No 822 “En mi opinión” Diciembre 15, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
If there not “Merry Christmas” in that that door window …
You walk right by that door.
THE 67 HOUSE REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE $1.1 TRILLION CROMNIBUS SPENDING BIL
THE 67 HOUSE REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE $1.1 TRILLION CROMNIBUS SPENDING BILL
Senator Ted Cruz Launches Constitutional Challenge Against Spending Bill Over Immigration
Pete Kasperowicz-The Blaze
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) late Friday formally challenged the constitutionality of the $1 trillion spending bill, and launched a process that could force the Senate to vote on whether the bill violates the Constitution because it allows President Barack Obama to implement his executive action on immigration.
Cruz took to the floor Friday evening, and said Obama’s immigration action violates the Constitution and is closer to the act of a monarch than a president.
“The president has justified this illegal amnesty by saying he told Congress what he wanted, and Congress refused to give it to him,” Cruz said. “Well, Mr. President, the relationship in our constitutional republic between the president and the Congress is not the relationship between a parent and a child.”
“The president does not get to demand of Congress, ‘here is the policy I want; either give me what I want, or I will decree it to be so and ignore the law,’ ” he said. “That is the president’s bargaining position.” After warning that Congress must stand its ground and fight Obama’s action, Cruz made a point of order against the spending bill by arguing it would allow Obama’s actions to stand.
“I am now offering and raising a constitutional point of order against Division L of this bill on the grounds that it violates the following provisions of the Constitution,” he said. Division L of the bill limits funding for the Department of Homeland Security until February 27, but it doesn’t go as far as many Republicans wanted, as it does nothing to limit Obama’s immigration plan.
Cruz said his point of order states that the bill violates the separation of powers provisions in the Constitution, language enumerating the powers of Congress, and language that says the president must faithfully execute the laws.
“It is incumbent on this body to resolve those constitutional questions, and to honor and protect the constitutional authority of the United States Congress,” he said.
Here are the 67 Republicans who voted against the $1.1 trillion spending bill passed by the House of Representatives late Thursday night. Fifty-seven Democrats voted for the bill, allowing it to pass the House by a vote of 219-206.
- Wittman, R. (R-VA)
- Williams, R. (R-TX)
- Webster, D. (R-FL)
- Weber, R. (R-TX)
- Stutzman, M. (R-IN)
- Smith, L. (R-TX)
- Smith, C. (R-NJ)
- Sensenbrenner, F. (R-WI)
- Scott, A. (R-GA)
- Schweikert, D. (R-AZ)
- Sanford, M. (R-SC)
- Salmon, M. (R-AZ)
- Rohrabacher, D. (R-CA)
- Rogers, M. (R-AL)
- Posey, B. (R-FL)
- Pompeo, M. (R-KS)
- Poe, T. (R-TX)
- Perry, S. (R-PA)
- Olson, P. (R-TX)
- Neugebauer, R. (R-TX)
- Mulvaney, M. (R-SC)
- Miller, J. (R-FL)
- Meadows, M. (R-NC)
- McKinley, D. (R-WV)
- McClintock, T. (R-CA)
- McAllister, V. (R-LA)
- Massie, T. (R-KY)
- Marchant, K. (R-TX)
- Lummis, C. (R-WY)
- Lankford, J. (R-OK)
- Lamborn, D. (R-CO)
- LaMalfa, D. (R-CA)
- Labrador, R. (R-ID)
- King, S. (R-IA)
- Jordan, J. (R-OH)
- Jones, W. (R-NC)
- Johnson, S. (R-TX)
- Hurt, R. (R-VA)
- Huelskamp, T. (R-KS)
- Griffith, H. (R-VA)
- Gowdy, T. (R-SC)
- Gosar, P. (R-AZ)
- Gohmert, L. (R-TX)
- Garrett, S. (R-NJ)
- Franks, T. (R-AZ)
- Flores, B. (R-TX)
- Fleming, J. (R-LA)
- Farenthold, B. (R-TX)
- Duncan, J. (R-TN)
- Duncan, J. (R-SC)
- DesJarlais, S. (R-TN)
- DeSantis, R. (R-FL)
- Crawford, R. (R-AR)
- Cotton, T. (R-AR)
- Conaway, K. (R-TX)
- Clawson, C. (R-FL)
- Rice, T. (R-SC)
- Burgess, M. (R-TX)
- Broun, P. (R-GA)
- Brooks, M. (R-AL)
- Bridenstine, J. (R-OK)
- Brat, D. (R-VA)
- Blackburn, M. (R-TN)
- Bentivolio, K. (R-MI)
- Barton, J. (R-TX)
- Bachmann, M. (R-MN)
- Amash, J. (R-MI)
(Vote breakdown via VoteCruncher)
Giuliani: “Blacks Have Responsibility to Curb Huge Murder Rate”
By Greg Richter
The U.S. Justice Department won’t have any better chance getting an indictment against former Ferguson, Missouri police officer Darren Wilson than did the St. Louis County prosecutor’s office, says former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani.
