faint of heart. Every day, the federal government establishes new regulations that infringe on our constitutional rights as Americans. Today, we must battle for the freedom that we hold most dear.

This afternoon, the North Dakota Senate voted on the Convention of States Resolution — HCR 3014 — to call for a Convention of States to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government. This is the tool given to us by the founding fathers that allows the states to check the runaway power of the federal government, using Article V of the US Constitution. If HCR 3014 passed, North Dakota would become the fourth state in history to successfully pass the application.

In a matter of minutes, the measure was defeated 15-31 with absolutely zero discussion on the floor.

This is unacceptable. Today, we must fight!

Tomorrow, HCR 3014 has the opportunity to be put up for a recall vote. We need your help to make it happen.

Please contact each of the Senators below who voted “NO” on HCR 3014, and ask them to move for a reconsideration vote, and to vote YES on HCR 3014, the only solution as big as the problem!

We encourage you to write your email in your own words, from your heart, kindly encouraging these legislators to support HCR 3014, and stand up for the entire nation. Please BCC lfennig@cosaction.com. For inspiration, check out talking points for HCR 3014 here.

Senator Tyler Axness taxness@nd.gov District 16
Senator Brad Bekkedahl bbekkedahl@nd.gov District 01
Senator Ron Carlisle rcarlisle@nd.gov District 30
Senator Dwight Cook dcook@nd.gov District 34
Senator Jim Dotzenrod jdotzenrod@nd.gov District 26
Senator Robert Erbele rerbele@nd.gov District 28
Senator Tim Flakoll tflakoll@nd.gov District 44
Senator John Grabinger jgrabinger@nd.gov District 12
Senator Joan Heckaman jheckaman@nd.gov District 23
Senator Ray Holmberg rholmberg@nd.gov District 17
Senator Ralph Kilzer rkilzer@nd.gov District 47
Senator Jerry Klein jklein@nd.gov District 14
Senator Karen Krebsbach kkrebsbach@nd.gov District 40
Senator Judy Lee jlee@nd.gov District 13
Senator Gary Lee galee@nd.gov District 22
Senator Richard Marcellais rmarcellais@nd.gov District 09
Senator Tim Mathern tmathern@nd.gov District 11
Senator Philip Murphy pmmurphy@nd.gov District 20
Senator Carolyn Nelson cnelson@nd.gov District 21
Senator Erin Oban eoban@nd.gov District 35
Senator David O’Connell doconnell@nd.gov District 06
Senator Dave Oehlke doehlke@nd.gov District 15
Senator Nicole Poolman npoolman@nd.gov District 07
Senator Larry Robinson lrobinson@nd.gov District 24
Senator David Rust drust@nd.gov District 02
Senator Mac Schneider macschneider@nd.gov District 42
Senator George Sinner georgesinner@nd.gov District 46
Senator Connie Triplett ctriplett@nd.gov District 18
Senator Terry Wanzek tmwanzek@nd.gov District 29
Senator Rich Wardner rwardner@nd.gov District 37
Senator John Warner jwarner@nd.gov District 04

Please email each of the Senators below who voted “YES” on HCR 3014, thank them, and ask for their continued support in a recall vote. BCC lfennig@cosaction.com.

Senate Howard Anderson hcanderson@nd.gov District 08
Senate Kelly Armstrong karmstrong@nd.gov District 36
Senate Bill Bowman bbowman@nd.gov District 39
Senate Randall Burckhard raburckhard@nd.gov District 05
Senate Jonathan Casper jcasper@nd.gov District 27
Senate Kyle Davison kdavison@nd.gov District 41
Senate Dick Dever ddever@nd.gov District 32
Senate David Hogue dhogue@nd.gov District 38
Senate Lonnie Laffen llaffen@nd.gov District 43
Senate Oley Larsen olarsen@nd.gov District 03
Senate Larry Luick lluick@nd.gov District 25
Senate Joe Miller joetmiller@nd.gov District 10
Senate Donald Schaible dgschaible@nd.gov District 31
Senate Ronald Sorvaag rsorvaag@nd.gov District 45
Senate Jessica Unruh jkunruh@nd.gov District 33

Thank-you for fighting with us. In the words of Ronald Reagan, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.”

