No 611 “En mi opinion” Marzo 6, 2014

<No 611    “En mi opinión”    Marzo 6, 2014>


“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

GOP Bill Authorizes Lawsuits against obama

House Republicans are again taking aim at the Obama administration for its failure to enforce laws passed by Congress.

Republicans serving on two key committees have introduced legislation that would allow the House or Senate to authorize a lawsuit against the Obama administration.

The ENFORCE the Laws Act is the latest GOP response to complaints that President Obama is willfully ignoring or altering federal law. As examples, Republicans have cited the several delays to ObamaCare provisions, and Obama’s 2011 decision to delay deportation proceedings against illegal immigrants who have not committed a crime.

“This administration’s disregard for the law has reached an unprecedented level from a constitutional perspective,” said Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), the lead sponsor of the bill.

“We have pursued certain remedies afforded to Congress to address executive overreach but these efforts have been thwarted,” he said. “This bill is necessary; it will give Congress the authority to defend this branch of government as the framers and our fellow citizens would expect.”



C.I.A. EMPLOYEES UNDER INVESTIGATION: Allegedly Spying On Senate Intelligence Commitee


The Central Intelligence Agency’s attempt to keep secret the details of a defunct detention and interrogation program has escalated a battle between the agency and members of Congress and led to an investigation by the C.I.A.’s internal watchdog into the conduct of agency employees.


The agency’s inspector general began the inquiry partly as a response to complaints from members of Congress that C.I.A. employees were improperly monitoring the work of staff members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, according to government officials with knowledge of the investigation.

The committee has spent several years working on a voluminous report about the detention and interrogation program, and according to one official interviewed in recent days, C.I.A. officers went as far as gaining access to computer networks used by the committee to carry out its investigation.

The events have elevated the protracted battle — which began as a fight over who writes the history of the program, perhaps the most controversial aspect of the American government’s response to the Sept. 11 attacks — into a bitter standoff that in essence is a dispute over the separation of powers and congressional oversight of spy agencies.

The specifics of the inspector general’s investigation are unclear. But several officials interviewed in recent days — all of whom insisted on anonymity, citing a continuing inquiry — said it began after the C.I.A. took what Senator Mark Udall, Democrat of Colorado, on Tuesday called an “unprecedented action” against the committee.

The action, which Mr. Udall did not describe, took place after C.I.A. officials came to suspect that congressional staff members had gained unauthorized access to agency documents during the course of the Intelligence Committee’s years-long investigation into the detention and interrogation program.

It is not known what the agency’s inspector general, David B. Buckley, has found in the investigation or whether Mr. Buckley has referred any cases to the Justice Department for further investigation. Spokesmen for the agency and the Justice Department declined to comment.

Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California and chairwoman of the Intelligence Committee, gave few details about the dispute on Tuesday as she left a closed committee hearing on the crisis in Ukraine, but she did confirm that the C.I.A. had begun an internal review.

“There is an I.G. investigation,” she said.

Asked about the tension between the committee and the spy agency it oversees, Ms. Feinstein said, “Our oversight role will prevail.”

The episode is a rare moment of public rancor between the intelligence agencies and Ms. Feinstein’s committee, which has been criticized in some quarters for its muscular defense of many controversial intelligence programs — from the surveillance operations exposed by the former National Security Agency contractor Edward J. Snowden to the Obama administration’s targeted killing program using armed drones





AMENPER: The Art of Misinformation

Sometimes we find people in our lives that surprise us with their misinformation about the Venezuela situation.  But you have to realize that the English-speaking media cater to the left. All they hear are opinions from people like Oliver North that calls the protesters fascists paid by the right in U.S.A.

I am reproducing an article from a paper “The Guardian” that is supposed to be independent, but you can see the misinformation that people from U.K. and the U.S.A. are getting form the media.


