No 827 “En mi opinión” Diciembre 20, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
YO ENTIENDO QUE TODOS LOS QUE APOYAN EL ABORTO NACIERON. RONALD REAGAN
…QUE PENA QUE NO FUERON ABORTADOS, PORQUE AHORA NO PODRIAN APOYAR EL ABORTO: Lázaro R González Miño
Hoy Diciembre 20 del 2014 a las 2 PM en el parque José Martí, 351 SW 4 St. Miami Fl. Se efectuará una manifestación en contra de los acuerdos tomados por Obama y el dictador Raúl Castro.
Amenper: “The friend in my adversity I shall always cherish most. I can better trust those who helped to relieve the gloom of my dark hours than those who are so ready to enjoy with me the sunshine of my prosperity.”
― Ulysses S. Grant
Amenper: Efectos colaterales de las Relaciones con Cuba. (si se logra)
La nueva decisión ejecutiva del Presidente Obama es un hecho. No voy a elaborar en los resultados y las consecuencias, ya muchos han hablado y están hablando de esto.
Lo que quisiera es hablar de la situación, una vez consumado el hecho, con respecto a los inmigrantes que es encuentran en este país procedente de Cuba y los futuros inmigrantes.
En primer lugar, tenemos la llamada Ley de Ajuste Cubano, establecida cuando las relaciones entre ambos países por diferencias por el sistema de gobierno en Cuba, era una razón para que las personas que vivían en ese país y que se sentían que su vida peligraba tuvieran un virtual asilo en los Estados Unidos.
Esta situación, ha cesado de tener vigencia con las amistosas relaciones entre los dos países.
La ley ahora tiene que ser derogada por no tener razón de existir.
Con respecto a los inmigrantes que han cometido violaciones de la ley migratoria existente, y que antes no podían ser deportados por la razón de no existir las relaciones entre los dos países, también deja de tener vigencia.
Ahora los que violen o han violado la ley pueden y deben estar sujetos a deportación igual que los otros inmigrantes provenientes de otros países que son deportados diariamente.
No puede ni debe de haber una ley de inmigración especial para los cubanos ahora, y otra ley para los inmigrantes de otros países. La situación ha cambiado con la nueva decisión ejecutiva de Obama.
Deportación (también llamado “eliminación”) ocurre cuando el gobierno federal formalmente elimina un extranjero de Estados Unidos por violaciones de un número de leyes de inmigración o de las leyes penales, como se detalla a continuación.
Una vez deportados, un extranjero pierde el derecho a regresar a los Estados Unidos, incluso como visitante.
Todo extranjero que se encuentra en los Estados Unidos puede estar sujetos a deportación si él o ella:
Es un extraterrestre inadmisible según las leyes de inmigración vigentes en el momento de la entrada a los Estados Unidos o ajuste de estatus de no-inmigrante.
Está presente en los Estados Unidos en violación de la inmigración y nacionalidad o cualquier otra ley de Estados Unidos
El estatus de no-inmigrante es violados o una condición de entrada en los Estados Unidos, terminada
Una residencia permanente condicional expira.
Una persona anima o asiste a otra persona a ingresar a Estados Unidos ilegalmente
Una persona participa en fraude de matrimonio para admisión a los Estados Unidos
Un inmigrante es declarado culpable de ciertas ofensas criminales
Una persona hubo de falsificar documentos relativos a la entrada a los Estados Unidos
Un inmigrante participa en cualquier actividad que ponga en peligro la seguridad pública o crea un riesgo de seguridad nacional
O un inmigrante participa en votación ilegal.
Si vamos a tener relaciones normales con Cuba, no hay razón para no ejecutar la ley de inmigración tal como está escrita.
Después de todo, este es un país que tradicionalmente se ha considerado como un cumplidor de las leyes existente.
Pero no vamos a apresurarnos, recuerden cuando Bill Clinton trató de establecer relaciones con Cuba. El derribo de los aviones de Hermanos al Rescate, terminó con el intento.
Hoy el régimen de Cuba según se reporta, hundió una balsa llena de personas que huían de Cuba. La historia se repite.
Quizás a Cuba, realmente no le interesa tener relaciones con los Estados Unidos, no le interesa perder la mejor manera de mantener el entretenimiento de la posible invasión de Cuba por el vecino imperialista.
Amenper: Normalized Relations with a man not with a Country… Another of Obama Firsts —
For the first time in American history America has normalized relations with a man.
The owners of Cuba, the Castro brothers, have been given the title “Cuba” by the Obama administration and the land, property, and people they seized two generations ago and reduced to their personal plantation has been given the status of a real country.
Opinions on this historic feat of autocratic magic on the part of Obama, the turning of a plantation and its ruthless owners into a legitimate state, pour in from around the world.
The only place in the world where the opinion would actually count, in Cuba, the actual Cuban people, there cannot actually be an independent opinion nor even the means to voice an independent opinion on the subject. “Cuba” is not the word for Cuba. “Cuba” is a euphemism for a man, Raúl Castro.
Cuba proper is at present nothing but a large tropical island with people on it that do not have a government that represents THEM.
There is no country “Cuba” to normalize relations with.
Obama has achieved a first. Unfortunately for him, history will remember him for it.
La respuesta al acuerdo
Indignación en el exilio cubano y la oposición a los Castro: Obama es un “traidor”
Quienes se han opuesto al régimen de los Castro durante años recibieron con indignación el anuncio. Algunos de ellos han dado su opinión en esRadio.
El acuerdo anunciado este miércoles sobre la reanudación de relaciones comerciales entre EEUU y el régimen de los Castro tras un intercambio de presos ha sido recibido con indignación por la mayor parte de la oposición a la dictadura cubana.
Guillermo Fariñas, Carlos Alberto Montaner, Zoé Valdés y Carlos Payá han dado su opinión a los micrófonos de Es la mañana de Federico y Es la tarde de Dieter de esRadio:
- Guillermo Fariñas, encarcelado tres veces por el régimen, protagonizó varias huelgas de hambre: “Yo pienso que es un error del gobierno de los EEUU el haber dado esta señal equívoca de acercamiento a una dictadura que está moribunda desde el punto de vista económico, político y social”.
- Carlos Alberto Montaner, escritor y colaborador de LD en el exilio: “Aparentemente es algo positivo, pero en la práctica es la pérdida de una oportunidad dorada por parte de EEUU de haber introducido a la sociedad civil cubana en la negociación. EEUU lo que ha hecho es mantener la suposición de que el problema de Cuba es un problema entre La Habana y Washington y no, el problema de Cuba es un problema entre La Habana y los propios cubanos. Por otra parte, EEUU hizo todas las concesiones de manera unilateral y Cuba lo único que hizo fue repetir unas cuantas consignas y no se comprometó a nada, ni siquiera publicaron el discurso de Obama en Cuba y ni siquiera lo transmitieron por televisión. Realmente no tengo ninguna esperanza de que esto vaya a cambiar las cosas. Las cosas cambian en las dictaduras cuando las dictaduras quieren cambiarlas“.
- Zoe Valdés, escritora y colaboradora de LD en el exilio: “Recibí la noticia con bastante escepticismo. Los cubanos estamos acostumbrados a ver las falsas promesas del castrismo. El discurso de Raúl Castro no varió nada a otros discursos que ya había hecho antes. No creo que vaya a ver libertad, democracia, elecciones libres. No creo que el levantamiento del embargo sirva para llevar la democracia a Cuba. El problema de Cuba es el inmenso bloqueo que le tienen impuesto los hermanos Castro a ese país desde hace más de cinco décadas. Es un bloqueo que ellos no van a levantar porque quieren seguir en el poder hasta el final y después del final tienen sus herederos. Por eso yo no soy optimista, no estoy dando saltos”.
- Carlos Payá, hermano del fallecido Oswaldo Payá y exiliado en España: “El régimen cubano hace ver que su problemas está en la falta de relaciones con EEUU. El verdadero problema de Cuba está en la falta de escucha por parte del régimen de su propio pueblo. Creo que hay un optimismo basado en una gran falacia: pretender creer que los cambios económicos traen por sí solos los cambios políticos“.
