HPIM0049

No 905 “En mi opinion” Marzo 18, 2015

No 905 “En mi opinión”  Marzo 18, 2015

“IN GOD WE TRUST”    Lázaro R González Miño    EDITOR

Enero 20, 2017 FIN DEL DISPARATE

The Jerusalen post: ISRAEL ELECTIONS

By JPOST.COM STAFF

In victory speech, Netanyahu says he will seek ‘strong, stable government’

“Hail, hail, Bibi,” Likud adherents chanted as Netanyahu took to the podium on Wednesday.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

A triumphant Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Likud supporters in his victory speech early Wednesday that he would aim to form “a strong, stable government” that would tackle “security and socioeconomic challenges.”
Netanyahu told a jubilant crowd of Likud supporters early Wednesday morning that “against all odds, we have scored a major victory for the Likud.”
“Hail, hail, Bibi,” Likud adherents chanted as Netanyahu took to the podium on Wednesday.
“We have scored a major victory for the nationalist camp headed by Likud,” Netanyahu said.

“I’m proud of the Israeli people because at the moment of truth they knew to differentiate between challenge and nonsense and they took up the challenge,” the prime minister said.
Netanyahu said that his government will work to improve on “the most important things for all of us, which genuine security and socioeconomic welfare.”
After the prime minister raised eyebrows in the latter stages of the campaign by warning of a high voter turnout among Israel’s Arabs, Netanyahu seemed to be extending an olive branch to Israel’s minorities during his speech.
“These are important things for every family, citizen, soldier, and all of Israel’s Jewish and non-Jewish citizens,” Netanyahu said. “You are all important, and you are all important to me.”
The prime minister also seemed to be going out of his way to mention economic matters, a departure from his public appearances during which regional threats and the security front were prominent.
“Now we must form a strong, stable government that will know how to uphold security and socioeconomic well-being.”
“We are faced with major challenges on the security and socioeconomic front,” Netanyahu said. “We promised to take care of cost of living and rise of housing costs, and we will do it.”
“I spoke to all of the nationalist party leaders, and I called on them to join me in forming a government without delay, because reality doesn’t take a timeout.”

“Citizens expect us to form a responsible leadership that will work for it, and that’s what we will do.” 

“En mi opinion” Hay alguien llorando ahora como una Magdalena en la casa negra el que adivine quien es Netanyaho lo invitara a la tribuna en Israel el dia de la toma de posición… Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino  (Es solo un chiste)…para mi

 

 

AMENPER: Las Plantas Nucleares

Las plantas nucleares son una fuente de energía barata y efectiva.

Ha habido intentos de encontrar otras maneras constructivas de remplazarlo, pero la energía nuclear es una fuente importante de energía en muchos países. 442 reactores nucleares están operando en todo el mundo con una capacidad total de 300.000 MW. Se agregarán dos veces y medio este número para el 2030 y cuatro veces más para el año 2050, según dijo la Agencia Internacional de energía atómica (OIEA), el bastión de la comunidad nuclear global

La variación de los precios de petróleo y energía que alternativas  hacen que  la energía nuclear sea más atractiva y esperan que conduzcan al crecimiento en la capacidad de generación nuclear en todo el mundo.

Mejoras en el diseño del reactor aumentan la seguridad, aumentan la eficiencia y reducen los costos, la fabricación de generación nuclear es una económicamente atractiva y segura fuente de energía

¿Por qué entonces el miedo a las plantas nucleares?  Hay muchos factores como el miedo a la radiación, aunque la realidad es que la mayoría van a estar expuesto a más radiación en los procedimientos de diagnóstico médicos que nunca lo estarán, sin duda, de una planta de energía nuclear.

Primero hubo la oposición de la izquierda y los ambientalistas a las plantas nucleares.  Esto se ha superado se ha comprobado que las plantas nucleares tienen menores emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero: Según los informes en 1998, se ha calculado que la emisión de los gases de efecto invernadero se ha reducido a casi la mitad debido a la popularidad en el uso de la energía nuclear.

La energía nuclear tiene en gran medida el mínimo impacto sobre el medio ambiente ya que no libera los gases como el dióxido de carbono y metano, que son en gran parte responsables del efecto invernadero. No hay ningún efecto adverso sobre el agua, tierra o cualquier hábitats debido al uso de las plantas nucleares.