The current protests in Venezuela are reminiscent of another historical moment when street protests were used by right-wing politicians as part of an attempt to overthrow the elected government. From December of 2002 through February 2003, there was strike of mostly white-collar workers at the national oil industry, along with some business owners. The US media made it look like most of the country was on strike against the government, when, in fact, it was less than one percent of the labor force. (This is false but if the control the media this is the information the people get)

The spread of cell phone videos and social media in the past decade has made it more difficult to misrepresent things that can be easily captured on camera. But Venezuela is still grossly distorted in the major media. (When you have the pen, you can write things like this, how could the major media distort what is substantiated by videos) The New York Times had to run a correction last week for an article that began with a statement about “The only television station that regularly broadcast voices critical of the government …” As it turns out, all “regularly broadcast voices critical of the government”. And private media has more than 90% of the TV-viewing audience in Venezuela. (Another false statement, the major opposition stations were closed and the other are under threat of being closed, the is 100% censorship in Venezuela) A study by the Carter Center of the presidential election campaign period last April showed a 57 to 34% advantage in TV coverage for President Maduro over challenger Henrique Capriles in the April election, but that advantage is greatly reduced or eliminated when audience shares are taken into account. (¿Where this guy gets his facts, the elections were tainted and were a sham. Elections were stolen by Maduro)

Although there are abuses of power and problems with the rule of law in Venezuela – as there are throughout the hemisphere – it is far from the authoritarian state that most consumers of western media are led to believe. (Please, I know that the U.K. readers are ignorant of what is happening in this hemisphere, but what unfortunately the hemisphere is today is a number of socialist governments, the stereotype of the banana republic that he is trying to imply does not exist today)

Opposition leaders currently aim to topple the democratically elected government – their stated goal – by portraying it as a repressive dictatorship that is cracking down on peaceful protest. This is a standard “regime change” strategy, which often includes violent demonstrations in order to provoke state violence. (¿Can you believe this guy, he is substantiating the regime propaganda, and fascist that are trying to topple a democratically elected government. Pleease)

The latest official numbers have eight confirmed deaths of opposition protesters, but no evidence that these were a result of efforts by the government to crush dissent. At least two pro-government people have also been killed, and two people on motorcycles were killed (one beheaded) by wires allegedly set up by protesters. Eleven of the 55 people currently detained for alleged crimes during protests are security officers. (Again this is somebody misinformed that is passing his disinformation to others, this is just a plain lie)

Of course violence from either side is deplorable, and detained protesters – including their leader, Leopoldo Lopez – should be released on bail unless there is legal and justifiable cause for pre-trial detention. But it is difficult to argue from the evidence that the government is trying to suppress peaceful protest. (What evidence does he need?)

From 1999-2003, the Venezuelan opposition had a strategy of “military takeover”, according to Teodoro Petkoff (pdf), a leading opposition journalist who edits the daily Tal Cual. This included the military coup of April 2002 and the oil and business owners strike from December 2002 – February 2003, which crippled the economy. Although the opposition eventually opted for an electoral route to power, it was not the kind of process that one sees in most democracies, where opposition parties accept the legitimacy of the elected government and seek to co-operate on at least some common goals. (He is giving his readers the stereotype of the banana republic when military dictatorships were the daily bread. But this is the people trying to get rid of a socialist dictatorship, this is the problem of the hemisphere today¨)

One of the most important forces that has encouraged this extreme polarization has been the US government. It is true that other left governments that have implemented progressive economic changes have also been politically polarized: Bolivia, Ecuador, and Argentina for example.

(Again, blame U.S.A. it is so wasted.  U.S.A. is promoting this, and the people are right-wing destabilization efforts) and there have been violent right-wing destabilization efforts in Bolivia and Ecuador. But Washington has been more committed to “regime change” in Venezuela than anywhere else in South America – not surprisingly, given that it is sitting on the largest oil reserves in the world. And that has always given opposition politicians a strong incentive to not work within the democratic system.

Venezuela is not Ukraine, where opposition leaders could be seen publicly collaborating with US officials in their efforts to topple the government, and pay no obvious price for it. Of course, US support has helped Venezuela’s opposition with funding: one can find about $90m in US funding to Venezuela since 2000, just looking through US government documents available on the web, including $5m in the current federal budget (pdf). Pressure for opposition unity and tactical and strategic advice also helps: Washington has decades of experience overthrowing governments, and this is a specialized knowledge that you can’t learn in graduate school. Even more important is its enormous influence on international media and therefore public opinion. (These monies mostly go to through the governments and to the Cuban opposition that can´t even find what to eat because they are repressed by taking their jobs and rationing privileges, the same in Venezuela, the only help for repression comes from Cuba to Venezuela)

When John Kerry reversed his position in April and recognized the Venezuelan election results that spelled the end of the opposition’s campaign for non-recognition.

