HPIM0049

No 840 “En mi opinion” Enero 5, 2015

No 840 “En mi opinión”  Enero 5, 2015

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño   EDITOR

Este año 2015, tenemos la oportunidad perfecta, para que desde una posición de principios hacer una gran contribución a la libertad, economía  y la consolidación de un sistema dirigido al bienestar del pueblo americano basados en el respeto a la Constitución y las leyes, con  una posición de principios de la libertad a nuestros conciudadanos y la nación Americana.

Los Republicanos tomaran el control del Congreso con la finalidad de retomar al camino de prosperidad y felicidad que debe ser el estado normal de vida de  los norteamericanos. Ellos han prometido frenar la anarquía y la falta de respeto a los ciudadanos a la nación americana y a la envestidura como presidente del actual inquilino de La Casa Blanca. Ahora ellos tienen que mantener a esa promesa y regresar a la Nación Americana a lo que siempre fue: “La Nación Más Poderosa y el Mejor Lugar donde vivir en El Planeta Tierra. Terminaran ya los desmanes, errores y horrores administrativos, políticos y militares.

Es un deber que los ciudadanos vigilen a quienes pretenden postularse a la presidencia de la nación más poderosa del mundo y debemos obligarlos a que cumplan con sus promesas de campañas y trabajen arduamente a recuperar todo lo que ha perdido el país en estos dos periodos presidenciales en manos de una persona torpe, incompetente y probablemente mal intencionado.

Los republicanos controlaran la Cámara y el Senado. Eso es una tremenda responsabilidad para los políticos en Washington, ahora más que nunca no solo debemos reparar lo que han destruido sino que tenemos que hacer que la nación sea mejor, más eficiente y que se respeten los derechos de los ciudadanos más que nunca. Pero también lo ciudadanos tenemos “EL DEBER DE SER CIUDADANOS RESPOSABLES, DECENTES Y TRABAJAR DURO PARA MERECER VIVIR EN LA MEJOR NACION DEL MUNDO”  Somos norteamericanos y estamos orgullosos de serlo pero también protegeremos y trabajaremos duro para que nuestra nación cada día sea aún mejor.

No pertenezco a ningún partido pero me guía el mejor faro de la historia: Sigo las enseñanza de los patriotas que forjaron esta nación y especialmente las enseñanza de ese hombre “Ronald Reagan” Vamos a seguir esa guía que el trazo para que la pudiéramos seguir, no tenemos que inventar nada, cuando tengamos una duda PENSEMOS COMO LO HARIA EL Y HAGAMOSLO ASI.

                                                                                         Lázaro R González Miño.

 

Could Republicans Dump John Boehner As Speaker… And Replace Him With Trey Gowdy?

“[It’s] time for new leadership.”F. PETER BROWN —

Sean Hannity is calling for Trey Gowdy to replace John Boehner as Speaker of the House. Hannity said in a recent interview with Breitbart News, “[It’s] time for new leadership. Trey Gowdy is my choice for speaker. He has the ability to articulate and implement the changes needed to get the country on the right path.”

Trey Gowdy has officially said “no” to the speakership. According to the Hill:

But the conservative South Carolina Republican says he has no interest in becoming Speaker when lawmakers cast their vote on the House floor next month.

“Rep. Gowdy has said his time and attention will continue to be devoted to the work assigned to him,” said Gowdy’s spokeswoman, Amanda Duvall. “He is not interested in any leadership positions and believes one can have influence without the title.”

This past spring, Boehner (R-Ohio) appointed Gowdy as chairman of the special House committee investigating the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya. And Boehner recently said Gowdy would remain in that high-profile post in the 114th Congress as well.

However, this has not stopped a growing movement to replace Boehner with Gowdy. The Tea Party Leadership Fund has launched an online campaign to draft Gowdy for speaker. The “Elect Trey Gowdy Speaker of the House” Facebook page has accumulated 21,000 likes, and the #SpeakerGowdy hashtag has seen widespread use.

A new poll by Pat Caddell and EMC Research revealed exactly how unpopular Boehner is with Republicans.

Among other questions about the speaker, Republicans were asked whether “Speaker Boehner has been ineffective in opposing President Obama’s agenda.” 64 percent agreed, and 24 percent disagreed. 29 percent strongly agreed that Boehner has been ineffective against Obama.

What do you think? Is it time to dump Boehner? Who should replace him — Gowdy or some other prominent House Republican?
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/republicans-dump-john-boehner-speaker-replace-trey-gowdy/#ToMg7fMu5RfJUz4F.99

 

 

Este es el tipo que hay que sacar. COMO SEA. La lujosa cena de los Obama que equivale a un alquiler mensual indigna en EE.UU.

El presidente de EE.UU. Barack Obama y la primera dama han pasado las vacaciones navideñas en Hawái, donde han cenado en uno de los restaurantes más lujosos del mundo. Ser miembro premium del establecimiento cuesta 500.000 dólares.

COMPARTE EN FACEBOOK

COMPARTE EN TWITTER 99

 

Mientras que unos 47 millones de estadounidenses reciben cartillas de racionamiento alimentario, la pareja presidencial cena en uno de los restaurantes más caros del mundo, el Vintage Cave, durante sus vacaciones navideñas en Hawái, informa ‘Washington Examiner‘.

En el restaurante hay obras de arte cuyo valor ascienden a un billón de dólares. Lógicamente para disfrutar del lujo de sentarse a una de sus mesas exclusivas es necesario pagar una cantidad considerable: convertirse en cliente especial cuesta 50.000 dólares y disfrutar de los beneficios de ser cliente premium cuesta 500.000 dólares. A cambio Vintage Cave ofrece un “ambiente relajante que permite escapar de lo ordinario”.

Según informan los medios, el precio promedio de un plato es de unos 295 dólares y la factura total de una pareja ronda los 1.000 dólaresLos Obama pidieron varios platos y disfrutaron de tres horas de extravagante cena provocando la indignación de los sectores más desfavorecidos de la sociedad estadounidense.

 

 

 

Amenper: Las Relaciones con Cuba, otro relajo publicitario de Obama 

Con todo lo doloroso que ha sido el bofetón de Obama al exilio histórico, tenemos que darnos cuentas que esto es algo más de este presidente que no gobierna, pero que mantiene una comedia en forma de una campaña publicitaria de opinión pública que lo mantenga en los cintillos de los periódicos mientras coloca los peones para agendas ocultas que son su objetivo final.

Lo que Obama llama “un nuevo capítulo” en las relaciones entre Estados Unidos y Cuba, está en la primera página. El resto del capítulo aún está por escribirse. ¿Qué viene después?

Con toda la atención de los medios de comunicación pegados a la decisión del Presidente Obama para “normalizar” las relaciones con Cuba, no está totalmente claro lo que  el presidente puede hacer por su cuenta para justificar esos titulares portentosos.  Si lo analizamos parece muy poco, ahora con las cámaras legislativas en manos de los republicanos.

Él no puede levantar el embargo comercial sin la aprobación del Congreso, que no llegará. Él no puede enviar a un embajador de Estados Unidos a la Habana sin confirmación del Senado, lo que probablemente no ocurrirá. Él incluso no puede expandir el tamaño de nuestra sección de intereses de Cuba en una embajada de pleno derecha sin créditos del Congreso, también dudosos.