Chernobyl que fue el único caso en el mundo de un accidente nuclear fatal, se debió a la ineficiencia del sistema comunista, por el atraso científico y la falta de regulación, el gobierno regulándose a sí mismo-

Pero los pequeños problemas que han ocurrido en el resto del mundo han sido exagerados por la publicidad.

No es noticia el decir que no ha habido accidentes fatales en ninguna planta nuclear, pero es una noticia alarmante el decir que el mundo está en peligro de un accidente en una planta nuclear.

Después de un terremoto de 9,0 magnitud y el devastador tsunami que golpeó Japón, matando o hiriendo a más de 25.000, el accidente estructural de la planta de Fukushima fue reportado como un peligro global. 

Al final, la cifra de muertos de exposición a la radiación en la planta de energía nuclear de Fukushima Daiiche devastado por la tormenta de Japón se encuentra en cero

Estos resultados demuestran lo que expertos habían predicho desde el terremoto y maremoto azotó la costa del Pacífico de Japón en marzo: nadie moriría de radiación como resultado del incidente.

Pero las noticias alarmantes no han publicado una retracción a sus erradas predicciones.

Por esto,  como en el caso de Ferguson, que a pesar de las pruebas todavía hay demostraciones con los brazos en alto, en el caso de las plantas nucleares todavía hay quienes protestan por la construcción de una planta nuclear.

Es más fácil recordar lo que nos dijeron por mucho tiempo que aceptar la realidad substanciada por las evidencias.

A pesar de no tener más remedio que aceptar la realidad, la administración de Obama, aunque no canceló la construcción de plantas nucleares que había aprobado Bush, todavía sigue manteniendo su apoyo a empresas alternativas como Solyndra que ha costado millones de pesos a los contribuyentes antes de descontinuar sus operaciones.

El proyecto de salida de la energía nuclear de Alemania aprobado en respuesta a Fukushima ya ha convertido el exportador de electricidad  en un importador, dejando a sí mismo y los clientes de largo plazo como Francia más dependiente que nunca sobre las importaciones de gas ruso.

Esto junto con el alto precio de fuentes alternativas “renovables” se compromete a mantener la tendencia de los desorbitados precios de la energía en Europa.

A diferencia de las fuentes tradicionales de energía como la solar y molinos que requieren sol o el viento para producir electricidad, energía nuclear puede ser producido de plantas de reactores de energía nuclear, incluso en los casos de las condiciones de mal tiempo. Pueden producir energía 24/7 y necesitan cerrarse únicamente con fines de mantenimiento

El costo del uranio que se utiliza como combustible en la generación de electricidad es muy bajo.

 La vida media del reactor nuclear van desde 40 a 60 años dependiendo de su uso. Estos factores combinados hacen el costo de producción de electricidad muy bajo. Incluso si se eleva el costo del uranio, el aumento en el costo de la electricidad será mucho menor.

Las protestas antinucleares ignoran  las consecuencias de dejar de considerar una economía privada de energía que obligaría a los países desarrollados  caer en las condiciones del tercer mundo

La energía nuclear con la comisión reguladora garantiza la seguridad de una energía eficiente.

El tiempo ha dado la razón a los expertos que predicaron esto por años.

Los que me conocen pueden pensar que estoy llevado por un interés personal, por tener un hijo que ha dedicado su vida a la construcción y mantenimiento de plantas nucleares, en diferentes partes del mundo y ahora en Estados Unidos.

Pero simplemente estoy exponiendo los hechos substanciados por la realidad probada a través del tiempo.

 

 

 

AMENPER: Saudade y Fado

Hay veces que no queremos pensar en el pasado, sobre todo los que tenemos unos cuantos años de más y en que los protagonistas y los lugares de nuestro pasado no están más con nosotros.

La primera vez que oí la frase “se te ve Saudade” fue de un gallego en Cuba.  No sabía lo que era “Saudade” y me explicó que era algo como melancolía. Me sonó como “saludable” por eso me acordé de la palabra aunque no oí la palabra otra vez hasta muchos años después.