But the opposition leadership’s closeness to the US government is also a liability in a country that was the first to lead South America’s “second independence” that began with the election of Hugo Chávez in 1998. (Ok he is showing his true colors more and more, that is his opinion, an opinion from the point of view of a communist an opinion of a communist journalist that wants to impose his ideology in his readers) a country like Ukraine, political leaders could always point to Russia (and more so now) as a threat to national independence; attempts by Venezuelan opposition leaders to portray Cuba as a threat to Venezuelan sovereignty are laughable. It is only the United States that threatens Venezuela’s independence, as Washington fights to regain control over a region that it has lost. (I am really mad now, his son o a bitch is calling laughable the help from Cuba to Venezuela, and he is laughing about people being repressed by a foreigner in their own country, dead people at the hands of a foreigner)

Eleven years since the oil strike, the dividing lines in 2002 have not changed all that much. There is the obvious class divide, and there is still noticeable difference in skin color between opposition (whiter) and pro-government crowds – not surprising in a country and region where income and race are often highly correlated.

In the leadership, one side is part of a regional anti-imperialist alliance; the other has Washington as an ally. And yes, there is a big difference between the two leaderships in their respect for hard-won electoral democracy, as the current struggle illustrates. For Latin America, it is a classic divide between left and right. (It is, but not because of race stupid, but because of ideology)

Opposition leader Henrique Capriles tried to bridge this divide with a makeover, morphing from his prior right-wing incarnation into Venezuela’s Lula in his presidential campaigns, praising Chávez’s social programs and promising to expand them. But he has gone back and forth on respect for elections and democracy, and – outflanked by the extreme right (Leopoldo López and María Corina Machado), last week refused offers of dialogue by the president. At the end of the day, they are all far too rich, elitist, and right wing (think of Mitt Romney and his contempt for the 47%) for a country that has repeatedly voted for candidates running on a platform of socialism. (That this gay is a writer in “The Guardian” is just something that we have to regret, he is giving his rider the old Marxist methods to defend the indefensible communist system. Accuse, accuse, always accuse, that way you don’t have to be accountable by your actions)

Back in 2003, because it did not control the oil industry, the government had not yet delivered much on its promises. A decade later, poverty and unemployment have been reduced by more than half, extreme poverty by more than 70%, and millions have pensions that they did not have before. Most Venezuelans are not about to throw all this away because they have had a year and a half of high inflation and increasing shortages. In 2012, according to the World Bank, poverty fell by 20% – the largest decline in the Americas. The recent problems have not gone on long enough for most people to give up on a government that has raised their living standards more than any other government in decades. (He kept the best for last, it is a big joke, we have to believe that the socialist government in Venezuela has raised the standard of living of the people more than any government in decades is the most outrageous statement that I have heard in decades).

But a number of people in U.K and U.S.A. are going to read this article without my remarks allegations, and they are going to believe it.  That is what happened in Cuba, this is what is happening in the U.S.A.

Misinformation is the best weapon of socialism.


Amenper: La simple complejidad de la Inmigración

Es verdad lo que oímos decir que el problema de inmigración es complejo, pero la complejidad ha surgido debido a los cambios en la manera de pensar de la nueva sociedad americana, en que las situaciones de corrección política convierten algo simple en complejo.

La pregunta que tenemos que hacernos es ¿Los inmigrantes traen beneficios a la comunidad como trabajadores y consumidores o drenan la economía cuando envían sus ingresos fuera del país y usan los beneficios de ayuda de los contribuyentes?

La respuesta pudiera en un momento haber sido guiada por prejuicios y generalizaciones, pero cada día se convierte en algo desgraciadamente palpable de lo que somos testigos, algo que no se puede negar.

Hay dos países en los que abiertamente se reconoce que el principal ingreso de la economía del país es la remesa de los emigrantes.  Estos países son Cuba y El Salvador, pero aunque Méjico no presenta estadísticas, las remesas quizás sean hasta mayores que esos países. Pero no se puede hablar de eso, porque es discriminatorio, es prejuicio.  Ahora ¿cómo un juicio probado puede ser prejuicio?

