No 627 “En mi opinion” Marzo 25, 2014

No 627    “En mi opinión”    Marzo 25, 2014Image

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor


Acabo de crear una nueva petición que espero quieras firmar — se llama: SENADORES ILEANA ROSS LETHINEN, MARCO RUBIO Y EL REPRESENTANTE MARIO DIAZ B: SUSPENDER VIAJES Y REMESAS A CUBA Y SUSPENDER COMPRA PETROLEO VENEZUELAEste tema es tremendamente importante para mí,y juntos podemos hacer algo al respecto. Si firmas la petición y la compartes con tus amigos y contactos, pronto llegaremos a nuestro objetivo de MAS DE 100 firmas y con ello incrementaremos la presión para lograr la decision que queremos. LA COMPRA DE PETROLEO A VENEZUELACampañas como ésta siempre empiezan de forma modesta, pero crecen cuando personas como nosotros se involucran. Por favor, toma un momento ahora mismo para contribuir firmando y compartiendo esta petición.






El 11 de Septiembre del 2001, dos aviones secuestrados por terroristas se estrellaron contra las Torres Gemelas en la Ciudad de New York.  Estas torres gemelas eran el símbolo de New York y de la fuerza económica de Wall Street y los Estados Unidos.  Fue un golpe contra el sistema económico del mercado

Esto es improbable que suceda ahora por la vigilancia que existe y la sofisticación de la tecnología, cualquier avión que entre el espacio aéreo de New York sería interceptado por cualquier medio.


Hoy en día las torres Petronas de Malasia son las torres gemelas más altas del mundo.

Estas torres cuentan con una altura de 452 metros.

 Las torres con 88 pisos de hormigón armado, acero y vidrio, se han convertido en el símbolo de Kuala Lumpur y Malasia. Una maravilla diseñada por la firma estadounidense Arq. Cesar Pelli y Asociados para Malasia.

PETRONAS es la sigla para la Corporación Nacional de Petróleo de Malasia, incorporada el 17 de agosto del 1974. La corporación maneja todo el petróleo y sus derivados en Malasia.


Un avión de la línea aérea de Malasia que se dirigía a Vietnam, cambió su rumbo, apuntando como para regresar a Malasia, su piloto o alguien en la cabina desactivó los métodos usuales de rastreo.

Hay teorías que se están presentando que el avión, secuestrado o dirigido por su piloto estaba dirigiéndose hacia las torres gemelas Petronas. 


Si es así algo o alguien impidió que el acto de terrorismo se completara, y el avión está pulverizado por un cohete en el fondo del mar. 

Si es así, es de vital interés para las partes que previnieron este acto, que esto no se conozca.  Los familiares de los pasajeros no podrían comprender el sacrificio de los suyos para evitar un acto de terrorismo. Si es así, nunca sabremos nada de nada.





ENRIQUE ENRIQUEZ:   Lourdes D’ Kendall 

 La primera dama Michelle Obama en Beijing.




Dear Conservative,

Congress keeps turning a blind eye to Obama’s abuse of our Constitution – and we’re counting on you to help set the record straight. 

As a member of the conservative majority in this country, we want to make sure your voice is being heard. That’s why I wanted to invite you to take The Conservative Caucus’s enormous new survey, which will eventually reach five million Americans. 

TCC’s goal is simple: to show conservatives in Congress that there is broad public support to conducting a full Inquiry into investigating whether Obama has faithfully kept his oath of office. 

If the Inquiry decides he hasn’t upheld his oath, Impeachment proceedings would begin, with the goal of removing Obama from office. 

Our survey will be distributed to every single member of Congress, and key members of the media – so that they know exactly how much support there is to investigating Barack Obama. 

Please add you voice to this 5 million-strong movement right away, by taking just a minute to take our survey right now. 

And as a gift for your donation, we’ll even send you TCC’s specially-prepared Official Impeachment Inquiry report – so you can know the details about Obama’s impeachable offenses before the American public does. 