I look forward to telling my grandchildren that our generation did everything we could to protect our nation’s most precious gift: liberty.

Yours in the fight,

Laura Fennig
Grassroots Director
Convention of States Action
lfennig@cosaction.com

Convention of States Action · 100 Congress Ave, Suite 2000, Austin, TX 78701, United States
This email was sent to lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com. To stop receiving emails, click here.

Created with NationBuilder, the essential toolkit for leaders.

 

 

 

 

Judicial Watch

 Newsletters

To: lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com

Judicial Watch: New Documents Show Homeland Security Released 165,900 Convicted Criminal Aliens throughout U.S. as of April 26, 2014 — Judicial Watch today released 76 pages of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) documents revealing that as of April 26, 2014, Immigration … READ MORE 

 

DHS Brags of Arresting 5% of Criminal Aliens It Freed From Detention — On the heels of releasing over 36,000 criminal aliens from detention, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has the audacity to pat itself on the back for arresting a tiny fraction of the illegal immigrants—thousands convicted … READ MORE  

 

Sen. Durbin Used Race to Block “Especially Dangerous” Latino Judicial Nominee — Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin has a lot of nerve to accuse Republicans of racism for delaying President Obama’s nominee for Attorney General considering he’s the only sitting senator who actually … READ MORE

 

Judicial Watch & The Clintons — Here at Judicial Watch, we’ve had a long relationship with Bill and Hillary Clinton. For more than twenty years, from our founding in 1994, Judicial Watch has consistently sought to shed sunlight on the Clintons’ activities through the Freedom of Information … READ MORE

 

Judicial Watch In the News 

 

New Court Action in Hillary Clinton Email Scandal

Fast and Furious Cover-up Rewarded in Appointment of New ATF Director

 

White House scrambles to limit damage from Hillary Clinton email scandal

 

Tweet Status 

 

New Documents Show Homeland Security Released 165,900 Convicted Criminal Aliens: http://jwatch.us/8jnPPz via @JudicialWatch (click to tweet)

Hola Lazaro R Gonzalez “En mi opinión”

Como sabes, mañana miércoles 25 de marzo se celebra en varios países el Día del Niño por Nacer.

Como sabes, el 25M es la festividad de la Encarnación. Este martes 24 por la tarde habrá una vigilia por la Vida en Santa María la Mayor de Roma para celebrar el 20º aniversario de la Evangelium Vitae. Habrá testimonios, catequesis y luego una misa. Un acto organizado por el Pontificio Consejo para la Familia.

En varias parroquias y diócesis habrá también algún tipo de celebración.

Te propongo, Lazaro R, que además, conquistemos las redes. Hagamos que #25mDiaNiñoXNacer se convierta en Trending Topic. ¿Qué puedes hacer?

El album ha quedado genial. Estoy emocionado. Veo a mis amigos Richard, Teresita, Claudia y un larguísimo etcétera. Hay embarazadas, niños, seminaristas, familias y organizaciones provida. ¡Me encanta! Un verdadero canto a la vida

https://www.flickr.com/photos/citizengo/sets/72157651514383202

Nos vemos mañana en las redes sociales, Lazaro R. ¡Vamos a ser trending topic!

Un abrazo,

 

Luis Losada Pescador y todo el equipo de CitizenGO

  1. No olvides mañana 25M participar en las redes sociales con el hastag#25mDiaNiñoXNacer

SI ESTO ES VERDAD RECOGE Y VETE…

Feds Urge Banks to Call Cops on Customers Who Withdraw $5,000 or More

(Antes era el control de depósitos de $10,000 o más – ahora son las salidas de solo $5,000 – mañana seran las entradas y salidas de solo $1,000 – Se esta preparando muy bien la cama para la incautacion de todo el dinero lo que uno tenga en las cuentas – el gobierno ya no tiene ni donde caherse muerto y necesita todo ese dinero para mantenerse a flote)

War on cash intensifies

Image Credits: Todd Kravos via Flickr

by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON | MARCH 24, 2015

The Justice Department is ordering bank employees to consider calling the cops on customers who withdraw $5,000 dollars or more, a chilling example of how the war on cash is intensifying.