Desde primeras horas de la mañana, las mayores críticas llegaron desde el exilio cubano en Miami. Allí, el líder opositor Jorge Luis García Pérez “Antúnez” denunció en rueda de prensa que la decisión de restablecer relaciones diplomáticas con La Habana es una “traición” de Obama que deja “indefensa” a la oposición interna.
Arropado por miembros de la Asamblea de la Resistencia Cubana, “Antúnez” vaticinó que “el régimen de Cuba se va a sentir más fortalecido” tras el acercamiento entre ambos países y lamentó que esa medida no beneficie a los ciudadanos que residen en la isla caribeña. “Obama se ha aliado con los represores de nuestra nación y los asesinos de nuestro pueblo”, dijo el disidente cubano, que ha protagonizado varias huelgas de hambre en los últimos años en La Habana para denunciar la falta de libertad en la isla.
“Invertirán muchos recursos en Cuba pero no va a ser ni para los ancianos ni para los enfermos. Va a ser para la casta gobernante que siempre se ha lucrado a costa del dolor de Cuba”, criticó “Antúnez”, que el pasado verano fue encarcelado durante varios días en Cuba.
El destacado opositor cubano entendió “que haya personas que se hayan cansado y quieran llegar a un entendimiento” tras más de 50 años de dictadura en Cuba, pero advirtió que el exilio “prefiere 50 años más de lucha, de resistencia y dolor que aceptar un continuismo con el régimen”.
En la conferencia de prensa, portavoces de la Asamblea de la Resistencia Cubana dijeron también que “la libertad, el respeto a los derechos humanos y el establecimiento de la democracia en Cuba no son negociables”.
Silvia Iriondo, presidenta de la Organización Mar por Cuba, aseguró que no debe haber “concesiones” a un régimen que “no solamente lleva 54 años violando los derechos y las libertades fundamentales del pueblo cubano, sino que lo continúa haciendo en estos momentos”.
No fueron los únicos en criticar la decisión. Familiares y allegados de las víctimas del ataque cubano contra la flotilla de “Hermanos al rescate” en 1996 criticaron la puesta en libertad de los tres espías por parte de EEUU a cambio de la liberación de Alan Gross. También desde Miami, varios familiares, junto con la congresista republicana por Florida Ileana Rohs-Letinen, tacharon de “burla” a sus seres queridos la decisión de Obama.
Los hechos ocurrieron el 24 de febrero de 1996 cuando dos avionetas de esa organización dedicada al rescate de balseros cubanos fueron impactadas por misiles disparados por cazas MIG cubanos en espacio aéreo internacional. Las viudas de los pilotos fallecidos aseguraron que la decisión del presidente es una “falta de respeto” y de “debilidad” ante un régimen que “no mostró debilidad al derribar las avionetas” de los “Hermanos al Rescate”.
A las críticas se unieron líderes republicanos como Marco Rubio o Jeb Bush, ambos con aspiraciones presidenciales. El senador Marco Rubio anunció que hará todo lo posible para bloquear el final del embargo. Bush, que criticó la nueva “extralimitación de la autoridad ejecutiva” de Obama y acusó al presidente de “recompensar a los dictadores cubanos” que almacenan un “historial catastrófico” de violación de los derechos humanos.
Likely Next Steps: Obama Off to Cuba, Castro Visits US
By Melissa Clyne
Just a day after his stunning announcement that the United States will re-establish a diplomatic relationship with Cuba — including opening an embassy in Havana — President Barack Obama is weighing a trip to the island nation or hosting a visit from its communist leader, Raul Castro.
“I don’t have any current plans, but let’s see how things evolve,” Obama told ABC “World News Tonight” anchor David Muir.
Story continues below video.
Time reports that Secretary of State John Kerry is already planning a trip there, according to a statement issued Thursday in which he said: “I look forward to being the first Secretary of State in 60 years to visit Cuba.”
Earlier Thursday, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the president was not “ruling out” a visit to Cuba, with Earnest adding that there could be “important national security reasons for the president to travel to other countries that have what we would describe at best as checkered human rights records.”
Earnest noted that the president has visited both Burma and Beijing.
“It is not unprecedented for us to go places and interact with countries with whom we have a very fundamental difference of opinion about that country’s treatment of their citizens,” Earnest said.
“A day after we were in Beijing, we traveled to Burma — again, a country that does not have a stellar record when it comes to respecting basic human and political rights. But we engage those countries and we engage the leadership of those countries, and we do so for a variety of reasons.
“Sometimes, and often, it serves our national security interests to do so, but also because it’s consistent with the President’s view that by engaging with the leaders of these countries and by engaging with the people of these countries, we can facilitate more respect for basic human rights.”
And “the president has had the leaders of both Burma and China to the United States,” Earnest said. “And for that reason, I wouldn’t rule out a visit from President Castro.”
Earnest also noted that the natural beauty of Cuba might entice the president to make a trip there.
“Like many Americans, (Obama) has seen that Cuba is a place where they have a beautiful climate and a lot of fun things to do, so, if there’s an opportunity for the president to visit, I’m sure he wouldn’t turn it down,” Earnest said.
The Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Roberta Jacobson, said that human rights were not a “direct conditionality” of the United States’ decision to restore diplomacy with Cuba, according to NPR.
No sitting president has visited Cuba since Calvin Coolidge in 1928, according to ABC News, citing the American Presidency Project at the University of California at Santa Barbara.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Headline/cuba-normalization-visit/2014/12/19/id/613982/#ixzz3MNkucOPa
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
For the first time, a sitting judge has weighed in on the debate over President Obama’s deferred deportations decree. Judge Arthur J. Schwab, presiding over a deportation case in Pennsylvania, sent out a memo on Tuesday that accused Obama of moving beyond his executive authority when he decided to make law from the White House. In the process, Schwab hacked away at most of the administration’s legal rationale.
“President Obama’s unilateral legislative action violates the separation of powers provided for in the United States Constitution as well as the Take Care Clause, and therefore is unconstitutional,” Judge Schwab wrote in the memo. His words echo the basis of a lawsuit filed against the president by 24 states that have demanded justice be done.
Unfortunately, Schwab’s memo will have no effect on the president’s executive amnesty. And in delivering his criticisms, the judge admitted that presidents have some discretion when it comes to how they will enforce the law. However, he maintained, the president’s decision went well beyond the boundaries of that discretion by outlining a system where illegal aliens could find protection from deportation. He determined that was a matter for Congress, and that Obama had usurped that power when making the decree.
Schwab’s scathing memo may have no effect on the law, but it does provide a glimpse into what we may see as lawsuits progress. It has certainly become obvious that Republican leadership in Congress is not serious about challenging the president on amnesty. Therefore, the court system may be the last vestige of hope.
Someone Stop This Madness
Conservatives were dismayed when they realized Republicans were perfectly willing to fund Obama’s amnesty order with hardly a fight. After spending much of the previous year slamming the order as illegal and outrageous, GOP leaders ultimately shrugged and went along with it.
While Obama’s work permits and Social Security numbers could spell doom for the economy, the rule of law, and low-income Americans, they won’t bother law-breaking employers who have been skirting the ban on hiring illegal immigrants for decades. Now, out of the blue, they have been given an effective pardon from the president. Exploit away, unethical business community! Washington’s got your back!
The amnesty order also gives these employers a license to avoid the federal mandate on Obamacare. Because “legal” illegal aliens will not be eligible for federal benefits (tax breaks notwithstanding), employers may actually prefer to hire them. By issuing his executive order, Obama has undercut his own healthcare program and made it more difficult for American citizens to compete against the fence-hoppers.
The reasons Obama’s amnesty should be thrown out are numerous and compelling, but Judge Schwab pretty much said it all with one word: unconstitutional. Let’s hope that the judges who actually preside over the lawsuits feel the same way
Amenper: La Paradoja del Ateísmo
Todos en mayor o menor cuantía, según la carrera que escogimos, hubimos de estudiar algo de física.
Las leyes de físicas que estudiamos eran realmente las leyes por las que se rige la naturaleza, y son inmutables. Basado en esas leyes se hacen los viajes espaciales. Cuando sale la nave espacial a la luna, no se dirige hacia la luna, pero al lugar donde se encontrará la luna según las leyes físicas del movimiento de la luna por los estudios astronómicos.