And that donation to TCC will also enable us to reach 5 million Americans as fast as we can, with a nationwide campaign – before liberals have a chance to smear and distract from Obama’s scandals, like they have from the past. 

Friend, this survey is just the tip of the iceberg. 

Over the next few months, we’ll be making this case not just in Washington, but in towns and cities all across the country, in newspapers, on TV, and with direct letters. 

We’re going to make sure the entire nation knows not just that Obama might have violated his oath of office – but that, finally, there’s a group like TCC that’s going to stop him from violating our Constitution, once and for all. 

Because The Conservative Caucus is the only grassroots group with a 40-year-long history of success. We’re the only group with the means and resources needed to get to the bottom of Barack Obama’s shameless, possibly impeachable scandals, just like we did with Bill Clinton in the late 1990s. 

On everything from using the IRS as a political weapon, to his dangerous Benghazi cover up on September 11th, to bypassing the legislative process, Obama has shown time and time again that, despite his presidential oath, he has no intention of following the letter of the law. 

And those are just the scandals we know about. A formal Congressional Inquiry would leave no stone unturned, no matter how hard the Obama White House fights. 

Like you, I know that the Constitution is the bedrock of our country. We’ve had the most prosperous, most free nation on earth for more than 200 years – and it’s because every president since Washington has faithfully obeyed the Constitution. 

But Barack Obama is different – and the dangers of a president actively ignoring the Constitution aren’t just bad for all of us today, but set a precedent that the rule of law is meaningless now, here in America. 

Friend, if you want to fight to protect the Constitution and our American values of liberty and freedom, please join our 5 million-strong movement right now, by filling out our survey. 

And make sure to include your donation, so we can send you our specially-prepared Official Impeachment Inquiry report, and you can see for yourself just how deep Obama’s scandals run. 

Your answers in this survey are absolutely critical to making Congress listen to the American people – and your gift to TCC makes it likely that we’ll be able to reach all 5 million Americans before it’s too late. 

Thanks for your support of TCC – and your help in taking our nation back from a president who doesn’t respect the very foundation of our laws. 


Peter J. Thomas, Chairman
The Conservative Caucus 



Manny Fernandez: SHRINKING AARP IS LOSING PLENTY OF SENIORS – VERY IMPORTANT READ!! Make sure to pass it along!!!!

AARP’s Fall from Grace


It only takes a few days on the Internet and this will have reached 75% of the public in the USA .


This letter was sent to Mr. Rand who is the Executive Director of AARP.




Dear Mr. Rand,


Recently you sent us a letter encouraging us to renew our lapsed membership in AARP by the requested date. This isn’t what you were looking for, but it’s is the most honest response I can give you. Our coverage gap is a microscopic symptom of the real problem, a deepening lack of faith. While we have proudly maintained our membership for years and long admired the AARP goals and principles, regrettably, we can no longer endorse its abdication of our values. Your letter stated that we can count on AARP to speak up for our rights, yet the voice we hear is not ours.


Your offer of being kept up to date on important issues through DIVIDED WE FAIL presents neither an impartial view nor the one we have come to embrace. We do believe that when two parties agree all the time on everything presented to them, one is probably not necessary. But, when the opinions and long term goals are diametrically opposed, the divorce is imminent. This is the philosophy which spawned our 200 years of government.


Once upon a time, we looked forward to being part of the senior demographic. We also looked to AARP to provide certain benefits and give our voice a power we could not possibly hope to achieve on our own. AARP once gave us a sense of belonging which we no longer enjoy. The Socialist politics practiced by the Obama Regime and empowered by AARP serves only to raise the blood pressure my medical insurance strives to contain. Clearly a conflict of interest there! We do not understand the AARP posture, feel greatly betrayed by the guiding forces that we expected to map out our senior years and leave your ranks with a great sense of regret. We mitigate that disappointment with the relief of knowing that we are not contributing to the problem anymore by renewing our membership. There are numerous other organizations which offer discounts without threatening our way of life or offending our sensibilities and values.