Banks are already required to file ‘suspicious activity reports’ on their customers, with threats of fines and even jail time for directors if financial institutions don’t meet quotas.

But as investor and financial blogger Simon Black points out, last week, “A senior official from the Justice Department spoke to a group of bankers about the need for them to rat out their customers to the police.”

Assistant attorney general Leslie Caldwell gave a speech in which he urged banks to “alert law enforcement authorities about the problem” so that police can “seize the funds” or at least “initiate an investigation”.

As Black highlights, according to the handbook for the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council, such suspicious activity includes, “Transactions conducted or attempted by, at, or through the bank (or an affiliate) and aggregating $5,000 or more…”

Black provides a chilling scenario under which an attempt to withdraw your own money from your bank account could end with a home visit from the cops.

“As you pull into your driveway later there’s an unexpected surprise waiting for you: two police officers would like to have a word with you about your intended withdrawal earlier,” writes Black, who accuses banks of already operating as “unpaid government spies”.

“Do you need to withdraw cash to purchase a used car from a private seller? Or perhaps you are pulling out some emergency cash for a loved one,” writes Mac Slavo.

“Either one of these activities are now considered suspicious and if your cash withdrawal amounts to even a few thousand dollars your bank teller is under a legal requirement to alert officials about your suspected criminal activity. And before you argue that you can’t possibly be a suspect because you have done nothing wrong, consider that even being suspected of being a suspect is now enough to land you on a terrorist watchlist in America.”

The war on cash is intensifying as authorities attempt to crack down on one of the few remaining modes of anonymity.

Over in France, Finance Minister Michel Sapin hailed the introduction of measures set to come into force in September which will restrict French citizens from making cash payments over 1,000 euros.

The new regulations, introduced in the name of fighting terrorism, will also see cash deposits of over 10,000 euros during a single month reported to anti-fraud authorities.

Meanwhile, in the UK, HSBC is now interrogating its account holders on how they earn and spend their money as well as restricting large cash withdrawalsfor customers from £5000 upwards.

Back in America, purchasing Amtrak train tickets with cash is being treated as a suspicious activity as part of a number of behaviors that are “indicative of criminal activity”.

Banks are also making it harder for customers to withdraw and deposit cash, with Chase imposing new capital controls that mandate identification for cash deposits and ban cash being deposited into another person’s account.

In October 2013, we also reported on how Chase instituted policy changes which banned international wire transfers while restricting cash activity for business customers (both deposits and withdrawals) to a $50,000 limit per statement cycle.

http://www.infowars.com/feds-urge-banks-to-call-cops-on-customers-who-withdraw-5000-or-more/

FRANK RESILLEZ: EL 10 DE MARZO, EL MADRUGON QUE DEBIA HABER SIDO

PARA QUE SEPAN LO H.P. QUE FUE KENNEDY.

Subject: El 10 de marzo, el “Madrugon” que deberia haber sido:

La verdadera fecha para la liberacion de Cuba por tropas cubanas era el 10 de marzo. Fecha con un significado politico muy grande ya que era la fecha en que Fulgencio Batista habia derrocado al ultimo gobierno democraticamente electo en Cuba. Pero el Presidiente John Kennedy tenia otras ideas…

El Presidente Kennedy queria suspender la invasion y dejar a los soldados cubanos con un cheque de despido en Centro America. Al Presidente no le importaba concluir un plan empezado por un Presidente anterior que era Republicano. Sus acesores, conocidos como los “New Frontier Boys”, querian apaziguar a la Union Sovietica, dandole una base en el hemisferio occidental, tal y como la tenia Estados Unidos en Turquia, fronteriza con la Union Sovietica. El Almirante Arleigh Burke de la Marina de Guerra de los Estados Unidos, fue el que le argumento que eso no se podia hacer: “Que las tropas cubanas estaban tan bien entrenadas y preparadas que eran posible que tomasen un pais de Centro America para ellos y de alli causar una guerra”; “Habia que mandarlos a Cuba…” El Presidente entonces dijo que “si los cubanos querian ir a Cuba, pues que los botaran en Cuba”. El Presidente insistio que fueran botados en un lujar y a una hora inospita y que no queria que la ayuda estadounidense “fuera muy visible”.