Lo simple es que no es que las leyes de inmigración necesiten cambio, el problema es que los inmigrantes han cambiado ahora entran en un número incontrolable ilegalmente.  La solución al problema es tan sencillo como el hacer cumplir las leyes que siempre han existidos en el país con respecto a inmigración, leyes que son pragmáticas y generosas, más que las mayor parte de los otros países del mundo.

Como inmigrantes, sabíamos las leyes cuando entramos al país, y cumplimos esas leyes de acuerdo con el momento en que llegamos. Algunos como inmigrantes legales tuvieron que cumplir la ley regular de inmigración, probando que no iban a ser carga pública.  Es algo lógico, cualquier sociedad tiene el derecho a pedir eso de sus inmigrantes.  En casos especiales la inmigración americana fue generosa y pragmática, como cuando dio asilo a los cubanos huyendo del régimen de Castro. 

Fue pragmático porque creó la única inmigración positiva que ha tenido este país, al crear más ingresos que los gastos que tuvo el país.  Primero por los grandes capitales que se filtraron de Cuba con los políticos corruptos de Batista que invirtieron en los Estados Unidos sus dineros, como en el caso de Miami, que secretamente y públicamente tenía una mayoría de inversores que en algunos casos cubrían extensiones como el caso del ministro de Batista que fue dueño del Key Biscayine, y construyó el estadio de pelota entre otras propiedades. Después con los capitales que en mayor o menor cuantía pudieron sacar los empresarios y la clase media de Cuba.  Es muy bonito pero no es realmente muy común el caso del millonario actual que llegó con 10 dólares en el bolsillo.  Realmente tenía oficialmente 10 dólares en el bolsillo pero tenía también algunos dólares que había logrado pasar esperando por él en el banco esto aumentó el ingreso de capital a la comunidad del área de Miami. No quiere decir que no hayan tenido mérito por haber aumentado ese dinero original, lo que trae al punto la cuestión el otro elemento, la inmigración de talento.

No ha habido una inmigración a los Estados Unidos que haya traído más personas con una formación empresarial y profesional que la inmigración cubana de los 60s. Por eso la inmigración cubana fue pragmática y positiva, por eso es tan diferente a la inmigración de ahora que es negativa.  Los que llegan ahora es para drenar no para aumentar las riquezas de la nación.

¿Cuál es la solución? Es tan simple como compleja es la sociedad actual. Simplemente hay que hacer cumplir las leyes de inmigración, hay que cerrar las fronteras a los ilegales.  No podemos aceptar que en un momento tecnológico como en el que vivimos no se pueda hacer, simplemente no se hace porque no es políticamente correcto hacerse en este complejo mundo en que vivimos.

Después de cerradas las fronteras se pude ser selectivo como dicen las leyes existentes, como entraban antes los inmigrantes.

Caso como el de los inmigrantes Venezolanos primero, y ahora ciertos empresarios Salvadoreños, que están entrando como inmigrantes inversionistas enriqueciendo la nación no drenándola.

Claro que hay xenófobos y racistas, siempre tiene que haberlos, y cuando hablan nublan a los pragmáticos y tergiversan a los que realmente quieren de una manera práctica solucionar el problema de inmigración. 

Pero la realidad es sencilla, tan sencilla como todos los problemas que tenemos en los Estados Unidos.

La solución es volver a ser los Estados Unidos tradicionales, con las leyes y tradiciones que la hicieron la nación de mayores libertades y oportunidades para el inmigrante que quisiera integrarse a ella, una nación de inmigrantes que arribó a estas playas en diferentes épocas para engrandecer a esta nación, no para destruirla.


SAMITIER: Una vergüenza USA PERDIÓ gracias a la estupidez de Obama, Clinton y Kerry

Que Vergüenza…

Hasta El New York Time Hoy Editorializa Diciendo Que Putín Ganó La Partida Y Que Es Mas Estadista Que Los Lideres

De USA; Obama, Clinton Y Kerry… La retorica de los demócratas es PURO BLA-BLA-BLA   Para Leerlo aquí tienen el enlace:

Obama Un Hombre Sin Visión Histórica

Ha Metido Las “2 Patas” En Egipto, Libia,

Siria y Ucrania… Cuando se meten las “2 Patas”No Hay Forma de salir del error… HISTÓRICO…  He aquí un articulo muy interesante:

La TIRANIA de los homosexuales

Si… Estamos Siendo TIRANIZADOS Por La

Minoría Homosexual Que Vota En Grupo

Y En Masa y Por Esa Razón Los Politiqueros

Viven Sometidos A Ellos…

¡Pero No Triunfaran!