This Obama Regime scares the living daylights out of us. Not just for ourselves, but for our proud and bloodstained heritage. But more importantly for our children and grandchildren. Washington has rendered Soylent Green a prophetic cautionary tale rather than a nonfiction scare tactic. I have never endorsed any militant or radical groups, yet now I find myself listening to them. I don’t have to agree with them to appreciate the fear which birthed their existence. Their borderline insanity presents little more than a balance to the voice of the Socialist Mindset in power. Perhaps I became American by a great stroke of luck in some cosmic uterine lottery, but in my adulthood I CHOOSE to embrace it and nurture the freedoms it represents as well as the responsibilities.


Your website generously offers us the opportunity to receive all communication in Spanish. ARE YOU KIDDING??? The illegal perpetrators have broken into our ‘house’, invaded our home without invitation or consent. The President insists we keep these illegal perpetrators in comfort and learn the perpetrator’s language so we can communicate our reluctant welcome to them. I DON’T choose to welcome them, to support them, to educate them, to medicate them, or to pay for their food or clothing. American home invaders get arrested. Please explain to me why foreign lawbreakers can enjoy privileges on American soil that Americans do not get? Why do some immigrants have to play the game to be welcomed and others only have to break and enter to be welcomed?


We travel for a living. Walt hauls horses all over this great country, averaging over 10,000 miles a month when he is out there. He meets more people than a politician on caffeine overdose. Of all the many good folks he enjoyed on this last 10,000 miles, this trip yielded only ONE supporter of the current Regime. One of us is out of touch with mainstream America .. Since our poll is conducted without funding, I have more faith in it than ones that are driven by a need to yield AMNESTY (aka-make voters out of the foreign lawbreakers so they can vote to continue the government’s free handouts). This addition of 10 to 20 million voters who then will vote to continue Socialism will OVERWHELM our votes to control the government’s free handouts. It is a “slippery slope” upon which we must not embark.


As Margret Thatcher (former Prime Minister of Great Britain) once said”Socialism is GREAT – UNTIL you run out of other people’s money”.


We have decided to forward this to everyone on our mailing list, and will encourage them to do the same. With several hundred in my address book, I have every faith that the eventual exponential factor will make a credible statement to you. I am disappointed as all get-out! I am more scared than I have ever been in my entire life! I am ANGRY! I am MAD as hell, and I’m NOT going to take it anymore!


Walt & Cyndy Miller,


Miller Farms Equine Transport





AMENPER: Los medios de comunicación liberales  como el New York Times se abrazaron a Fidel Castro, que usaba en su propaganda para fomentar la aceptación en el mundo occidental.

En una carta a un compañero revolucionario en 1954, Fidel Castro dijo: “no podemos ni por un segundo abandonar la propaganda. La propaganda es  de vital importancia–la propaganda es el corazón de todas las luchas. “

Asimismo, el Che Guevara que se consideraba en sus comienzos como el “Cerebro de Castro”, y que admiraba a  Stalin y que una vez se jactó “Soy todo lo contrario a Cristo” afirmó, “un reportero extranjero–preferiblemente americano–era mucho más valioso para nosotros en aquel momento (1957) que cualquier victoria militar. Mucho más valioso que reclutar un guajiro para nuestra fuerza guerrillera, son an reclutas guerilleros para exportar nuestra propaganda.” 

“Castro es honesto,” informó la revista Newsweek el 13 de abril de 1959. “Y un gobierno honesto es algo único en Cuba…Castro no es ni remotamente un comunista”.

Herbert Matthews, del New York Times informó, (julio de 1959) “Esto no es una revolución comunista en ningún sentido del término. Fidel Castro no sólo no es comunista, es decididamente anticomunista.”

En una entrevista con Bill o ‘ Reilly de Fox News, el ateo y liberal fundador de CNN, Ted Turner negó que el régimen estalinista de Fidel nunca mató a nadie.