Entonces se decidio eliminar el plan original de la invasion a Cuba y optar por un plan secundario donde los soldados cubanos fueran forzados a desembarcar en medio de la noche, sobre un arrecife, alfrente de un pantano, y despues sin apoyo aereo: Bahia de Cochinos era esa opcion para los 3,068 hombres de la Brigada 2506.

El plan original del 10 de marzo, tenia como meta la ciudad de Trinidad y el puerto de Casilda. Este plan era muchisimo mejor por las siguientes razones:

  1. Trinidad era una ciudad con muchos desencantados de la Revolucion.
  2. Casilda era un puerto donde habia mucho combustible disponible en el puerto y los soldados podian apearse en el puerto sin tener que desembarcar amfibiamente.
  3. Habian carreteras, vias ferreas, y aereopuerto entre Casilda, Trinidad, y el resto del pais.
  4. Ambos locales estaban cerca de las montañas del Escambray donde habian cientos de guerrilleros ya peleando contra el comunismo.
  5. La ciudad de Trinidad y el puerto de Casilda estaban fuera del alcanse de los aviones jets T-33 de la Fuerza Aerea Rebelde.
  6. Ambos locales estaban en el centro geografico de la isla de Cuba y vecino a la Provincia de Camaguey, provincia notablemente anti-revolucionaria y con territorio abierto ampliamente.

Frank Resillez

Buscamos un candidato decente que no sea un metiroso o un ladron, ni un descarado para para alcalde Miami Dade:

1-         Que no haya sido ni sea político profesional nunca.

2-         Que no se robe los dineros de los contribuyentes.

3-         Que se someta a un tribunal de cuentas al final de su mandato para que testifique que sus propiedades y peculio no sea mayor de los que represento su sueldo de alcalde u otras fuentes legales y agenas a su posición de alcalde.

4-         Que al final de su mandato se someta a una inspección de la diferencia de su dinero y sus propiedades.

5-          Que se comprometa a eliminar el MDX “Miami Dade XpresWay” (Departamento que ha puesto todos los peajes en las carreteras) Y a eliminar todos los Peajes.

6-          Que no engañe a los contribuyentes tratando de robarse dineros públicos diciendo que va a reparar el edificio de la corte.

7-           Que no engañe al contribuyente diciendo que el inversionista no van a pedir dineros públicos y luego le dan dineros públicos.

8-   Que no tenga ni hijos ni amigos “Cabilderos”

9-           Que no traiga amigos de el para que sean “Vice-Alcaldes” (Cargo que ni existía) Y luego les pague $100,000 o más mas gastos.

10-                     Que se comprometa que al final de cada trimestre se reúna con los ciudadanos del condado a responder las preguntas de los ciudadanos sobre su gestión durante este trimestre.

11-                     Que la deuda y los movimientos económicos, compras, gastos, del condado sean expuestos en un sitio público para que los electores puedan tener control de su administración. 

12-                     Que sea juzgado por los tribunales si favorece de forma económica a sus amigos o familiares.

13-                     Que no le tenga miedo a los gánsteres que hasta hora han desgobernado y desguazado el condado Miami Dade y casi todas las alcaldía de las ciudades.

 “EMO” Por favor envíenme todas las características que considera debe tener el alcalde que usted quiere que administre, fiscalice  y controle al Condado Miami Dade.

Envienme ambien los nombres de las personas que ustedes consideren que sea la persona que se puede enfrentar con esta difícil tarea.        

Lázaro R González Miño Editor  “En mi opinion”

“En mi opinión”

 “FREEDOM IS  NOT  FREE”

Blooger:  https://www.blogger.com/home

https://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s