Acaban de ALCANZAR OTRO TRIUNFO en Arizona…


A Costilla De Todos Los Dueños De Viviendas…

La Racha De Foreclosure NO SE DETIENE

En Estos Momentos La Florida Esta En Primer

Lugar… 1 Por Cada 346 Casas Esta En Foreclosure…

Los Bancos Siguen Reportando GANANCIAS

Y Siguen Dando Dinero A Los Politiqueros De

Ambos Partidos… 

También Los Abogados De Los Bancos… Contribuyen A Las Campañas

Políticas De Los Jueces…

La Ayuda a Los Bancos También afecto a Los Que

tenían Sus Casas Pagadas…

El Desplome Del Precio De Las Viviendas Fue De Casi Un 50%… Los

Que Tenían Sus Casas Pagadas PERDIERON EL 50%…Mientras Los

Banqueros Continuaron Ganando Dinero…

Pruebas de aterrizaje de avión NO TRIPULADO EN UN PORTA AVIONES 


10 De julio de 2013, la armada realizó con éxito los despegues y aterrizajes de un portaaviones nuclear bastante nuevo, el USS George H.W. Bush, con un nuevo jet invisible llamado theX-47B.


¿Qué es tan diferente de este avión es el hecho de que es un robot. Sí, es completamente no tripulado. Drones vienen en todos los tamaños y theX-47B es probablemente uno de los más grandes.


¿Qué es tan irónico de todo esto es, el hecho de que el enemigo no puede detectar un avión como éste en primer lugar. En el caso improbable que consiguen suerte en el derribo de uno, no habrá ninguna pérdida humana de la vida o cautiverio. Como ve la tripulación de cabina de vuelo señalando el avión, que ellos simplemente están señalando las cámaras a bordo, que a su vez están siendo tripuladas por personal dentro de la inteligencia del comando centro (CIC) a bordo del barco.


También revise la corta distancia necesita el avión para el despegue. Impresionante.


Calladamente LA LEY OBAMA-CARE fue cancelada por DOS AÑOS MAS…

Aprovechando La Crisis De Ucrania… Que Tiene Entretenido

A Los Ciudadanos… Que es Un Hecho Consumado y Que Nada Van A Resolver…  

Calladamente Obama Y Sus Secuaces Cancelaron Por 2 Años

La Ley Mas Grande Hecha Por El Congreso 6,000 Paginas

También La Única Ley Aprobada… Sin Ser Leída… 

Pasaron 3 Años Implementándola… Gastaron

$600 Millones en Programas… Que No Sirvieron…

En Fin  FRACASARON… Y AHORA Calladamente…La Ley Queda SUSPENDIDA

POR DOS AÑOS…  ¿Por qué La Suspenden? Por Politiquería…

Los candidatos demócratas, que desean seguir MAMANDO DE LA TETA DEL GOBIERNO… que están luchando para ser RE-ELECTOS  le han pedido al  Sr. Obama que SUSPENDA LA LEY… 

En noviembre Obama anunció UN APLAZAMIENTO DE UN AÑOpara los planes de seguro que no cumplían con los requisitos mínimos de cobertura de la ley de salud de 2010. 

Ayer CALLADAMENTE Obama FIRMO una nueva suspendió que va mucho más allá, esencialmente LA SUSPENDE POR DOS AÑOS más y PERMITE QUE SE SIGAN EMITIENDO las llamadas pólizas POR OBAMA de seguro de mala calidad y la chatarra. 

La extensión ES PARA AYUDAR a los POLITIQUEROS demócratas en las elecciones del PRÓXIMO NOVIEMBRE, ya que esta SUSPENSIÓN va a evitar la anulación de las pólizas de seguro médicos a millones de personas… que de otro modo se habrían producido en el MEDIO de la temporada de la campaña política de este otoño. 