CNN, que fue la primera red de los medios de comunicación extranjeros  que obtuvieron una oficina en la Habana, declararon que el sistema de salud de Cuba era un modelo que se debía implantar en los Estados Unidos Mientras que casi todos los informes que reportaban sobre Cuba eran positivos.

Por eso no es extraño de ver el silencio de los medios de comunicación americanos sobre los sucesos de Venezuela  

Los medios de comunicación liberales son partidistas y reportan las noticias distorsionadas para apoyar las políticas socialistas. Este sesgo lo tratan de  expresar por declaraciones de pseudointelectuales marxistas. En última instancia, la función de la llamada prensa liberal es cavar la tumba para el pueblo estadounidense y los valores estadounidenses. Para ellos el separarse de la verdad es una necesidad tan vital como el ratón es para  un gato. Su única tarea es romper la red troncal Nacional de las personas, preparando así la nación para convertirse en los esclavos de sus amos, los liberales.

No les importa que el comunismo haya fracasado en el mundo y que terminara matando a 100 millones de personas en el siglo XX, según el historiador francés marxista Courtois y su equipo

 Esa es algo sobre lo que  la izquierda debiera ser confrontada a responder esta pregunta : ¿por qué su “idealismo” ciego y su poder-ansia insaciable conduce a dichos resultados desastrosos, una y otra vez?

“Mañana todos vamos a despertar en un mundo nuevo, un mundo donde la Constitución es pisoteada por un ejército de clones terroristas, creados en un laboratorio de investigación de células madres dirigido por médicos homosexuales que esterilización sus instrumentos sobre quema de banderas estadounidenses. Donde demócratas con sus impuestos y gastos toman todo su dinero duramente ganado y lo usan para comprar coches eléctricos para la Radio Pública Nacional y enseñan la evolución a los inmigrantes ilegales, y todo el mundo está bajo un tono de un pito de mariguana leyendo el New York Times que nos dicen que todo está bien.





¿Por qué Irán construye una réplica gigante de un portaaviones estadounidense?

Por Laura Koran, CNN

(CNN) – En medio de las conversaciones diplomáticas de alto nivel que tienen lugar entre Estados Unidos e Irán, es un símbolo de la desconfianza latente.

Imágenes de un satélite comercial obtenidas por CNN revelan que Irán está construyendo una réplica a gran escala de un portaaviones estadounidense, con aviones falsos similares a los de Estados Unidos incluidos, cerca de la ciudad portuaria de Bandar Abbas.

La maqueta parece imitar un portaaviones de clase Nimitz (CVN 68), incluso tiene pintado un número “68” en la cubierta, pero se desconoce cuál será su uso.

Según una fuente oficial estadounidense, la réplica se parece más a un estudio de Hollywood que a un buque de guerra.

El gobierno de Estados Unidos no cree que sea un barco de verdad ni que Irán sea incluso capaz de construir un portaaviones.

La misma fuente dijo a CNN que aunque se desconoce el propósito de la réplica, Irán podría planear destruirlo como medida de propaganda. El gobierno iraní ha destruido barcos de tiro al blanco en el pasado y ha emitido los videos en los medios estatales.
footage on its state-run media.

Los portaaviones de clase Nimitz son los buques insignia de las fuerzas navales estadounidenses y los buques de guerra más grandes del mundo. Pocos países en el mundo tienen barcos nucleares de este estilo en sus flotas.

La revelación de que Irán construye esta réplica llega en un momento potencialmente clave en las relaciones entre ambos países.

En noviembre, se llegó a un acuerdo interino sobre el programa nuclear iraní entre negociadores iraníes y de una coalición de países. Irán accedió a interrumpir partes del programa a cambio de suspender ciertas sanciones económicas.

Pero continúan las negociaciones en torno a un acuerdo mayor.

El jueves, en un mensaje al pueblo iraní para celebrar el nuevo año persa, el presidente Barack Obama dijo estar “comprometido con la diplomacia” con su país.

Pero en medio de la suavizada retórica, continúa la desconfianza mutua.