Una manera más simple de explicar esto es cuando un outfielder o un wide receiver está corriendo para capturar una bola de un fly o un pase, este no se dirige hacia donde está la bola, se dirige al lugar donde la bola caerá según la trayectoria de las leyes físicas, con las variaciones que puede producir otras leyes de física, como la velocidad del viento.
Todo lo que nos rodea son las leyes de la naturaleza. Si dejamos caer un objeto, cae hacia abajo por la ley de gravedad, si sube diríamos que nos encontramos ante un milagro.
Todo lo que no se ajusta a las leyes físicas de la naturaleza, es un milagro. Por eso el hombre es un milagro de la naturaleza. El hombre actúa independientemente de las leyes de la naturaleza, no se conforma con las leyes naturales, trata de usar esas leyes con su libre albedrío, a veces para el bien y otras veces para el mal.
El ser humano es uno de los principales testimonios de la existencia de Dios. No sólo por su compleja constitución, el funcionamiento de sus órganos con sus elaboradas conexiones fluviales y eléctricas pero además porque el hombre no ajusta su conducta a la naturaleza, es como un subproducto diferente, que actúa independientemente de la naturaleza.
El hombre ha manejado la naturaleza y sus leyes, aprendió a volar a correr a velocidades increíbles, a vivir más años que los que le había destinado su naturaleza con sus descubrimientos científicos, es el milagro que no se conforma con las leyes naturales, el hombre es un milagro.
El hombre es un milagro que creó Dios, que hizo del hombre algo diferente al resto de la naturaleza, lo hizo un milagro cuando le dio libre albedrío, con un espíritu donde reside esa condición. Esta era una condición reservada exclusivamente para Dios, antes de la creación del hombre, esto es a lo que referimos cuando decimos que estamos hechos a su imagen y semejanza.
Dios creó al hombre con un espíritu, y compartió con el hombre su libre albedrío, a diferencia del resto de la naturaleza, por eso aunque algunos se empecinen en negarlo, negándose a ellos mismos, estamos identificados con Dios, por eso estamos conscientes de nuestra relación única con Dios.
Ciertos hombres en su egolatría producto del mal uso del milagro del libre albedrío, de su independencia de la naturaleza en su libertad de pensamiento, dirigen la capacidad que le provee este milagro para paradójicamente usar una condición para negar la existencia del que le dotó de esa condición.
Entonces somos testigos de esta paradoja del libre albedrío, vemos, sobre todo en esta temporada de las fiestas pascuales, que salen, como cucarachas durante una tronada, para atacar y acusar de ignorantes a los que estamos conscientes de que si somos un milagro de la naturaleza, es porque por decisión del creador de la naturaleza. Dicen que somos enemigos de la ciencia, cuando son ellos los que niegan a la ciencia porque niegan el milagro que son ellos mismos niegan que el hombre es el señor de la ciencia, el señor de la naturaleza por designio del Creador y en una gran paradoja niegan a ese Creador.
“Y’All Come!” Skype Opens America’s Borders. Green Cards for All!
Written by Gary North on December 19, 2014
Beginning in 2015 and escalating from then on, skilled workers from all over the world will have the digital equivalent of green cards. They will be legal to hire. They will flood into America’s middle-class job markets.
The last major barrier is coming down: the language barrier.
Mercantilism is about to get hammered in the world’s labor markets. The free market is about to score another victory. Skype will soon announce to the unemployed, college-educated, 20-something workers of the world: “Y’all come!”
From China, from India, from Singapore, from Latin America, from Spain, and from Greece they will come. They will offer their services to America’s businessemen. “Hire us. We speak fluent English — digitally.”
They will not be living inside America’s borders. So, they will not be illegal aliens. They will be legal aliens.
In flawless English, they will say three words: “I’ll work cheaper.”
There is no way to stop this. The genie is about to leave the bottle. Free trade in services is about to overcome the last great barrier to entry: language.
Those Americans who cry out against the 10 million or 20 million illegal aliens who it would take $500 billion to deport — illegal immigrants who fix roofs — will watch in impotent rage as legal aliens take away their middle-class jobs — legally.
The cries of outrage will be heard across the nationalist blogospshere. “This must be stopped!”
How? Be specific. Tell me how.
How will white-collar Americans compete against low-cost workers who can do their jobs at half the price, and who can speak face-to-face with American employers?
I’ll tell you how. By getting better trained. By working more efficiently. By lowering their prices. By American know-how. By market competition. By offering employers a better deal.
With respect to all those people who demand federal protectionism in goods, and who have failed politically to get it for 45 years, protectionism in services is also about to go the way of all flesh.
As Joe Louis might put it regarding protectionists, “They can run, but they can’t hide.”
Advanced economies specialize in services, not manufacturing. America’s economy is a service-based economy. The labor unions are mostly gone. They cannot win elections in the profit-seeking service sector. Now what has happened to union members is about to happen to white-collar workers: wage competition.
Protectionists can scream. “It’s not fair!” Let them scream. Let them scream in a dozen languages on Skype. It’s all over but the screaming.
As a matter of fact, it is fair. It is morally fair. It is economically fair. It is the free market’s principle in action: the right to bid. It is the right to offer customers a better deal. It is liberty in action.
The right to bid. Protectionists hate this principle with every fiber of their being. But it will do them no good in the world that is coming.
The floodgates are about to open. Be prepared. Be prepared to supply a service locally that cannot be supplied over the Internet. Be prepared to compete if you do supply a service over the Internet.
Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2014/12/19/yall-come-skype-opens-americas-borders-green-cards/#mVTv2rRGPQKdZAcf.99
New Bergdahl Bombshell Could Bring Obama Down, And He’s Doing His Best To Hide It
“It’s embarrassing for the Army and the Department of Defense.”
Months after his name made headlines, first as a released hostage and then as a possible traitor, Bowe Bergdahl is the source of renewed scrutiny ahead of a new U.S. Army report set to be released.
The Army sergeant was released from Taliban custody in an exchange that set five dangerous Guantanamo Bay prisoners free. Barack Obama approved the controversial trade despite acknowledging that the released terror suspects “absolutely” posed a continuing threat to America.
Not only have critics maintained the exchange could embolden terrorists to take even more Americans hostage in the future, Bergdahl has had his character questioned extensively by those who served with him in Afghanistan.
Several soldiers reported that, in the days leading up to Bergdahl’s 2009 disappearance, he deserted his platoon, leading to a doomed search-and-rescue mission that cost as many as eight individuals their lives.
The military soon launched an investigation into Bergdahl and the circumstances surrounding his release, which analysts recently revealed was completed in October. Army Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer and Col. David Hunt spoke to Fox News host Bill O’Reilly this week and explained that they had both heard from reliable sources that the report compiled by military brass will show Bergdahl was a deserter and a traitor to his country.
Shaffer worked on securing Bergdahl’s release, telling O’Reilly he was selected based on his expertise to “advise a couple of the different commands about specifically some options to bring him back.”
Of three such options on the table, he explained, Obama chose the only one that offered the Taliban an exchange and other incentives for the release of the soldier. Furthermore, he confirmed, the Army report will likely show just how far Bergdahl went to disavow the military and his country.
Bergdahl deserted and “did as much damage as Private Bradley Manning,” he said. “People died looking for him and…I feel he gave aid and comfort to the enemy, the Taliban.”
Shaffer indicated the report will likely be released next month and “will confirm that Bergdahl was a deserter.”
The bigger question, he maintained, is whether he was also a traitor.
He concluded that the Army “will give him a less-honorable discharge,” though the fact that he has already received hundreds of thousands of dollars in back pay has left a black mark on the military.
“It’s embarrassing for the Army and the Department of Defense,” he said.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/military-sources-new-report-will-prove-bergdahl-deserter/#SipSzbSSjSvlowOd.99
BREAKING: ISIS Dungeon Suspected of Holding Western Captives Found
If only the special forces interfered sooner.
This is the first glimpse inside the secret underground prison where ISIS caged Western hostages – including James Foley, Steven Sotloff and David Haines – former fellow prisoners have claimed.