Lo que REVIENTA ES QUE TODAVÍA LA PRENSA PRO HOMOSEXUAL siga apoyando estas BARBARIDADES POLITIQUERAS… hechas por un verdadero dictador… 


Obama Y Sus ASESORES son unos cabezas HUECAS

Hoy El New York Times Anuncia Que

Obama y Sus Asesores Piensan Usar

El Gas Natural De Los Estados Unidos

Como Un Arma Para “CONTENER” a

Putín… Ya Que Rusia Anunció Que

No Venderá a Ucrania El Gas Con

Subsidios Espaciales…   

En otras Palabras… Además de los 3 Billones Gastados


El Billón ofrecido por OBAMA-KERRY… AHORA piensan

Vender el GAS DE U.S.A. a precios de SUBSIDIOS… como

Hacia CHÁVEZ… todo lo que empobrece más aun la

Situación de los ESTADOS UNIDOS… 

¿Qué tienen en la cabeza Obama Y sus Asesores?

¿Qué piensan hacer los Senadores REPUBLICANOS contra



Reaparece la OEA en Venezuela

Insulza Anuncia Que La OEA Va A Actuar En Venezuela No Para Liberarla De La Dictadura Comunista…

Al Contrario Para Lograr “ARMONÍA” Y ENTENDIMIENTO Con La Oposición

Para GARANTIZAR A Maduro En Control  

Esto No Necesita Mas Explicación…

La OEA un Brazo Del Globalismo…

Comunismo Fabiano De U.S.A.

Los Politiqueros Republicanos VOTARON AYER A FAVOR DE LA MARIGUANA…


Una Mentira Mas Para Destruir A U.S.A. 