Attorney General Eric Holder’s office is conducting two civil rights investigations into the shooting death of black 18-year-old suspect Michael Brown Jr. — one against the white police officer himself and one against the Ferguson Police Department.
But Giuliani, appearing on “Fox News Sunday,” said the Justice Department would be working with no evidence that the Missouri grand jury didn’t have, so there is no need to expect a different result. Giuliani is also a former federal prosecutor.
“This is the kind of case had it not … had the racial overtones and the national publicity where a prosecutor would have come to the conclusion that there’s not enough evidence to present to the grand jury,” Giuliani said. “It’s an impossible case to present to a grand jury.”
Giuliani has come under fire for saying last week on “”Meet the Press” that people should also be talking about the problem of black-on-black crime. He didn’t back down on Sunday, but admitted that blacks do have a legitimate complaint that they are unfairly targeted by police and that there individual incidents that are unjustified.
“There is more interaction and more unfair interaction among police officers, white and black, in the black community than in the white community. And I think some of that responsibility is on the police department and on police departments to train their officers better and to make their police departments much more diversified,” Giuliani said Sunday. “But I think just as much, if not more, responsibility is on the black community to reduce the reason why the police officers are assigned in such large numbers to the black community.”
Giuliani then returned to the crime statistics he cited last week on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
“It’s because blacks commit murder eight times more per capita than any other group in our society. And when I assigned police officers with Commissioner Bratton and Commissioner Safir, we did it based on statistics. We didn’t do it based on race. If there were a lot of murders in a community, we put a lot of police officers there,” he said.
“If I had put all my police officers on Park Avenue, and none in Harlem, thousands and thousands more blacks would have been killed during the eight years I was mayor.”
He said he now favors body cameras on police officers, but is sticking by his support of the “broken windows” and “stop-and-frisk” policies that he says reduce crime. Stop-and-frisk can be abused, he admitted, and should only be used when there is probable cause and not simply targeting people based on race.
- Ex-NYC Chief Kerik: Key to Preventing Riots Is Early Communication
- Ex-NYC Chief Kelly: Ferguson PD Dropped the Ball From Beginning
© 2014 Newsmax.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/giuliani-feds-indictment-ferguson/2014/11/30/id/610124/#ixzz3LygBlQR6
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Amenper: ¿Apelamos o Apretamos?
Vamos a suponer una situación en que se descubre que los terroristas han colocado una bomba en New York, pero no sabemos dónde, pero se sabe que explotará en las próximas 12 horas.
Se logra capturar a uno de los terroristas que es parte de los que colocaron la bomba.
Pero no se puede torturar para obtener información, porque eso es una conducta que agravia directamente la esencia del ser humano, que afecta su dignidad como ninguna otra acción.
Es algo también son considerado como delito de Lesa Humanidad.
Entonces simplemente le preguntamos al terrorista, por favor, ¿nos puede dar información de donde está la bomba? No sé por qué, pero me parece que no se podrá conseguir información de esa manera.
Pero nuestro presidente ha afirmado que tampoco por la tortura se puede obtener ni nunca se obtuvo información.
Entonces ¿Qué hacemos? Apelamos a su Humanidad, o Apretamos sus hue…sos, nos preocupamos por la esencia de este ser humano o le sacamos la esencia de sus hue..sos.
Dios quiera que esta hipotética situación no se presente, pero lo hipotético no quita la posibilidad, sobre todo ahora que saben que si lo encarcelan, los soltarán y que nunca más lo torturarán.
Si el castigo al crimen es contrario a la dignidad del ser humano, no harían falta las cárceles, y el que comete un crimen, siempre se ha considerado un enemigo público, sobre todo los terroristas asesinos en masa, que al cometer el crimen renuncian a sus derechos de respeto a su humanidad.
Hubo 3,000 muertos el 9-11, hubo 3 torturados en Guantánamo, como van las cosas, creo que habrá tanta publicidad sintiendo lástima por los 3 torturados como por las 3000 víctimas.
Y mi opinión y las de muchos otros es que la situación hipotética de arriba, hubiera podido ser real si no hubiera sido por la información que se obtuvo por los agravios a la esencia y a la dignidad de esos 3 hijos de puta y que cualquier persona con sentido común tiene que estar de acuerdo que es mejor apretarle los genitales a un hijo de puta que dejar que mueran miles de americanos..
Obama Can’t Even Hide it Anymore – What He Just Said Was Actual Communism
Barack Obama is the most dangerous, far-left President America has ever had. But after he was caught during his two campaigns in damaging off-script comments – such as to Joe “the Plumber” about “redistributing the wealth” – he has stuck to the teleprompter. Carefully poll-tested words are used to rally support for causes which are to the left of mainstream American politics.