Creo que no oí esa palabra más hasta que fui a Portugal y fui dos veces a oír cantar el Fado una muy típica en Coimbra, y otra más turística en Lisboa, y usaron la palabra saudade que también significa lo mismo en portugués para describir la canción..

El Fado es la expresión más conocida de la música portuguesa. En el fado se expresan los malos momentos de la vida a través del canto. Generalmente es cantado por una sola persona, acompañado por la viola, en el fado son la melancolía, la nostalgia o pequeñas historias del diario vivir de los barrios humildes, pero especialmente el fatalismoy la frustración es el tema de la canción, es  como “La Guantanamera Portuguesa”. 

Triste momento que hubimos de pasar en un viaje de placer. Aunque un portugués al que le dije que el Fado lo que traía era tristeza, que mejor era cantar otra cosa más alegre, me dijo que había que comprender que el saudade era  “El bien que se padece y el mal que se disfruta”

Para nosotros los que perdimos no sólo a los seres queridos pero a una patria en el pensamiento que nunca podremos recuperar, porque existe solamente en nuestra memoria, el saudosismo es parte de nuestra existencia.

Porque de eso se trata básicamente el saudade, del sentimiento reprimido de saber que aquello que se extraña nunca volverá pero a la vez esa melancolía puede traer también alegría, así que quizás los amantes del Fado están en lo correcto,  Cuando nos reunimos con las personas que vivimos juntos el pasado, y hablamos del saudade de haber perdido algo que uno tenía, algo que ya no es suyo, lo hacemos con la alegría de revivir los tiempos en que lo tuvimos.  Porque el saudade des una mezcla de nostalgia, añoranza, melancolía de algo o alguien de tu pasado, recuerdo doloroso y a la vez hermoso. Doloroso porque se extraña, hermoso por lo vivido.

Quizás sería conveniente traer un cantante de Fado a esas reuniones aunque nos cantaría con fatalismo y frustración, pero traería visos de alegría. Al menos no sería una Guantanamera que siempre envolvía un crimen violento aunque en el exilio inventamos la Guantanamera con versos de Martí que es menos fatalista..

Recientemente me enteré por un Brasileño que celebra el día del Saudade en Brasil cuando el pasado 30 de Enero viajó a Rio para la celebración.

Parece extraño si hay tristeza, fatalismo, frustración, melancolía, como puede ser una fiesta, una pachanga, pero si van a una sesión de Fado, pueden ver que realmente no hay tristeza, pero una alegría, un poco extraña pero una alegría. 

Quizás nosotros los viejos que hemos pasado por esa sensación que es el Saudade, podemos aprender del Fado portugués y disfrutar el mal de lo que perdimos con el bien de la alegría.

De todos modos les mando un enlace para que puedan oír un Fado muy apropiado para nosotros Recordar es vivir.  Ponchen en el enlace, y disfrutenlo. 