La exsecretaria de Estado Hillary Clinton dijo ante el Congreso Judío-Estadounidense en Nueva York el miércoles que es “escéptica con que los iraníes cumplan” el acuerdo de noviembre.

Y en enero, el ministro de Relaciones Exteriores de Irán, Mohammad Javad Zarif, dijo a CNN que el gobierno de Obama ha alterado los términos del acuerdo.

Por ahora, tanto los esfuerzos diplomáticos como el futuro de la réplica de portaaviones son inciertos




The Buried Secrets Of Bill And Hillary Clinton Revealed. What exactly is Bill hiding? Apparently, a lot…

KRIS ZANE — MARCH 21, 2014

Bill and Hillary Clinton’s lawyers have circled the wagons around documents, photos, videos, and, most recently, newly discovered audio recordings—likened to the Nixon tapes—held at the William J. Clinton Presidential Library. After the government watchdog group Judicial Watch sued to force the Clinton Library to release the literally millions of files, the Library released a scant 5000 records, claiming that the FOIA requests don’t reflect the other documents being held.

But this is just the tip of the iceberg.

On the other side of town, the documents held at the Butler Center for Arkansas Studies in Little Rock, documenting Bill Clinton’s years as governor of Arkansas, make the security at the Clinton Library seem mild. The files are held in a giant safe and require the personal signature of Clinton crony Bruce Lindsey for even a peek—and Lindsey has released exactly zero files.

And there’s a lot to hide.

Let’s start with the “suicides” of teenagers Don Henry and Kevin Ives by laying on the railroad tracks. Clinton’s medical examiner conveniently ruled the deaths suicide; but when the parents of the teens screamed bloody murder, the bodies were exhumed showing that the medical examiner, Dr. Fahmy Malak, had lied. Their bodies clearly showed signs of foul play, one teen having a knife wound, the other with blunt force trauma to the head. It has been rumored for years that the boys had witnessed a  huge drug deal go down, part of Clinton’s infamous cocaine empire based in Mena, Arkansas—and so had to disappear.

What secrets do the William J. Clinton Presidential Library and Butler Center for Arkansas Studies hold? We will never know. Presidents and former Presidents in this country, as we now know,are above the law. Unless the American people demand otherwise.





By: John Hayward  

Journalistic icon Bob Woodward has been in hot water with the Obama Administration and its more enthusiastic apologists for a while now.  He’s not going to get any more popular with that crowd after his appearance on “Fox News Sunday” last weekend, in which he related a conversation with a doctor he described as a “very knowledgeable, very involved supporter of ObamaCare” who nevertheless described it as similar to “a car stuck in first gear.”

When Woodward asked this ObamaCare-supporting doctor when he thought second gear might kick in, the response was, “Honestly, years!” because, to continue the clunker car analogy, “the transmission is in the shop for repairs.”

This led to a remarkable burst of blubbering from one of our dwindling supply of ObamaCare apologists, Juan Williams, who sobbed that nobody was trying to count up enrollment numbers or calculate sustainability when Mitt Romney rolled out his health care plan in Massachusetts, and those mean old green-eyeshade-wearing Republicans should just put their evil accounting witchery on hold and give ObamaCare a few years to creak and shudder into second gear.

Which nicely illustrates one of the core idiocies animating ObamaCare apologists: they’ve arrogantly insisted on refusing to accept the very obvious point that Massachusetts is not equivalent to the entire United States of America.  A program that more-or-less works in one state (and there have always been plenty of critics, both locally and nationally, who think “less” is a better description of how well RomneyCare works) can prove both Constitutionally offensive and unsustainable on the national level.  It’s such an obvious point that it seems ludicrous to have to explain it to adult citizens of the United States, over and over again.  Mitt Romney tried to do so on the campaign trail, but frankly he didn’t make the point nearly as well as he should have, and the fact that he had to make it at all was a burden upon his campaign.  Like ObamaCare, Romney’s campaign ended up stuck in first gear, trying to explain a high-information concept to low-information voters, while the Idiocracy ran around telling people that Mitt Romney gave a steel worker’s wife cancer just by looking at her.