Freed captives told MailOnline they lived in wretched conditions alongside them, half-starved on hard concrete floors in almost permanent darkness in the basement room of the abandoned factory in the Sheikh Najjar Industrial City, in the suburbs of Aleppo, during the last four months of 2013.
They were then moved to Raqqa, Syria, where they were handed over to their executioner, the infamous ‘Jihadi John’ and his death squad.
The former prisoners gave a chilling insight into the ordeal that the men – and allegedly one woman – endured in the bleak darkness.
One of the former hostages who talked to MailOnline identified the dungeon – either a disused wood or furniture factory – from footage broadcast by a pro-Syrian TV Channel earlier this year, after President Bashar Al-Assad’s forces pushed out Islamist rebel groups from the heavily contested area.
But the Syrian reporter walking through the ISIS prison – before the world was revulsed by the video of Jim Foley’s execution in August – had no idea that it had housed nearly 20 Western journalists and aid workers.
As he walks through, he points the cameraman to discarded blankets, tattered mattresses and plastic water bottles that are strewn around the dusty floor in the footage – haunting evidence of the miserable existence of the prisoners who had been caged there.
The reporter also posted images of his visit to the Sheikh Najjar prison to his Facebook page, showing the cubicles in which some of the prisoners were believed to have been kept.
Epic Marco Rubio Smack Down of Reporter’s Question On Cuba
Rubio puts liberals in their place.
Check it out:
I really don’t know how Senator Rubio contained himself during a press conference in Miami, when a reporter asked him how he could support his current position on Cuba.
According to the reporter, who cited a recent Florida International University poll conducted on normalizing relations with Cuba, the “super majority of Cuban Americans” do not support the existing U.S.-Cuba foreign policy.
Rubio shot back at the reporter, answering his question with several mic-dropping questions of his own.
Obama: Sony ‘Made a Mistake’ By Pulling ‘The Interview’ Movie
President Barack Obama said Friday that Sony Pictures Entertainment “made a mistake” by nixing the release of a comedic film after the company was hacked and received cyber threats.
“Sony’s a corporation. It suffered significant damage. There were threats against some of its employees,” he said “I am sympathetic to the concerns that they faced. Having said all that, yes, I think they made a mistake.”
In a year-end press conference, Obama said that he wishes Sony had spoken to him before deciding to back down on the film “The Interview,” which depicted a plot to assassinate North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. “I would have told them ‘Do not get into a pattern in which you’re intimidated by these kinds of criminal attacks,'” he said.
“That’s not who we are,” he said. “That’s not what America’s about.”
Obama also addressed his recent decision to work towards normalized relations with Cuba, saying that he believes more engagement with the nation will advance the freedom of its people.
“I don’t anticipate overnight changes,” he said. “But what I know deep in my bones, is that if you’ve done the same thing for 50 years and things haven’t changed, you should try something different if you want a different outcome.”
“Change is going to come to Cuba,” he added. “It has to.”
He acknowledged that presidential action alone cannot cancel the decades-long embargo against Cuba but said that he expects a “healthy debate” in Congress about the issue.
Obama added that he hopes to one day visit the island nation but said that, at this stage, a trip is not “in the cards.”
“There is nothing specific where we’re trying to target some sort of visit,” he said.
On race relations
Asked about race relations in the United States, Obama said that, like all Americans, many black families are better off due to the improving economy. But he suggested that the income gap between white and black Americans persists.
“I have been consistent in saying that this is a legacy of a troubled racial past, Jim Crow and slavery. That’s not an excuse for black folks,” he said. “And I think the overwhelming majority of black people understand that’s not an excuse.”
And, he added, the debate over policing reforms in the wake of the Ferguson and Staten Island grand jury decisions has been a “healthy conversation.”
On the final years of his presidency
The president opened the briefing by highlighting his administration’s accomplishments throughout the year, emphasizing recent positive economic news and the millions of Americans who are newly insured under the Affordable Care Act.
“Take any metric that you want,” he said after mentioning advances in manufacturing and the energy sector. “America’s resurgence is real. We are better off.”
The president notably only called on female reporters during the lengthy exchange with the press corps, during which he struck an optimistic note, saying he is “energized” and “excited” about the final two years of his presidency.
“My presidency’s heading into the fourth quarter,” he said. “Interesting stuff happens in the fourth quarter.”
– Carrie Dann
“Global Warming a $ 22 Billions Scam”
Imagine, for a moment, sitting at a prestigious steakhouse in Palm Beach, Florida, a hot spot for some of the most wealthy and famous — Donald Trump, Tiger Woods, Oprah Winfrey, James Patterson, Rush Limbaugh, and hundreds more.
And, imagine dining with a handful of men you’ve only read about. Some of them are worth millions, others published best-selling books, and some have held prominent positions at the White House.
In essence, you’re sitting at a five-person table of VIPs.
You’re about to take a bite of your New York strip when one of the men, a top U.S. intelligence agent, slams a 164-page document in the middle of the table.
This document, you soon find out, contains damning evidence that a network of politicians, corporations, and scientists have conspired together to promote the fear of “global warming” . . . despite evidence clearly stating no such “global warming” exists.
The motive: $22 billion per year.
To be clear . . . that’s $22 billion of taxpayers’ money . . . the amount that our government pays to stop the “global warming” epidemic.
That comes out to $41,856 every minute.
Or, to put it in perspective, that is twice as much as what our government spends on securing our borders.
Then, imagine this top U.S. intelligence agent turning to you, and asking for you to join him on a mission to out those involved in the “global warming” lie.
Doing so would cost a lot of money, a lot of time, and could cost you your reputation. But, pretending you never saw the document, and carrying on with your life, would allow the scandal to continue and actually put lives at risk.
So, imagine if you were at that table, and the scenario I just described happened to you.
My name is Tom Luongo. I am a former scientist with the University of Florida and currently run theResolute Wealth Letterprogram.
My name is Tom Luongo, and I’ve recently had this exact experience.
In the following few pages, I am going to show you the alarming research in the document that was laid before me that night in Palm Beach.
I will tell you why this network of politicians, corporations, and scientists tried to hide this research . . . and how you can be part of a newly formed initiative with the aim of getting this research into the hands of every American.
This research proves, once and for all, that “global warming” is a sham . . . a sham perpetuated by a network of dirty government officials, greedy corporations, and bought-off “scientific” organizations.
How you respond will be up to you.
I can guarantee you one thing: After reading the next few pages, you will never look at government officials the same way . . . you will never trust what you hear in the media again . . . in fact, you will become skeptical of any and all authority figures going forward.
It’s unfortunate, but the betrayal you’re going to discover today runs very deep, and revealing the truthabout “global warming” comes with great risk.
As a scientist for over 20 years, I’ve always upheld the truth.
I’ve worked with the University of Florida to do some amazing things . . . I’ve helped make crop yields more productive for third world countries . . . I helped create an intermetallic coating for gun barrels that dropped maintenance requirements on firearms by half . . . and I’ve helped cure diseases.
I have seen a lot of research go across my desk. But none of it can compare to the 164-page document that landed in front of me that night in Palm Beach.
That’s why I’m going to lay the facts from this document before you today, and then I’m going to ask that you join me, and the man who composed this document, on our mission to defund the “global warming” sham . . .
All it will take is a click of your mouse.
With one click, you’re going to put more momentum behind what I hope to be the largest effort . . .ever . . . to annihilate the “global warming” lie and defund the government’s multibillion-dollar spending frenzy to keep it alive.
Now, before we begin, I ask that you excuse any “rough” elements in this letter. What I’m sharing with you today is so urgent that I’ve made a huge effort to get the research in this 164-page document available to you as quickly as possible . . .
With President Obama’s recent speech about getting tougher on “global warming” issues I think it’s critical that we don’t waste a minute in getting this information out.
The sooner we get this information into the hands of the public . . . your hands . . . the more informed voters will be when they cast their ballots.
First, you should know who put this document in my hands — a man whom Al Gore is personallyattacking . . .