António Ganhão, “Fado Proença” – “Recordar é viver (Carlos Conde)” – YouTube

Jorge A Villalon: Some in Congress want to “Audit the Fed.” But an audit, unless the word is used in a very broad sense, would be redundant and basically irrelevant. Deloitte & Touche LLP already audits the Fed, and it releases an annual report that includes the auditor’s opinion, each year.
Wild-eyed conspiracy theories have cropped up that suggest the Fed may not actually own the bonds it says it does or that it pays too much to certain banks when buying them. But none of this is true; there is no evil accounting going on. In a financial sense, the Fed is almost certainly squeaky clean. The Fed doesn’t need another audit, what it needs is more responsible and effective oversight from Congress, a smaller balance sheet and less ability to interfere with private business decisions.
The Fed has become the biggest financial entity in the world, with bond holdings that have ballooned to $4.25 trillion. Fed assets, six years after the Panic of 2008 ended, exceed the annual budget of the US government and are equal to 24% of GDP.
During the Great Depression, 1930-39, the Fed’s balance sheet averaged 13.2% of GDP. It peaked at the end of the Depression, in 1940, at 16% of GDP and then averaged 12.6% from 1941-45, during World War II. If the Great Depression and WWII did not require balance sheets as large as the current one, then something has gone terribly awry.
What is interesting is that during the boom years of the 1980s and 1990s, the Fed’s balance sheet averaged 5.2% of GDP. So, it’s impossible to make the case that the Fed needs such a large balance sheet in order for the economy to create jobs with low inflation.
Lest we forget, Congress already has oversight of the Fed, and the past six years happened under its watch. Only a few members of Congress have enough knowledge of monetary policy to be effective at oversight. The same is true of voters. The Fed typically wins political battles because most people find monetary policy boring, complicated and difficult to grasp.
Nonetheless, the simple fact that the Fed is bigger, more powerful and more intrusive than ever imagined by any of its creators in Congress suggests that the Fed needs to answer more questions from more people. This does not mean the press, which has a conflict of interest, due to the fact that it wants access. Critical questioning risks losing access.
Moreover, the Fed is about to embark on a rate hiking campaign even though there are still excess reserves in the banking system. This has never been done before. Typically, the Fed makes reserves scarce in order to drive up interest rates.
But because the Fed wants a bigger balance sheet, it is trying to have its cake and eat it too. The Fed thinks it can pay banks more interest on those reserves and through a process of reverse repos drain money from the system. In other words, the Fed thinks that it can keep the balance sheet huge and manipulate interest rates even though the banking system is swimming in excess liquidity.
The Fed does have a back-up plan. If banks will not let the Fed sop up those reserves, and instead they decide to lend them, potentially creating inflation or bubbles, the Fed believes it can use “Macro-Prudential Policy Tools” to manage the money multiplying process. Macro-prudential tools would allow the Fed to stop banks from lending, by raising capital standards, or by limiting growth in certain types of loans or by certain types of banks. And, it allows the Fed to expand its reach to “systemically important financial institutions” that could potentially include insurance companies, brokerages, money managers and even hedge funds.
It is true that monetary policy should be independent of the political process. Whenever politicians take over the money supply, inflation results. But the corollary argument is just as important. Whenever bureaucrats take over the banking system, everything becomes political. Why? Because the bureaucrats are dependent on the politicians for their existence. The Fed must please enough members of Congress, and the right members, to keep new rules from passing that will limit its power.
The Fed missed the bubble in housing partly because Washington’s political mindset was focused on boosting homeownership any way it could. So, bubbles in politically correct industries, like housing or green initiatives, are tolerated or even encouraged. Also, risk-taking in private decisions is discouraged because bank losses become political problems. In other words, the bigger and more powerful the Fed becomes, the more dependent it is on the political process.
The easiest way out of this mess is for Congress to force the Fed to sell its assets and limit the Fed’s power to bank oversight, not bank management and macro-prudential policy tools. Do not audit the Fed; do not create conspiracy theories, but rein in the overreach and force a smaller balance sheet. If we really want an independent Fed, make it smaller and less powerful. The bigger it gets, the more political, and less independent, it becomes.
Brian S. Wesbury, Chief Economist
These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L. P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward-looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.

 

Fotos de Fidel y los Cincos fueron trucadas con Photoshop. Él no estuvo en el encuentro.                      Jorge A. Villalón

Estimado Lazaro, esto me lo acaban de enviar, es un dato interesante pues los contactos que tengo es que Fidel lleva mucho tiempo en el hospital y esto nopudo ser posible, al principio no lo creí pero un gran amigo fotógrafo me averiguo bien esto y aquí lo tienes.

un abrazo,

JV
E/mail: jorgeavillalon@bellsouth.net  On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 4:53 PM, Jorge Villalon <menpode@mentalpowerdevelopment.com> wrote:

Fotos de Fidel y los Cincos fueron trucadas con Photoshop. Él no estuvo en el encuentro.

Según revela la agencia  Cuba Liberación, las fotos del encuentro de líder cubano Fidel Castro y los Cinco presos cubanos, fueron trucadas.“Fidel nunca estuvo en el encuentro”, dijo  a Cuba Liberación, Erislander Lara Santín, investigador y disidente del municipio Luyanó, actual corresponsal del Estado de SATS.

Para Erislander, quien afirma que todo no fue más que un montaje de antiguas imágenes y la utilización de un doble, la cosa no estuvo tan clara en el inicio, pero luego de un análisis más detallado de dos de las imágenes, llegó a la conclusión que debía estudiar a fondo lo que ocurría, y así lo hizo.