Puede relajar las restricciones para viajar a Cuba, pero ya 600.000 estadounidenses  viajan cada año a la nación, en su mayoría cubano-estadounidenses visitar a la familia. No está claro que el número aumentará considerablemente a raíz de la decisión de Obama.

Gracias a su anuncio, aquellos que hacen el viaje por primera vez será capaces de utilizar sus tarjetas de débito y crédito mientras estaba allí. Traen tabacos y Ron como recuerdos. Pero ninguno de los dos productos se importará a la venta en los Estados Unidos a menos que el Congreso se comprometa a levantar el embargo comercial, un cambio claro para que el Presidente no ha puesto ningún predicado en el Capitolio todavía.

En pocas palabras, la decisión de Obama es más expresiva que definitiva, que es ya un recurso familiar para un presidente cuyo record de política exterior abunda en declaraciones simbólicas y gestos vacíos.

Al igual que su decisión ejecutiva no deportar a algunos inmigrantes ilegales, se puede revertir su acción ejecutiva en Cuba tan fácilmente como fue hecha por un sucesor con prioridades diferentes.

Como resultado, la especulación de los medios de comunicación que esta pequeña alteración en las relaciones EEUU-Cuba trabajará un cambio profundo en la tiranía que ha oprimido a la sociedad cubana durante casi seis décadas parece ser cómicamente exagerada, es un relajo más.

El régimen de Castro soportó la pérdida de sus patrocinadores soviéticos, que había sostenido la economía de Cuba primitiva, así como el prestigio que en tiempos gozaba en partes de nuestro hemisferio y en los campus universitarios. Ahora, es sólo un remanso del Caribe con coches antiguos, la belleza en ruinas de sus ciudades y un floreciente comercio de turismo sexual,

En otras palabras, Raúl no es un guerrillero heroico, ni el presidente de una nación, es la matrona del bayú en que se ha convertido Cuba.

El régimen no muestra señales de cambio o falta de confianza, no mientras Obama sea presidente. Es infantil el pensar que va a convertirse en un organismo más benigno simplemente debido a la presencia de turistas americanos.

Los partidarios de Obama señalan a la normalización de las relaciones diplomáticas y comerciales con China y Vietnam, que se han extendido ampliamente aunque ambos regímenes  continúan oprimiendo a sus ciudadanos. Eso es cierto. Por supuesto, China es una gran potencia, y su enorme impacto en la seguridad global y la prosperidad requiere nuestro compromiso con ellos. 

Cuba es diferente, cada inversionista es un testimonio de que hacer relaciones con Cuba es un masoquismo. Controla las empresas no paga sus cuentas y fuerza a los inversionistas a retirarse dejando su inversión atrás.

No tenemos seguridad ni los intereses económicos en juego en la decisión de intercambiar embajadores o comerciar con Cuba.

Como China, en las dos décadas desde que normalizaron las relaciones, Vietnam ha mantenido un estado unipartidista que los que desafían sus prerrogativas encarcela a los opositores. Sin embargo, Hanói ha establecido un mercado libre capitalista y ha cedido en algunas concesiones políticas.

Los casos de China y Vietnam no son vistos agradablemente para los que conocemos lo que es estar bajo un sistema totalitario, pero al menos para los inversionistas , los mercaderes que no les importan los pueblos, al menos es un negocio.

Pero en Cuba vemos que ya Raúl confirmó lo que todos sabemos, que a ellos no les interesa el libre mercado en Cuba, simplemente “socios capitalistas” controlados por ellos.

Los vietnamitas nunca han formalmente aceptado todas las condiciones que se le han pedido , pero cumplieron con algunas condiciones. Salieron de Camboya y vaciaron los campos de reeducación. Su cooperación en las investigaciones de POW/MIA, que había sido reticente y caprichoso, pronto se convirtió en mucho más útil y confiado y permitido para lo que será recordado como uno de los más amplios esfuerzos para dar cuenta de los caídos en la historia de la guerra.

Pero, ¿Qué nos ha dado Cuba realmente?, unos prisioneros internos que pueden ser detenidos en una semana otra vez, y el cambio de espías por un inocente ciudadano americano que no debiera de haber estado preso si hubiéramos vivido en otra época.

En consecuencia, la decisión para normalizar las relaciones con China y Vietnam fue y son, mucho menos polémicas y políticamente menos conflictivas que la decisión de Obama sobre Cuba.

Á Pero esto es lo que se puede esperar de un presidente que está más interesado en aparecer todos los días en los medios de comunicación que los intereses legítimos de la nación.

 

 

Caddell Poll: GOP Voters Want to Dump Boehner as Speaker

By James Morrison

Sixty percent of Republican voters want John Boehner replaced as Speaker of the House, a new poll shows, as a conservative mutiny grows against the Ohio congressman they consider too accommodating with President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats.
The Caddell Associates’ survey of 602 Americans who voted Republican in the midterm elections also found that they agree with the simmering conservative revolt, as 64 percent called Boehner too “ineffective” in opposing Obama’s agenda.

Special: These 7 Things Activate Alzheimer’s in Your Brain

When asked if they wanted to replace Boehner, 34 percent said they would “definitely” support a new speaker and 26 percent added that they “probably” would want someone else.
The survey, conducted last week, adds to a growing debate on the right over Boehner’s future as the leader of the House in the new Congress.
The election for speaker is scheduled for Jan. 6, and Boehner would need the support of a majority of members present and voting.
The resignation of Republican Michael Grimm of New York dropped the total number of House members in the new Congress to 434, with Republicans holding 246 seats. Boehner would need at least 218 votes. So far, as many as 18 Republicans are 
privately opposing him.
Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina, one of the few Republicans who are publicly against the speaker, says he “cannot vote in good conscience for John Boehner.”

“Right now, I’ve been meeting with a small group, and we — about 16, 18 — and we’re hoping to have a name of a sitting member of Congress that we can call out their name,” he told North Carolina’s Talk of the Town radio program.

Special: What This Soldier Did When He Came Home From Iraq . . . (Surprising)

Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, another Republican openly opposing Boehner, sees a lighter side to the campaign, even at a local fast-food restaurant.
Some of the strongest opposition to Boehner comes from conservative talk-show host Sean Hannity, 
who told Breitbart on Tuesday that he supports Trey Gowdy of South Carolina.
“It’s time for new dynamic leadership in the House of Representatives,” he said. “Trey Gowdy is my choice for speaker. He has the ability to articulate and implement the changes needed to get the country on the right path.”

“EMO” Get out Boehner, we do not wnt you there. You are traitor. LRGM.
Read Latest Breaking News from
Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Politics/Republicans-John-Boehner-Speaker-of-the-House/2015/01/02/id/616081/#ixzz3NlxTiPwZ
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

 

 

Amenper: REVOLUCIÓN

Nadie escarmienta en cabeza ajena 

Hay una revista llamada “Revolution”.

Los artículos se titulan,  “No un nuevo año bajo este viejo sistema” otro se llama “Revolution and Religion” y la portada es la foto de las demostraciones contra la policía.

Los casos de la policía, las demostraciones, todo está orquestado con un objetivo final, la revolución comunista, de acuerdo con las enseñanzas en el Manifiesto Comunista, y con el apoyo de las figuras de esta administración, del alcalde de New York, de falsos religiosos como Al Sharpton y compáñeros de viajes de otras religiones, y hasta del presidente.

¿Es paranoia el pensar así? ¿O es nuestra experiencia de lo que vivimos en Cuba?

La persona que está tras las manifestaciones profesionalmente dirigidas, es Bob Avakian, un activista político y Chairman del partido Comunista Revolucionario de U.S.A. USA (RCP).

Como el partido comunista de Cuba, no presenta la cara, los medios de comunicación los ignoran como si no existieran, y no se habla mucho de ellos, ni siquiera en los medios de comunicación que no son afines a la administración.

Los que se encuentran en la administración de Obama, los Al Sharpton, el alcade de New York, son los nuevos Castros, Guevaras de los albores de la revolución cubana.

Son los que presentan una justificación al movimiento agitador con lemas comunistas sin aparecer como parrte de ellos.

Es la misma historia, el mismo sistema que leemos en el manifiesto comunista y que ellos llaman ahora el “Nuevo manifiesto comunista”

Así es como ellos describen a Bob Avakian:

“Bob Avakian y el trabajo que ha hecho durante varias décadas, resumiendo la experiencia positiva y negativa de la revolución comunista hasta el momento, y a partir de una amplia gama de la experiencia humana, hay una nueva síntesis del comunismo que ha sido presentado, realmente hay una estrategia y visión viable para una radicalmente nueva y mucho mejor, la sociedad y el mundo, y existe el liderazgo crucial que se necesita para llevar adelante la lucha hacia ese objetivo”.

Como Fidel en Cuba, Obama no es comunista, es estúpido decir esto, él critica la muerte de los policías y condena la violencia. 

No importa que toda su familia por parte de padre y madre hayan sido comunistas, no importa que sus mentores y profesores hayan sido comunistas, no importa que use el sistema de decir algo hoy y hacer lo contrario mañana que es el sistema comunista,”Obama no es comunista” El no tiene nada que ver con lo que está pasando, se entera por los periódicos.

 Muchos creyeron esto en Cuba de Fidel, y nos lo repetían con burla cuando lo decíamos,  muchos creen esto ahora, y después cuando lo confiese, será demasiado tarde.

La tradición democrática de Estados Unidos, hará más difícil para ellos lograr su objetivo, pero no es imposible si el público no se educa sobre la manera de como toman el poder los comunistas.  La tradición democrática de Estados Unidos, usada por los ideólogos socialistas pueden lograr el sistema para destruirlo. 

Los sindicatos que después desaparecerán cuando el único patrón sea el estado, los jueces que serán peones del partido gobernantes, los capitalistas que creen que pueden aprovechar el amiguismo de la administración, los periódicos y medios de comunicación que serán simplemente una sola voz, la del gobierno,  todos terminarán en su autodestrucción pero entonces será demasiado tarde para protestar..

Entonces veremos lo que ellos mismos nos auguran, “Una nueva constitución del partido socialista de América”.  Nos lo dicen en el “Nuevo Manifiesto Comunista” pero la mayoría no lo lee, como no lo leyeron en Cuba.

Pero no podemos hablar de esto, porque como en Cuba, al que lo dice lo tildan de estúpidos paranoicos.

Porque por desgracia “Nadie escarmienta en cabeza ajena”

 

 

Montana’s Largest Newspaper Admits “We Were Wrong” on Obama

Breaking News, 

After endorsing him for President in 2008, the Billings-based Gazette – Montana’s largest newspaper – has admitted that they were off the mark in supporting Barack Obama and have been proven wrong by the last six years of history.

As part of a June 27th editorial, the paper said, “Sometimes, you have to admit you’re wrong. And, we were wrong.”

An unusual move for a newspaper to make, the Gazette’s editors felt they had no choice but to apologize for endorsing a young candidate who has been at the center of several scandals (Benghazi, the IRS, Iraq) as well as a President who has done little to make progress on his most important campaign promises. The latter is actually great news for anyone who doesn’t want to see the country slide into a liberal swamp, but it’s understandable that the Gazette would not see things this way.

Even the right’s most prominent columnists rarely wrap Obama’s failures in such a succinct bow. The paper cites the NSA spying controversy, the Bergdahl fiasco, the VA scandal, the lack of promised transparency, and the failures in Iraq as the reasons for withdrawing support.

Obviously, this falls pretty comfortably in the “better late than never” category, but it’s still a blessing to see people in the media come to their senses about this guy. It might be unfortunate that this wake-up call couldn’t have happened two years ago, but I guess you have to take what you can get. In any case, the same journalists that have abandoned the Hope and Change Train will be jumping on the next socialist social climber that comes along.

Of course, the Gazette probably doesn’t have much to apologize for in the first place. The state went to McCain in 2008, it went to Romney in 2012, and it will probably go to the Republican candidate in 2016. Montana is a red state through and through, with Republicans enjoying a 14-point percentage advantage according to a 2012 Gallup poll. And that even begs the real question: how much do newspaper endorsements mean in the first place? Furthermore, should they even be making endorsements to begin with?

Newspaper endorsements have tradition in their favor, but they date from a time when people expected their journalists to have a point of view. In the last half-century or so, the public has forced newspapers to take a more balanced approach to the news, eschewing yellow journalism and endless polemic writing for the plain facts. Of course, the idea of bias ever leaving journalism entirely is a joke, one that has become even more hilarious in the advent of a few major corporations controlling most of the media. Still, the idea of a newspaper – even one that draws laughter when they claim to be unbiased – throwing their support behind a candidate is archaic and unsettling. Certainly, they have the right to do so. It’s just a matter of whether they should.

– See more at: http://www.fixthisnation.com/conservative-breaking-news/montanas-largest-newspaper-admits-we-were-wrong-on-obama/#sthash.6pspWIv8.dpuf

 

 

Hypocrisy / Politics / Nothing News

From: frank.calzon@cubacenter.org
Sent: 1/4/2015 7:53:20 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
Subj: Senator Tom Udall: Trade With Dictatorship, Not Democracies

From CapitolHillCubans.com:
Last week, U.S. Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) returned from Havana advocating “business ties” with Castro’s monopolies.
Ironically, in the two years that he served as Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Western Hemisphere Subcommittee, Udall held only one hearing on the region — in June 2013 on U.S.-Mexico Security Cooperation.
Meanwhile, Udall’s trip to Cuba was the first (and last) official trip he’s taken to the region as Western Hemisphere Subcommittee Chairman.
During this three-day trip to Cuba, Udall (to his credit) spent two-hours meeting with Castro’s American hostage, Alan Gross.
Kudos for that.
However, the remaining 70 hours of the trip were spent visiting Castro regime officials. And, of course, he completely disregarded Cuba’s courageous democracy movement.
Upon his return, Udall stated in a press release:
New Mexicans are anxious to meet and work with Cubans, and the time is right to rebuild business and cultural ties between the United States and Cuba.”
Of course, he “forgot” to mention that all foreign trade with Cuba 
must be conducted through Castro’s monopolies.
So why didn’t Udall explore — on behalf of “anxious New Mexicans” — business ties with Chile, Colombia, Peru, Panama or any of the other 33 democracies in the region during his tenure as Western Hemisphere Chairman?
A look at Udall’s voting record provides some clues.
He’s voted:
NO on trade with Peru.
NO on trade with Central America.
NO on trade with the Dominican Republic.
NO on trade with Chile.
NO on trade with Colombia.
NO on trade with Panama.
But:
YES on trade with Cuba.

That pretty much sums it up.

Gatria.

 

 

Amenper: “Levanten El embargo”

Mansión de Raúl Castro, la Habana, Cuba-

-“El embargo no ha funcionado”, dice Raúl Castro. “Si el pueblo cubano quiere finalmente tener cambio de régimen y el gobierno democrático real, yo debo ser derrocado,” dijo  una emisión especial ayer desde el salón de su mansión de lujo en la Habana.

Las haciendas de Castro son los únicos lugares en Cuba que aún conservan algo del antiguo esplendor anterior a la revolución. Tienen varias todas bien lujosas.

En un extraño e inexplicable giro de los acontecimientos alrededor del mundo, todos los de la izquierda que hace solo semanas profesaban amor y admiración por Castro y su gobierno, todos cantan la misma canción: “el embargo no ha funcionado. Si va a haber un cambio de régimen en Cuba, América debe terminar el embargo”.

Todos nos dicen lo mismo, lo repiten los medios de comunicación, hasta ahora amigos del régimen “el embargo no ha funcionado. Si va a suceder el cambio de régimen en Cuba, América debe terminar el embargo”.

Muchos se preguntarán por qué aquellos que han pasado toda una vida alabando a Castro, Cuba y el socialismo están preocupados de que el embargo no ha derrocado a su héroe Castro, de repente, y de repente y también me pregunto,¿ por qué esos recalcitrantes comunistas repentinamente apoyan políticas que según ellos trabajarán hacia el cambio de régimen en Cuba

Mientras tanto, incluso Castro, apoya el cambio.

 En su emisión presentó este cartel de protesta emitida por el estado para el mundo: El embargo no ha funcionado. ¡Pedimos el fin del embargo para traer un cambio de régimen y derrocarme !Por favor!

Así que nosotros estamos equivocados, la mejor manera de tumbar el régimen comunista es hacerle caso a los comunistas y levantar el embargo.

Estoy un poco confundido con este razonamiento.

 

 

 

Here’s why House Republicans should replace Speaker Boehner

BY JASON PYE

The House of Representatives may be under Republican control, but it lacks any semblance of principled leadership. In fact, fiscally conservative and libertarian-leaning members — the ideas wing of the GOP — have faced an increasingly hostile environment under Republican leadership, one in which they’re treated as obstacles rather than allies to advance the limited government policies that Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and his team purportedly believe.

Since 2011, when he assumed the gavel, Boehner has gone out of his way to antagonize principled members of his own caucus. In December 2012, for example, Republican leadership unceremoniously purged three fiscal conservatives from their committee assignments. When it was rumored that he would be removed from the House Budget Committee, Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) said that he “ha[d] not received a single call, e-mail, or text from Republican leadership confirming” the report.

Boehner attacked many of his own members as well as fiscally conservative organizations, including FreedomWorks, that opposed sequester-busting spending increases in the Ryan-Murray budget deal. Earlier this year, Boehner’s leadership, with help from House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA),orchestrated a surprise voice vote to pass the Medicare “doc fix” while most members were absent from the floor.

This measure came with a $21 billion price tag, funded by debt on the backs of taxpayers, and House Republican leaders sheltered themselves from the sunlight of roll call vote, which would have allowed the American people to see how their representatives voted, preferring the darkness of a voice vote.

More recently, Boehner and his leadership team left fiscally conservative members out of negotiations on the 1,600-page government-funding bill, known to many as the “CROmnibus,” leaving them hardly any time to read the $1 trillion bill.

Over the last couple days, a handful of fiscally conservative members — including Reps. Jim Bridenstine (R-OK), Thomas Massie (R-KY), and Ted Yoho (R-FL) — have announced that they will not support Boehner when votes for Speaker are cast on Tuesday. There may be more who join them.

Not only are fiscally conservative members rejecting Boehner, 60 percent of Republican and Republican-leaning independent voters said that they want someone new as the next Speaker, according to a survey released last week. Only 25 percent supported Boehner.

Boehner has had plenty of time to show that he’s capable of leading the House and pursue the limited government ideals on which Republicans ran. Instead, he’s proven himself to be a shaky leader with little credibility among fiscal conservatives. Boehner has failed to lead, and he’s sold out taxpayers time and time again. House Republicans shouldn’t preserve the status quo on Tuesday, they should pull the gavel directly from Boehner’s hand and elect a new Speaker.

 

 

 

Carlos A. Montaner hace trizas el Legado del presidente Barack Hussein Obama

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA3_iGA8LmM&feature=em-uploademail

 

 

  Obama OKs New North Korea Sanctions Over ‘Destructive’ Cyber Attack

President Barack Obama on Friday authorized additional sanctions on North Korea in the wake of the “destructive and coercive” cyber attack on Sony Pictures Entertainment.

The new sanctions target three entities — including the country’s primary intelligence organization — and 10 individuals as agencies or officials of the North Korean government, according to the Treasury Department.

In a statement, the White House called the sanctions “a response to the Government of North Korea’s ongoing provocative, destabilizing, and repressive actions and policies, particularly its destructive and coercive cyber attack on Sony Pictures Entertainment.”

Other organizations targeted by the new sanctions are Korea Mining Development Trading Corporation, which the Treasury Department classifies as North Korea’s primary arms dealer, and Korea Tangun Trading Corporation, a group tied to the nation’s defense research.

Before leaving for his holiday vacation in Hawaii, Obama pledged that the United States would “respond proportionately” to the massive hack and subsequent threats linked to the satirical film “The Interview,” which depicted an assassination attempt against North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.

“‘We take seriously North Korea’s attack that aimed to create destructive financial effects on a U.S. company and to threaten artists and other individuals with the goal of restricting their right to free expression,” the White House said Friday.

— Carrie Dann and Kristin Donnelly

 


Tragedia de AirAsia: 30 cuerpos han sido recuperados

Por Jethro Mullen, CNN

(CNN) – Los equipos de búsqueda que intentan encontrar más cuerpos y restos del vuelo QZ8501 de AirAsia en el mar de Java enfrentaron dificultades a causa del mal tiempo el jueves. Hasta ahora, 30 cuerpos han sido recuperados, 4 han sido identificados y la primera víctima identificada ya fue enterrada.

Se están utilizando barcos, aviones y helicópteros para encontrar víctimas del desastre. La mayoría de las personas que iban a bordo del vuelo siguen desaparecidas, y los funcionarios aún no han confirmado si han encontrado el fuselaje del avión.