John Casey is a former White House space program advisor, consultant to NASA Headquarters, and space shuttle engineer. He is now one of America’s most successful climate change researchers and climate prediction experts.
John is a former White House space program adviser, consultant to NASA headquarters, and space shuttle engineer. He is now one of America’s most successful climate change researchers and climate prediction experts.
In short, John is the very definition of a government insider. He spent 35 years conducting classified research, examining confidential documents, and directing critical scientific programs.
For example: In 1986, when the space shuttle Challenger tragically exploded, killing seven crew members, John testified before Congress on the cause of the accident. After the testimony, Congress instructed NASA headquarters to bring John in to chair a special internal investigation into why these critical systems failed.
Now, keep that in mind for a moment: Capitol Hill and NASA trusted John’s detailed analytical approach and his engineering credentials so much they asked him to investigate the cause of one of our nation’s greatest tragedies.
After 35 years of serving his country, John quietly retired in Florida. He planned on living peacefully, spending time with his wife, children, and grandkids.
But on one April afternoon in 2007, John made an “unfortunate” discovery that changed everything.
When the space shuttleChallenger crashed in 1986, the U.S. government asked John Casey to investigate.
The discovery would ultimately lead him to abandon his plans for retirement in order to support a cause that was bigger than himself . . . that was bigger than anything he had done in his 35-year career.
In fact, this discovery would result in him becoming hated by all those who once heralded him as their friend and adviser.
After this outright rejection, John realized that despite his science not changing, despite the thousands of pages of irrefutable data, and despite millions of lives at risk . . . he was alone.
The responsibility of letting the world know about this discovery rested solely on his shoulders, and those who would listen to him.
Indeed, what he has to say goes contrary to everything you have been told about “climate change.”
I initially rejected what John had to tell me. But when he showed me what was in his 164-page document, I couldn’t argue with him.
Facts are facts.
What John discovered that fateful afternoon was . . .
You see, John found evidence — buried right in the government’s own environmental studies — thatdestroys their argument for “global warming.”
Using their own data, John has proven, once and for all, “global warming” is a sham. And perhaps the most expensive — and lethal — sham in American history.
A sham that our government spends $22 billion a year financing. Think about that: our government spends $22 billion a year financing “global warming” initiatives.
Again, that’s almost double what the government spends on securing our borders.
Or, to break it down to real numbers . . .
But this is just the tip of the iceberg.
John’s research also uncovered a different looming cataclysm that will ruin every nation that’s not prepared . . . a calamity that has been accelerating for the last 17 years . . . and brewing for over 200 years.
This impending catastrophe is as natural as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west. And just as unstoppable.
I’m talking about a tectonic shift in the world’s economies that will . . .
- Send oil to over$300 a barrel
- Cause food prices to triple and in some places make food completely unavailable
- Lead to violence erupting in the streets of your suburban neighborhood
- Cause governments to topple, nations to descend into chaos, and international wars to break out.
In the 164-page document John handed me, he went to great lengths to explain exactly how serious this crisis will be. It’s going to be worsened by the fact our politicians are bullheadedly ignoring it.
The result will be every American being blindsided . . . unable to see it coming because of Al Gore and his cronies preaching false dogma.
As I said before, I didn’t believe it either until I saw the evidence in John’s dossier. And even then, it took me hours of talking to John afterward to digest it.
John’s research has now been corroborated by 17 independent scientific individuals and organizations. These are some of the top scientific minds in the field of climate science . . . in the world.
When John retired, he had many allies and supporters in the government.
However, when he turned that same analytical approach Washington loved so much on Washington itself . . .
He became, in essence, their “public enemy No. 1.”
Let me explain.
As mentioned, in April of 2007, already into a comfortable retirement, John began examining some solar and environmental physics research (these are his hobbies).
The “unfortunate” discovery he made would make any honest American sick to the stomach. John immediately took the evidence and called his colleagues and fellow government insiders to alert them to the situation.
He even sent notices to the White House warning them of the crisis.
Silence, and then rejection.
And every year since, John has continued to notify every state governor, every U.S. senator, the House of Representatives, state attorneys general, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Obama’s Science Adviser Dr. John Holdren, and Dr. Jane Lubchenco, then head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
You see, all of John’s “friends” suddenly “forgot” his name and number when he revealed the inconvenient truth about Uncle Sam’s most expensive sacred cow . . . and showed them solid, scientifically sound research that obliterates the idea of “global warming.”
You’ve heard how the earth is rapidly heating up . . . causing drought and mayhem.
For sure, the media jumps on the “global warming” story every time there is a heat wave and each time a hurricane hits the East Coast.
But how much has the world really warmed?
Well, according to NASA’s own data, the world has warmed .36 degrees Fahrenheit over the last 35 years (they started measuring the data in 1979).
I think you would agree that a .36 degree increase in temperature over the last 35 years is hardly anything to get in a panic about.
Granted, that does mean the world is warmer, right?
The problem with that argument is that we experienced the bulk of that warming between 1979 and 1998 . . . we’ve actually had temperatures DROPPING ever since!
The reality is this: The world is 1.08 degrees cooler than it was in 1998.
Just take a look at this chart from Remote Sensing Systems, which provides data to NASA, NOAA, and other scientific organizations.
If you’re like me, this makes a lot of sense.
We’ve had cooler summers and longer winters.
Again, take one more look at the chart above — global warming reversed its rise in 1998. In the dossier John handed me, he explains exactly why this happened . . . and what’s going to happen next.
But for now, just keep this fact in your back pocket: the case for “global warming” is dead in its tracks.
“Global warming” proponents have said for a long time we’d see a heating of the oceans.
This proposition is necessary, since it means all those big chunks of ice are supposed to melt, killing off polar bears and causing states like Florida to get swallowed up by water.
In 2007, while accepting his Nobel Prize for his “global warming” initiative (and quietly pocketing millions of dollars), Al Gore made a striking prediction . . .
“The North Polar ice cap is falling off a cliff. It could be completely
gone in summer in as little as seven years. Seven years from now.”
The arctic ice caps have increased in size by 43% to 63%.
It is seven years later, and recent satellite images show that not only have the icecaps not melted . . . but they’ve expanded in size by 43% to 63%.
Here’s what a Globe and Mail article had to say: “An area twice the size of Alaska — America’s biggest state — was open water two years ago and is now covered in ice.”
I think we know who’s using actual science, and who’s fear-mongering their way to wealth and fame.
Since 2002, the ocean temperatures have fluctuated less than 1 degree Fahrenheit. There is no warming.
Again, there is nothing to get hysterical about here.
You’ve heard for years how climate change has been caused by . . . well, you!
Al Gore and his liberal friends have stood onstage blaming you and your “gas-guzzling” car, standard four‑bedroom house, and the factory downtown.
Al Gore spreads “Global Warming” propaganda for his own profit.
Shame on you, right?
Of course, the hypocrisy of the claim is that Al Gore himself racks up annual electric and gas bills of $30,000, more than 20 times the national average.
Now, while I am all for keeping the environment clean (I recycle, drive a fuel-efficient car, and reuse materials), humans have not caused “global warming” . . . nothing can be further from the truth.
Indeed, “global warming” alarmists and their allies in the liberal media are famous for saying that scientists agree that man has caused “global warming.”
President Obama even tweeted on May 16, 2014, “97% of scientists agree: climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.” John Kerry, Al Gore, and a host of others have championed this statistic.
NOTE: I’ve shared a quick snapshot of the facts in John’s controversial 164-page document. Truth be told, John has 33 scientifically reviewed reasons that “global warming” is more than just a farce . . . it’s the product of bad, botched science. In John’s own words, the research in this document is “something you have not been allowed to hear for almost 20 years.” That is, the truth about our climate, the politicians manipulating the science, and the real key that controls our planet’s temperature — the sun.
As The Wall Street Journal reported, “The assertion that 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a man-made, urgent problem is a fiction.”
When further review was done, it was discovered that a mere 1% of scientists believe human activity is causing most of the climate change.
In outrage, a petition was signed by more than 31,000 scientists that states “there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of . . . carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”
Indeed, even a founding father of the man-made “global warming” theory — Claude Allegre — recently came out and renounced his position by admitting, “The cause of this climate change is unknown.”