“No ha sido una tarea fácil, desde el día en que salieron las fotos, hasta el sol de hoy, hemos estado trabajando duro un grupo de compañeros para lograr descifrar el misterio y mostrarle al mundo esta patraña del comunismo”, agregaría el disidente e investigador.

Erislander, quien entendió desde un inicio que él solo no resolvería el misterio, acudió a un amigo fotógrafo, dos ingenieros nucleares, un master en diseño industrial y dos periodistas independientes, quienes conformaron un equipo de trabajo, cuya única misión, eran encontrar todas y cada una de las piezas del rompecabezas que tenían delante de sí.

A pesar de no contar con los recursos adecuados no cejaron en su empeño. Bajaron las imágenes de Internet, las imprimieron en casa de Arturo el fotógrafo, después las recortaron en pequeños fragmentos de un centímetro cuadrado y las fueron uniendo nuevamente una y otra vez.

“Todo esto lo hicimos nosotros solos, sin la ayuda ni el financiamiento de nadie, desde el 28 que salieron las fotos, hasta el día de hoy, hemos estado tan enfrascados en el proceso que a veces ni hemos comido compañero “, agregaría Romualdo Pascual, uno de los ingenieros nucleares y el cual detectaría tres de los errores de las fotos que verán a continuación.

No fue hasta ayer que llegaron a la conclusión de cuales eran los errores en las fotos que ponían al descubierto su falsedad.

1- Foto Primera

1- El mechón de pelo de uno de los Cinco no aparece en fotos anteriores.

2- El ancho de la cintura de Fidel no se corresponde con una de las fotos que fuera tomada un mes antes y publicada en Cuba Debate.

3- Una punta de la guayabera de uno de los Cinco y circulada por el equipo de investigación, parece alterada.

 

Mainstream Fact Checker Just Slapped Obama On The Grill Because Of These Whoppers About Guns

The president has a big Pinnochio problem…

Norvell Rose

Many people believe, with good cause, that President Obama has a rather shaky relationship with the truth about lots of things — the true effects of Obamacare being high on the list of the president’s often-told falsehoods, deceptions, and outright lies.

And while mainstream media outlets frequently fail to hold Obama accountable for the truth-challenged words that often come pouring out of his mouth, there’s one watchdog on the prowl who hasn’t been reluctant to sink his teeth into the president.

That media watchdog is Glenn Kessler, the fact checker for The Washington Post who has lately been willing to pile Pinocchios on the president.

Advertisement-content continues below

On March 2nd of this year, Kessler gave Obama four Pinocchios — indicating the highest possible long-nosed offense against truth — because of the explanation Obama gave for his veto of the Keystone Pipeline bill.

An earlier instance of Obama’s playing fast and loose with the facts resulted in another four-Pinocchios penalty against the president.  That example of a flagrant foul committed against truth-telling resulted from Obama’s claim in mid-2014 that Republicans had “filibustered about 500 pieces of legislation.”

Now we find the Post’s fact checker putting what he calls “Obama’s odd series of exaggerated gun claims” to the test. The result? Another major fail for the man who continues to chip away at the faith and trust the people need to have in the occupant of the Oval Office.

Advertisement-content continues below

This time, Kessler awards Obama three Pinocchios for his “exaggerated claims and faux statistics” on gun violence and the availability of firearms in the United States.

While many conservatives would, no doubt, say the president was simply making stuff up and lying with abandon to students gathered for a town hall at Benedict College in South Carolina earlier this month — not softening the critical blow by writing of exaggerations — the Post fact checker did nonetheless sharply criticize Obama for his careless comments.

Among the president’s off-the-mark statements, according to Kessler’s research:
“…our homicide rates are so much higher than other industrialized countries. I mean by like a mile…” Not true.
“…there are neighborhoods where it’s easier for you to buy a handgun and clips than it is for you to buy a fresh vegetable…” Exaggerated claim.
“People just say well, we should have firearms in kindergarten and we should have machine guns in bars…” Wildly over the top.

As Kessler points out in his analysis that once again shows how Obama’s rambling rhetoric is often not tethered to the truth, “the gun debate is serious enough that it should not be poisoned” by the man holding the highest elected office in the land.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/mainstream-fact-checker-just-slapped-obama-grill-whoppers-guns/#VlVpul5SjM74a3ZZ.99

ATTACKED: Tourists Killed in Tunisian Museum, Terrorists Take Hostages
Sounds like the Islamic State has made it to Tunisia.