En La Guerra Contra Israel… Donde Los Egipcios Perdieron

Cientos de Tanques… los Israelitas encontraron que en los

Tanques se encontraron mariguana… 

Hay una verdad NO DICHA es un “TABÚ”  por lo menos el

25% de los que asaltaron el PALACIO PRESIDENCIAL de

Cuba con el fin de matar a BATISTA… Fueron conocidos

MARIGUANEROS… ¿Fracasó el ataque porque estaban

ENMARIGUANADOS… o fracaso porque los comunistas…

Infiltrados en ese equipo NO CUMPLIERON CON EL PLAN…

La Verdadera Historia Debía De Escribirse Por Los

Que Participaron… y lo saben… Yo solo sé que había



Adjunto Una Simpática Reflexión… Del Estadounidense Andy Bergen Sobre “Los Cubanos” Pueden estar de acuerdo o NO… 
El primer pecado del cubano fue su aprecio desmedido por el
standard de vida y el progreso. 
El segundo pecado fue que antes de 1959 su moneda nacional valía más que el
El tercer pecado fue hacerle la música al mundo…
Pero el peor pecado de los cubanos fue levantar una ciudad de lo que 
fuera un terreno pantanoso en Florida para convertirla en el puerto
estadounidense hacia las Américas y un punto obligado del 
turismo mundial. Quien le niegue este pecado a los industriosos 
cubanos, está divagando o es un acomplejado.
Entonces, ¿los cubanos son malos, regulares o simplemente muy buenos? 
Jesucristo dio una pauta para la conducta humana cuando dijo:
“Por sus obras los conoceréis”. Así que ya tienen en Miami una regla para 
medir a los cubanos. 
Yo no soy de ascendencia cubana. Tampoco creo que los cubanos lo sean, 
pues los verdaderos cubanos fueron los Taínos, los Siboneyes y
Guanajatabeyes que poblaban la hermosa isla, pero fueron
exterminados por quienes luego dieron origen al nuevo pueblo cubano. 
Creo que la expresión “cubano” viene siendo como
un título de nobleza. No se puede decir siquiera que 
cubano sea una raza. En el pueblo cubano hay de todo: blancos europeos, 
negros, mulatos y hasta asiáticos 
A mi entender, el cubano no es más que un proyecto genético bien 
concebido en un lugar llamado Cuba.  Creo realmente que el cubano es 
distinto a todos los demás latinoamericanos.  Tal vez sea su posición
geográfica o su herencia euro-africana la que los hace tan
Los cubanos hablan alto, gesticulan con las manos, son prepotentes y 
se ríen de todo el mundo, pero también de ellos mismos y de sus 
De su dolor sacan arte y de su alegría hacen verdaderas 
El cubano no suele ser racista, pero sí es clasista. “Lo 
bueno que tiene Miami, es que aquí todas las aguas cogen su nivel”, 
me dijo una vez un amigo cubano refiriéndose a las castas 
sociales, supuestamente eliminadas en Cuba para que la chusma se 
mezcle con las capas altas y educadas.  Sin embargo, el cubano liberó 
al negro mucho antes de que los negros estadounidenses fueran 
libres.  En Cuba nunca se les llamó afrocubanos,   sino simplemente, 
El negro de Cuba es tan cubano como el blanco o el
No obstante,  los cubanos,  en especial los de Miami,  son uno de los
pueblos más vilipendeados en el mundo.  Creo sinceramente que hay mucha 
envidia en esas críticas.  Molesta mucho su éxito extraordinario,
sus cinco congresistas en el Congreso de EE.UU,  su enorme
poder económico,  su influecia política,  su afán de trabajo 
y progreso,  la imposición de su idioma y sus costumbres, y 
mucho más. 
El cubano por su ingenio y laboriosidad nunca podrá escapar a su destino.
Siempre tendrá a su lado al hermano Cain y al amigo Cain,  a todas 
esas razas y etnias que no soportan el éxito de los demás y quieren 
aplastar a los triunfadores.
Yo vivía en Miami en los 60s, cuando los cubanos empezaron a llegar en
grandes cantidades.  No tenían nada, sólo un gran orgullo y un inmenso dolor
de haber tenido que dejar a su bella isla detrás. Pronto me di cuenta de que esta gente no había llegado a 
Estados Unidos en busca de un plato de comida. Venían con alma de
colonizadores, en busca de progreso y libertad de ideas y 
expresión; y conquistaron estas tierras, para luego levantar a la 
gran urbe cosmopolita que es el Miami de hoy.
¿Qué habría sido de la isla de Cuba si a su pueblo no le hubieran truncado la
creatividad y el espíritu empresarial?
Probablemente sería la verdadera “perla de las Antillas”, envidia de 
América Latina y de muchos pueblos más.
Los cubanos son comparables con la comunidad judía e italiana en Estados 
Unidos, que se levantaron triunfantes después de años de vicisitudes.
¿Qué sería de Miami si algún día se marchan los cubanos? 
Ningún otro pueblo lograría imprimirle tanto sabor y 
alegría a la ciudad de Miami . Por eso me gusta tanto la letra de la 
canción de la cantante cubana Marisela Verena…Nosotros los cubanos 
y el resto de la humanidad……..




Western assertions about Crimean dispute overlook Moscow’s basing-rights agreement


WASHNGTON – Russia’s military presence in the Crimean Peninsula in Ukraine has been described as an “invasion” and a “takeover” of the region by troops that now have surrounded two marine bases in an ongoing stand-off.

However, Russian troop movements on the Crimean Peninsula are permitted under a 1997 Partition Treaty signed between Russia and Ukraine, as long as there are not more than 25,000 Russian troops.

At present, the Russians have about 16,000 troops on the peninsula, which means a further increase of troops would be permitted.

The Kremlin contends the move is to protect ethnic Russians who make up a majority of the population on the peninsula and in eastern Ukraine. Moscow asserts that ethnic Russians, especially in the Crimea, are being threatened by ultra-nationalists, as WND recently reported.

Meantime, there is concern on Capitol Hill that Russian troop movements were not anticipated by the U.S. intelligence community, resulting in impending oversight hearings to find out why.

According to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, there was debate within the intelligence community about whether Russian troops were on the move in Crimea, prompting public allegations that the Obama administration was caught by surprise.

The treaty

In addition to the limit of 25,000 troops, Russia Today said the agreement allows on Crimean territory 24 artillery systems with a caliber smaller than 100mm, 132 armored vehicles and 22 military aircraft.

Further, there are five Russian naval units stationed in the port city of Sevastopol as allowed under the treaty. The units are:

  • The 30th Surface Ship Division, which is formed by the 11th anti-submarine Ship Brigade. It comprises the Black Sea Fleet’s flagship missile cruiser, Moskva, Kerchg, Ochakov, Smetlivy, Ladny and Pytivy, as well as the 197th Landing Ship Brigade, which consists of seven large amphibious vessels.
  • The 41st Missile Boat Brigade, which includes the 166th Fast Attack Craft Division consisting of Bora and Samum hovercrafts and the small missile ships Mirazh and Shtil and the 295th missile Boat Division.
  • The 247th Separate Submarine Division, consisting of two diesel submarines, the B-871 Alrosa and B-380 Svyatoy Kryaz Georgy.
  • The 68th Harbor Defense Ship Brigade, consisting of four vessels of the 400th Anti-submarine Ship Battalion and 418 Mine Hunting Ship Division.
  • The 422nd Separate Hydrographic Ship Division comprising the Cheleken, Stvor, Donuzlav andGS-402 survey vessels and hydrographic boats.
  • Two Russian air bases in Kacha and Gvardeysky.