Community organizing is rooted in Marxist philosophy, and that’s the only other “job” Obama has ever had. Now, Obama is so bold with his messaging that the White House is promoting actual communism on Twitter:
And Michelle Obama jumped in with that theme on her official account:
Incredible! Obama doesn’t believe in private ownership and private entrepreneurship – but instead is endorsing communities working collectively. In Obama’s mind, the individual doesn’t matter, as long as government grows toward its impossible goal of utopia.
Communism has killed more than 100,000,000 people in modern history. Let’s not repeat those mistakes.
Is it time to impeach Barack Obama? Please leave us a comment and tell us what you think
Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/obama-cant-even-hide-anymore-just-said-actual-communism/#ixzz3LykMKtCa
PARA LOS PAPAS ABUELOS ETC… QUE TANTO QUIEREN A SUS DESCENDIENTES…!!!!
PARA LOS QUE TENGAN HIJOS, NIETOS, HERMANOS PEQUENOS Y EN CUALQUIER NIVEL DE ESTUDIO… EN PARTICULAR EN LA FLORIDA CON SU “FLORIDA STANDARD” ACA “COMMON CORE”…”EDICION ESPECIAL DE ENTRE OTROS DEL TERRORISTA CONFESO , CONDENADO. Y PUBLICAMENTE NO ARREPENTIDO. COMO BILL AYER.. SUPER AMIGO DEL SENOR SUPER TIRANO. DE USA…. Y OTROS COMUNISTAS CONFESOS MAS…. Y “DIGAN QUE LOS ADORAN”….PERO NO SE PREOCUPAN DE COMO SE LES LAVAN EL CEREBRO EN LAS ESCUELAS DE LA FLORIDA …. Y LOS CONVIERTEN EN ENEMIGOS DE USA… ADEMAS DEL CONTROL COMUNISTA DE SUS VIDAS…. CON EL SISTEMITA… QUE TANTO DEFIENDEN LOS “LLAMADOS FUNCIONARIOS DE EDUCACION”…!!!
… DESPUES NO SE QUEJEN DE LAS VIVORITAS QUE LES ESTAN CREANDO…!!!!
Luis E. Guzman
Amenper: John Boehner
“I’m selfish, impatient and a little insecure. I make mistakes, I am out of control and at times hard to handle. But if you can’t handle me at my worst, then you sure as hell don’t deserve me at my best.”
Ok, I agree. But we may be able to find somebody who is not Selfish, impatient, insecure and make so many mistakes, and that could handle better the issues.
“EMO” I do not know why we have john Boehner in these position. We do not have any better to be in charge of the Republicans in the congress??? LRGM.
Amenper: Valores Familiares
Lo que se ha dado por llamar “cultura” de los grupos que componen la sociedad, es realmente los hábitos sociales de esos grupos, los valores en que se fundaron esos hábitos con que crecieron.
Y si analizamos cada grupo, ya sean los blancos del sur o del norte, los negros, o los hispanos, vemos que hay más similitud que diferencias en sus valores familiares.
Todos los grupos se fundan en la familia y alguna creencia religiosa o moral que se funda en valores judeo-cristianos, y el crisol de esos grupos, componen la sociedad americana que creció para ser la nación a los que todos admiraban, la nación a la que todos querían pertenecer o imitar en sus países.
Pero llegó la política, el socialismo, el liberalismo, con su lucha racial y de clases, separando a los grupos y al mismo tiempo creando sub-culturas que hicieron perder la identidad original de los grupos.
Sus hábitos sociales y su moral tomaron una nueva dimensión, un nuevo rumbo, un nuevo concepto de la moral o falta de ella. Se convirtieron en esclavos de los nuevos hábitos, a la vez que desdeñaban los hábitos anteriores.
El Dr. Ben Carson, un negro que creció en el gueto, de una madre soltera, pero que le supo educar en los valores cristianos, no se cansa de explicar el fenómeno de la nueva esclavitud basada en la dependencia del estado y la destrucción de la familia.
Carson nos dice esto:
Como alguien que creció como parte de la comunidad negra, es evidente que muchos de sus miembros sufren enormemente la falta de una figura paterna y la ruptura de la unidad familiar tradicional – y muchas personas están buscando sustancia sobre retórica.
Vamos a usar nuestra sabiduría dada por Dios para responder a los proveedores de la división y el engaño. Seamos leales a los principios, independientemente del costo personal a corto plazo y los valores correctos. Los beneficios a largo plazo será bien vale la pena.