Let us focus upon a very simple reason Romneycare could survive in Massachusetts – until the incompetence of Barack Obama and his team turned even that state into an ObamaCare nightmare – while the Affordable Care Act doesn’t work across the whole of the United States: money.  ObamaCare is hideously expensive, and only a portion of the cost is borne by the inflated insurance premiums so many of its subjects are expected to pay.  It’s the worst Cash for Clunkers scheme Obama has come up with yet – it’s costing us billions to get the ACA clunker into second gear.  We can’t afford to spend more billions every year while bureaucrats fiddle with the clutch and gear shift, especially since ObamaCare’s critics – who have always understand the law far better than its supporters – think third gear will never kick in.

“After four years of implementation, countless delays, a website disaster, and constant litigation, the Affordable Care Act celebrates its inauspicious birthday this week,” says the introduction to a new study from the American Action Forum.  ”From a regulatory perspective, the law has imposed more than $27.2 billion in total private sector costs, $8 billion in unfunded state burdens, and more than 159 million paperwork hours on local governments and affected entities. What’s more troubling, the law has generated just $2.6 billion in annualized benefits, compared to $6.8 billion in annualized costs. In other words, the ACA has imposed 2.5 times more costs than it has produced in benefits.”

159 million paperwork hours is more than double what the hideously complicated, economy-retarding Dodd-Frank law dumped on Americans – enough of a burden to keep eighty thousand people working 2,000 hours per year.  Of course, Big Government liberals believe private-sector time is without value – you should be happy to spend hours expressing your patriotism by wrestling with mandatory paperwork! – but even government agencies, such as HHS and the Treasury, are paying for millions of hours of paper-shuffling due to the Affordable Care Act.  Or, more to the point, they’re forcing you to pay for it by funding these bloated agencies, but at least they acknowledge the cost exists, unlike the private-sector compliance costs they try to obscure.

ObamaCare imposes costs far beyond paperwork compliance, of course.  All those mandates, plus dozens of hidden taxes, siphon more billions out of the private economy.  And all this for a law that has, thus far, actually increased the number of uninsured Americans!  But even if the ACA survives and finally climbs into “second gear” one of these years, the meager potential increase in the insured population becomes utterly ridiculous when measured against the exorbitant cost.  Instead of wasting billions and wrecking the insurance industry to give a handful of people access to lousy insurance policies with huge out-of-pocket costs, we could have bought every uninsured person in America circa 2008 a Cadillac health care plan for a fraction of the cost.

The scale of expense associated with ObamaCare is staggering, and it finances a system the majority of Americans hate.  When the apologists for this system whine that we need to give it a decade or two before we pass final judgment, they’re not just telling us to mute our criticism (as if they have any right to make that demand!)  They’re commanding us to pour billions more dollars into a system that has already wasted enormous sums, while failing to keep any of the promises it was sold under.

ObamaCare is an expensive fraud.  Why should we spend a few more years watching the hucksters who sold us this lemon grind its gears, grinning through a river of sweat as they promise it will take off like a rocket any day now?  Shall we discuss the agonizingopportunity cost of time lost while we struggle with this failed program, rather than implementing real reforms that would benefit our health care system?  And does anyone remember the Clunker-Salesman-in-Chief warning us that it would take years of time, and billions of dollars in expenses, before his scheme started firing on all cylinders… or that it would take a hundred million hours a year in paperwork to keep it running?




UPDATE: When The Man Who Occupies The Oval Office Says He Will Veto A Law That Would Require Him To Obey The Law, Is It Unreasonable To Ask If America Has Become A Dictatorship?

       To echo Congressman Trey Gowdy, if the man occupying the Oval Office asserts the power to ignore or disregard certain laws, what is to stop him from violating any law he chooses to violate? 

       Last week, the House of Representatives passed Gowdy’s ENFORCE the Law Act of 2014 (H.R. 4138), a simple measure that would require Barack Obama to actually obey and enforce the law… imagine that. Harry Reid and Barack Obama are trying to block it… and we’re not going to let them get away with it. 

       It’s time for patriotic Americans to literally rise up and send Barack Obama a clear message: You are not a KING. You are not our DICTATOR. You are not ABOVE THE LAW. And we refuse to allow you to make up the law as you go

“If A President Can Change Some Laws, Can He Change All Laws? … What Is Our Recourse?” – Trey Gowdy

       In short, the ENFORCE the Law Act would enable Members of Congress to sue the Executive Branch  including Barack Obama in federal court when it disregards or flagrantly violates the U.S. Constitution. 

       As Gowdy put it: “This bill is necessary; it will give Congress the authority to defend this branch of government as the Framers and our fellow citizens would expect.” 

       The Separation of Powers enumerated in the Constitution aren’t difficult to understand. In fact, they are so easy to understand that we teach them to 10-year-olds in our nation’s failing public schools. 

       But Mr. I-Am-A-Constitutional-Scholar Obama and his minions seem to have difficulty with the very same concept that is understood by grade school children. 

       After the House passed Gowdy’s bill on a bipartisan vote, Barack Obama immediately issued a statement that said: “Congress may not assign such power to itself.” It would appear that Mr. Obama isn’t reading the same Constitution that our Founders signed and ratified. 

       And one of Mr. Obama’s puppets in Congress, ultra-liberal Representative James P. McGovern, (D-MA), trumpeted Obama’s dictatorial delusion when he said, “You guys just don’t like the president. I get it. But get over it,” just before declaring that Gowdy’s bill is “unconstitutional.” 

       Sorry Mr. McGovern, but the American people aren’t just “going to get over it.” 

       Gowdy asked: “If a president can change some laws, can he change all laws?”In light of the statements and actions coming from Mr. Obama and his allies in Congress, we must ask: If a president can declare entire sections of the Constitution unconstitutional, what is to stop him (or her) from effectively declaring that the entire Constitution is unconstitutional? 

       We can think of no better reason to explain exactly why we must rally behind Gowdy. His ENFORCE the Law Act is moving to the Senate and we need a flood of faxes and calls demanding that the Senate pass this law and send it to Barack Obama’s desk immediately. 

Obama Is Threatening A Veto, But We Say Bring It On.

       Even Speaker of the House John Boehner knows the score when it comes to Obamas lawlessness. Boehner stated, “The fact that the president would threaten to veto a measure requiring him to uphold his Constitutional obligations underscores why this bill is needed, and why Senate Democrats should pass it immediately.” 

       Oh yes, Barack Obama is threatening to veto this bill, but what should we expect from a man who brags that he will go around Congress if Congress does not do as HE wants? What should we expect from a man who has proudly and defiantly engaged in lawlessness at every turn? 

       When Obama hasn’t gotten what he wants from Congress, he has: 

         Forced literally dozens of politically-motivated lawless changes to the ObamaCare debacle through Executive fiat. 

         Effectively granted Amnesty to millions of so-called DREAMers against the wishes of Congress and the American people. 

         With the swipe of his executive pen, gutted the work requirement of welfare reform. 

       Thats just to name a few examples of the Obama Administrations lawlessness. From the Obama IRS abuses to any one of the other mounting Administration scandals, the list literally goes on and on… 

       After all, Obama’s arrogance knows no bounds. Even the liberal media’s favorite leftist “legal expert” and Obama apologist Jonathan Turley seems to acknowledge that Obama believes that our Constitution says what Obama thinks it says at any given moment. 

       Turley writes: The United States is at a constitutional tipping point: The rise of an uber presidency unchecked by the other two branchesand “contempt for the separation of powers has accelerated at an ‘alarming rate’ under Obama.” 

       Make no mistake, we want the Senate to bring the Enforce the Law Act of 2014 to Mr. Obama’s desk and we’re going to dare him to veto it. 

       We’re going to dare him to explain to every man, woman and child in the United States exactly WHY he VETOED legislation that will help force him to faithfully execute the Constitution and laws of our nation. 

       We can take back this country. We can take back the debate, but to do so we must force those who we elect to high office to act with bold colors and not pale pastels.

       As Gowdy said: “Maybe members of Congress would be respected more if we respected ourselves enough to require that when we pass something, it be treated as law.” 

       We agree. We say that the time to push the envelope is now and we say that pushing that envelope starts with patriotic Americans overwhelming Members of the United States Senate with calls and faxes. Let them know that you are paying attention and let them know that you are serious. 

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the United States Senate. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the United States Senate. 

Send My Blast Faxes




When terrorists become pharmacists
by James S. Robbins

Do you know where your medications come from? It might be from an international terrorist drug ring. A new study from the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism finds that terror group Hezbollah is “already involved in manufacturing and distributing counterfeit medications.” Institute director Boaz Ganor says that “Hezbollah is liable to use its production centers, international smuggling and distribution networks, and ties to international crime syndicates to insert deadly fake drugs into the pharmaceuticals market.”

There are a variety of ways terror groups get involved in the legal drug market. They may steal, repackage and sell licit drugs, either prescription or over-the-counter medications. Pharmaceutical workers may moonlight with terror groups, or work for them full time. Sometimes terrorists sell bogus or adulterated medications, and other times manufacture and market their own.

Hezbollah has been involved in the counterfeit drug market for several years. In 2006, Iran sent Hezbollah in Lebanon equipment to make Captagon, an amphetamine that was once used for treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactiity Disorder (ADHD). Captagon has been banned in most countries since 1986, but it still widely used — and abused — in the Middle East. Engaging in this type of illicit trade within the Islamic world creates religious-ethical issues for the terrorists, but Hezbollah obtained a special religious dispensation, provided the pills did not go to Shiite Muslim areas but only to Sunni-majority countries.

Participation in the drug trade reaches the highest levels of the terror group. Lebanese authorities intercepted two machines for Captagon manufacture being sent to Sheikh Hussein al-Musawi, a Hezbollah parliamentarian and chemist. In February 2013, Lebanon charged Abdullatif Fneish, brother of Hezbollah official and Minister of State for Administrative Affairs Mohammed Fneish, with importing counterfeit drugs. The Fniesh drug ring is alleged to have imported and warehoused over 100 types of medications, for distribution within Lebanon and abroad.

Hezbollah has a well-developed global drug distribution and money-laundering network, based on years of involvement in trading heroin and cocaine. Last April, the U.S. Treasury Department blacklisted two Lebanese financial houses for aiding Hezbollah in hiding profits from the drug trade. Kassem Rmeiti & Co. for Exchange laundered nearly $30 million in drug proceeds in the last five years. The Halawi Exchange Co. helped move $220 million worth of used cars from the United States to Benin as a front to hide drug money. Hezbollah is also active in the West African diamond trade, through which it makes drug profits virtually untraceable.

Hezbollah is active in the Western Hemisphere, working in concert with Mexican drug cartel Los Zetas to distribute drugs in Latin America. Presumably they could tap into cartel drug distribution networks that reach into the United States. It would not be the first time Hezbollah penetrated our borders. The organization ran a cigarette smuggling ring out of Charlotte, North Carolina, for several years that generated tens of millions of dollars. And loosely-regulated internet drug sales present opportunities for terrorists to ply the drug trade through seemingly respectable front groups. Given this emerging frontier in narco-terrorism the time may come when you may not know whether your pharmacist is actually a terrorist.

James S. Robbins, Deputy Editor at Rare, is a former professor at National Defense University who specialized in counter-terrorism. He is the author of Native Americans: Patriotism, Exceptionalism, and the New American IdentityFollow him on Twitter @James_Robbins 







“En mi opinión”    Lázaro R González Miño Editor.

Para contribuir con artículos, opiniones, sugerencias o recibir “En mi opinión”

e-mail a:, o,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s