Two men dressed in military garb went into a museum in Tunisia’s capital Wednesday and opened fire, killing eight people and taking hostages, authorities said.

Mohamed Ali Aroui, an Interior Ministry spokesman who detailed the deaths at the Bardo Museum in Tunis, called the attackers Islamists in remarks on national radio.

Housed in a palace dating to the 19th century, the museum describes itself as “a jewel of Tunisian heritage.” It explores Tunisian art, culture and history, and boasts a collection of mosaics, including one of the poet Virgil, as well as marble sculptures, furniture, jewels and other artifacts.

The violence wasn’t necessarily confined to the museum. Photos on Twitter showed security forces in bulletproof vests and black helmets and masks, guns drawn, in the area.

And the North African nation’s government building nearby was evacuated shortly after noon Wednesday, Tunisian lawmaker Sayida Ounissi said on Twitter.

Read more: CNN

“Don’t Like Gay Marriage? You Will be Forced to Like It. . . or Else”

by Gary DeMar

The Meme below has been making its way around Facebook. There are a lot of good “Don’ts” on the list that I can agree with. It’s the first one that has a great number of problems. First, it’s poorly written. “Don’t like gay marriage? Don’t get married.” It makes no sense. It should read “Don’t like gay marriage? Don’t marry someone of the same sex.”

But even this has its problems since, second, it opens the door to other marriage possibilities. “Don’t like sex with animals? Don’t have sex with animals.” “Don’t want to marry your sister? Don’t marry your sister.” A list like this could go on and on.

Read more: City Officials Order Black Couple to Perform KKK Wedding.

Third, the “gay-marriage movement” is about the redefinition of marriage that has wider implications than the choice for people of the same sex to marry.

image: http://cdn1.godfatherpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Same-Sex-Marriage-meme.jpg

As has been pointed out numerous times, the foot-in-the-door argument was that same-sex marriage won’t affect people who oppose it. That has not happened.

Read more: “Homosexual Bakeries Discriminate Against Heterosexuals.”

Here’s the latest “Don’t Like Gay Marriage? You Will be Forced to Like It” incident:

“Jenn Moffitt and her partner Jerra Kincely were on the hunt in February for a wedding videographer.

“She sent an email asking video production business ‘Next Door Stories’ in Bexley, Ohio, if it would cater to a same-sex couple.

“She was shocked by the response.

“‘Unfortunately at this time I do not offer services for same-sex weddings,’ the owner of business wrote in an email Moffitt shared with CNN.”

*****

“The incident comes on the heels of similar complaints from same-sex couples around the country claiming discrimination from wedding vendors. A bakery in Oregon was ordered to pay fines for violating a same-sex couple’s civil rights by refusing to cater their wedding.”

So much for “Don’t Like Gay Marriage? Don’t Marry Someone of the Same Sex.” How about “If you don’t like a baker, florist, photographer, or videographer who won’t service your ‘wedding,’ then find someone who will.”
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/21098/dont-like-gay-marriage-you-will-be-forced-to-like-it/#qRYPSR085CcGRLHm.99

 

 

Sale del clóset el Ex Presidente colombiano César Gaviria y se declara homosexual…(Marica)