The reality is simply this: The climate changes over time.
When Alexander the Great was conquering Persia, climate change was a big factor. And we all learned in high school that the “little ice age” that rocked Europe killed hundreds of thousands of people from the 1600s through the 1800s. Additionally, we know about the heat wave and drought that wiped out much of America during the 1930s. Thousands of people were dislocated in search of survival.
Were those events caused by man-made “global warming”?
Of course not.
And, the reality is, most scientists who advocate “global warming” today know mankind has nothing to do with climate change.
Remember: Temperatures have only risen .36 degrees since 1979 . . . and the bulk of that happened during the 1990s! We haven’t seen any warming for the last 17 years . . . in fact we have seen a drop in temperatures.
Well, think about it.
Every year, the temperatures rise and fall with spring, summer, fall, and winter. A year is simply a 365-day cycle.
The sun is 1.3 million times larger than the earth. When its temperature changes, our temperature changes.
Every day, the temperatures rise and fall with daytime and nighttime. A day is simply a 24-hour cycle.
These two cycles happen automatically. We can neither change them nor stop them any more than we can stop the Earth’s rotation. It’s impossible. The temperatures fluctuate based on these cycles.
So clearly, the Earth’s temperatures rise and fall based on its exposure to . . . the sun.
Well, here’s the breaking news. And you must pay close attention . . . because what I’m about to tell you has been deemed a “forbidden theme” in the scientific community.
Talking about it gets you a black mark at the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change or the World Meteorological Society.
You see, there are larger cycles of the sun . . . “solar cycles.”
This may not seem earthshattering, but solar cycles are — bar none — the most devastating argument against man-made “global warming.”
Essentially, there are times when the sun gets hotter and times when it cools off as measured by “sunspots.” And John Casey found multiple solar cycles that determine the temperatures of the Earth.
The thing about these cycles is that they are predictable, and therefore it’s not difficult to see what is coming in the years ahead.
Indeed, if scientists were paying attention to these “solar cycles” years ago, they could have told you that the Earth would get warmer during the 1990s, and then it would cool . . . just like it has.
In fact, this climate cycle, along with several other cycles, has allowed John to make 11 accurate predictions about the Earth’s climate over the past few years, and it has allowed him to make a catastrophic prediction which I will share with you in a moment.
Ironically, as John released his data on these solar cycles, the ugly lie about man-made “global warming” started leaking out.
You probably already knew somewhere deep inside that something wasn’t right about the “global warming” theory.
Sure, during the 1990s, we all noticed it getting warmer. But, to say that it is directly tied what humans are doing seemed to be a stretch, and, we have all noticed it getting a LOT cooler lately.
So it might not come as a surprise to say that “global warming” is a sham. But what does come as a surprise to many is the evidence of outright lying that is now leaking out of trustworthy scientific agencies.
Shortly after John exposed the truth about “global warming,” 1,000 emails and 2,000 documents from leading “global warming” scientists were found . . . revealing potential conspiracies, collusions, data manipulation, destruction of information, and even admission of flaws that were buried.
- One leading scientist — Kevin Trenberth — admitted“The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty we can’t.” A travesty simply because they were worried about losing their government funding.
- In another email, Dr. Phil Jones — a leading “global warming” advocate at the United Nations — admitted thathe used “Mike’s Nature trick” in a 1999 graph to “hide the decline” in temperature.
- And another study done by Stephen Goddard at Real Science revealed just how ridiculous “climate scientists” can get with data manipulation. Here is what he had to say: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA) has been “adjusting” its record by replacing real temperatures with data “fabricated” by computer models.”
There are several other documents just like these.
More recently, Professor Robert Stavins — who helped write the 2014 United Nations Climate Report — came out to Breitbart News . . . and revealed that politicians demanded he change and edit parts of the report to fit their needs!
In short, governments, and government-funded scientists, want to make sure that any “global warming” research published . . . will say exactly what they want it to say.
Now, everyone knows from their high school education that the No. 1 rule of doing scientific research is that it cannot be undertaken with an end goal in mind because you will only use the data points that support your end goal.
That’s not real science.
But that’s exactly what “global warming” scientists are doing! They are only using partial data . . . the data the supports their end goal . . . to make their point that there is man-made “global warming.”
So, we’re being told that the survival of our planet, of the human race, relies on tackling “global warming” . . . yet the whole thing is a sham.
Why would this network of politicians, corporations, and scientists do such a thing?
Well, think about it.
Our federal government spends $22 billion on “global warming” research each and every year (twice as much as we spend on protecting our border!).
Again, that is $41,856 every minute.
If government-funded scientists came out and said “global warming” didn’t exist, their funding would be cut immediately.
But “global warming” has been kept on life support for another crucial reason: It has been a practical ATM for every in-the-know political figure.
The media is catching on to Al Gore’slies, but he is not going down without a fight.
Al Gore, for example, has been one of the most vocally aggressive crusaders for “global warming.”
In 2001, before leaving office as vice president, Gore was worth less than $2 million. Since then, he has grown his wealth to $100 million . . . almost entirely by investing in a handful of “green-tech” companies . . . 14 of whichreceived more than $2.5 billion in loans, grants, tax breaks, and more from the Obama administration.
The Telegraph reports Al Gore could become the “world’s first carbon billionaire” thanks to his investments in green companies . . . all of which benefit from tax dollars and government loans to “prevent global warming.”
And he’s not alone.
After accepting $1.25 million in campaign contributions, President Obama made sure to include his “global warming” plans in his victory speech: “We want our children to live in an America that isn’t threatened by the destructive power of a warming planet.”
You are likely familiar with the story of the failed Solyndra green energy initiative, which cost taxpayers $500 million; President Obama took a lot of flak for that.
But here’s a little-known side of the Solyndra story I bet you haven’t heard: Obama, in essence, used taxpayer money to finance his re-election campaign . . . by funneling it through Solyndra.
You see, when Solyndra fell on hard times, it passed into the hands of two large private equity investors . . . Goldman Sachs and George Kaiser. When $500 million in taxpayer money was given to Solyndra, both Goldman Sachs and George Kaiser benefited. Coincidentally, both have made contributions to Obama’s election campaigns adding up to roughly $1.25 million.
It doesn’t stop there.
- In 2010, another federal loan of $400 million went Abound Solar. That resulted in a bankruptcy as well. But investors in Abound Solar seemed to do just fine . . . investors like billionaire heiress Patricia Stryker. Stryker has famously contributed$500,000 to the Coalition for Progress while throwing $85,000 toward Obama’s inaugural committee. It’s just a coincidence that the government handed a company she invested in $400 million just before bankruptcy . . . right?
- There’s also A123 Systems, which paid one lobbying firm $970,000 to secure money from the government — and received $279 million in federal assistance. The CEO of A123 Systems went on to fund multiple Democratic senators and contributed to Obama’s campaign.
- First Solar received $646 million in government loan guarantees, and has since contributed more than $180,000 to Democratic campaigns.
- GE is notorious for spending tens of millions of dollars a year to “buy” green energy credits for its wind turbines and other green technologies — credits which helped the firm pay ZEROtaxes in 2011.
There are a host of other examples of liberals getting wealthy off “global warming” initiatives just like these.
You can see why green energy is such a profitable business — CEOs and executives get to rake in millions of dollars, while politicians get lucrative donations for their campaigns . . . and scientists get all the funding they need to keep them going . . . all on your dime.
But here’s the cherry on top . . .
While $22 billion of our money is being redistributed every year to greedy scientists, politicians, and corporations . . .
$22 billion is just what is spent on these “global warming” initiatives.
The reality is, these initiatives have ripple effects . . . mainly the regulations (from government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency) that shackle free enterprise and force us to rely on foreign energy.
According to Forbes, the total cost of these ripple effects is a staggering $1.75 trillion annually.
I want you to really think about that for a moment.
We’re watching $1.75 trillion per year . . . $3,329,528 per minute . . . go to waste.
It’s worse when you note that the U.S. Energy Information Administration says these regulations could ultimately cause gasoline prices to rise 77% over baseline projections . . . send 3 million Americans to the welfare line . . . and reduce average household income by a whopping $4,000 each year.
Washington knows all of this . . . and is still barreling forward with its nonsense policies!
They’re just letting you foot the bill, while they pocket the benefits.
Fact is, organizations like the Environmental Protection Agency have handcuffed capitalism . . . based on a theory even its staunchest supporters (like the aforementioned Dr. Allegre) have already renounced.
The result: reduced business, higher energy and food costs, higher taxes, lost jobs, and more money going overseas.
With $1.75 trillion in annual costs, you would think someone out there would listen to John and his research, but . . .
When John discovered that the world was indeed cooling, he urgently shared his findings, only to get lambasted.
Al Gore himself specifically called John a “pseudo-scientist” and discarded his findings.
“Global warming” advocate Dr. Benjamin Kirtman simply dismissed John’s warnings as the “usual nonsense.”
Media Matters has published two personal attacks against John — saying he has “no background in climate science” (which isn’t true) and calling him a “scam artist.”
But think about something for a moment.
Why would John take on this mission to expose the truth about “global warming” if he didn’t fully know that his evidence was fact? Why would he risk his reputation, his retirement, and his way of life?
It would have been much easier to walk away.
But John isn’t the type to walk away from the truth . . . especially when it would put his family, country, and even the world at risk.
That is why John has taken on this mission, even if it means doing it alone.
It is why he has exhausted his savings and retirement funds to spread the word about his research through his organization, Space and Science Research Corporation (SSRC).
He will let nothing stop him.
John’s persistence is finally paying off.
A small movement is starting . . . one that I am proud to be a part of, and one that I will invite you to join in a moment.
Helping fuel this movement has been the series of cold winters and cool summers that John predicted would come. The media no longer could ignore the irony in front of them. Here is what they have reported recently.
And now, a small but distinguished group of scientists and researchers are publically aligning themselves with John Casey and his organization.
One such organization recently named John . . .
Perhaps that is because unlike some of the “global warming” darlings and proponents — NOAA, NASA, and the IPCC — John’s research has consistently predicted weather patterns correctly.
John has spoken at conferences across the United States . . . making 11 accurate predictions.
Since he first began sharing this work in 2007, John’s 11 predictions have come true (mind you, these are MAJOR events, not predicting that tomorrow will be slightly cloudy with a chance of rain).
I could walk you through all 11, but they are very extensive and heavy on the science. John has accurately predicted everything from a drop in solar activity (NASA later adjusted their own projections to fall in line with his) to a rise in historic earthquake activity (10 months before the earthquake that hit Japan and caused the Fukushima meltdown).
Please know, all 11 of his predictions of have been verified — by myself and other third parties. All of them have been attacked by government-funded scientists, only for those same scientists to eat their words later.
Each and every one of John’s predictions have been made publicly and shared with top government officials and the mainstream media for the last seven years.
John has made every effort to share this information. But instead of listening, the media and the left treated him like a leper and have done their best to smear his name.
Science and politics have worked this way for hundreds of years.
Galileo was ridiculed by scientists invested in the idea the sun revolves around the Earth.
Robert Goddard — the man who ushered in the Space Age and rocket ships — was ridiculed endlessly during his life for proposing . . . traveling to the moon.
William Harvey was ostracized for proposing the theory of blood circulation . . .
Opponents could never refute the science — they could only attack the man behind it. Just like they do with John today.
But there is a small group of scientists that are starting to listen, and take action!
Unlike the “scientists” who want to present information that has been twisted to fit a political agenda, and slam anyone who rebels against the accepted dogma . . .
John has done nothing but put his research up to public scrutiny for the last few years.
And now some of the top scientific minds in the world are rallying to him. Here’s what they have to say . . .
- Fumio Tsunoda, professor emeritus of geology at Japan’s Saitama University, testified, “[John’s] work is quite a revelation that marks a step toward a new scientific civilization ” and his findings “add a brilliant page to the history of science.”
- Natarajan Venkatanathan, professor of physics, SASTRA University, said, “[John’s] ideas may be opposed by conventional scientists, but they will have to accept his theory because the truth prevails.”
- Boris Komitov, one of Europe’s top solar physicists and a professor at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, was so impressed with John’s work, he reached out to John and joined the Space and Science Research Corporation (SSRC). Here’s what Dr. Komitov had to say:“These problems brought on by this next climate change that Casey ably discusses . . . are more important than ever. ”
- Ole Humlum, professor of physical geography at the University of Oslo, said, “The history of science is filled with examples of individuals with new ideas being met by the current scientific establishment not with enthusiasm, but rather with disregard and sometimes, even ridicule. These hypotheses were considered outrageous by many contemporary scientists, but today they represent the very foundation for much of our present understanding of planet Earth’s dynamics. New hypotheses based on empirical observations should always be welcomed warmly. This also applies very much to [the work] by John Casey.”
- Giovanni Gregori, who has served on the National Research Council of Italy since 1963 and serves on multiple astronomical councils and in several societies, went so far as to say thatJohn Casey is the modern day Leonardo da Vinci. He also said: “[John Casey’s work] is an important contribution for understanding and facing the environmental challenge, in its multifaceted and often disquieting manifestations.”
- Dong Choi, editor-in-chief of the New Concepts in Global Tectonics newsletter, calls John’s work“earth-shattering.”
Each of these scientists has reviewed John’s work and had no choice but to agree with his conclusion after seeing the evidence, just as I did.
John even confided in me that several other scientists secretly support his work. They agree with his conclusions. They think “global warming” and the accepted climate science is hogwash.
But they can’t say anything about it.
In John’s words: “If you work for the government and you stand up and say, ‘Man-made climate change is all nonsense’ you can kiss your government job goodbye. They’ll either make it hell to work there, or fire you outright.”
It’s easy to get upset with these scientists, and we should be, but in reality, they are just trying to keep their jobs. We should put the bulk of the blame on our government.
We have a government that prefers comfortable delusion to uncomfortable truth.
I am proud to be an American and I think God has really blessed this country.
When it comes down to it, no other nation has ever given every man, woman, and child the chance to enjoy so much prosperity.
And more importantly, so much control over their lives.
However, our nation has made a hard turn over the last few years — we’ve spent more time furthering agendas of a handful of politicians than actually protecting the American people.
John’s research is just one example.
Rather than being, as he says, “one of hundreds” sharing this information . . . John and his small organization have been doing it all.
And as a result of their tremendous effort, a small movement has started.
However, this small movement is at risk of dying in its tracks without help from bold Americans like you.
That’s why . . .
As I said earlier, my name is Tom Luongo.
I’ve been a scientist for the better part of my life.
I’ve worked to make crop yields higher in third world countries, I’ve done hundreds of chemical tests to make firearms less maintenance-intensive, and I have worked to help cure diseases.
I used the “scientific” approach in other areas of my life as well.
For example, I’ve been able to turn every $5,000 into $34,000 using a scientific approach to investing.
I used the scientific method to teach myself economics . . . and, as a result, started buying gold in 2001 — watching it jump 473% since.
I even used it to deduce the housing bubble was coming, three years in advance (and, along with my wife, took special precautions to avoid the fallout).
My point is, I’ve seen and done many things with my scientific background. I’ve used it to help myself and help others.
John Casey knows I have a knack for getting things done, and done right.
That’s why, at a dinner in Palm Beach not long ago, John set a 164-page document in front of me. This document is the culmination of his years of work — it’s all his research in one bound volume.
John knew I would validate his claims, and upon doing so, take action.
Since that fateful night, John and I have teamed up to take that document and rewrite a good bit of it into a simple-to-read and easy-to-understand book, so that we could publish it, and get it into every home in America.
The book is called Dark Winter . . . and I want you to have a FREE copy of it!
In it, John holds nothing back. He names names. He shows the evidence. And he reveals the cold truth about “global warming.”
- This book includes every alert, every warning, every scrap of information he has sent urgently to our government.
- John reveals the science behind his 11 accurate predictions in simple-to-understand terms, and why he foresees more significant events like tornadoes, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions.
- John also reveals 33crushing scientific dissections he performs which make “global warming” even more of a farce.
