No 583 “En mi opinion” Febrero 2, 2014

<No 583 “En mi opinión” Febrero 2, 2014>

Image

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

No podemos esperar que ningún gobierno se porte correcto y decentemente. Mucho menos este que tenemos ahora. Tenemos que vigilarlos, fiscalizarlos, amenazarlos y derrocarlos si es necesario. Por lo general los gobiernos solo sirven a los que son miembros de ese gobierno y después a los que tienen la misma filosofía, si es que tienen alguna, o privilegian a los que los ayudaron a tomar el poder.  Si tú crees que el gobierno va a proteger y proteger tus derechos ciudadanos… Tú eres un tonto o quizás algo peor. El gobierno solo va a quitarte tus derechos y a abusar de ti. El gobierno va a hacer todas las estupideces que se les ocurra. Va a saquear tu cuenta en el banco con todos los taxes y planes de salud y todas las estupideces que se les ocurra. Entre otras cosas los gobernantes van a ordenar la vaca hasta que le salga sangre de la teta. Ellos van a acumular la mayor cantidad de prebendas para poder vivir bien cuando no sean gobierno, si es que no se envisten de dictadores y no abandonan el poder. Ahora me vas a decir que soy un tonto y que eso no puede pasar en Los Estados Unidos.  Déjame decirte que desgraciadamente eso es lo que está ocurriendo exactamente en nuestro Estados Unidos.  Y sabes porque me arriesgo a decir esto porque ya perdí una patria, ya me pusieron en una prisión y por poco pierdo la vida.  Gracias a DIOS y a Reagan me sacaron de la cárcel y me trajeron aquí, este ahora es mi país y yo lo defiendo y defenderé porque no quiero perder mi patria dos veces. Acaben de despertase. JOSE MARTI. Lo dijo mucho mejor y mas alto que yo. “No es tiempo de ponerse plumas en el sombrero… ES LA HORA DE LOS HORNOS Y SOLO SE HA DE VER LA LUZ”  “EMO” Lázaro R González Mino

 

 

 

Amenper” Well, the best news of the week (or even the month) is that someone on Capitol Hill still has a spine.
When Rep. Steve Stockman got up and walked out of the president’s State of the Union address on Tuesday night, I rejoiced. Finally, someone has decided that enough is enough!
Stockman apparently couldn’t make it through the entire speech without losing his temper. He’s mad that President Obama is rewriting the U.S. Constitution, and he has every right to be.
Here’s what Stockman had to say:
Tonight I left early after hearing how the president is further abusing his Constitutional powers. I could not bear to watch as he continued to cross the clearly defined boundaries of the Constitutional separation of powers.
“Even worse, Obama has openly vowed to break his oath of office and begin enacting his own brand of law through executive decree. This is a wholesale violation of his oath of office and a disqualifying offense.”
Stockman didn’t stop there, either.
He went on to proclaim: “I’m considering filing Articles of Impeachment against Barack Obama.”
Now we’re talking!
The nation is tired of the Republican leadership’s complacency and the “let’s all get along” culture that’s endemic among politicians. And finally, it appears that someone on the Hill agrees.
Instead of acting like nothing is wrong, Stockman is speaking the frustration of millions of Americans, citizens who are sickened by their selfish, do-nothing leaders who only care about getting re-elected at all costs.
Recent polls show that just 31% of Americans believe that the country is better off now than in 2009, when Obama was sworn in. And a new Rasmussen poll reported that 69% of likely voters believe that the president should work with Congress, while only 27% believe that the president should go around Congress.
A CNN snap poll conducted among State of the Union viewers found similar results: 67% said that they wanted Obama to compromise with Congress, while just 30% said that they preferred for him to act on his own.
Stockman told NPR that “acting unilaterally, without Congress, is not the concept of what our Founding Fathers envisioned. And I had hoped [Obama] would reach across the aisles and – especially in his final years – make a difference.”
Meanwhile, the rest of the Republican leadership would be smart to follow Stockman’s lead. Impeachment should be on the docket – it’s what the American people want. On top of that, the process is long overdue. To recap:

Obama’s administration has trafficked guns to Mexican drug cartels.

Obama’s administration ignored calls for help from numerous Americans in Benghazi, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, resulting in their deaths.

Obama’s administration has unilaterally rewritten bankruptcy laws and stripped investors in GM bonds, including a teacher’s pension fund, of property rights.

Obama illegally bombed Libya without Congressional authorization.

Obama unilaterally rewrote the Affordable Care Act, exempting chosen businesses, unions and Congress from the effects of the law. And now he plans to usurp the powers of Congress and govern by decree. I truly wonder how much more these other Republicans can stomach before they join the calls for impeachment, too.