Jesus Marzo Fernandez

Y LOS QUE FALTAN,  PRONTO HABRA SORPRESAS

Ruben Blades Cantaba.. ¨SORPRESAS te da la VIDA….Etc, etc..!! ¨

En un escueto comunicado publicado a través de su página en Internet, que ha dejado con la boca abierta a más de un desprevenido, el ex-presidente colombiano César Gaviria Trujillo, ha declarado públicamente su condición de homosexual.
Gaviria fue elegido presidente en j1990 y ocupó la primera magistratura del país por cuatro años, donde encabezó los esfuerzos estatales en la llamada guerra contra el narcoterrorismo, declarada por el famoso y ya fallecido capo de la droga, Pablo Escobar Gaviria. César Gaviria también ha ocupado cargos de gran importancia a nivel internacional, como el de Secretario General de la Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA) entre 1994 y 2004 y ha sido una ficha importante en la política colombiana desde entonces, como jefe del Partido Liberal Colombiano, jefe de campaña del actual presidente de Colombia, Juan Manuel Santos durante su campaña por la reelección este mismo año y como padre del director de Planeación Nacional, Simón Gaviria.
En el comunicado que apareció publicado en la noche del sábado en su página de Internet, el ex-presidente empieza agradeciendo a sus esposa y a sus hijos por el amor y el cariño que le han demostrado durante sus años más difíciles, siguiendo con una extensa apología al pueblo colombiano, mencionando el voto de confianza dado por el país en uno de sus momentos más oscuros. El ex-presidente culmina su comunicado manifestando que “en busca de proteger la honra y el buen nombre de su familia” ha decidido revelar su condición de homosexual, misma que según el mismo Gaviria “había mantenido oculta en aras del bien común, tanto de mi familia como del país”.
Rumores sobre la homosexualidad de César Gaviria han existido desde la década de los 70, cuando Gaviria ocupaba el cargo de Representante a la Cámara por su departamento natal, Risaralda. Recientemente, incluso se llegó a afirmar por parte de algunos periodistas que el curador y director de la galería de arte contemporáneo del ex-presidente, llamada “Nueveochenta”, es su pareja desde hace más de diez años.

 

 

President Obama Blames Bush For Rise Of ISIS

COWBOY BYTE  

President Obama blamed former President George W. Bush for the rapid rise of Islamic State terrorists, and says the terrorist group is a consequence of the Iraq war.

“ISIL is a direct outgrowth of Al Qaeda in Iraq that grew out of our invasion, which is an example of unintended consequences which is why we should generally aim before we shoot,” Obama said in an interview with VICE News, referring to the Iraq war launched by Bush.

Obama pointed out that his fight against ISIS had a 60 country coalition, which would “slowly push” the terrorist group out of Iraq.

Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/37325/president-obama-blames-bush-for-rise-of-isis/

EMO- Lo unico que pouedo decier es: LE RONCA EN MANGO!!!! LRGM

 

 

 

 

Is this tue or false:

New Gov’t Programs Threaten to Confiscate Savings

Written by Damon Geller

In his latest State of the Union address, Obama shocked Congress with his proposal to tax college savings plans to pay for his new programs.  His proposal is nothing more than confiscation-through-taxation, and it comes on the heels of a number of alarming government programs to confiscate citizen savings & retirement.  The United States and governments across the globe are increasingly turning to private wealth confiscation in order to manage their massive debts and maintain their power structure.  Throughout America, police seize cash from innocent citizens without ever charging them with a crime. Bankers conspire with the IRS to seize the accounts of innocent citizens with no notification, no court order, and no charge of crimes.  The IMF proposes global wealth confiscation as a means of funding bankrupt governments.  And Congress passes controversial new laws to make your savings & retirement a prime target for confiscation.  So if you want to protect your hard-earned savings, the time to act is NOW!

The U.S. Gov’t Is Going Bankrupt

Desperate government officials will always resort to expropriation, be it through excessive taxation, inflation, debt accumulation, deficits, or outright confiscation.  With the Federal Reserve currently buying 90% of the U.S. Treasury market (and going insolvent doing so), who do you think the government will lean on to finance the debt when the Fed runs out of ammo?  The answer is YOU.  In fact, the U.S. government has made several highly controversial moves to make your savings & retirement accounts a prime target for confiscation!  They’re using legislation and authoritarian power in collusion with the modern financial system to gain access to your private assets in the name of “protection”, “security” or “national emergency.” But in reality, your savings & wealth are being targeted as a revenue source.

Obama Wants Your Savings & Retirement

In back-to-back State of The Union addresses, Obama announced new initiatives aimed at getting to your savings & retirement money.  Obama’s latest proposal is to tax citizens’ college savings plans to pay for new programs, such as making the first two years of community college free.  So hard-working Americans will now have a portion of their children’s college savings confiscated through new taxation.  This comes right on the heels of Obama’s previous initiative:  the MyRA.  MyRA means your retirement money will now be used to pay for U.S. debt.  The MyRA is nothing more than an investment scam being sold to the American people as a you-can’t-lose, zero-risk investment.  But in reality, the Fed can’t conjure up money from thin air to buy the debt anymore, and our foreign friends don’t want our debt anymore, so Obama needs YOU to finance the debt.