Esta es la información clave sobre cómo están las cosas hasta ahora:

El vuelo  

Lo que sabemos: el vuelo QZ8501 despegó temprano el domingo de Surabaya, Indonesia, con destino a Singapur. Cuando habían pasado aproximadamente 35 minutos de vuelo, el piloto le pidió al control de tráfico aéreo permiso para girar a la izquierda y ascender a una altitud mayor a fin de evitar el mal tiempo. Minutos después, el avión desapareció del radar del control de tráfico aéreo.

Lo que no sabemos: qué fue lo que ocurrió a bordo luego de que se perdiera el contacto con el avión. No se recibió ninguna llamada de emergencia. Las autoridades indonesias de aviación han sugerido que el avión ascendió a pesar de habérsele negado el permiso a causa del tráfico.

Algunos expertos han especulado que el avión podría haber experimentado un paro aerodinámico debido a la falta de velocidad o por volar en un ángulo muy agudo para lograr suficiente impulso. Los analistas también han sugerido que los pilotos podrían no haber estado obteniendo la información de los sistemas a bordo acerca de la posición del avión, o que la lluvia o el granizo de tormentas eléctricas en el área podrían haber dañado los motores.

Hasta que se encuentren los principales restos del avión, junto a las grabadoras del vuelo, los expertos tienen poca evidencia para respaldar sus teorías.

La búsqueda  

Lo que sabemos: los equipos de búsqueda encontraron restos y algunos cuerpos en el agua el martes, de 100 a 200 kilómetros (más o menos de 60 a 120 millas) desde la última posición conocida sobre el mar de Java, dijo la agencia de búsqueda y rescate de Indonesia. Treinta cuerpos han sido recuperados, dicen las autoridades, uno de ellos una mujer vestida con el uniforme de la tripulación.

Indonesia está liderando el esfuerzo de búsqueda internacional, con el apoyo de varios países, entre ellos Malasia, Singapur y Estados Unidos.

Lo que no sabemos: la posición exacta del cuerpo de la aeronave. Un oficial de búsqueda indonesio le dijo a CNN el miércoles que él pensaba que el equipo de sonar había detectado restos del vuelo 8501 en el fondo del mar de Java. Pero el director de búsqueda y rescate del país dijo que el avión aún no había sido encontrado. El mal tiempo ha dificultado la operación de búsqueda.

Las personas a bordo  

Lo que sabemos: el vuelo transportaba a 155 pasajeros y 7 miembros de la tripulación. La inmensa mayoría de las personas que iban a bordo eran indonesias. También había ciudadanos de Gran Bretaña, Francia, Malasia, Singapur y Corea del Sur. Ahora están surgiendo detalles acerca de algunas de las personas que iban en el avión, dados a conocer por familiares y amigos.

Lo que no sabemos: los restos de qué pasajeros y miembros de la tripulación han sido recuperados, y cuáles aún permanecen en el mar de Java. El jueves, las autoridades de Indonesia anunciaron la identificación de uno de los cuerpos recuperados: una mujer llamada Hayati Lutfiah Hamid, quien fue enterrada el jueves. Ellos aún están trabajando para identificar a los otros. Muchos familiares están esperando en Surabaya para recibir noticias de sus seres queridos.

La investigación  

Lo que sabemos: la clave para entender lo que ocurrió podría estar en la grabadora de voz de la cabina y la grabadora de datos de vuelo del avión, comúnmente conocidas como cajas negras. Las cajas negras, que en realidad son de color naranja, están en la cola del Airbus 320-200s. Si se recuperan, serán trasladadas a un laboratorio en Yakarta, Indonesia para ser analizadas, dijo Tatang Kurniadi, jefe del Comité Nacional de Indonesia para la Seguridad del Transporte. Las baterías que alimentan el sistema que envía señales acústicas tienen solamente 25 días para dejar de funcionar, dijo.

Lo que no sabemos: hacia dónde podrían haber sido llevados los restos del avión a causa del clima. Los investigadores necesitarán usar la información que obtengan de las grabadoras del vuelo, pero también utilizarán los indicios de los restos en sí.

“Mientras más piezas ponga en mi mosaico, mejor será mi imagen”, dijo el experto en seguridad de aviación, Michael Barr. “Mientras mejor sea la imagen, mejor puedo llegar a entender lo ocurrido”. Sin embargo, las condiciones en el mar hacen que el trabajo sea mucho más difícil que en tierra. “En el agua, trabajas con corrientes y vientos, así que las piezas no estarán donde tuvieron el impacto inicial”.

¿Qué viene después?  

El avión y los pilotos  

Lo que sabemos: el Airbus A320-200 de 6 años de antigüedad, operado por una filial indonesia de AirAsia, había acumulado alrededor de 23.000 horas de vuelo en aproximadamente 13.600 vuelos, de acuerdo con Airbus. El último mantenimiento programado de la aeronave fue el 16 de noviembre.

El veterano capitán del vuelo 8501, Iriyanto, de 53 años de edad, tenía 20.537 horas de vuelo, 6.100 de ellas con AirAsia en el Airbus A320, dijo la aerolínea. El primer oficial, Remi Emmanuel Plesel, de 46 años, tenía 2.275 horas de vuelo, una cantidad razonable para su puesto.

Lo que no sabemos: si problemas técnicos, el error humano u otros problemas estuvieron involucrados en el accidente. De acuerdo con la información de la base de datos de la Red de Seguridad Aérea, ha habido 54 incidentes relacionados con el A320.

“En la familia A320, los accidentes e incidentes van desde el desprendimiento de los paneles que protegen los motores, problemas con el tren de aterrizaje, choques contra aves o pérdidas en accidentes del casco por un error del piloto”, dijo Kane Ray, analista de la Oficina Internacional de Aviación, un grupo consultor mundial de aviación. “Muchos aviones tienen problemas al principio y, en la mayoría de los casos, son erradicados. Muy rara vez, estos problemas causan desastres… en gran parte como resultado de factores que desencadenan este tipo de acontecimiento”, dijo Ray.

 

UNA BUENA OPINION DE UN BUEN AMIGO DE LA CUAL APRENDEMOS. [Muchas gracias Luis]

DE NUEVO GRACIAS POR TUS TRABAJOS…‏

luis guzman

PERO CON TODO RESPETO TE TENGO UN COMENTARIO …SOBRE EL ARTICULO QUE SALE EN EL NRO .No 839 “En mi opinion” Enero 2, 2015… SOBRE EL PARACRONISMO ETC… QUE SE PODRIA HABER UTILIZADO MAS AMPLIAMENTE EN EL TEMA DE LOS NEGROS EN USA… COMO DESDE EL ESCLAVISMO, .. SIEMPRE HAN SIDO LOS REPUBLICANOS LOS QUE HAN SALIDO EN DEFENSA DE LOS NEGROS EJEMPLO EL PTE. LINCOLN REP.. LOS LIBERO EN USA.. SE  MODIFICARON LOS BILL OF RIGHT PARA QUE LOS NEGROS PUDIERAN BOTAR.. SIEMPRE  CON LA OPOSICION DE LOS DEMO_RATS .   SE MANDO LA GUARDIA NACIONAL PARA QUE SE FORZARA LA INTEGRACION DE LOS NINOS NEGROS EN LAS ESCUELAS…. EL KKK LO INTEGRARON DEMO_RATS.. INCLUSIVE UNO LLEGO HASTA SENADOR…… Y LA LISTA ES LARGA… Y RESALTAR COMO A PESAR DE ELLO LOS NEGROS SIGUEN COMO CARNEROS DETRAS DE QUIENES COMO SIEMPRE EL PARTIDO DEMO_RATS LOS MANIPULA Y AL SARPTON LOS CHULEA ENTRE OTROS TANTOS Y TANTOS DEMO_RATS… AUNQUE NO SON MUCHOS PERA YA HAY VOCES NEGRAS DE PESO..!!!… QUE DAN ESOS SIGNOS… PERO AHORA LOS DEMO_RATS QUIEREN APURAR EL PASO  CAMBIAR NEGROS… POR LATINOS ADOCTRINADOS… PARA SUPLANTAR A LOS VOTOS QUE NECESITAN …PARA SEGUIR… EN LOS MISMOS PASOS. DE DESTRUIR A USA…..!!

“SIEMPRE QUE SE PUEDA NO DEJAR DE.. CON LA VERDAD APLASTAR SIN PIEDAD A LOS CANALLAS”  PARA.. SACARLOS .DEL CAMINO… . QUE PIENSEN DOS VECES EQUIVOCARSE CONTIGO..!!!!”  Y REPETIR Y REPETIR…. NO  LA MENTIRA PARA QUE SE CONVIERTA “PARA ALGUNOS TONTOS UTILES EN VERDAD”… SINO PARA QUE NUESTRA VERDAD Y NUESTRO COMPLEJO DE SALMON  SIGA Y SIGA ABRIENDO…. OJOS..!!!.. EL CASO DE ESTA ULTIMA VOTACION…. EL FORZAR A QUE YA PRATICAMENTE BOEHNER SALGA DEL CAMINO Y LO QUE ESO SIGNIFICA PARA NUESTRA VICTORIA ES UNA PRUEBA ENORME DE QUE A PESAR DE LAS FUERTES CORRIENTES EN CONTRA …. AVANZAMOS,,,…. !!!

TE SIGO CON MUCHO INTERES TUS TRABAJOS Y DISCULPA EL COMENTARIO FUE HECHO CON LA MEJOR DE LAS INTENCIONES…

Y….. ESCRIBO CON  LETRA GRANDE PORQUE SI NO ME ES UNA TORTURA ESCRIBIR… AUNQUE USO ESPEJUELOS.!!!!..

 

Luis E. Guzman

“EMO” OJALAH QUE TODOS LOS QUE NOS LEEN NOS ENVIEN DE CUANDO EN CUANDO, SUS OPINIONES Y SUGERENCIAS PARA PODER SER MEJORES CADA DIA. LRGM.

 

 

Luis E Guzman: WND EXCLUSIVE

POLL: 60% OF REPUBLICANS WANT BOEHNER OUT

Top GOP leader ‘lost the confidence of his own party’

As Congress gets ready to convene, a new poll shows a full 60 percent of Republican voters want Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, removed from his position as House speaker.

Boehner has lost the confidence of his own party voters, according to the telephone survey conducted Dec. 26-30 by pollster Pat Caddell on behalf of People’s Poll.

The national poll reveals that only 25 percent of GOP voters would vote to keep Boehner.

The official speaker’s election is scheduled for Jan. 6.

JOIN THE DON’T BE YELLOW, DUMP BOEHNER NOW CAMPAIGN.

Asked if they believed Boehner has been ineffective at opposing Obama’s agenda, a full 64 percent of voters agreed.

“[N]o respected party leader has polled this low among his own party’s voters unless he was embroiled in a major personal scandal,” wrote the Conservative Review.

“With 60% of Republican voters desiring a more conservative Speaker, what does this mean for John Boehner next Tuesday – when members of the House will cast votes for the next Speaker? And how can Boehner continue to lead the opposition to President Obama when he has lost the confidence of his own party?”

As WND reported, the idea of Republicans in the U.S. House not having Boehner as speaker come next week is catching on in the media, too.

Fox News reported on Tuesday about North Carolina Rep. Walter Jones’ comments before Christmas that there was a “small group, and we – about 16, 18 – and we’re hoping to have a name of a sitting member of Congress that we can call out their name.”

Only hours earlier, the Daily Caller had cited the same local radio interview, which was reported by Buzzfeed at the time.

But WND had reported on Dec. 19 on Jones’ comments, as part of the publicity over the new DON’T BE YELLOW, DUMP BOEHNER NOW CAMPAIGN, which encourages constituents to let all 247 GOP members of the House majority know they need to pick another speaker for the coming Congress.

It’s because of Boehner’s decision not to fight Barack Obama’s amnesty and Obamacare, both of which now are funded through 2015, even though the GOP will hold the majority in both the House and the Senate – a stunning victory handed to the party by voters – starting next week.

BizPacReview notes that there’s been talk of Boehner’s removal before, but there’s been no action.

The report points out now there would need to be only 30 conservative GOP members denying Boehner their votes for him to face removal.

“Boehner spokesman Michael Steel indicated that the speaker is not concerned by the challenge,” the report said. “‘Rep. Boehner was selected as the House Republican Conference’s choice for speaker last month,’ Steel wrote in an email, ‘and he expects to be elected by the whole House next week.’

“Perhaps he shouldn’t be so confident,” the report said.

The DUMP BOEHNER campaign already has lined up more than half-a-million letters that are scheduled for delivery to GOP members of the House as soon as members convene next week.

And it’s earned the support of the founder of Tea Party Nation, one of the organizations that helped rouse the American electorate in 2010 and give the GOP control of the U.S. House.

“Absolutely,” Judson Phillips told WND Monday. “I want people storming the halls of Congress. Melting the phone lines and anything else.

“So, I love [WND CEO Joseph Farah’s] letter writing idea.”

It was in a commentary in the Washington Times, Phillips explained why he thinks Boehner should be replaced.

“A month after its incredible victory, the GOP squandered its mandate, surrendering to the Democrats,” he wrote. “The GOP-led House of Representatives did not proclaim its mandate and hold off on major decisions until the Republican majority in the Senate was sworn in. No, they went to the GOP position of preemptive surrender and gave President Obama and the Democrats almost everything they wanted.

“Despite the pleas and demands from the base, the GOP did nothing to stop Mr. Obama’s executive amnesty. They even rewarded left-wing billionaires who had spent millions to keep the Democrats in power by extending so-called ‘Green Energy’ subsidies,” he wrote. “The architect of the Republican surrender was House Speaker John Boehner.”

Despite Boehner’s earlier reliance on the tea party, as soon as he was in office, he ignored the movement, Phillips wrote.

“Mr. Boehner made the obligatory statements about cutting spending and reducing Obamacare. Yet time after time, when the occasion called for him to stand and fight, he chose surrender,” he wrote. “2014 is almost over and 2015 is almost here. The first order of business for the House of Representatives in 2015 is to elect a new Speaker of the House.

“It cannot be John Boehner.”

Actually, there are more than 510,000 letters that already have been put into the pipeline for delivery. They would make up a stack nearly 167 feet tall.

On Twitter, the hashtags #BoehnerMustGo and #DumpBoehner have been surging, and other commentators, while not adopting the specific Don’t be Yellow, Dump Boehner Now! campaign, agree with the goal.

At the American Thinker blog, Layne Hansen wrote: “It is time to stop thinking of John Boehner and the rest of the Republican congressional leadership as being cowardly and recognize them for what they are: part of The Ruling Class that believes it has the right to tell the rest of us how to live.

“The current GOP leadership has got to go; this has ceased to be an arguable point. We cannot count on these people to do what is right. Conservatives did not give them majorities in both chambers for them to keep playing the same game,” he wrote.

And at RedState.com, Editor Erick Erickson also delivered a “no-other-options” message.

JOIN THE DON’T BE YELLOW, DUMP BOEHNER NOW CAMPAIGN.

“House conservatives must summon the courage to oppose Boehner’s nomination on the floor in January. It is a moral imperative. You cannot consistently complain about leadership’s many failures – and the treachery involved with a speaker fresh off a successful wave election conspiring with President Obama to fund amnesty and enjoy a celebratory phone call in the aftermath – and then vote for him to continue in this role. To paraphrase Albert Einstein, that is the definition of insanity, and it is enabled by a vote for Rep. John Boehner,” he wrote.

Critics of Boehner’s actions are responding to the “Don’t Be Yellow: Dump Boehner Campaign” from WND founder Joseph Farah for voters to let the majority members know their thoughts on the issues of amnesty and Obamacare, which both were funded into 2015 in a massive $1.1 trillion spending bill agreed to by Boehner.

Farah said he expects, based on early reaction, to generate millions of letters in time for delivery when the new Congress opens its session this month.

“It’s clear from the viral nature of this campaign that millions of Americans, mostly Republicans, by the way, would like to put coal in Boehner’s stocking this year. And they’d like him to accept the gift as just another member of the House of Representatives rather than as its leader,” Farah said.

The innovative campaign that allows anyone to send a form letter on yellow paper to every Republican member of the House was organized quickly in response to growing anger and frustration from GOP voters. They felt betrayed by Boehner and his leadership team over what Farah characterizes as “his capitulation to Obamacare and the unconstitutional amnesty executive action, which were both fully funded by House Republicans who were voted into office to do just the opposite.”

“While the news cycle has forgotten about Boehner’s betrayal of Republican voters in November, the grass-roots electorate has not,” said Farah. Americans, he said, “are angry enough at the Republican establishment to put their money where their mouth is – investing in this unusual lobbying effort to wake up House members as to the state of their leadership crisis.

“Will Republican House members respond in January? At the very least, they won’t be able to ignore the deluge of mail that awaits them,” he said.

JOIN THE DON’T BE YELLOW, DUMP BOEHNER NOW CAMPAIGN.

“You can order your letters sent today, and they will be ready for delivery when the new Congress reconvenes. It would be great to see thousands or, better yet, tens of thousands flooding in that first week. That will make an impression that cannot be ignored by Republican members of the House,” he said.

“I’m excited. Now it’s up to you. I’ve already ordered my letters. I’ve even secured the domain names DumpBoehnerCampaign.com and DumpBoehnerNow.com for social media dissemination. Tell your friends,” he wrote.

Recruit your friends, neighbors, and fellow commuters to the “Don’t Be Yellow: Dump Boehner Now” campaign with this exclusive bumper sticker.

 

The letter explains to members of the U.S. House that two issues have “prompted Americans to turn in droves to the Republican Party in November 2014 – Barack Obama’s blatantly unconstitutional executive action to provide amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, and the deliberately deceptive restructuring of America’s health-care system through Obamacare, which threatens to unravel the greatest health delivery system in the world.”

Pointing out that Republicans before the election “solemnly vowed to STOP this lame-duck president,” the letter states: “Now you have the power, right and duty to stop him.

“But it won’t happen with John Boehner leading you. You know this to be true. The trillion-dollar budget deal is just the latest proof that Boehner is not capable of leading the House to victory during this critical period.”

Farah noted that the launch of the program rivals the historic “Pink Slip Campaign” in 2010 that generated some 9.5 million letters to Congress.

“Americans are angry about Boehner’s betrayal of the voters who gave him a bigger majority in the House and Republicans control of the Senate. This could prove to be Boehner’s undoing,” he said.

The campaign allows people to send letters, with their own names and addresses via FedEx, all for the one price of $29.95, to each of the House GOP members.

Farah said, “From previous campaigns we know this approach prompts members to talk about the boxes of letters that are coming into their offices each day. And that’s exactly what we want to do with the DUMP BOEHNER CAMPAIGN – a grass-roots lobbying effort that can channel your outrage into effective and meaningful action.”

He said what can be guaranteed is that members “will see, hear and feel your participation in it.”

“We saw the same thing in 2010,” recalled Farah. “People were angry then. They may be angrier now. It is as if elections have no consequences when Republicans vote.”

A sampling of just how upset people are has been posted online, with abundant promises of “I’m in,” and “Do it.
Read more at
http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/poll-60-of-republicans-want-boehner-out/#FiXAjMo0GOJwKTla.99

 

 

 

 

John McCain Using Obama Donors to Purge Arizona Tea Party

 by Gary DeMar 

John McCain has got to go. He’s up for reelection in 2016. The Tea Party needs to begin the process of ridding this political pariah from office. He’s a menace to good government and constitutional fidelity.

McCain’s latest deed of political maleficence is working behind the scenes to lead a purge of Republican conservatives from leadership positions in Arizona, using the help of big Obama donors Greg and Lisa Wendt of San Francisco to do it. “Trading on his Vietnam War hero status, a new super PAC started by McCain’s political allies “reportedly recruited Vietnamese-Americans in Arizona who respect McCain for taking ‘up the cause of the country’s refugees’ and his military service to many precinct posts. According to Politico, ‘more than 50 individuals of Vietnamese descent signed up to run for the precinct slots, and won.’”

Many Republicans consider John McCain to be a war hero. Yes, he survived being a prisoner of war in Vietnam. This doesn’t qualify him to be a principled person when it comes to politics. He’s vindictive and spends more time attacking his fellow Republicans than the Democrats. In fact, he said, “I think the Democratic Party is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and their philosophy.”

Ted Cruz was right when he said the following:

“You want to lose elections? Stand for nothing. Look at the last four congressional elections, in ’06, ’08, ’10′, and ’12. In 3 of the four we followed that strategy. In ‘06, ‘08 and ‘12, we put our head down, we stood for nothing and we got walloped.

“The one election that was a tremendous election was 2010, when Republicans drew a line in the sand. We said we stand unequivocally against Obamacare, against bankrupting the country, and we won an historic tidal wave of an election.

“And of course then all of us remember President Dole, and President McCain, and President Romney. Now look those are good men, those are decent men — but when you don’t stand and draw a clear distinction, when you don’t stand for principle, Democrats celebrate.”