Russia also has coastal forces that consist of the 1096th Separate Anti-Aircraft Missile Regiment in Sevastopol and the 810th Marine Brigade, which includes 2,000 marines.

Sources point out that the Russian military units are restricted to their bases, although there are persistent reports that Russian troops are swarming all over the peninsula.

The sources say that Russian President Vladimir Putin moved troops into Crimea in response to a request from authorities of the Ukrainian Autonomous Republic of Crimea.

The prime minister of the Crimean autonomous region is Sergiy Aksyonov, a pro-Russian politician who was elected by Crimea’s regional parliament.

Aksyonov has given orders to Ukrainian naval forces on the peninsula to disregard any orders from the “self-proclaimed” interim government in Kiev, which took over following the ouster of the democratically elected Ukrainian president, Viktor Yanukovych.


Yanukovych has sought refuge in Moscow.

On March 1, Rear Admiral Denys Berezovsky, who had been appointed chief of the Ukrainian navy only a day earlier, announced alongside Aksynov that he had defected to the Crimean autonomous region.

The Russians have long-standing ties to the Crimean Peninsula. The links go back to Catherine the Great in the 18th century when Russia took Ukraine and Crimea from the Ottoman Empire.

In 1954, then-Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, who was half-Ukrainian, gave the Crimea to Ukraine as a gift.

After Ukraine became independent in 1991 when the Soviet Union broke up, Russian President Boris Yeltsin entered into an agreement with Ukraine to base Russia’s Black Sea fleet at Sevastopol under a lease until 2017. That lease recently was extended to 2042, although the Kiev interim government is attempting to abrogate that agreement.

Yeltsen also signed in 1994 the Budapest Memorandum, which was to guarantee the territorial integrity of Ukraine. As WND reported, however, it lacked any enforcement provision for military assistance should there be an attack.

The memorandum was signed in exchange for Ukraine giving up its nuclear weapons.

In addition to Yeltsin, U.S. President Bill Clinton, British Prime Minister John Major and Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma signed the agreement.




Issa: Contempt Citation Against Lerner ‘Has to Be Considered’

But as a short but contentious congressional hearing on Wednesday, former IRS official Lois Lerner repeatedly invoked her 5th Amendment right not to testify about the IRS targeting of tea party groups.

This was the second time Lerner has declined to answer questions put to her by the House oversight committee. Asked if he was considering a contempt citation against Lerner, Committee Chair Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said, “that’s certainly something that has to be considered.” He said he hoped to get answers from Lerner, and the committee will continue to seek answers in other places.

Issa adjourned the hearing while the ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), was speaking. Issa said Cummings was recognized to ask a question but instead “went into an opening statement,” and therefore his microphone was turned off.

Read More:






Protest in front of the white house and the congress

  Washington DC. On May 26 2014, “Memorial Day” .

 “STOP” obama and the congress “STOP”

Are you be one of us to ask?




Washington DC . USA at 6 AM on May 26, 2014

“Don’t be upset be even”

More information to:,


Sostenemos como evidentes por sí mismas dichas verdades: que todos los hombres son creados iguales; que son dotados por su Creador de ciertos derechos inalienables; que entre estos están la vida, la libertad y la búsqueda de la felicidad; que para garantizar estos derechos se instituyen entre los hombres los gobiernos, que derivan sus poderes legítimos del consentimiento de los gobernados; que cuando quiera que una forma de gobierno se vuelva destructora de estos principios, el pueblo tiene derecho a reformarla o abolirla, e instituir un nuevo gobierno que base sus cimientos en dichos principios, y que organice sus poderes en forma tal que a ellos les parezca más probable que genere su seguridad y felicidad.





“En mi opinión”    Lázaro R González Miño Editor.

Para contribuir con artículos, opiniones, sugerencias o recibir “En mi opinión”

e-mail a:, o,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s