Los más peligroso para los manipuladores modernos son las personas que han liberado de la mentalidad de plantación. Ellos rechazan la propaganda de victimismo y son los defensores de la responsabilidad personal. Ellos ven la verdadera compasión de ayuda a una mano trabajadora en lugar de una mano recibiendo una limosna.
El Dr. Carson, como de costumbre, está en lo correcto. Las políticas liberales, los manipuladores como los llama Carson, han creado enormes problemas para la comunidad negra, todo en el nombre de “ayudarlos”. Los liberales sólo están interesados en ganar votos, no ayudar a los negros a tener éxito y lograrlo sin la ayuda del gobierno.
Susana Martínez es una abogada que ha llegado a la posición de Gobernadora del estado de New México. Es una de las figuras más destacadas del partido Republicano.
Ella se crió en una familia de clase media de ascendencia mexicana. Martínez fue demócrata como sus padres, hasta 1995, cuando ella cambió al partido republicano.
Preguntada en una entrevista reciente el por qué había cambiado de partido, contestó:
“Una vez comparando las políticas del partido demócrata y del republicano, sobre los valores familiares, el aborto, el matrimonio homosexual, el feminismo promiscuo enemigo de la familia, la responsabilidad fiscal y personal, las filosofías económicas y otros puntos que estaban contra mi pensamiento social y político, me dije a mí misma, yo realmente soy republicana.”
Pero realmente no se trata de un partido político, lo que Susana Martínez descubrió es que los hábitos sociales en los que ella había crecido estaban siendo destruidos por las políticas liberales.
En inmigración, Susana se considera una defensora de la inmigración legal. La cual dice está siendo perjudicada por la inmigración ilegal. “Terminen con el imán de la trata de seres humanos, el fraude y el delito, Se deben asegurar las fronteras; negar licencias y matrícula a inmigrantes ilegales”
Esto que descubrieron un negro y una hispana, lo mismo puede y debe de haber sido descubierto por cualquier persona de cualquier origen o color que se crió con los valores judeo-cristianos tradicionales de esta nación y que ahora está expuesto a los nuevos valores o falta de ellos..
No puedo o no quiero creer que los que dicen representar a los negros y los hispanos con un protagonismo en los programas y las noticias de los periódicos y la televisión, representan a las familias instituidas de estos grupos. Ellos representan a la nueva clase a los nuevos hábitos instituidos en esos grupos por los que Carson adecuadamente llama “manipuladores” cuyo único interés es mantener cautivos los votos de las minorías.
CHRISTMAS HEROES: Parents Fighting Anti-Christian Agendas
Written by Kevin Fobbs
How ironic that as children all across the nation prepares to take part in various Christmas season events that they, in far too many cases, will not be allowed to actually celebrate Christmas. But to be honest, it is far more serious than just celebrating Christmas. Each day millions of students are sent by their parents off to build a solid academic base as well as learn about our American values in school. Those values and principles are built upon Judeo-Christian beliefs. In 2013 there were over 400 biblical principle attacks on children who wanted to read a Bible before or after school or even during lunch break and were denied.
When your child returns from the Christmas holidays will he or she still have to learn and embrace the teaching of Islam in the classroom, but have the teaching of biblical history overruled? What happens when the topics your child may be learning are ideals and values that marginalize how you have raised them and articulate an agenda that compromises your family’s religious beliefs? This is not something that can be overlooked simply because the child is heading home for a Christmas break.
Actually this serves as the best time to discuss and share what your beliefs are and reinforce the reasons why you will stand up for them when your child returns to school in the New Year. Don’t accept the erroneous church and state separation argument that liberal school officials try to jam down the throat of Christian parents. Your child has U.S. Constitutional rights and they must be protected.
In 2014, it has become an unfortunate circumstance in far too many communities across America that conservatives and parents of faith find themselves locked out of a parental support system like the school’s parents’ organization. Instead of assisting the parents by standing up for their interests and the interests of their kids, the parent organizational members give them cold to lukewarm support.
So it really is upon you. As a parent what are you willing to sacrifice to stand up and protect your child from a school or a school district that is willing to take away or marginalize your child’s values and principles because it is convenient for them? Are you willing to tolerate unfair and illegal treatment of your child? Are you willing to let the politically correct values of liberal parents and secular anti-Christian organizations dominate your life, principles and support of America’s biblical heritage?
America has a culture that rises up from the deep foundational values that guided the founding fathers. We understand that it is America’s heritage found in small towns, big cities and rural communities that give birth to parental heroes whose actions become larger than life. These are the parents that pray over their decisions at their kitchen table, or in the living room or perhaps during the church service. As a responsible parent they take a stand on principle rather than they should turn over their role and responsibility to the offending teacher, principal, submitting to the will of a partial anti-Christian school administrator or local school board member. They are not like others who take the easy route and conveniently swallow their principles and their values.
Be one of those parents who are not just heroes for their children but are truly American Heroes with a capital H. Join and recruit others in your school, neighborhood and church this Christmas season in the nation’s Heartland.
Take a page from Samuel Adams, who was one of America’s Revolutionary Heroes and a Founding Father. Adams’s father was a church deacon and was deeply influenced by him. Adams spoke of lukewarm supporters saying,
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.
Let liberty and your children and America’s future generations be your guide and your prayer as you celebrate this Christmas season. There is no tranquility in servitude to political correctness, so take off the politically correct chains of convenience that are used to shackle your children. Praise the birth of the Son of God and fight to protect your child and their future in the New Year as their Hero!
Cruz, Lee Lead GOP Senate Attack on Spending Bill
First it was objections by House Democrats that stood in the way of passage of a $1.1 trillion catchall spending bill. Now it’s the Senate Republicans’ turn, specifically Ted Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah.
The two lawmakers demanded a vote Friday night on a proposal to cut funds from the bill that could be used to implement President Barack Obama’s new immigration policy, ending any chance the measure could clear the Senate and be sent to the White House with a minimum of fuss.
Officials in both parties said the bill remains on track for clearance by early next week. Even so, the move led Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., to abandon plans to adjourn the Senate for the weekend, and raised the possibility of a test vote on the spending bill shortly after midnight on Saturday.
Senate Republican leaders have pledged to challenge Obama’s immigration policy early in the new year, after the GOP takes control of the Senate. But Cruz suggested they shouldn’t be entirely trusted to keep their pledge.
“We will learn soon enough if those statements are genuine and sincere,” he said, in a clear reference to Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker John Boehner.
Ironically, Cruz and Lee played a major role in events slightly more than a year ago that led to a partial government shutdown — an event McConnell, Boehner and most Republicans have vowed to avoid repeating. This time, Republican officials said they may have inadvertently given Reid an opening to win confirmation for several of Obama’s nominees that might otherwise have languished.
With the end of the two-year Congress approaching, Reid is pressing to confirm about 20 Obama nominees to fill posts such as surgeon general, director of the Social Security Administration and federal judgeships.
The spending measure tops the remaining items on a quarrelsome Congress’ agenda. Others include renewing tax breaks for individuals and businesses and a government program supporting the market for insurance against terrorist acts. In one bit of progress, the Senate sent Obama a sweeping defense policy measure by a big bipartisan vote.
Earlier Friday, the controversial spending package won a personal endorsement from Obama and was brought before the Senate.
Obama acknowledged that the measure has “a bunch of provisions in this bill that I really do not like,” and said the bill flows from “the divided government that the American people voted for.”
Obama has sided with old-school pragmatists in his party like Reid, but he’s split from leading liberals such as House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Warren blasted the measure in a Senate speech for the third straight day, saying it was a payoff to Citigroup, whose lobbyists helped write a provision that significantly weakens new regulations on derivatives trading by Wall Street banks.
“Enough is enough. Washington already works really well for the billionaires and the big corporations and the lawyers and the lobbyists,” Warren said. “But what about the families who lost their homes or their jobs or their retirement savings the last time Citi bet big on derivatives and lost?”
Another provision loathed by many Democrats — though backed by the Democratic National Committee — raises the amount of money that wealthy donors may contribute to political parties for national conventions, election recounts and headquarters buildings.
Democrats will lose control of the Senate in January because of heavy losses in midterm elections last month and will go deeper into a House minority than at any time in nearly 70 years.
Lawmakers from both parties came to the floor to praise the underlying spending measure, which provides funding to keep nearly the entire government operating through the Sept. 30 end of the current budget year.
The sole exception is the Department of Homeland Security, which is funded only until Feb. 27. Republicans intend to try then to force the president to roll back a new immigration policy that removes the threat of deportation from millions of immigrants living in the country illegally.
© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Headline/senate-budget-bill-cruz/2014/12/13/id/612818/#ixzz3LyiruDnr
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Rush Limbaugh Shocked by Romney Amnesty Embrace
Rush Limbaugh was shocked by comments Mitt Romney reportedly made regarding permanent immigration reform. Limbaugh labeled the former Massachusetts Governor’s comments as “Romnesty.”
Criticizing Romney for going “wobbly on amnesty,” Limbaugh posted his reaction on his website and in a YouTube video.
Limbaugh referred to an article on Breitbart, which said Romney recently told Spanish-language Univision that Obama’s executive action is “giving people false hope. He’s also communicating to people outside this country, ‘Hey, get into the United States illegally and stay, because they’ll always let you stay.’”
Romney called on Congress to pass “permanent clarification of our immigration laws so that people know where they stand,” according to Breitbart.
Obama’s executive action eased the threat of deportation for about 4.7 million undocumented immigrants. Critics have said it amounts to amnesty.
“I’m pretty confident that what the president’s doing will so inflame passions on the part of many in my party … that they will be far less likely to move aggressively on the type of permanent reform that’s so badly needed,” Romney said, according to Fusion Media.
Romney said he hopes Republicans will still take up bills that boost border security, reform the visa system, and make applying for residency more transparent, according to Fusion.
“Maybe even then, Republicans will swallow hard and say, ‘OK, even despite the fact that we now have a stick in our eye launched by the president, we’re going to go ahead and try and see if we can’t make some improvements to the immigration system.’ I hope we’re able to do that,” Romney was quoted as saying.
Romney has said he won’t make a run for president in 2016, but a CNN poll found that 20 percent of voters say Romney would be their first choice for the Republican nomination among 16 potential contenders.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/TheWire/rush-limbaugh-shocked-romney-amnesty/2014/12/02/id/610674/#ixzz3LyfYgrsQ
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Jeb Bush Champions Centrism Over Conservatism. By Luis Guzman.
Even though only Dr. Ben Carson has officially declared his candidacy for president, prospective nominee Jeb Bush has been getting most of the headlines lately. Topping several polls in recent months when compared with potential primary challengers, Bush has already made it clear that he believes the key to victory in 2016 is to be as moderate, compromising, and “positive” as possible.
Speaking at the Wall Street Journal CEO Council meeting on Monday, Bush said that whoever is nominated should “lose the primary to win the general without violating your principles.” That statement doesn’t seem to make any sense out of context, but Bush goes on to make it clear that conservatism is not going to win the day in 2016. He expressed his support for positions unlikely to garner a lot of excitement amongst the conservative base. Bush is in favor of Common Core, of course, but he’s also in favor of working more closely with Democrats on immigration. He said he opposed Obama’s executive action, but he seems more concerned with a Republican Party too divisive to govern.
“We have to actually show that we can, in an adult-like way, we can govern, lead,” Bush said.
Bush makes some good points, but I question whether conceding important matters of national policy to the Democrats is really the kind of leadership we need. While I agree that Republicans have to untie themselves from this endless cycle of reacting to the president, a GOP president that would be indistinguishable from a Democrat doesn’t solve the problem.
At least one of Bush’s most likely competitors for the job sees things from a different perspective. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul said Tuesday that the former Florida governor was suffering under a misunderstanding of what the Republican Party was all about.
“We are a conservative party,” Rand said on Fox News. “As a conservative, I can’t understand really even referring to conservatives in the third person.”
Unleash the Power of Truth
Fact is, we haven’t nominated a conservative candidate for president since at least 2004. Some might argue that we haven’t done it since 1984 – the last time, incidentally, that the Republican victory was so overwhelming that it made the Democratic candidate look like a joke. What if…we just tried it? You know, one more time just for the hell of it. We rally behind one guy who has at least 8 out of 10 Reagan-like qualities. He doesn’t have to be perfect; he just needs to be free of this moderate muck that Republicans are drowning in.
Americans respond to force and vigor, especially when it’s backed up by facts and heart. This is the easiest thing to do with conservatism, yet it seems almost impossible to find candidates able to do it without making fools of themselves along the way. If a Bush or a Romney winds up our 2016 frontrunner, that’s fine. We’ll do the best we can. But wouldn’t it be nice this time around to be able to go to the polls in November of 2016 and cast a vote out of hope and pride rather than fear and resignation? – See more at: http://www.fixthisnation.com/conservative-breaking-news/jeb-bush-champions-centrism-over-conservatism/#sthash.69AKawy0.dpuf
Muslims with Dead Baby in Trunk Allowed to Drive Away by Tennessee Cops For Fear of Offending Muslims
Special rights for Muslims. Islamic law in America.
On Wednesday a glaring case of sharia occurred in Tennessee. A police officer allowed a car full of Saudi Arabians to drive away with a dead baby in the trunk so as not to be “disrespectful” towards Muslims.
The vehicle, which had paper tags and a registration violation, contained three Saudi Arabians with Saudi drivers licenses, who told the officer that they had a dead child in the trunk, prepared for an Islamic burial at a mosque in Franklin.
Millersville Police Chief David Hindman told News 2 that the officer, “not wanting to be disrespectful to the men or their faith, let the car drive away without checking the trunk to see if their story was true.” The cop also failed to take the names of the Saudi men or any information from their identification documents. It was also subsequently confirmed that there isn’t even a mosque in Franklin.
Apparently, it was a family transporting a dead baby, but the dereliction of duty and flouting of law enforcement norms because they were Muslims is dangerous and shocking.
Millersville PD: Father had permit to transport fetus
By WKRN web staff, December 10, 2014, Updated: December 11, 2014
MILLERSVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) – A father stopped on Interstate 65 in Robertson County Wednesday afternoon had a permit to transport the 15-week-old fetus he reported was in the trunk of his car, Millersville Police Chief David Hindman said in a news conference Thursday afternoon.
Hindman said the mother miscarried at 15 weeks on December 7 at a hospital in Bowling Green, Ky., and the parents were given the permit from the coroner’s office. The father and two other men, all from Saudi Arabia, were transporting the baby to a mosque in Williamson County for an Islamic burial ceremony when they were stopped in Millersville.
A language barrier prevented him from showing the officer the permit, Chief Hindman said Thursday. “What they told the officer is their baby had died. They had processed the body according to Muslim faith,” he explained.
Hindman said the officer, not wanting to interfere with a Muslim religious burial ceremony, decided at that time not to cause a scene with the family in the midst of their mourning, and to let the vehicle go on to bury their child.
While the officer is five months new to the job, the chief says he stands by his employee. “I stand by my officer and he will continue to be with us here at Millersville police,” he said.
Chief Hindeman called the incident very rare, but said he does plan to create a new policy in order to deal with similar scenarios in the future.
News Anchor Reveals Shocking Examples Of Media Covering For Obama. …she has never revealed that information for fear of losing her job.
Journalists of all stripes have long complained about the current administration’s lack of openness in dealing with the media despite claims that it is the “most transparent” in history.
While plenty of reporters lament their limited access to unbiased information, however, Fox News correspondent Monica Crowley revealed that many of her colleagues are more than happy using their influence to shill for Barack Obama.
Crowley penned a recent editorial for the Washington Times in which she recalled a conversation with one broadcast network reporter who revealed the sycophantic inner workings of her newsroom.
The unidentified woman described herself as a conservative, Crowley wrote, though she explained that she has never revealed that information for fear of losing her job. The veteran newswoman said that, while her industry has long leaned to the left, reporters have taken an even more partisan tone in dealing with the current White House.
“Every morning,” she told Crowley, “we hold a meeting about how to build that evening’s broadcast. We’ve been doing this for decades.”
Those meeting have always had an “unspoken” liberal undertone, she noted; however, the 2008 presidential election cycle showed a specific bias toward Obama.
“Once Obama pulled ahead of Hillary and certainly once he became president, the bias came out of the closet,” the source told Crowley. “Now, every morning when we meet to discuss that night’s show, they literally say – out loud – ‘How do we protect Barack Obama today?’”
This anecdote is hardly the only evidence suggesting newsrooms actively work on Obama’s behalf instead of fulfilling a commitment to impartiality. Crowley shared a conversation with another fellow journalist, Fox Business’ Melilssa Francis, who recalled a similar pressure to carry water for the administration.
When Francis reported inaccuracies surrounding the math behind Obamacare during her time at CNBC, she said executives raked her over the coals for “disrespecting the office of the president.”
Former CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson has also made news in recent months for her assertion that she was forced out of her job due in large part to her criticism of the Obama administration.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/news-anchor-reveals-shocking-examples-media-covering-obama/#excpJyyH3zVLYbJd.99
Sr. Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino “En mi opinion”
GRACIAS A TU ATENCION…!!!
To: Lazaro R. Gonzalez
GRACIAS COMO SIEMPRE A TUS “EN MI OPINION”…. EN REALIDAD YO ESTOY SUPER ASQUEADO CON TODOS ESOS TIPEJOS QUE PARA MI SON UNAS PROSTITUAS CON CORBATA…!!! CON EL PERDON DE LAS PROSTITAS…Y SI ES NECESARIO… ME TIRO EN LA CANDELA PARA QUE ALGUNO SALTE..Y QUERAMOS DEFENDER IDEAS PUES ANALIZAREMOS LO QUE HACEN TODOS Y QUE DEFINICION LE DAMOS Y VEREMOS QUIEN ESTA EQUIVOCADO …. !!!! .PORQUE HACER LO QUE HA HECHO DESDE WOODROC WILSON HASTA EL MUSULMAN … LEVANTANDO LA MANO Y JURAR DEFENDER LA CONSTITUCION.. PARA LUEGO INFAMEMENTE TRAICIONARLA ES HORA QUE SE LE LLAME POR SU NOMBRE…. NO EN VANO DESDE UN INICO DE SU ORGIA DE ASESINATOS…. TRES ANOS DESPUES LENIN… LOS LLAMO IMBECILES UTILES…. YO DESDE LA PRIMARIA Y EN LA VIDA DIARIA CREO ESO QUE HACEN DE NO SOLO ENGANAR A SUS CONSTITUYENTES, PARA LUEGO TRAICIONAR SU JURMAMENTO Y HACER LO CONTRARIO CON LA CONSTITUCION … E S SOLO TRAICION…( COMO LA HACE UN SOLDADO Y MUCHAS MAS OTROS CASOS)… PORQUE UNA PROSTITA CON CORBATA NO ESTA AUTORIZADA POR LA CONSTITUCION PARA HACER CUANDO LLEGA AL CARGO CON ELLA LO QUE LES DE LA GANA…!!!