The 2014 election was even bigger for conservatives than 2010. Was McCain and his fellow-Establishment Republicans leading the charge against the Democrats with a conservative agenda? They were nowhere to be found. In order for Establishment Republican Thad Cochran to win in Mississippi, he had to align himself with Democrats to beat back a primary challenge against Tea Party candidate Chris McDaniel.

John McCain was not happy with Cruz’s comments or his principled strategy to put our nation on sound constitutional footing. McCain said the following on Democrat-friendly MSNBC:

“[Sen. Cruz] can say what he wants to about me, and he can say anything he wants to, I think, about Mitt – Mitt’s capable of taking it. But when he throws Bob Dole in there, I wonder if he thinks that Bob Dole stood for principle on that hilltop in Italy when he was so gravely wounded and left part of his body there fighting for our country?”

What does one thing have to do with the other? Nothing.

The Right Scoop gets it right:

“This is why I said McCain sounds like a slimy Democrat because this is exactly what slimy Democrats do. McCain goes on MSNBC to attack Cruz and suggest that he doesn’t respect the military sacrifice that Dole gave for this country. How dare he!

“Ted Cruz was not talking about Dole’s military service and McCain knows it. Cruz was talking about his political campaign for president. He was talking about the Republican Party.”

McCain is “not only a liberal Republican, but he’s vindictive and ethically challenged. He doesn’t seem to represent Arizona. He represents a handful of wealthy out of state donors trying to manufacture voters still willing to blindly pull the lever for him.”
Read more at
http://godfatherpolitics.com/19519/john-mccain-using-obama-donors-purge-arizona-tea-partiers/#D8eWF3wLBZECpjyr.99

 

What This Investigative Report Just Revealed Shows How ObamaCare Makes Millions Sick…

middle-class workers on employer-provided plans are…NORVELL ROSE —

Heading into 2015, one of the bigger questions regarding ObamaCare is whether the latest Supreme Court case involving the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will lead to a ruling that sends the law into an insurance “death spiral.”

It’ll be many months before any ruling is issued on King v. Burwell, but already the liberal hand-wringing has begun over the fact that a decision from the high court could render ObamaCare unworkable.

As reported at nationaljournal.com, the basis of the legal challenge involves the subsidies — actually tax credits — offered to ObamaCare enrollees and whether Congress intended for that financial assistance to insurance premium payers to be universally available:

…the subsidies are part of a complex, interwoven set of policies that aim to balance out each state’s insurance market.

The vast majority of Obamacare enrollees are receiving tax subsidies, which are offered on a sliding scale based on income, and most of them live in the 36 states that didn’t set up their own exchanges.

But as that future ruling hangs over ObamaCare as well as the lawmakers and liberal advocates who support it, there is a significant present problem identified in a lengthy investigative report at usatoday.com.

With new ObamaCare rules, regulations, and requirements radically changing the healthcare marketplace, middle-class workers on employer-provided plans are “increasingly staying away” from doctors’ offices, largely because deductibles have skyrocketed.

It’s a deep and common concern across the USA, where employer plans cover 60% of working-age Americans, or about 150 million people.

Coverage long considered the gold standard of health insurance now often requires workers to pay so much out-of-pocket that many feel they must skip doctor visits, put off medical procedures, avoid filling prescriptions and ration pills — much as the uninsured have done.

While the USA Today investigation doesn’t entirely blame ObamaCare for the fact that more and more people are facing prohibitively high deductibles with their policies, the report does say that deductibles have risen dramatically since the ACA went into effect.

A recent Commonwealth Fund survey found that four in 10 working-age adults skipped some kind of care because of the cost, and other surveys have found much the same.

And a Mercer study showed that 2014 saw the largest one-year increase in enrollment in “high-deductible plans” — from 18% to 23% of all covered employees.

The result, according to the USA Today story, is that increasing numbers of Americans are avoiding or delaying health care, and are frequently not taking their prescription medications as their doctors say they should.

As to the prospect that time will heal the problem with runaway insurance plan deductibles, the USA Today investigation concludes that relief for those struggling with high-deductible issues — or their potentially negative health consequences — is nowhere in sight.

There are no signs high deductibles are going away.The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services last month cited these plans as one of the reasons health care spending hit a record low in 2013.

But CMS statistician Micah Hartman says his office is “not looking forward to what the impact would be going forward” if consumers who delay care need far more expensive emergency care later.

Given this bad news for so many millions of Americans, one might wonder exactly what President Obama really meant all those times he and his supporters claimed he has been working so hard to “protect the middle class.”
Read more at
http://www.westernjournalism.com/what-this-investigative-report-just-revealed-shows-how-obamacare-makes-millions-sick/#dGvHUigrUUBuuQfw.99

 

 

Senate Republicans Have Big Plans For Big Labor

 by Cowboy Byte

With Republicans about to take over the Senate, one of the new majority’s priorities is reforming a federal board that helps decide disputes between unions and businesses.
Check it out:

The Democratic-dominated National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been accused of being too biased in favor of liberal policies and labor unions. To address this, Tennessee Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander — the incoming chairman of the Senate committee with jurisdiction over labor issues – has introduced the National Labor Relations Board Reform Act.


Read more at
http://cowboybyte.com/35836/senate-republicans-big-plans-big-labor/

 

 

24 States to Submit Article V Convention of States Applications This Month

As many State Legislatures begin their sessions this month the real work of reining in the Federal Government will truly begin. It is a very exciting time in our country’s history. Be sure to get involved and encourage your local legislator to support COS!
Check it out:

Click Here to Sign the PETITION

Representatives in the Aiken County legislative delegation have hit the ground running by pre-filing bills to gain position at the top of the agenda when legislators get back to Columbia in January.

S.C. Rep. Bill Taylor, R-Aiken, is continuing his push for an Article V Convention of States and pre-filed for the bill about three weeks ago.

Taylor began his pursuit of a states’ convention a year ago when he represented South Carolina in the Palmetto State’s call for a convention along with Virginia.

“Whereas, it is the solemn duty of the States to protect the liberty of our people, particularly for the generations to come, to propose amendments to the Constitution of the United States through a Convention of the States under Article V to place clear restraints on these and related abuses of power. …,” Taylor wrote in the bill.

Moving forward, Taylor and others said they expect 24 states, including South Carolina, to join Alaska, Florida and Georgia and submit formal applications next year. It takes 34 states, or two-thirds, to call for a convention. Each state has to pass a resolution and send it to Washington, D.C., for Congressional Record.

Once 34 states apply for the same purpose, then, the Constitution says, Congress shall call a convention, and the states will send delegates to propose amendments.

From there, the proposed amendments have to be sent back out to the states and then three-fourths, or 38 states, have to approve them.

Click Here to Sign the PETITION
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2015/01/24-states-submit-article-v-convention-states-applications-month/

Click Here to Sign the PETITION

 http://conservativebyte.com/2015/01/24-states-submit-article-v-convention-states-applications-month/

 

“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

En mi opinión”

No 840  Enero 5, 2015

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño   EDITOR

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

One thought on “No 840 “En mi opinion” Enero 5, 2015

  1. Pingback: No 840 “En mi opinion” Enero 5, 2015 | Romelbpaz1's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s