Your eyes on the Hill,

Floyd Brown

 

 

 

 

Amenper: La Alegría del Odio

El odio a los Estados Unidos por los socialistas del mundo, no tiene límites ni fronteras. 

No importa que los Estados Unidos hayan elegido como presidente a un negro socialista, el odio es tan intenso que no pueden resistir el denigrar a este país cada vez que tienen una oportunidad.

Le dieron el premio Nobel a Obama simplemente porque fue electo por ser negro, pero eso fue para molestar a los que no votaron por él, no por méritos porque no había tenido ninguna gestión de gobierno, no había hecho nada todavía, así que fue premiado simplemente para mandar el mensaje de odio al pueblo americano.

Ahora dos políticos noruegos han nominado conjuntamente al ex contratista de la Agencia de seguridad nacional Edward Snowden para el  premio Nobel de la Paz, diciendo que su divulgación de documentos secretos de Estados Unidos ha contribuido a construir un mundo más pacífico.

Los beneficios que hayan  podido producir las divulgaciones de Snowden no compensan la realidad de que el individuo es una persona de una poca capacidad intelectual en busca de un protagonismo que nunca había tenido en su vida. Sus divulgaciones están rodeadas de sofismas extraños, realidad mezclada con absurdos, como de que hay extraterrestres gobernando en los Estados Unidos.

Esta nominación fue presentada por los legisladores socialistas Noruegos Baard Vegard Solhjell, un ministro de medio ambiente y el congresista socialista Snorre Valen y sólo significa que Snowden será uno de decenas de nombres que examinará el Comité Nobel, pero sólo el hecho de su nominación enseña una vez más lo que Greg Gutfeld llama en su libro “La alegría del Odio”.

Gutfeld maneja muy bien la sátira, es gracioso, pero este hecho oscurece el hecho de que Gutfeld maneja muy bien el absurdo inteligente.

En su libro “La alegría de odio: Cómo triunfar sobre los llorones en la edad de la falsa indignación”, Gutfeld argumenta como las fuerzas de la intolerancia reclaman un monopolio exclusivo de, bueno, la tolerancia.

Pero usan la tolerancia como un garrote intolerante, un medio de aplicar corrección política y avergonzar a los herejes en el silencio.

“La idea de la tolerancia — un concepto aparentemente inocuo — se ha convertido en algo totalmente aberrante: una forma de darle porrazos a la  gente para que se callen, para que los agredidos se disculpen, cuando los agredidos son a menudo los que tienen la clave para el sentido común,” escribe Gutfeld.

En otras palabras, detrás de la conducta de los socialistas, existe un doble rasero. Se quejan porque tienen una norma única: la izquierda tiene el monopolio de discurso aceptable.

Sería una aberración, pero no sería nada extraño que Snowden recibiera el premio Nobel, es una oportunidad de darle un garrotazo más a los odiados americanos.

 

 

 

 

Amenper: P.S. del Estado de la Unión

Una hora no es suficiente para demandar de los ciudadanos que sigan los consejos de mi administración para que todos podamos vivir en armonía, igualdad y felicidad.

Por esto estoy presentando un P.S. no confundir con un B.S.que, aunque en esta instancia  se parece, tiene alguna diferencia.  
P.S. quiere decir un “Post Scriptum”, o un “Post Scrotum”  ( también los dos se parecen pero creo que el último es el más apropiado en este caso) en el cual les incluyo las indicaciones que no pude hacerles en mi discurso a la nación.

 

Barack Hussein Obama

 

 

1.- Gaste  todo su dinero; Siempre tendrás la Seguridad Social para cuidar de ti y si no te alcanza tienes los sellos de alimentos, un chequecito del Welfare y otras bisuterías que te daremos.

2. Invierta en mi nuevo plan de retiro My IRA este es un fondo mutuo de conciencia social. Un buen fondo no colocará su dinero con cualquier empresa que contamina, discrimina, explota o hace un beneficio de cualquier manera. No importa si al final usted no recibe beneficios, pero ayuda a mi administración…perdón….quise decir a la nación.

3.-Aplique para el Welfare. Es su obligación moral el recibir asistencia pública.

4.-Mantengase en sintonía siempre con MSNBC. ¿Por qué gastar dinero en escuelas y libros cuando usted en su lugar puede ser educado por Chris Mattews?

 

5.- No pagues por la hipoteca de tu casa. El gobierno generosamente te perdonará

 

6- Carga todas las tarjetas de crédito al máximo. No importa que te endeudes, vas a estar obteniendo cosas gratis. Y, también estarás ayudando al bien común estimulando la economía.

7– Destruye  tu casa con una bola de demolición. De esta manera crearás nuevos trabajos cuando tienes que reconstruirla.