- Most importantly,Dark Winter makes an alarming prediction. There is a looming cataclysm that will ruin every nation that’s not prepared . . . a calamity that has been accelerating for the last 17 years . . . and brewing for over 200 years. This event will cause international wars as governments topple and nations descend into chaos.
- John even exposes why we may soon see oil rise to $300 a barrel and food prices triple (and in some places, food will become unavailable).
- Best of all, John reveals a three-step plan to protect yourself if his latest predictions come to fruition just like his last 11.
Again, I want you to have a copy of this book . . . for free.
I want to get it in your hands . . . and in the hands of every other American out there!
And that is why we need your help.
You’ve seen for yourself how “global warming” is a farce. You’ve seen how an entire community of scientists, politicians, and corporations are padding their pockets with $22 billion of taxpayers’ moneyevery year in the name of “global warming.”
And you have seen how John has made 11 accurate predictions and a team of scientists are rallying around him.
Most of all . . . you have seen how John has spent his retirement time and money preaching this message to anyone who will listen. Yes . . . they are few and far between. But some are now listening.
John’s not doing this for money. As I said, he’s actually exhausting all of his savings to get this message out.
But we can’t stop here.
And John can’t do it alone.
He is facing a $22 billion budget along with years of “global warming” brainwashing. Some battles have been won, but the war is far from over.
John is on the left. I am on the right. We have worked hard on putting together theCold Truth Initiative, and we appreciate your support.
I have personally poured my own blood, sweat, and tears into putting this initiative together.
I figured it was the least I could do for my good friend John Casey after all he has done for us.
The Cold Truth Initiative will send an audacious message to those who have perpetrated this blatant lie called ‘global warming’ — a message that will stop their malicious deceit in its tracks.
We will achieve this mission by completing three bold goals before January 1.
Goal No. 1: Spread the Truth About ‘Global Warming’ to Every American
We will reveal the fraud, the bought science, the government manipulation, and the outright deceit so that EVERY American can see the deception in broad daylight. We want everyone to know that the little hunch they have about “global warming” being hyperbole . . . is the right hunch. We want to expose just how foolish these “global warming” policies are that cost us trillions of dollars. We want every man, woman, and child to see that “global warming” isn’t science — it’s a get-rich-quick scheme for politicians. And it must stop immediately!
Goal No. 2: Place a Copy of John Casey’s BookDark Winter in Every Home in America
The government’s favorite way to control the population is to keep them misinformed. The last thing Al Gore would want you to see are the truths that are revealed in this book. When every American has a copy of Dark Winter, they will be freed from the control of man-made “global warming” lies. In order to do this . . . we have decided to give the book away for free at a huge expense.
Goal No. 3: Defund the ‘Global Warming’ Initiative
We will take back the $22 billion of taxpayer money the government is misappropriating every year, and let people use their money the way they would like to . . . rather than watch it burn up on pointless legislation. Once the “global warming” enterprise folds, the American economy can grow again . . . by as much as $1.75 trillion per year.
We have ambitious goals, no doubt.
Thankfully, because of good people like you, within the last week we have raised tens of thousands of dollars. We have used that money to reach an estimated 2 million people with the truth.
John Casey and I have been working day in and day out, shoulder to shoulder, to spread this message.
But now we need your help!
You can join the Cold Truth Initiative right now.
All we ask is that you make a one-time contribution of $5 that we will use to fulfill our mission.
Once you join, you will receive a free copy of John Casey’s book Dark Winter (a $29 value): This 164-page document is a death sentence for the dogma of the “climate believers.”
This book reveals the groundbreaking research that forced John to reverse his belief in “global warming.” He spent most of his life buying into the dogma . . . that is, until that fateful evening in April, 2007.
Once he saw the truth, there was no going back.
I am willing to bet this information will have the same effect on you.
However, your FREE copy of Dark Winter is just the first item you will receive today when you join theCold Truth Initiative.
John and I want to give you an arsenal of weapons to help spread the truth.
That’s why the book Dark Winter is just the first item we will be arming you with today. We are holding nothing back for this initiative.
You will also receive . . .
- The Lost Video Interview (a $29 value):This is the private conversation I had with John after reading his 164-page document. During the course of this interview, John revealed more cold hard facts about the end of “global warming.” I think you’ll be just as floored as I was (particularly when John explains the real reason Russia is invading Ukraine, and why it could be very bad for America).
- The Dark Winter Survival Guide (a $49 value):In John’s book, Dark Winter, he goes beyond blowing “global warming” out of the water . . . he reveals a calamity far worse than most climate scientists can imagine — all based on proven solar cycles. I worked hand in hand with John to create a DETAILED action plan for you to avoid the biggest pitfalls and even thrive during this coming era of chaos.
- The Dark Winter Investment Guide (a $49 value):As a seasoned investor, I feel it’s important to help you get all your ducks in a row. Money makes the world go round — and having enough of it, especially during the potential dark days ahead, can make your life much easier. I’ll show you how to effectively invest your money — and possibly, like me, turn every $5,000 into $34,000.
- A 3-Month Subscription to My Resolute Wealth Letter (a $24 value):I write a monthly newsletter that is distributed to about 10,000 people. Think of this newsletter as your monthly road map not only to wealth (I hand-pick several home-run investments every month for my readers) . . . but also to honest science, real economics, and alternative, practical ways of living outside of Uncle Sam’s reach. I bring in top experts to help me share little-known strategies for protecting your privacy, slashing your taxes, and even living “off the grid.” You get all of this information delivered straight to your inbox every single month — free — for three months. And then, if you choose to renew the subscription, it is only $97.95 for the full year.
Every dollar you contribute will be spent to spread the truth about “global warming” and on equipping you with the tools you need to tell others about this lie . . . so that you and your fellow citizens can be prepared for what is to come.
None of the money will be kept.
To be clear, the minimum contribution when you join the Cold Truth Initiative is $5. But you are allowed to contribute more . . . in fact, I estimate that every $5 you contribute helps us reach 20 more people with this message through online advertising, media buys, and campaign speeches.
That’s 20 more people who will know the truth and who will spread the truth.
Just think . . . if it were not for somebody else’s previous contribution, you wouldn’t be reading this message right now. You likely wouldn’t know that the Earth’s temperatures have risen a mere .36 degrees over the last 35 years, that the icecaps were actually increasing in size by 43% to 63%, or that our government is wasting $41,856 every minute in the name of “global warming.”
However, because of one of your fellow Americans . . . an anonymous contributor you will never meet . . . you are now getting the information you need.
John has put 100% of his life into spreading this message.
I have made a commitment to print thousands of copies of Dark Winter along with the other critical items in your Cold Truth Initiative Introductory Kit . . .
Thousands of others have already financially supported us through contributions to the Cold Truth Initiative.
Liberals like President Obama and Al Gorehope you remain silent on what you have read today.
So what will you do now that you have seen the evidence for yourself?
My hope is that you don’t walk away in silence as a network of dirty politicians, greedy corporations, and bribed scientists rob you year in and year out.
That’s exactly what they want you to do.
They want you to think that your contribution won’t make a difference. They want you to think your voice is too small to change things.
Remember, this information isn’t just important, it is vital!
$22 billion of your money is being spent every year to keep the “global warming” lie alive . . . consumers and corporations take a blow of $1.75 trillion a year because of useless legislation.
Imagine how the American economy might look if we weren’t effectively flushing this money down the toilet . . . imagine how much your taxes could drop if the government wasn’t spending your money on nonsense programs . . .
The only way we can win this war is if we unite together.
Thousands have already contributed to the Cold Truth Initiative. We are making headway, but we have a long way to go.
Now is your chance to make a difference.
Today, you can strike back at the lies, and more importantly, you can help other Americans protect themselves.
I urge you to click the button below and make a small contribution of $5 or more today.
We’ll rush you a free Cold Truth Initiative Introductory Packet that includes John’s book Dark Winteralong with The Lost Video Interview, The Dark Winter Investment Guide, The Dark Winter Survival Guide, and a three-month subscription to my Resolute Wealth Letter.
Proud Member of the Cold Truth Initiative
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
“En mi opinión”
No 827 Diciembre 20, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR