No 697 “EN MI OPINIóN” Junio 25, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor
Letrero en la frontera USA/Mejico que dice:
LOTS OF FREE STUFF AHEAH
HEALTH CARE . EDUCATION . HOUSING . FOOD . CONTRACEPTION . ABORTION . CASH . OBAMA PHONES . MEDICAL AND DENTAL SERVICES
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Amenper: Sólo cuestión de Tiempo. El ataque químico a ciudades de Estados Unidos es inminente.
Leemos esta noticia en el “Capital Hill Daily” Esta semana, nos llega una noticia devastadora de Irak: los terroristas han incautado de arsenales de armas químicas, incluyendo el mortal gas sarín.
Este es un suceso aterrador. Como Osama bin Laden antes que él, Baghdadi sabe que los radicales islámicos oran, casi sin cesar, por un líder para por la fuerza causar daño en la patria americana.
Y Baghdadi mismo es famoso por haberse burlado de los Estados Unidos durante los días antes de ser liberado de su detención en un campo de internación iraquí. Antes de que Obama lo liberó, el líder de ISIS amenazó las tropas americanas cuidándolo, diciendo: “Nos vemos en Nueva York”
Baghdadi sabe que con el fin de crear su largo sueño del califato y unir los gobernantes islámicos bajo una sola bandera, debe ser capaz de atacar lo que él llama al “gran Satán”, los Estados Unidos de América.
Un asesino a sangre fría
Según un informe en el WND.com altamente respetado, “ISIS ha capturado un arsenal de viejas armas químicas, la producción de armas químicas de Al Muthanna es compleja y numerosa, como sus luchadores que avanzan a través de la región controlada por suníes de Irak.
El acceso a una planta de producción de gas venenoso gas sarín y el hombre con la experiencia necesaria para operar, es el resultado de una nueva alianza entre los combatientes yihadistas brutal y Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, quien era un comandante militar superior y Vicepresidente del derrocado Saddam Hussein”.
Las armas de destrucción que los americanos no pudieron encontrar, y que fue excusa de los liberales para criticar a Bush, ahora están apareciendo en Irak
La alianza entre Bagdad y los restos de las fuerzas de Saddam ha creado un peligro muy significativo, ellos saben donde se encuentran estas armas, ya mucha de ellas están en su poder, en el poder de un asesino a sangre fría que ha jurado destruirnos, y que Obama liberó..
AMENPER PARECE QUE DICK CHENEY TIENE LA MISMA OPINION QUE TU O TU TIENES LA MISMA OPINION QUE DICK CHENEY…
‘FAR DEADLIER’: Dick Cheney Predicts US Will Suffer a Terrorist Attack Worse Than 9/11
Posted on June 25, 2014
One thing for certain is that ‘violent religion of peacers’ aren’t going away and it appears that, contrary to Obama’s claims, they’ve become very emboldened in the last few years. Check it out …
Former vice president Dick Cheney believes that a terrorist attack even worse than the destruction of the twin towers on September 11, 2001 is probable before the end of the decade.
Cheney appeared on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show on Tuesday and was asked if he thought the United States would ‘get through this decade without another massive attack on the homeland.’
‘I doubt it,’ Cheney said. ‘I think there will be another attack and the next time I think it’s likely to be far deadlier than the last one. You can just imagine what would happen if somebody could smuggle a nuclear device, put it in a shipping container, and drive it down the beltway outside Washington D.C.’
Hewitt wondered if the government could continue in such a scenario and Cheney recalled a Cold War era plan for constitutional government in the event of a nuclear attack.
‘Basically, it involved having a government in waiting if you will ready to go in the event of nuclear attack on the United States so that we could always maintain the constitutional-based governmental authority,’ he explained.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/06/far-deadlier-dick-cheney-predicts-us-will-suffer-terrorist-attack-worse-911/#BhRIvjGQVQpqhFdd.99
Amenper: Mitt Romney
Mitt Romney ha dicho una y otra vez que no tiene ningún interés en correr para Presidente por tercera vez.
Pero, el domingo por la mañana, en CBS Bob Schieffer dijo que era muy pronto para decirle que no a la idea de una campaña de 2016 de Romney tan rápidamente.
“Tengo una fuente que me dijo que si no decide correr Jeb Bush, Mitt Romney puede realmente intentarlo de nuevo”, dijo Schieffer.
Si analizamos a los candidatos posibles realmente hay solamente dos que se pueden considerar con posibilidad de ganar y capacitados para ser presidentes. Estos dos Candidatos son Scott Walker, que todavía está pendiente de que pueda ganar en las elecciones parciales este noviembre, y el otro es Mitt Romney.
Ted Cruz tiene el impedimento que le estarán sacando que nació en Canadá a la vez que tratarán de usan el sentimiento anti-hispano para quitarle la oportunidad de ser presidente. Algo parecido le pasaría a Marco Rubio, con el agravante que muchos conservadores no le perdonan que haya presentado un plan de inmigración con los demócratas. Ben Carson, además de no tener experiencia suficiente, es negro, y esto es anatema para muchos republicanos del sur.
Santorum no sacó suficiente votos en Pennsylvania para re-elegirse senador en una campaña en que una nieta mía trabajó, y no fue electo por sus apoyos a los sindicatos, aunque es socialmente conservador, no es tan conservador para los que lo conocen en todas sus facetas así que que podemos esperar de su aventura como candidato. Además desde mi punto de vista personal no me parece muy brillante. Esto se encargarán de sacárselo si aspira en unas elecciones presidenciales como candidato del partido..
Huckabee y Chris Christie tienen poco chance, especialmente después de la cama que le hicieron a Christie en New Jersey. Esto es algo que es importante, la maquinaria demócrata destruye a los candidatos republicanos. A Scott Walker lo están tratando de destruir con lo que llaman contribuciones ilegales. No importa si esto ya ha sido revisado y visto que es falso, ellos lo repiten y lo repiten hasta crear una imagen negativa. El caso de Christie que es algo que debía de haber sido un incidente secundario parroquial, lo convirtieron en una causa célebre.
Jeb Bush sería un buen presidente, pero también la prensa complaciente y los demócratas se han dedicado a destruir y demonizar el nombre de Bush, no importa quién lo lleve.
A Mitt Romney ya le sacaron todo lo que le tenían que sacar, y los que creyeron que por ser rico y empresario no podía saber lo que era mejor para América, ahora si tienen dos dedos de frente, se pueden dar cuenta que lo que necesitamos es un hombre de experiencia y capacidad, no importa si es pobre o rico, y que el organizador comunitario que escogieron, se ha portado de acuerdo a su experiencia y capacidad, y los resultados son palpables. La diferencia de votos populares fue pequeña en las pasadas elecciones, y los votos electorales se perdieron en algunos estados también por poco margen en los que ahora se pueden ganar. Así que el pueblo no lo rechazó, simplemente la campaña de Romney no fue la mejor en esta era en que la publicidad es tan importante. Todo lo que necesita es un equipo de campaña mejor para tener la oportunidad de triunfo ante el desastre de los años de gobierno demócrata.
Que no me digan que Mitt Romney es parte del “establishment republicano” porque todo lo que le oí decir durante la campaña nos dejó ver que es su propia persona y que no se ajusta a ninguna vertiente como doctrina inflexible. Si esto no le gusta a los dogmáticos, no importa, los que tienen independencia mental saben que no necesitamos un dogmático pero un buen presidente que tome decisiones por su capacidad.
Para dogmático e incapacitado en la presidencia ya hemos tenido uno por seis años..
Sin lugar a dudas la trayectoria de su vida, tanto en lo político como en su vida privada me hace pensar que no es un seguidor de grupo, pero que es un director de sus propio pensamiento, y que por un largo tramo es el candidato de más capacidad para ser el presidente de los Estados Unidos.
Dios quiera que el pueblo de Estados Unidos tenga esta nueva oportunidad para rectificar su error.
How President Gowdy Solved the Middle East Problem
Written by Donald Joy
Back in 2021, right after Trey Gowdy’s inauguration, Muslims at first fled away from the cities of Mecca and Medina on the Arabian peninsula, because they generally sensed what was coming. And they sensed correctly–Gowdy blasted those places to smithereens with a dual nuclear bomb strike.
Immediately, of course, Muslims across the globe rioted and struck as hard as they could at any and all possible targets–both military and civilian, particularly in Western cities–with their suicide bombs, automatic weapons, arson, assassinations, and various other tactics.
The carnage around the globe was extensive and awful, however not nearly as bad as it might have been had not Western populations and governments already become so fed up, overall, with Islamic aggression and terrorism that they’d been doing a lot of prevention and pre-emptive preparation. An almost universal, lightning-fast crackdown minimized the death toll.
Police and military units deployed everywhere at top speed in the immediate aftermath of Gowdy’s devastation of the ultimate Islamic “holy” sites, and the enraged, foaming-at-the-mouth Muslims who massed in the streets of Western cities in response were unceremoniously mowed down by tactical units using whatever means necessary–drone strikes, helicopter gunships, mechanized and armored squads, you name it.
Problematic Muslim clerics and known jihad ringleaders living in Western countries, along with their already watchlisted followers and lesser-recognized adherents, were ruthlessly rounded up without a moment’s delay–not only by official units and personnel, but equally by citizen militias and vigilantes who realized an almost uniform, unwritten, across-the-board de facto deputation status. No one in any official capacity whatsoever even contemplated objecting to ordinary civilians joining in the effort to contain and defeat, with extreme prejudice, the imminent Islamic threat. Those jihadis who mounted any kind of fight to try to avoid being taken into custody were just killed instantly by overwhelming force. Numerous hostages, most unfortunately, were sometimes lost when their Islamic hostage-takers were summarily and hastily obliterated, lest the enemy think such a tactic would in any way further their jihad by weakening our resolve.
It was beneficial that so many governments had already undertaken the process of cleaning house with regard to the Islamic problem. Things had escalated so much and for so long that everyone in their right minds simply knew without a doubt that a modern Crusade was not only necessary, but was moreover the highest moral priority for civilized societies who wished to survive, in the end, against the sustained and savage aggression and violent onslaught waged increasingly for so many decades by bloodthirsty Muslim hordes.
Gowdy’s gambit of strikes against Mecca and Medina was, on the surface, symbolic, however it was extremely effective and ingenious in the strategic realm.
What took place after the strikes was exactly what Gowdy and his generals had anticipated, and the fact that they so carefully planned for the result, and for subsequent actions, is what made their strategy so brilliant.
As expected, and as the radioactive dust was still settling, it wasn’t long before virtually millions of Muslim warriors swarmed toward Mecca from around the world. Obviously, they saw the freshly vaporized site as that much more of a sacred rallying point; as the place to coalesce and “make their stand” for Islam, as Western forces maneuvered and feigned–pretending as if to want to move into, seize, hold, and occupy the Muslims’ holy wasteland.
Being mostly the regressive, inbred spawn of marriages between cousins (prevailing practice in Islamic societies), the Mohammedan armies just weren’t that bright to begin with–but now they seemed to glow that much more with the fervor of rabid, wild-eyed, screaming Islamic religiosity as they stupidly flocked and teemed en masse to the poisonously toxic area where the nuclear warheads had hit home.
That easily forecasted, brainless rush toward Mecca (in the immediate aftermath of the U.S. nuclear strike) by legions of the most hyper-rabid Islamic mujahideen from all corners of the globe accomplished two key goals: First, their aforementioned exposure to whatever degree of radioactive fallout, which need not really be explained in terms of its advantage to the civilized world. Second, it gave Gowdy’s generals and their allied counterparts from friendly countries such easy, ready targets, all assembled in one big sandbox, for continued tactical elimination, that it was very soon that the “soldiers of Allah” collectively realized their mistake. Almost all of them were basically wiped out in a matter of days, primarily from above.
Gowdy first deliberately drew them into the killing field, then killed them.
Once the non-Muslim world actually took the Muslim world up on its long-standing practice of all-out war, the war ended rather quickly.
It didn’t take long at all for the message to sink in, in the minds of Muslim leaders and followers worldwide: The paper tiger had burned up, replaced by a real tiger.
Try as the ayatollahs, muftis, sheiks, clerics, and would-be caliphs might, to rally the troops for ongoing and endless jihad against the infidels, they were beaten back and beaten down by every kind of laser-guided hellfire munition imaginable–until many of the remaining mosques began to be converted into Christian churches by desperate goatherders and merchants seeking a better way. Imams either fled, or shed their dirty nightshirts and traded them in for Joel Osteen designer togs, heeding the begging and beseeching of their communities’ plaintive pleas for a new chance at life, and renunciation of Islam in hopes that the laser-precision bombs and missiles might cease.
Pakistan’s nukes weren’t even part of the equation once Israel took them out (along with the Pakis’ almost entire command and control systems), simultaneous to Gowdy’s having blasted the black stone cube of Mecca into mere metaphysical “carbon credits” toward the heating and air conditioning costs of keeping Barack Hussein Obama housed in U.S. federal prison, according of course to the comforts befitting a convicted former American president.
Very few American servicemen’s lives or limbs were jeopardized or lost during the final decisive campaign to defeat Mohammedanism; almost none, in fact, compared with other global conflicts in recent history. All it took, really, was the will to use the tools at our disposal, to end an existential threat to us and to our children.
As for Islam, they still practice it in cults and sectors throughout the Middle East, and elsewhere around the world, but mainly it’s discussed in history books, and in articles online. Not too many surviving denizens of even its birthplace are interested in being associated with such a failed, vanquished, disreputable, and notoriously depraved ideology. Like Nazism, and like the doomed, kamikaze emperor-worship of Imperial Japan of the last century, it’s been sent to the dustbin where it belongs.
It’s unfortunate that so many people who were guilty of nothing more than having been bred into mere supporting roles in Islam had to die to bring the war to a close, but it’s that much more fortunate that so many millions, even billions in posterity, will live free from Islam’s shackles and bloodthirsty reach. Peace be upon you.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/06/president-gowdy-solved-middle-east-problem/#bdfzqk4FFr3DRXrv.99
Amenper: “Glimpse” en inglés quiere decir ver algo por unos segundos,o imaginarse algo por un corto tiempo, la traducción que nos da el diccionario es “vistazo o ojeada” Dios quiera que esta palabra que escogió la periodista Dorothy Rabinowit en su escrito del Journal de hoy sea una premonición de los intentos de Hillary a la presidencia de este país, que sea solamente un vistazo, algo que no se materialice.
Hillary quiere hacerse pasar por moderada mientras apoya el aborto y el matrimonio homosexual, quiere hacerse pasar por una Margaret Thatcher tratando de duplicar la victoria de Obama por ser negro, y alcanzar la victoria por ser mujer al tratar de ganar el voto de las mujeres, cuando la dama de Hierro siempre dijo que no le dieran ventajas por ser mujer. Quiere separarse de la política exterior de Obama cuando fue el arquitecto de esa política.
Hillary te falta mucho para ni siquiera parecerte a Margaret. En este escrito de Dorothy Rabinowit en el Journal de hoy, nos deja ver un “glimpse” de lo que pudiera ser la presidencia de Hillary, y como si tenemos la desgracia que suceda, vamos a tener igual que ahora, un presidente que no se puede criticar por la coraza de la raza, en el caso de Hillary la coraza de su vagina.
A Glimpse of Hillary as President
It is hard to imagine Margaret Thatcher complaining, as Mrs. Clinton did, that ‘it was all about my hair.’
The past few weeks of Hillary Clinton‘s book tour have given Americans more than a modest whiff of what a future Clinton presidency would bring. Nothing has brought home with more immediacy the role we can expect gender to play in that administration—or more to the point, the focus on anti-women bias about which we would evidently be fated to hear a great deal.
That would come as a change, after what will by then have been eight years of a different ruling focus in the White House—that being, of course, the president’s race. Years in which Obama administration staff members, congressional allies and advocates in the political culture regularly nurtured the view—when they weren’t making outright accusations—that vociferous opposition to this president, and his policies, was largely fueled by white racism. Jay Rockefeller (D., W.Va.) just last month declared that opposition to ObamaCare came from people who don’t like the president “because maybe he’s the wrong color.”
Attorney General Eric Holder in turn delivered himself of bitter complaints to Al Sharpton‘s National Action Network in April about the lack of respect accorded him by a House committee. “What attorney general has ever had to deal with that kind of treatment? What president has ever had to deal with that kind of treatment?” Barack Obama had barely taken office, which he could not have won without the vote of white America, when his attorney general charged that the American people were “a nation of cowards” in their dealings with race. Mr. Holder would go on to attack states attempting to curtail voter fraud, to refuse prosecution of members of the New Black Panther Party who had menaced white voters at a Philadelphia polling place, and to become, in all, the most racially polarizing attorney general in the nation’s history.
A Hillary Clinton administration would bring change, yes, but much about the change would feel familiar. We were given a small foretaste last week in a statement by Lanny Davis, former special counsel to Bill Clinton and indefatigable Hillary supporter. Mr. Davis had taken offense at the press description of Mrs. Clinton’s performance on a National Public Radio program—one that had not gone smoothly for her. He was offended at certain language that had been used to describe Mrs. Clinton’s reactions when the NPR interviewer questioned the consistency of her support for gay marriage. Reporters had described her as “testy,” “contentious” and “annoyed.” Mr. Davis opined that “had it been a man, the words ‘testy’ and ‘annoyed’ would not have been used.”
Mr. Davis’s reflexive discovery of insult to Mrs. Clinton—to women—in those words comes as no surprise. The idea that certain words are demeaning to women, because they’re deemed unlikely to be used about men, is by now deep-rooted political faith. Many people were doubtless unaware, until Mr. Davis brought the odd news, that testy is a word not used for men—that hitherto standard descriptive words and phrases might now be subjected to close examination and be rendered illegitimate on the grounds of their potential offensiveness to women.
None of this would come as a shock to anyone with experience of the speech codes and all similar products of the ideological fervor on the nation’s campuses today—institutions of learning where any text, any class reference, can be considered harassment or gender bias, should any student raise a claim of discomfort. That ideological fervor wasn’t going to be confined to universities and colleges, and it hasn’t been. Determining the words that may or may not be used to describe a woman candidate for the presidency is only its bare reflection—the beginning. We will be seeing that fervor full-blown should Mrs. Clinton win election to the White House.
In her conversation with Diane Sawyer on ABC, Mrs. Clinton herself recalled the unwelcome attention to her appearance during her travels as secretary of state. People mentioned her hair, the scrunchie she wore to keep it in place. Try as one may, it’s impossible to imagine Margaret Thatcher complaining to an interviewer, as Mrs. Clinton did, that “it was all about my hair.”
There are other signs that the tone of a Hillary Clinton presidency would bear strong resemblance to that of Mr. Obama’s. Under questioning during her recent media interviews, the former secretary of state deflected all challenging questions—when any were put—with her characteristic unyielding aplomb. Whether queried on al Qaeda’s triumphant march to power despite the administration’s long-continued assurances that al Qaeda was a spent force—or about disaster in Bashar Assad’s Syria, or her own role in the Benghazi catastrophe in Libya—she exuded a serene assurance. And with it, the faintest hint of amazement that such queries should actually be put to her—a cheery puzzlement that anyone should think she had anything to do with what might have gone wrong.
“Let’s talk about what was accomplished,” she briskly instructed Diane Sawyer, who had asked about Syria and al Qaeda and Benghazi.
Mrs. Clinton could not at that moment have sounded more like the current resident of the White House. Or more like a future one who would be, much like her predecessor, a leader of boundless self-confidence. One also inclined, when presented with the evidence of catastrophic policies of her own making, to wonder what any of that had to do with her.
Ms. Rabinowitz is a member of the Journal’s editorial board.
DE ESTA FORMA ES QUE LOS CUBANOS QUIEREN ELIMINAR A FIDEL CASTRO Y SU RECUA DE DEGENERADOS QUE APLASTAN A LOS CUBANOS EN CUBA Y EXPLOTAN A LOS CUBANOS DE MIAMI. EN FIN SE RIEN DE TODOS… MENOS LOS QUELOS HEMOS TIRADO A MIERDA. SI LO SIGUEN HACIENDO ESTE REGIMEN ASESINO Y DESPOTICO ESTARA AHÍ MILES DE ANOS, AUNQUE SE MUERA EL DEGENERADO EN JEFE. “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño
Enviado por Georgina López. Emigrantes enviaron a la Isla en 2013 más de 3.500 millones en ‘remesas en especie’
You Are Not Going To Believe What Oprah Just Said About Michelle Obama…
This is a behind the scenes look…
In a follow-up to his bestselling Obama exposé, ‘The Amateur’ author Edward Klein is back with a new book detailing the animosity between the Clintons and the Obamas.
One particularly interesting passage in the book, titled ‘Blood Feud: The Clintons vs. the Obamas,’ includes quotes from media mogul Oprah Winfrey, in which she lets loose on the current first lady and Obama advisor Valarie Jarrett.
“They’re always badgering you for something,” Klein quotes Winfrey as asserting. “I’ve spent much of my life fending off powerful and not-so powerful people who want things from me. But these two women are something else again. They’re walking agendas. Their wish list never stops.”
According to Klein’s account, Winfrey described spending time with the pair as “tiresome.”
Furthermore, the book alleges the one-time vocal Obama supporter now feels “slighted” by the first family.
Klein cites one of Winfrey’s friends who claims the treatment she has received since Obama’s inauguration has not only been “thoughtless,” but “unfair and hurtful.”
In contrast, Klein concludes Winfrey is far more loyal to expected 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. While fielding endorsement requests from potential nominees including Joe Biden, the book states Winfrey is considering joining forces with a Clinton candidacy.
“I have a much warmer relationship with Hillary than I do with either Michelle or Barack,” Winfrey reportedly said. “The Clintons make me feel at ease 100 percent of the time. But even when the Obamas think they are being charming, they hold you at arm’s length. They make me jumpy, even when they obviously don’t mean to.”
“Bill and Hillary have both had long talks with Oprah,” Klein quotes one source in his book. “They’ve made it clear they’re planning a run for the White House and would appreciate her support.”
The insider further states that the Clintons hope to receive the same enthusiastic endorsement Winfrey gave Obama in 2008.
“They think her support is worth a million votes, and maybe more,” the source reportedly stated. “Hillary says she’s convinced that Oprah is going to come on board.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/oprah-reveals-contempt-michelle-obama-new-book/#CEjwhudlSyAPyVuZ.99
AMENPER: La Burbuja Racial
Cuando una agencia del gobierno, sobre todo uno tan poderosa como el IRS, se dedica a algo que incluso las personas que simpatizan con el gobierno se ve raro y sospechoso, debe de incumbir a todos los medios de comunicación nacionales para preguntar agresivamente más preguntas. Los republicanos en el Congreso están haciendo preguntas.
Creo que con una administración diferente, una que fuera una administración republicana, o inclusive otra administración demócrata, esta historia sería una obsesión nacional. Y en su lugar, se está haciendo una cobertura superficial aquí y allá con un silencio cómplice. .
Pero merece mucho más preguntas, es lógico. Tiene que haber más claridad, no pueden mantener el pueblo en la oscuridad, y no me estoy refiriendo al color de la piel del presidente y de sus principales asesores, me refiero a la oscuridad en las explicaciones, en la descarada respuesta de los oficiales del IRS de que “perdieron” los E Mail de Lois Lerner. Si hay precedentes como el caso de los tapes de Nixon, ¿Por qué hablar de impugnación es anatema en esta administración?.
Esto es una cuestión de racismo a la inversa, y esto es también algo que se mantiene en la oscuridad, nadie habla de esto.
Hay una sola y simple razón por los que este presidente no se puede impugnar y esta es porque es negro. Porque es el primer presidente negro de los Estados Unidos.
No es racismo el decirlo, es racismo el hecho evidente.
El complejo de culpabilidad de este país por el abuso de la segregación, es una coraza que el peor presidente que ha tenido los Estados Unidos usa como una protectora burbuja racial para proteger una administración inepta en lo domestico donde constantemente se violan los derechos civiles fundamentales de los que no comulgan con ellos y criminal en la política exterior, porque ha costado y costará la vida de personas inocentes, de civiles y nuestros soldados.
WATCH MSNBC (Yes, MSNBC!) Hammer Obama Over His Lies About Iraq And Al Qaeda
“You said it was stable.”
Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski pressed President Obama on the deteriorating situation in Iraq: “Is this part of reality going back into Iraq? You said that the war was ended in Iraq. You said al-Qaeda was decimated. You said it was stable.”
“It was,” Obama replied. “But just because something is stable two years ago or four years ago doesn’t mean it’s stable right now. It is ultimately up to the Iraqi leadership to pull the politics of the country back together again. That doesn’t mean that we re-occupy Iraq.”
Obama said that the U.S. will have to deal with some of the best and some of the worst “impulses” in the region. “What we’re not going to be able to do is to play ‘whack-a-mole’ and chase wherever extremists appear and occupy those countries for long periods of time.” The President added that as the world’s lone superpower, the ability to solve other country’s problems exceeds our capability.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/brzezinski-obama-said-al-qaeda-decimated-iraq-stable/#v6XFY43VVARYzXz8.99
Watch: Rep. Jim Jordan Takes His Turn To Roast IRS
Koskinen’s seat has to be getting pretty toasty..
We sure hope John Koskinen is OK with heat. Because he is getting grilled long and hard byrepresentatives, and it’s only a matter of time before legal action takes place.
This time, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) was grillmaster during a House committee hearing, repeatedly asking why IRS Commissioner John Koskinen waited nearly two months to tell Congress that the agency lost Lois Lerner’s crucial emails due to a hard drive “crash.”
Koskinen claimed he didn’t tell Congress, the White House, the FBI, the Inspector General, or any other outside agencies about losing the emails until the IRS’s report last week, after Congress asked them about it.
The Congressman later asked: at which point does this withholding of “critical information” become an obstruction of justice?
“We’ve been after this for 13 months,” Jordan said. “We subpoenaed six months ago for this, you had a hearing on the 26th where everyone went after you and said ‘We want all the emails,’ and you assured us you’d get them all to us; and then you learned you can’t, and you don’t tell anybody?”
“This is ridiculous,” Jordan added.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-rep-jim-jordan-takes-turn-roast-irs/#Dt3w2sORGFozw6Sd.99
AMENPER: Conferencia de Prensa de Supermán
Supermán y su compañera Lois Lane, han hecho declaraciones en una conferencia de prensa el pasado Martes.
Desde su retiro en Metrópolis, Supermán se ha quejado que Lois ha recibido numerosos E Mails derogatorios a su persona, así como de que sus E Mail han sido tratadoe de der robados por diferentes “hackers”
Supermán considera que estos hechos han sido causados por una confusión en cuanto a la identidad de Lois Lane. “Quiero aclarar que Lois nunca ha tenido ninguna posición en el IRS o en el gobierno de Obama y que nunca ha efectuado investigaciones políticas a grupos conservadores.
Esta confusión debe de ser porque hay personas que considera que Lois Lerner es Lois Lane por la similitud de los nombres-
El hombre de acero dijo que espera que con esta aclaración no se hable más de los E Mail de Lois Lane y que se preocupen más de los E Mails de Lois Lerner.
‘America Is an Islamic Country’ – Obama Homeland Security Adviser Insists
Last fall, a top Obama Homeland Security adviser generated controversy when he wrote that the U.S. Constitution was “Islamically compliant.”
Mohamed Elibiary returned to the topic in a Saturday morning Twitter post: “… I said America was an Islamic country not a Muslim country. Pls study up on the difference b4 attacking me.” The post appears to have been deleted from Elibiary’s Twitter feed.
Elibiary declined to explain what he meant when the Investigative Project wrote to him asking for clarification. The tweets are puzzling considering that there were 2.6 million Muslims in the United States as of the 2010 census – roughly less than .2 percent of the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims.
A source close to Elibiary told the IPT, however, that the Homeland Security adviser meant to say that he feels there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution and the American system that runs contrary to Islam.
Zuhdi Jasser, president of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, rejected the theory.
“His entire attempt to repeatedly say that ‘American is Islamic’ is pure deception in the context of an Islamist ideologue like him who has not only never critiqued Islamism but rather continuously advocates for it,” Jasser said. “In fact it is not. American Islamists like Elibiary have consistently rejected debate with other anti-Islamist Muslims about the threat of Islamism and the way to separate Islam from Islamism.
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2014/06/america-islamic-country-obama-homeland-security-adviser-insists/#iWdMyRBF1e9CD0mw.99
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2014/06/america-islamic-country-obama-homeland-security-adviser-insists/#iWdMyRBF1e9CD0mw.99
Republicans In This State Just Took Steps To Impeach Obama
“I’ve got a thick book on impeachable offenses…”
According to recent reports, South Dakota Republicans joined together to pass a resolution demanding Barack Obama be impeached. Among the reasons listed is the recent release of five dangerous terrorists in a deal with the Taliban to return Bowe Bergdahl, a hostage described by his fellow soldiers as an Army deserter.
The state’s Republican Party drafted the resolution to convince “our U.S. Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president of the United States.”
In a relatively close 191-176 vote, party delegates approved the resolution sponsored by Sioux Falls Republican Allen Unruh. In addition to the Taliban trade, the document listed allegedly impeachable offenses including the misrepresentation of ObamaCare and the Environmental Protection Agency’s targeting of America’s coal-fired power plants.
“I’ve got a thick book on impeachable offenses of the president,” Unruh asserted.
Butte County resident Larry Klipp also supported the measure, saying he “will pray for” anyone who failed to see the “traitorous scandals” that have defined this administration.
It remains to be seen whether the resolution will have any bearing among the state’s legislators. South Dakota has but one U.S. Representative, Kristi Noem, who has not been receptive to the idea of pursuing impeachment.
A spokesperson for the congresswoman indicated that she “believes the best way for Congress to hold the president accountable is to continue aggressive committee oversight and investigations” into the aforementioned scandals.
She is far from the only state Republican unwilling to support the idea. David Wheeler, one of the dissenting delegates in the resolution vote, contended that pursuing impeachment would essentially be a political move that would ultimately only damage the GOP.
“By doing this, we would look petty,” he concluded, “like we can’t achieve our political goals through the political process.”
Larry Eliason also disagreed with the move, though he admitted he has disagreed with every decision Obama has made during his presidency – with the exception of his pet adoption.
While this resolution might ultimately fail to gain traction in any definable way, it is yet another example of the growing trend among experts and elected officials who believe Obama’s actions as president warrant a criminal investigation.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/republicans-state-just-took-steps-impeach-obama/#zEriEf1400SjZ5m6.99
SECURE AMERICA NOW:
Dear Lazaro R Gonzalez —
President Obama’s time is up.
The actions of the Obama Administration have gone unchecked for far too long and inaction is no longer an option. It is our responsibility to hold Obama accountable for his repeated failures in office.
Join with Secure America Now as we call Congress to demand they file articles of impeachment against the President. From the Benghazi cover-up to the Bergdahl swap, President Obama has repeatedly risked the lives and liberties of all Americans. Obama has deceived Congress and the American people, breaking the law and facing no penalty for his wrongdoing. Impeachment starts with the House of Representatives, but they will not act unless we rally together and make our voices heard!
Call Congress today and tell them that Americans are ready to impeach the President.Just a few minutes on the phone can help us condemn President Obama’s unlawful actions by compelling Congress to start the impeachment process. We cannot allow the Obama Administration to carry on with their culture of cover-ups, scandals and back room deals.
Obama’s actions have a consequence: impeachment. Call your Representative now and remind them that the American people want to see Obama held responsible and impeached!
Together we can make our voices heard and finally impeach President Obama.
And, if you can, please consider supporting our efforts by chipping-in today!
President of Secure America Now
“Aquí sí que se comieron el mecate”
AMERICAN PROSPERITY NETWORK: Militant Islamic Group ISIS Trained at U.S. Base in Jordan.
Jordanian officials recently revealed that members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (also known as ISIS) were trained in 2012 by U.S. military instructors at a secret base in Jordan.
This militant Sunni group has made violent advances through northern and western Iraq, videotaping executions of civilians and soldiers and taking over Mosul – Iraq’s second largest city.
ISIS’ ultimate goal is to create an Islamic caliphate state in Iraq and Syria based on Sharia law.
World Net Daily reported that in February 2012 the U.S., Turkey and Jordan ran a training base for Syrian rebels in the northern Jordan town of Safawi. This report has been corroborated by Reuters and the German weekly Der Spiegel.
Of course, this raises the obvious question: Why did the American military train dangerous Islamic militants?
Answer: Because they were being trained with the intent of overthrowing the Syrian government and President Bashar al-Assad.
Jordanian officials claimed these Syrian rebels were screened to ensure they had no ties to Al-Qaeda or any other overly radical Islamic group. They also said that this training had no intention of being used in Iraq.
However, these good foreign policy intentions have backfired on the Obama Administration in a big way. Especially since the President declared an end to combat operations in Iraq nearly four years ago.
It appears that these U.S.-trained forces were better prepared than their Iraqi counterparts. Many American-trained Iraqi soldiers threw down their weapons and uniforms or didn’t offer much resistance to the invading Islamic forces.
The Jordanian officials who spoke to World Net Daily are also concerned this sectarian violence will spill over into their country.
It’s hard to put the outrage about this scandal into words, but we’ll give it a shot. Based on the numerous scandals before this one, the Obama Administration is the most corrupt — and either the most incompetent or treasonous — in American history.
NESTOR DAN: SHE IS A REAL TEACHER!!!
In September of 2005, on the first day of school, Martha Cothren, a History teacher at Robinson High School in Little Rock , did something not to be forgotten. On the first day of school, with the permission of the school superintendent, the principal and the building supervisor, she removed all of the desks in her classroom. When the first period kids entered the room they discovered that there were no desks.
> > > ‘Ms. Cothren, where are our desks?’
> > >
> > > She replied, ‘You can’t have a desk until you tell me how you earn the right to sit at a desk.’
> > > They thought, ‘Well, maybe it’s our grades.’ ‘No,’ she said.
> > > ‘Maybe it’s our behavior.’ She told them, ‘No, it’s not even your behavior.’
> > >
> > > And so, they came and went, the first period, second period, third period. Still no desks in the classroom. Kids called their parents to tell them what was happening and by early afternoon television news crews had started gathering at the school to report about this crazy teacher who had taken all the desks out of her room.
> > >
> > > The final period of the day came and as the puzzled students found seats on the floor of the desk-less classroom. Martha Cothren said, ‘Throughout the day no one has been able to tell me just what he or she has done to earn the right to sit at the desks that are ordinarily found in this classroom. Now I am going to tell you.’
> > >
> > > At this point, Martha Cothren went over to the door of her classroom and opened it. Twenty-seven (27) U.S. Veterans, all in uniform, walked into that classroom, each one carrying a school desk. The Vets began placing the school desks in rows, and then they would walk over and stand alongside the wall. By the time the last soldier had set the final desk in place those kids started to understand, perhaps for the first time in their lives, just how the right to sit at those desks had been earned.
> > >
> > > Martha said, ‘You didn’t earn the right to sit at these desks. These heroes did it for you. They placed the desks here for you. They went halfway around the world, giving up their education and interrupting their careers and families so you could have the freedom you have. Now, it’s up to you to sit in them. It is your responsibility to learn, to be good students, to be good citizens. They paid the price so that you could have the freedom to get an education. Don’t ever forget it.’
> > >
> > > By the way, this is a true story. And this teacher was awarded Veterans of Foreign Wars Teacher of the Year for the State of Arkansas in 2006. She is the daughter of a WWII POW.
NELSON HORTA REPORTA…
• Reince Priebus dice estar de acuerdo con una re-evaluación total del sistema tributario
MIAMI 25 DE JUNIO DE 2014, nhr.com—El Presidente del Comité Nacional Republicano Reince Priebus está pidiendo la abolición del servicio de rentas internas (IRS), según nelsonhortareporta.com ha podido conocer.
“Una re-evaluación total de nuestro sistema tributario es importante y necesario, estoy de acuerdo con todo eso”, dijo Priebus durante una conversación con reporteros.
Sin embargo Priebus agrego que la tarea es más fácil decirla que hacerla.
“Estoy a bordo con la idea de reacondicionamiento o librarnos del IRS y el condigo tributario y que entre un nuevo sistema”, dijo.
El Presidente del Partido Republicano estuvo de acuerdo en que “desafortunadamente, nada de eso va a ocurrir teniendo en la Casa Blanca a una persona que esta mas interesado en un estilo de gobierno europeo que la manera en que nuestro país fue creado y ejecutado nuestra Constitución”.
La idea de anular el IRS es muy difícil de hacer, sobre todo con líderes de la mayoría en el Senado como Harry Reid que lo hacen más difícil.
El Servicio de Rentas Internas ha estado en la mirilla de influyentes líderes del Congreso por haberse realizado un mayor escrutinio a grupos conservadores por sus creencias políticas.
El asunto, que saltó a la luz en mayo del pasado año 2013, y ha dado abono a los republicanos que siempre han criticado las presuntas maniobras políticas y falta de transparencia de la Administración Obama.
Las declaraciones de Priebus llegan en el momento en que el Comisionado del IRS John Koskinen esta compareciendo ante el Comité de supervisión del Congreso que investiga las denuncias sobre las investigaciones injustas de la agencia federal contra grupos conservadores.
Koskinen, ha sido acusado por el Presidente de ese importante comité Darrell Issa de tener “un problema de credibilidad”.
“Este tipo, refiriéndose al Comisionado del IRS John Koskinen, es una de las personas más arrogantes, petulantes que he visto en cualquier tipo de audiencia formal en Washington, D.C. “Es increíble, dijo Priebus.