8.-Si usted posee un negocio, obligue a sus empleados a formar un sindicato. Serán mejores trabajadores así. Y recuerda el consejo que les dí en mi discurso súbeles el sueldo a todos aunque tengas que ir en bancarrota.  

9.- Paga más impuestos que lo que sugiere el IRS. Hazlo por lo menos el triple de la
cantidad sugerida; cualquier inversión en nuestro gobierno será devuelto a usted muchas veces más. Y de esa manera se ahorrará tener que invitar a almorzar al agente del IRS cuando vaya a visitarlo.

 

10.- Y aunque lo he dejado para último esto es lo más importante, Inscríbase usted y todos sus conocidos y familiares en el Obamacare. Es un seguro accesible.

Es caro, pero yo nunca dije que era barato ni bueno, ni mejor que el que usted tenía y le cancelaron, nunca mentí, sólo dije que era accesible y es accesible,usted se puede inscribir y lo puede pagar accesiblemente-

Nunca he mentido al pueblo.

 

 

 

 

 

Obama on Being Sued by Congress: ‘I Am Not Particularly Worried About It’

Asked about a Republican-led effort to sue him for executive overreach, President Obama said Thursday: “I am not particularly worried about it.”

House Republicans — led by South Carolina Rep. Tom Rice — have introduced what they call the STOP Act, which stands for Stop This Overreaching Presidency. It aims to take the president to court over the White House taking unilateral action on everything from Obamacare to immigration.

In his State of the Union address on Tuesday, Obama made clear he plans to use executive orders to enact policies he cannot get passed in Congress.

CNN host Jake Tapper — during an interview on Thursday in Waukesha, Wisconsin — asked Obama about the The Stop Act.  “They want to rein in what you’re trying to do,” Tapper said. “How do you respond to that?”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/ Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2014/01/obama-sued-congress-particularly-worried/#SiHUZcUSRY2IqywZ.99

 

 

 

Amenper: Razonamiento Alucinantemente Contradictorio

Los liberales, en caso de que ustedes no se hayan dado cuenta son una raza extraña y curiosa, pero ahora tenemos que añadir unos nuevo adjetivos,  contradictorios y alucinantes.

Han estado detrás de nosotros dándonos sermones de que nos estamos matando con nuestras costumbres, han declarado la guerra a las carnes rojas, el tabaco, los tragos, y otras cosas que se llaman nombres raros como Trans fats y otros nombres que ni siquiera sé lo que son, pero que si ellos no quieren que no las coma deben de ser sabrosas. 

Esas cosas son muy malas, pero cuando los liberales se le habla de las drogas, bueno eso no es tan importante y nos dicen  ¿Por qué no legalizar la marihuana? Después de todo es un producto medicinal.  Oye, la cocaína y el opio también son medicinales, pero no creo que masticar una hoja de coca como Evo Morales, o fumar una pipa de Opio como el premier de China 中华人民共和国国务院总理 Cuyo nombre no puedo pronunciar en español, no es precisamente para curar ninguna dolencia.

Ahora, yo reconozco que yo hago cosas que yo sé que son malas para mí, como, por ejemplo  de vez en cuando me como un postre de dulce de leche que me gusta mucho, o un Donut glaseado cubierto de chocolaque que también es muy sabroso, con lo que rompo mi dieta virtual para bajar de peso.  Pero nunca había pensado que eso era comparable a que fumarse un pito de Mariguana.

Pero esta gente de Obama lo confunden a uno. Resulta que Christopher Beach, nos dice en una entrevista en Político, que aunque comer un Donut Glaseado no es más dañino que fumar un pito de mariguana, que, ambos son adictivos y psicoactivos. Así que la actividad que produce el azúcar de un Donut es comparable a un pito de mariguana.

Bueno, voy a comerme ahora un Donut glaseado y grajeado y bien cubierto de chocolate, para ver si agarro un tono bien subido.

 Nuestro  Presidente Obama en una entrevista reciente con el New Yorker dijo::

“Yo fumé marihuana cuando era niño (sí, eso fue lo que dijo “niño” “boy”), y lo considero como un vicio y un vicio, no muy diferente de los cigarrillos que también  fumaba cuando era joven y  a través de una gran parte de mi vida adulta,

Bueno, menos mal que no habló de los Donuts, parece que eso se lo deja a Michelle.
El mismo Presidente quien firmó una dura ley federal contra el tabaquismo  en 2009 ahora apoya legalización de marihuana. legalizarla?. 

Vamos a razonar, porque estoy confundido….¿por qué firma una dura ley contra los cigarrillos y ahora quiere legalizar la mariguana? ¿Si dice que no son muy diferentes? ¿por qué no firma una dura ley contra la mariguana?.

 No entiendo, estos liberales me marean esta es una contradicción alucinante, estoy alucinado y les juro que hoy no me he comido un Donut.

 

 

 

Amenper: Well, the best news of the week (or even the month) is thatsomeone on Capitol Hill still has a spine.

When Rep. Steve Stockman got up and walked out of the president’s State of the Union address on Tuesdaynight, I rejoiced. Finally, someone has decided that enough is enough!
Stockman apparently couldn’t make it through the entire speech without losing his temper. He’s mad that President Obama is rewriting the U.S. Constitution, and he has every right to be.
Here’s what Stockman had to say:
Tonight I left early after hearing how the president is further abusing his Constitutional powers. I could not bear to watch as he continued to cross the clearly defined boundaries of the Constitutional separation of powers.
“Even worse, Obama has openly vowed to break his oath of office and begin enacting his own brand of law through executive decree. This is a wholesale violation of his oath of office and a disqualifying offense.”
Stockman didn’t stop there, either.
He went on to proclaim: “I’m considering filing Articles of Impeachment against Barack Obama.”
Now we’re talking!
The nation is tired of the Republican leadership’s complacency and the “let’s all get along” culture that’s endemic among politicians. And finally, it appears that someone on the Hill agrees.
Instead of acting like nothing is wrong, Stockman is speaking the frustration of millions of Americans, citizens who are sickened by their selfish, do-nothing leaders who only care about getting re-elected at all costs.
Recent polls show that just 31% of Americans believe that the country is better off now than in 2009, when Obama was sworn in. And a new Rasmussen poll reported that 69% of likely voters believe that the president should work with Congress, while only 27% believe that the president should go around Congress.
A CNN snap poll conducted among State of the Union viewers found similar results: 67% said that they wanted Obama to compromise with Congress, while just 30% said that they preferred for him to act on his own.
Stockman told NPR that “acting unilaterally, without Congress, is not the concept of what our Founding Fathers envisioned. And I had hoped [Obama] would reach across the aisles and – especially in his final years – make a difference.”
Meanwhile, the rest of the Republican leadership would be smart to follow Stockman’s lead. Impeachment should be on the docket – it’s what the American people want. On top of that, the process is long overdue. To recap:

Obama’s administration has trafficked guns to Mexican drug cartels.

Obama’s administration ignored calls for help from numerous Americans in Benghazi, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, resulting in their deaths.

Obama’s administration has unilaterally rewritten bankruptcy laws and stripped investors in GM bonds, including a teacher’s pension fund, of property rights.

Obama illegally bombed Libya without Congressional authorization.

Obama unilaterally rewrote the Affordable Care Act, exempting chosen businesses, unions and Congress from the effects of the law. And now he plans to usurp the powers of Congress and govern by decree. I truly wonder how much more these other Republicans can stomach before they join the calls for impeachment, too.

Your eyes on the Hill,

Floyd Brown

 

 

 

 

Lester Aviles: SOTU Media Blames Obama’s Woes On Everything But His Failed Policies by John Nolte 

 

Obama’s policies have failed. That is why he is in trouble, and failed policies are not the only reason. Obama lied to the American people to pass the ObamaCare they hate, and we still have the unresolved scandals of the IRS, NSA, and Benghazi. But to hear the media talk in the run up to Tuesday night’s State of the Union, you would be led to believe that what’s ailing Obama are low approval ratings, political opposition, the public tuning him out, and second-term blues…

The chyron on MSNBC reads: “President Obama Faces Low Poll Numbers Ahead of Tonight’s Address.” The CNN chyron reads: “Obama Faces Pessimistic Public.” All morning MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” talked about how the American people have tuned the president out. NBC’s Chuck Todd dissected the entrails of Obama’s latest dismal poll numbers.

CNN tells us that “Obama failed to get any of his 2013 State of the Union priorities through Congress.” The AP warns“Obama faces a politically divided Congress.” ABC Newsreports, “Obama’s agenda as outlined in last year’s speech was at the mercy of Congress.” CBS reminds,  With Congress unwilling or unable to act on these key issues[.]”

Our dishonest media is reporting and focusing only on symptoms, as though symptoms are the disease. No one in media wants to say that if the voters had his back, Obama could get past a divided Congress. No one in media wants to reveal why Obama’s poll numbers are tanking; why the public has tuned him out; where the second-term blues emanate from.

What the media refuses to say is that Obama is in the pickle he is in because he and his policies have failed. And the reason the media can’t bring themselves to admit this is because that would be the same as admitting that the left-wing policies they themselves believe in do not work. To admit Obama and his policies have failed is to admit liberalism has failed, and that is something our media will go bankrupt before doing.

For the first two years of his presidency, Obama had total run of the country with huge majorities in both Houses of Congress. Everything he wanted passed passed — most notably,  major economic programs (the stimulus, Dodd-Frank, tax increases), the complete overhaul of our health care system (ObamaCare), and a regulatory rampage that continues to this day. And for five years, like any president. Obama has been able to govern foreign policy as he sees fit

And it has all failed.

Five years in, Obama’s “recovery” is still the worst in American history, there are no jobs, Iran is laughing at us, Syria’s Assad regime has used us successfully to win a civil war, Egypt is a mess, we have 4 dead Americans in Benghazi, our hard-fought gains in Iraq and Afghanistan are being surrendered, and no one’s been held accountable for the abuses of the IRS, NSA, or the security failures in Libya.  

And then there is Obama the liar: “You can keep your health insurance” and “‘Twas YouTube killed the Libyan Ambassador.”

Obama is a failed president who has worked harder than anyone in recent history to enact failed economic policies, govern by dividing the country, blunder through foreign policy, and look Americans in the eye and lie… repeatedly.

According to the media, though, what plagues Obama are polls, political opposition, a lack of public trust, voter pessimism, and national exhaustion … all of which, they apparently want us to believe, manifested from thin air.

If Obama’s policies had been successful, he would be having none of these problems. The facts are just that simple and the media are engaging in verbal diarrhea to say everything but.

Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC

 

 

 

ARTICLES OF EMPICHMENT AGAINST barack hussein obama. Finaly by Floyd Brown.

Well, the best news of the week (or even the month) is that someone on Capitol Hill still has a spine.

When Rep. Steve Stockman got up and walked out of the president’s State of the Union address on Tuesday night, I rejoiced. Finally, someone has decided that enough is enough!

Stockman apparently couldn’t make it through the entire speech without losing his temper. He’s mad that President Obama is rewriting the U.S. Constitution, and he has every right to be.

Here’s what Stockman had to say:

“Tonight I left early after hearing how the president is further abusing his Constitutional powers. I could not bear to watch as he continued to cross the clearly defined boundaries of the Constitutional separation of powers.

“Even worse, Obama has openly vowed to break his oath of office and begin enacting his own brand of law through executive decree. This is a wholesale violation of his oath of office and a disqualifying offense.”

Stockman didn’t stop there, either.

He went on to proclaim: “I’m considering filing Articles of Impeachment against Barack Obama.”

Now we’re talking!

The nation is tired of the Republican leadership’s complacency and the “let’s all get along” culture that’s endemic among politicians. And finally, it appears that someone on the Hill agrees.

Instead of acting like nothing is wrong, Stockman is speaking the frustration of millions of Americans, citizens who are sickened by their selfish, do-nothing leaders who only care about getting re-elected at all costs.

Recent polls show that just 31% of Americans believe that the country is better off now than in 2009, when Obama was sworn in. And a new Rasmussen poll reported that 69% of likely voters believe that the president should work with Congress, while only 27% believe that the president should go around Congress.

 

Forget Dividends: $2,046 every three months on $18,999

$1,461 in cash on $18,660 invested. $2,046 in cash takes only $18,999 to access. These aren’t dividends… it’s something better. Best of all, nearly any stock is eligible… including the ones already in your portfolio. Click here for the full story.

A CNN snap poll conducted among State of the Union viewers found similar results: 67% said that they wanted Obama to compromise with Congress, while just 30% said that they preferred for him to act on his own.

Stockman told NPR that “acting unilaterally, without Congress, is not the concept of what our Founding Fathers envisioned. And I had hoped [Obama] would reach across the aisles and – especially in his final years – make a difference.”

Meanwhile, the rest of the Republican leadership would be smart to follow Stockman’s lead. Impeachment should be on the docket – it’s what the American people want. On top of that, the process is long overdue. To recap:

  • Obama’s administration has trafficked guns to Mexican drug cartels.
  • Obama’s administration ignored calls for help from numerous Americans in Benghazi, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, resulting in their deaths.
  • Obama’s administration has unilaterally rewritten bankruptcy laws and stripped investors in GM bonds, including a teacher’s pension fund, of property rights.
  • Obama illegally bombed Libya without Congressional authorization.
  • Obama unilaterally rewrote the Affordable Care Act, exempting chosen businesses, unions and Congress from the effects of the law.

And now he plans to usurp the powers of Congress and govern by decree. I truly wonder how much more these other Republicans can stomach before they join the calls for impeachment, too.

Your eyes on the Hill,

Floyd Brown

 

 

 

Amenper:La “Cristiandad” de los Liberales

 

Hay veces que sale el masoquista que todos tenemos y me pongo a oír a CNN, no a MSNBC, porque todavía no tengo dentro un masoquista tan desarrollado.

Pero siempre que oigo a CNN me siento mal.  Dicen que Fox News está parcializada, pero cuando veo a los comentaristas siempre tienen aunque sea a un liberal para defender su punto.  Esto no sucede en CNN¸ lo que vemos es que los entrevistadores y los comentaristas no sólo no cuestionan lo que dice el liberal entrevistado, sino que le dan pie para que se luzca.

En una entrevista un Senador Demócrata de Nebraska estaba criticando a Tea Party por su oposición a los programas de ayuda, y en tono de burla mencionó la parte de la Biblia en el evangelio de Mateo  que dice “cuanto lo hicisteis a uno de estos mis hermanos más pequeños, a mí lo hicisteis”. Diciendo que los conservadores hablan de la Biblia pero que no la cumplen, que no quieren ayudar a otros, que no tienen caridad cristiana..

 Esta gente que ni creen en su madre y que lo que hacen lo hacen para ganar votos no para ayudar a nadie, quieren dar lecciones de caridad.  No creo que nadie esté contra la caridad cristiana, lo que se critica es la dependencia que crea en los pobres el mantenimiento continuado sin trabajar.

Y no puede haber confusión cuando Pablo dice en la segunda epístola de Tesalonicenses

3:10 Porque también cuando estábamos con vosotros, os ordenábamos esto: Si alguno no quiere trabajar, tampoco coma.  Porque oímos que algunos de entre vosotros andan desordenadamente, no trabajando en nada, sino entremetiéndose en lo ajeno. 

Yo creo que esto que copio textualmente de la Biblia, está más claro que lo tergiversa este liberal que quiere hacerse el gracioso no creo que alguien pueda interpretarlo de otra manera que la ética de trabajo es parte de a doctrina cristiana, y que este politiquero que lo que quiere es tener a los pobres como rehenes para que no salgan de la pobreza y les sigan dando su voto lo que está tratando de hacer es poner en ridículo a los que no piensan como él.

 

 

 

 

 

Date: January 30, 2014 1:11:03 PM PST

Subject: » SHERIFF ARRESTS … Chief of Police Harassed by Feds, Placed on Leave After Signing Pledge to Uphold Constitution .. 

http://www.infowars.com/chief-of-police-harassed-by-feds-fired-after-signing-pledge-to-uphold-constitution/

NWO Sheriff orders Shane Harger to disband entire police department due to “political affiliations”

Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com

UPDATE: Police Chief Shane Harger and Sheriff Richard Mack will both appear on Infowars Nightly News tonight to discuss this story. Harger is meeting with other Jemez Springs law enforcement officials tonight to discuss his position.

A police chief was detained and harassed by federal agents while traveling to a constitutional convention before returning home to be told he was being placed on administrative leave and ordered to disband his police department after signing a pledge to uphold the bill of rights.

Police Chief Shane Harger of the Jemez Springs, NM Police Department was flying out of Albuquerque Airport last week on his way to a Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA) convention taking place in Las Vegas. CSPOA is an organization headed up by Sheriff Richard Mack under which law enforcement officers gather to re-affirm their commitment to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Before passing security, Harger was approached by a TSA agent who asked the police chief to show his credentials. Moments later, a man claiming to be a “federal agent” also asked to see Harger’s credentials before telling him he was a “person of interest.” The federal agent then demanded to know where Harger was traveling to and why.

When Harger told the federal agent he was attending the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association Convention in Las Vegas, he was detained for 35 minutes before finally being allowed to board the airplane.

On Tuesday January 28, a day after his return, Harger was placed on administrative leave and ordered by Sandoval County, NM, Sheriff Douglas C. Wood to disband his entire police department due to his “political affiliations”.

What were his political affiliations? While attending the convention, Harger, along with 38 other police officers, signed a declaration affirming their pledge to “obey and observe” the U.S. Constitution, in addition to refusing to carry out unconstitutional orders such as gun confiscation without constitutionally compliant warrants, violations of the 4th amendment without probable cause, detainment or incarceration of citizens without probable cause, or working with the military for domestic law enforcement.

In other words, Harger was targeted for federal harassment and subsequently suspended for re-affirming his belief in the very Constitution he took an oath to uphold and protect in order to become a police officer in the first place.

“Despite having received a meritorious commendation from the Mayor of Jemez Springs on January 22, 2014, it seems that no one in the village government is willing to come to the assistance of Harger. It appears that Harger’s stance to defend and uphold the Constitution has put him and his entire department of ten part-time and volunteers out of business,” writes Vincent Finelli.

“I was at the convention and I never saw nor heard anyone say nor do anything that was a violation of any law. The CSPOA convention was an assembly of peace-loving Americans who just wanted to uphold their oath of office, that being to support and defend the US Constitution and Bill of Rights for all of us, We The People,” adds Finelli.

Harger’s treatment is yet another disturbing indication that the federal government, in addition to law enforcement authorities, view Americans who support the bill of rights as domestic extremists. Harger’s position as Chief of Police also shows that they are desperate to prevent citizens who identify as constitutionalists, tea partiers or libertarians from holding any position of influence within law enforcement or society in general.

Harger’s potential dismissal for his patriotic and constitutional “political affiliations” is a chilling reminder that such positions are not only not welcomed but actively discriminated against by the federal government.

 

 

TIDES HAVE TURNED: Putin–America is Godless, Has Turned Away from Christian Values, By GJWHG

Russian President Vladimir Putin condemned the West, including the United States, for eschewing Christian values and opting instead for a “path to degradation.”

FOLLOW GIRLS JUST WANNA HAVE GUNS ON FACEBOOK!

In his State of the Nation speech last month, Putin asserted that, “Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values… Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan.”

Russia has adopted new laws that ban homosexual propaganda and criminalizes the insulting of religious sensibilities.

The law on religious sensibilities was approved in the wake of a protest in Moscow’s largest cathedral by a female punk rock group, Pussy Riot.

State-run television said the group’s “demonic” protest was funded by “some Americans.” Russia’s newfound embrace of traditional values has prompted a rise in Orthodox vigilantism.

Extreme groups such as the Union of Orthodox Banner Bearers, an ultraconservative faction who adopted a slogan “Orthodoxy or Death,” are gaining prominence.

It was not that long ago that the United States was accusing Russia for being a “godless nation.” On March 8, 1983, Ronald Reagan said this about Russia to an audience of evangelicals… Read more at http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/2014/01/tides-turned-putin-america-godless-turned-away-christian-values/#0IlOHy43wrh4PDt2.99

 

 

 

Amenper: Intervencionismo

El intervencionismo es un sistema de procedimientos que perturba y eventualmente destruye la economía de mercado. No convierte a las personas en ricos, los hace más pobres. Ludwig von Mises

Los azares de la vida nos llevaron a través de una experiencia de cambio doble. Hemos pasado de una economía de libre mercado a un régimen socialista, entonces, afortunadamente nos hemos podido trasladar a un país que fue un modelo de democracia y libre empresa.

Debido a estas experiencias en nuestra vida, tenemos que estar preocupados cuando vemos cómo 
teorías, embusteras, falsas y engañosas sobre economía están convirtiendo americanos al socialismo sin comprender lo que está pasando.

Nos dicen, ¿cómo puedes llamar a esto socialismo? ¡Este es un país de libre empresa!

La experiencia es el mejor maestro. Debido a nuestra experiencia con la transformación de una sociedad al socialismo hemos aprendido a reconocer las formas sutiles de la economía.

Por supuesto, esto no es socialismo (todavía), este país se ha transformado de una sociedad libre en un Estado intervencionista

Cuando la filosofía del intervencionismo comenzó a existir como tal, el intervencionismo era considerado un sistema entre capitalismo y socialismo y debía ser el mejor de los tres sistemas económicos. Pero porque no funciona, a largo plazo el intervencionismo es un método para mover progresivamente un país del capitalismo al socialismo.

El intervencionismo es el método utilizado por el socialismo del siglo XXI, un método para transformar un país capitalista en un sistema socialista utilizando las herramientas de la democracia.

Como su nombre indica, el intervencionismo es un sistema económico en el cual agentes del poder gubernamental consideran que tienen el derecho de intervenir o interferir con el funcionamiento de una economía de mercado siempre que le convenga a sus planes para la sociedad.

La creencia errónea del intervencionismo es que la intervención gubernamental puede lograr resultados económicos exitosos sin caer bajo los controles totales que caracterizan a un sistema socialista.

En realidad el intervencionismo es un sistema en el cual gobierno interfiere con el funcionamiento normal del sistema de mercado con el fin de alterar los términos de intercambio de una manera que benefician a algunos a expensas de otros.

El intervencionismo es el resultado de un gobierno invitando a un grupo para entrar en el proceso de mercado y cambiar el ritmo en el cual los intercambios tienen lugar.

Los defensores del intervencionismo nunca explican que esto es lo que realmente es su sistema.

En su lugar hablan en términos morales elevados sobre la importancia de ciertas metas sociales y cómo esos objetivos sólo pueden ser logrados si el gobierno interfiere de una manera que podrá contrarrestar el egoísmo de algunos para lograr el bien para todos.

Hay otra razón por la cual es importante distinguir entre el capitalismo y el intervencionismo. Cuando las medidas intervencionistas llevan, como a menudo lo hacen, a serios problemas económicos, los economistas y políticos intervencionistas, nunca admiten que los problemas resultan de la manipulación gubernamental de la economía, al contrario, dicen que es el resultado del hecho de que hubo no intervención suficiente del gobierno en la economía. Lo hemos visto en Venezuela y otros países que han adoptado el socialismo del siglo XXI, lo vimos durante el discurso del Estado de la Nación de Obama.

De esta manera inteligente pero deshonesta, los fracasos de intervencionismo son citados como razones para un mayor grado de injerencia del gobierno en la economía.  

El reconocer la existencia de intervencionismo, es extremadamente importante.

Hoy en día, Estados Unidos no es una forma de capitalismo; es una versión de intervencionismo que finalmente terminará como otra versión del socialismo del siglo XXI.

Para algunos de ustedes el español es su lengua nativa, para otros es inglés. 

Como he dicho antes, mis E Mails son una descarga de mis emociones y generalmente se los envío en español. Para algunos de ustedes el español es su lengua nativa, para otros es inglés.

Pero hoy estoy enviándoles esta versión bilingüe de este correo electrónico porque considero que no importa el idioma, edad o cultura, es imprescindible reconocer el momento en que vivimos para tratar de salvaguardar nuestra forma de vida. Todavía tenemos el voto como última arma para evitar  un régimen socialista en este país, tenemos que votar contra el socialismo. Nos gustaría que todos los candidatos fueran conservadores Republicanos, pero tenemos que votar por los candidatos que se están aspirando contra los socialistas.

Si no votamos no nos podemos quejar más tarde sobre nuestra libertad perdida.

 

 

Interventionism

Interventionism is a system of procedures which disturb an eventually destroy the market economy. It does not make people richer; it makes people poorer.

Ludwig von Mises

The hazards of life took us through a double-change experience. We went from a free market economy to a socialist regime, then, fortunately we were able to move to a country with a free economic system and a democratic society..

Because of these experiences in our life, we have to be concerned when we see how false, misleading and deceptive theories about economics are turning Americans into socialism without comprehending what is really happening.

They tell us ¿How could you call this socialism? This is a free enterprise country!

Experience is the best teacher.  Because of our experience with the transformation of a society to   socialism we have learned to recognize the subtle ways of economics.

Of course, this is not socialism (yet), this country has been transformed from a free society into an interventionist state

When the philosophy of interventionism came to exist as such, interventionism was considered a system between Capitalism and Socialism, and was supposed to be the best of the three economic systems. But because it doesn’t work, in the long run interventionism is really a method to progressively move a capitalist country into socialism.

Interventionism is the method being used by the Socialism of the XXI century, a method to transform a Capitalist country into a socialist system using the tools of democracy.

As the name suggests, interventionism is an economic system in which agents of governmental power think they have the right to intervene in or interfere with the operation of a market economy whenever it suits their plans for society. 

Interventionism results from the mistaken belief that governmental intervention in economic matters can successfully achieve desired results while still falling short of the total controls that characterize a socialist system.

In reality interventionism is a system in which government interferes with the normal operation of the market system in order to alter the terms of trade in ways that benefit some at the expense of others.

Interventionism is a result of one group inviting government to enter the market process and change the rates at which exchanges take place.

Advocates of interventionism never explain that this is what their system really is. Instead they talk in lofty moral terms about the importance of certain social goals and how those goals can only be attained if government interferes in ways that will counterbalance the selfishness of some in order to bring about the good for all.  

There is another reason it is important to distinguish between capitalism and interventionism. When interventionist measures lead as they often do to serious economic problems interventionism economists and politicians never admit that the problems result from governmental tampering with the economy.  The problems, they complain result from the fact that there was insufficient government intervention in the economy. We have seen it in Venezuela and other countries that have adopted the Socialism of the XXI Century, we saw it during Obama’s State of the Union address.

In this clever but dishonest way, the failures of interventionism are cited as reasons for even greater degrees of government interference with the economy. 

Recognizing the existence of interventionism is extremely important. Today, the United States is not a form of capitalism; it is a version of interventionism that eventually will come out as another version of Socialism of the XXI century.

As I have told you before, I unload my emotions in my E mails that I send you, and I usually do it in Spanish. For some of you Spanish is your native tongue, for other it is English.

But I am sending you this bilingual version of this E Mail because I consider that no matter your language, age or culture, it is imperative to try to safeguard our way of life. We still have the vote as a last weapon to avoid a socialist regime in this country, we have to vote against socialism. We rather have conservative Republican candidates, but we have to vote for any of the candidates that are running against socialists.

If we don’t vote we can’t complaint later about our lost freedom.

 

 “LA LIBERTAD NO ES GRATIS” <IN GOD WE TRUST>

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”

 “IN GOD WE TRUST”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s