FATCA Gives the IRS Worldwide Power

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or FATCA, took effect in 2014.  FATCA requires foreign banks to disclose the identity and details of Americans with foreign accounts.  Foreign Financial Institutions must report our account numbers, balances, names, addresses, and U.S. identification numbers.  If they do not, they will receive a FATCA letter warning them to comply, or else.  What happens if a financial institution doesn’t comply with U.S. demands?  FATCA cuts off companies from access to critical U.S. financial markets if they fail to pass along American data – tantamount to financial warfare against many of our own allies.  Fearing the wrath of the U.S. government, more than 100 nations have agreed to the law, including the Vatican!  Even Russia and China have been intimidated into signing on.

CARDS Gives the Gov’t Access to All Brokerage Accounts

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which oversees how investments are sold, proposed what it calls CARDS – Comprehensive Automated Risk Data System – which is an electronic system that will regularly collect data on balances and transactions in all 4100 brokerages nationwide. CARDS is disguised as a way to “protect” investors, but the system is clearly designed to have detailed information on the structure & location of every citizens’ investments.  Since the government needs us to support its debt (because outside interests no longer do), wouldn’t it be convenient to know and control the structure or every investment portfolio in America?

Banks Conspire with Gov’t to Confiscate Accounts

Think your money is safe in the bank?  Think again.  A recent bombshell from the New York Times exposed that the nation’s biggest banks have willingly turned bank accounts over to the government for total confiscation.  It’s all done in secrecy, often initiated by the bankers. Tragically, bank account holders don’t even know they’re being targeted until after the money is seized from their accounts.  The banks’ deplorable actions have resulted in millions of dollars stolen from U.S. citizens without a shred of due process.  And in 80% of the cases, no criminal charges were ever filed. Even more alarming – in a matter of just a few years – these cases of unconstitutional bank account seizures have risen over 500%!

Police Seize Money from Innocent U.S. Citizens

In learning about the massive bank account seizures, you might think your money is safer as cash in your hands.  Think again.  As revealed in a recent Washington Post report, the executive branch of government has seized money from thousands of innocent U.S. citizens with absolutely no due process.  Police departments around the country, at the command of the Justice Department & Homeland Security, have confiscated money from over 200,000 citizens – in some cases tens of thousands of dollars – even though many of them committed no crime!  Why?  Because our state & federal governments are broke, bankrupt and in desperate need of capital.  Just like the administration, law enforcement is shredding the Constitution and rule of law.  The Police State is now being expanded to unlawfully gain access to citizens’ money.

Government Confiscation Is Now a Global Trend

Maybe you think you’re safe moving your accounts off-shore?  Wrong.  As first reported by Forbes, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) dropped a bomb in its Fiscal Monitor Report.  The report paints a dire picture for high-debt nations that fail to aggressively “mobilize domestic revenue,” which is code for “aggressively tax its citizens.”  It goes on to build a case for drastic measures and recommends a series of escalating income and consumption tax increases – culminating in the direct confiscation of assets.  The IMF explicitly recommends that nations seize 10% of your private savings in addition to the taxes you’re already paying!

There’s Only One Place to Hide

With our desperate governments gaining unprecedented access to your personal savings anywhere in the world, you need to take action NOW to protect your savings & retirement from outright confiscation.  But if the government has its hands in your bank accounts, retirement accounts, brokerage accounts, and even the cash in your pocket, is any place safe?

Absolutely. There’s ONE asset class this sits outside the financial system and is completely secure from government confiscation and global economic collapse:  gold & silver.  Gold & silver have been the best wealth protectors for over 5,000 years and have survived every government & currency collapse in history.  So the time is now.  Protect your savings & retirement with physical gold & silver before you have nothing left to protect. (Call 800-226-8106 to receive your free copy of Damon Geller’s popular book, “Defend Your Money against Gov’t Confiscation,” or see below)

 

 

 “En mi opinión”

 “FREEDOM IS  NOT  FREE”

Blooger:  https://www.blogger.com/home

https://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s