…. Y POR OTRO LADO LOS QUE PERDEMOS DE NUESTRO TIEMPO PARA QUE ALGO SE DESPIERTE EN LOS MUCHOS QUE POR DESGRACIA ESTAN MIRANDO A LAS MUSARANAS….( SI EN ESE BARCO QUE ESTAN CUANDO SE HUNDA SOLO SE HUNDE ELLOS PUES … SE LO GANARON PERO LA REALIDA ES QUE NOSOTROS LOS QUE ALERTAMOS TAMBIEN NOS HUNDIREMOS…!!!)… QUE METODO USAR PARA QUE SEPA CUAN GRANDE ES LA CANALLADA QUE A PLENA CONCIENCIA COMETEN.?????… SI UNO DICE LAS COSA DANDO RODEOS… NO IMPACTA… Y SIGUE LA, INDIFERENCIA, APATIA..O EL NO VALORAR CORRECTAMENTE SUS “_______”,
ADEMAS DE AGRADECERTE TU TRABAJO TAMBIEN TE PREGUNTO………”COMO DECIR TRAICION SIN DECIRLA”..??? HABRIA QUE TENER UNA FRASE PREPARADA DE COMO ENGANAN A SUS CONSTITUYENTES SIN NINGUNA PIEDAD… SOLO CON EL FIN DE LLEGAR AL CARGO … QUE CUANDO LLEGAN A SUS CARGOS LEVANTAN LA MANO PARA JURAR DEFENDER LA CONSTITUCION Y LUEGO LA “_______” ETC…ETC ETC.. Y EL PAIS LO TIENEN HECHO UN CASCARON QUE EN CUALQUIER MOMENTO SE DESMORONA…!!
COMO TU LO DIRIAS…??? “TO BE OR NOT TO BE” ???
ACEPTO CUALQUIER SUGERENCIA ..!!!!!
QUE DIOS(JEHOVA’) TE PROTEJA A TI , FAMILIA Y LO QUE VA QUEDANDO DE NUESTRO AHORA PAIS….
Luis E. Guzman
“EMO” Muchas gracias Luis, por esta nota, por todas las otras que me has mandado y por todas las que quedan por llegar. Lamentablemente(?) pertenecemos a los que no nos callamos y eso hace que naveguemos en un mas de contrariedades y pedidos demoderacion. Pero quien puede ser moderado en medio de tanta traición y complots para destruir el lugar donde vivimos. Adelante mi amigo y mientras yo este aquí tu tendras un lugar donde protestar.
Un abrazo, Lázaro R González Miño Editor de “En mi opinión”
Government Debt Can Never Be Repaid. by Bob Allen —
Government debt has grown so large that it is now mathematically impossible for the government to pay it back.
Sports fans are familiar with the calculations in which your team is “mathematically-eliminated” from any possibility of making the playoffs (something Chicago Cubs fans typically process in early summer, but… maybe it’ll take a little longer in 2015?).
So how should one react when it becomes mathematically impossible for your entire nation to repay its debts?
There was an article this week saying around 20% of Americans state they will not pay off their personal obligations before they die (quite a moral proclamation!). Now Simon Black believes it’s time to realize the United States as a whole will never make good on its gargantuan debt, and some form of default is coming.
He writes in the Sovereign Man blog:
Over the subsequent decades there was a sustained push to finally establish the country’s central bank that will control money and credit, as well as institute a permanent income tax to feed the expanding aspirations of government.
They succeeded in 1913 when the Federal Reserve Act was passed and the 16th Amendment ratified, binding the country in the shackles of central banking and taxation of income.
Over the century that followed, the US has gone from being the biggest creditor in the world to its biggest debtor.
Decades of expanding government programs, waste, endless and costly wars, etc. have racked up such an enormous pile of debt that it has become almost impossible to pay it down.
A lot of folks don’t realize that, since the end of World War II, the US government’s total tax revenue has been almost constant at roughly 17% of GDP.
In other words, even though the actual tax rates themselves rise and fall, the government’s ‘slice’ of the economic pie is almost always the same—17%.
I’ve worked out a mathematical model which shows that, even with absurd assumptions (7%+ GDP growth for years at a time, low interest rates, etc.), it is simply not feasible for the US government to ‘grow’ its way out.
Default has become the only option. Socialist ideology has its consequences. When the People give up all pretense of paying for their own needs and desires, and seek Daddy State to make up the difference, you must confess you live in a nation of thieves.
Read more at http://politicaloutcast.com/2014/12/government-debt-can-never-repaid/#tuteP8BkM6WI3jdY.99
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
“En mi opinión”
No 822 Diciembre 15, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR