No 551 “En mi opinion” Dic. 23 2013

No 551 “En mi opinión”   Lunes, Diciembre 23, 2013

“IN GOD WE TRUST”  Lázaro R González Miño Editor



No 1st Amendment Rights For “Duck Dynasty” Star – Who’s Next? REV MICHAEL BRESCIANI 


A gaggle of pundits joined Sean Hannity on his show Thursday night and debated whether “Duck Dynasty”’s Phil Robertson had stepped over the great unseen line to insult the sensitivities of the LGBT, gays in general, and the newly forming army of last day’s reprobates in our nation of pop culture sleaze.

Robertson has been canned for correctly paraphrasing the contents of a book in the Bible written to the church of Corinth by the Apostle Paul. To wit:

“Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.” (1Co 6: 9-10 NIV)

In the Hannity debate, one idea kept coming to the fore that seemed like a reasonable answer. The suggestion was made that rather than waiting for huge groups of “Dynasty” fans to boycott the A&E show, the entire “Dynasty” cast should walk out together in protest.

The Bible Robertson is so willing to stand on also covers the subject of quitting – that too is also not allowed among the faithful.

Believers are told to hold fast to God’s word and live out the examples Christ gave in the face of all sorts of adversity and resistance, which would include the loss of jobs and careers.

Have Phil Robertson’s First Amendment rights to freedom of religion and freedom of speech been violated? And is the suspension from the A&E show a violation of the law?

In fact, it is; and not even the LGBT with its emerging new favor among the fallen and fickle of the nation have the right to deny Robertson’s civil rights. This one should be tested in the courts, but not in the court of public opinion.

Should Phil turn over and die, or stand and fight this abuse of power fostered by the trends of the new left louses of lust and looseness?

Over nine million fans of “Duck Dynasty” will now have to submit to the collective spanking the LGBT (and others in the new school of law by sensitivities and trends) doles out for them until the matter is completely resolved.

Robertson’s comments were not made on his show, but were part of an interview with GQ magazine.

Phil is quoted for saying, “start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men. – don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers — they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.”

Robertson also said, “It seems like, to me, a vagina — as a man — would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me. I’m just thinking: There’s more there! She’s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I’m saying? But hey, sin: It’s not logical, my man. It’s just not logical.”

Let’s see. Robertson’s quoted the Bible accurately, he expressed a pretty logical analysis or exegesis of the scripture passage, and he was well within his First Amendment rights of expression.

For this, he is labeled a ‘homophobe’ and loses his job.

Did this happen in America?

Let’s rein this nonsense in. It is clearly time to admit that those throwing around the derogatory term ‘homophobe’ have become ‘truthophobes.’

The great moral decline the Bible warns about in the last days has a unique element to it. When homosexuality is addressed, it is followed by a warning that it is birthed by the effort to remove all the specifics about rampant immorality, not just from the scene, but from the very mind and consciences of all men.

“And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient” (Ro 1: 28)

The LGBT and GLAAD have done a marvelous job of indoctrinating this weak-minded, pop culture-driven generation; but even they should pause and take a look at the Constitution of the United States because even in this troubled hour, the First Amendment is still there.

The Bible is still here as well, and it does not agree that gays were born that way. It does, however, intimate that they have got themselves a good helping of last days devils to promote their position in the public.

“And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.” (Rev 16: 13-14) Read more at



Obama’s Forged Birth Certificate Brings Call For Revolution. DECEMBER 19, 2013 BY KRIS ZANE 

More and more Americans are calling for Revolution—a demand that Obama “put down the Quran and leave the White House”—with a renewed scrutiny of Obama’s birth certificate after it was revealed in the lawsuit Klayman v. Obama that there existed multiple versions of Obama’s birth certificate—proving it’s a forgery.

The judge quietly dismissed the case on December 16, 2013; but with Larry Klayman singlehandedly winning a lawsuit against the NSA’s massive spying program on the exact same day, everyone from pundits to politicians are taking a new look at Obama’s forged birth certificate.

Conservatives who have long called for Obama’s impeachment are being joined by Americans from every political stripe, demanding that the Forger-in-Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, get out of the White House—immediately—now!



Betty: merry chritmas all from flautin One of the best.

Don’t go CHRISTMAS shopping until you watch this onYouTube.  Put on sound



Amenper:  El Teflón Negro


Nunca se ha visto en la historia de Estados Unidos a un presidente cometer tantos actos que en otros casos hubieran sido causa de impugnación y que hayan pasado como algo de una importancia secundaria.

El que llamó a Barack Hussein Obama el presidente de teflón, hizo una analogía impecable.  A Obama no se le pega nada, puede tener la política doméstica  exterior peor de los últimos años desde Jimmy  Carter, pero todavía es tratado como un individuo de una capacidad superior, un estadista para la historia.

¿Por qué?  Esta pregunta sin lugar a dudas tiene su respuesta en los medios de comunicación que han exaltado su figura a niveles místicos. Podemos considerar que la inclinación de izquierda de Obama tiene algo que ver con esto, pero hay casos de políticos de izquierda que han cometido hechos de menor importancia  que los de Obama y a la prensa no le ha quedado más remedio que denunciarlos.

Lo que hace parecer diferente en este caso es la raza de Obama.  El primer presidente negro de una nación que era vista como racista, que las fotos de la policía echándole los perros a los negros aparecían como una situación diaria en los Estados Unidos, en los periódicos globalmente, ha sido como una reivindicación para los americanos en el mundo.

Algo como que han reconocido su error y ahora aceptan a los negros.

Esto es bueno hasta cierto punto, y debiera haber sido bueno para la armonía racial  y sobre todo una oportunidad para los negros de superar su condición en la sociedad al sentirse iguales que los blancos con un presidente negro.

Pero lo que hemos visto es una situación de péndulo, y no sólo en la sociedad, y en los medios de comunicación pero en el presidente y los miembros de su administración que no desaprovechan oportunidad para inferir que todavía los Estados Unidos son un país racista.

Lo peor es que esto ha traído una situación en que los negros, en vez de asimilarse racialmente, han  creado una auto-segregación arrogante y confortativa, en que piden derechos en casos de conducta criminal por el hecho de ser negros.

Los negros tienen cuatro veces más probabilidades de ser arrestados por crímenes violentos y no menos de ocho veces más probabilidades  de ser arrestado por robo.

Entonces nos dicen que los negros son arrestados tan a menudo porque la policía establece injustamente un perfil discriminatorio. Los medios de comunicación quieren que creamos que la policía está arrestando a los negros en masa, ya sean culpables o inocentes.

Esta visión ha hecho que muchas autoridades locales han aprobado leyes para corregir lo que ellos creen que pudiera ser una situación racista por parte de la policía.

 La policía se defiende y dicen con lógica que arrestan a gran número de negros sólo porque un gran número de negros están cometiendo un gran número de los delitos.

La mejor prueba para determinar si hay parcialidad por parte de la policía es comparar los números sobre la delincuencia. — si, por ejemplo, podemos determinar que la mitad  los ladrones son negros, y nos encontramos con que aproximadamente la dos tercera parte de los ladrones detenidos por la policía son negros —sería suficiente para demostrar discriminación..

¿Pero qué información tenemos sobre la raza en la delincuencia?

Los negros tienen siete veces más probabilidades que las personas de otras razas para  cometer asesinato, ocho veces más probabilidades de cometer robo. Cuando los negros cometen delitos de violencia, son casi tres veces más probabilidades que sea contra otros negros.

Los delincuentes  negros tienen más posibilidad de usar un arma y más de dos veces más probabilidades de usar un cuchillo

,De los casi 770.000 crímenes violentos  cometiedos el año que termina , los negros cometieron el 85 por ciento y los blancos cometen el 15 por ciento.

Ahora contrario a épocas anteriores que era  lo opuesto, los negros tienen 2.25 veces más probabilidad de comete los designados oficialmente crímenes de odio contra los blancos que viceversa.

Estos números oficiales lo que enseñan es que elegir un presidente negro, no sólo no han  arreglado las diferencias raciales pero las han aumentado.

Pero cuando se le pregunta a un negro, aunque el negro sea una persona educada y decente, que debieran sentirse preocupados por la situación, siempre contesta que la situación de los negros ahora es mejor. 

Lo mismo nos dicen los números de comunicación, no importa lo que digan las estadísticas.

Los negros ahora están más dependientes del estado paternalista que nunca, no han aumentado su autoestima, pero la han disminuido.

Si se niega lo que es evidente en la sociedad, no es de extrañar que el primer presidente negro sea de teflón.




Samitier: Turquía, ayer fue ATACADA por los BANQUEROS TERRORISTAS…


INCREÍBLE La Excusa Usada Para Devaluar La Moneda Turca

La Excusa Es Que Han Arrestados A Una Serie De Políticos Corruptos… Los Banqueros De Wall Street Se Pasan La Vida Diciendo Que Hay Que Ser Honestos… Cuando Comienzan A Ser Honrados Meten En La cárcel A Los Politiqueros Ladrones Les Devalúan La Moneda Para Crearles Una Crisis Económica…

Lo Peor Que Tiene Esto Es Que En Estados Unidos… Los Grandes Ladrones Ni Siguiera Son Investigados… A Los Que Cogen Son A Los “Políticos” De Los Municipios Mas Chiquitos… Como Sweetwater…

Turkey’s Lira Weakens to Record as Erdogan Fights Graft Probe. Debe ser al contrario! Si el gobierno es más limpio y honesto, la moneda debe de aumentar en valor!! Esto, es una lección para todo país en desarrollo! No se puede confiar en los banqueros!!



Samitier: Los Banqueros de Wall Street No Son Ni Honrados Y mucho menos patriotas

Todo Ha Sido Un Cuento… La Solución Es Volver Al Pasado… El Trabajo Es Lo Que Nos Hace Libres…  

Antes de la Globalización, cada país manejaba su propia moneda.

Los terroristas Bancarios, amenazaron a todos los países del mundo

de entrar al sistema mundial o sino, se quedarían detrás, de la economía mundial.  

Como CONDICIÓN DE ENTRADA, obligaron a estos países a flotar sus monedas,

en el mercado “libre”:

Mentira!  Todo era mentira! Primero, el Mercado de divisas no es libre!

Es trucado!  

Segundo, China, El País Que Mas Rápido Crecimiento Tiene,

Controla El Valor De Su Moneda!! Y los banqueros no se Meten con ellos…  

Ahora, son los terroristas banqueros que controlan las monedas nacionales de todos los países en la lista “libre” que les pongo más abajo…  

Compran Y Venden 4,500 Millones De $ En Monedas Diariamente.

Manipulan su valor artificialmente, ganando un %  sin hacer nada!!!  

Ahora, tienen el poder para empobrecer cualquier país en solo unos días de ventas.

Fíjense, la lista que estos terroristas bancarios han preparado y esta LISTA PARA


Primero en la lista es Turquía! Y  le devaluaron la moneda por meter en la cárcel

A los POLÍTICOS LADRONES… Cuando debían de ser al contrario…

OJO A ELLOS no les importa que Turquía sea Aliado de la OTAN y vecino de Siria.

Ambos países puntos claves, para poder fabricar el gasoducto de Arabia Saudí a Europa.

Cuanto le pagaron a los políticos turcos, para traicionar a su Pueblo???  


Los políticos colombianos, se han olvidado de patriotismo monetario o fueron comprados??? Es una Traición Preparada Clarísima!!!  

Cuando vean la devaluación, no digan que no fueron avisados y les cogió de sorpresa! Está preparada ya!! Por los terroristas Bancarios de Wall Street!!!   




Amenper:  Obama and the Redneck Tenors


December 18, 2013|11:32 am

President Obama is packing his bags for a 17-day, taxpayer-funded Christmas vacation to Hawaii, The Washington Times reported. The vacation begins on Friday, December 20.

The first family will reportedly be shacking up at a palatial oceanfront home that rents for $24,500 a week. When you toss in the shaved ice, greens fees, and gas for Air Force One, the American taxpayers could be on the hook for one mighty expensive Hawaiian holiday.

The Hawaii Reporter ran the numbers on last year’s trip and found that it cost taxpayers more than $4 million. That’s some pricy poi.

And while the first family enjoys pampering in paradise, it’ll be anything but a vacation for folks who live close by, according to Hawaii News Now. Residents will be subjected to roadblocks and security checks. A popular canal will be closed and patrolled by Navy Seals and military blockades have reportedly been erected on the beach.

“One time they stopped me – they opened up my gas cap to look into the lawn mower,” resident Norman Asing told the newspaper.

And as much as the locals enjoy the attention, some say the inconvenience has worn thin.

Follow us Get CP eNewsletter ››

“I understand he’s the president and so he needs his security, but I’d like for him to pick next year another spot,” one resident told the newspaper. ‘At first it was exciting, but now it’s no longer exciting. It’s maddening.”

I still don’t understand why the president can’t let his hair down somewhere within the continental United States. Why not Branson, Missouri or Pigeon Forge, Tenn.?

Branson’s annual festival of lights is breathtaking and the “3 Redneck Tenors” are a holiday hoot! And who doesn’t love Dollywood at Christmas? As Amy Grant once sang, there’s nothing quite like a tender Tennessee Christmas (not to mention the pancakes at Cracker Barrel).

But those closest to the president argue that an above-average president can’t vacation like an average American.

The editor of Newsweek once declared that President Obama is “sort of God” and MSNBC’s Chris Matthews was nearly brought to tears when he was granted an audience with The One.

“He came to us today,” Matthews declared. “He came amongst us.”

Robert Gibbs, the president’s former press secretary told The Washington Post that Hawaii is where he goes to recharge “both physically and emotionally.”

“The schedule is one that’s relaxing,” he said. “The climate is warm like he likes it. It’s the perfect elixir for having had a long and busy year in national politics.”

Gibbs does have a point. The president has had such a grueling life in the nation’s capitol – with a countless stream of parties to attend, weekend golf outings and basketball games, and lavish trips on Air Force One. And lest we forget, President Obama has been forced to live in the squalor of public housing – where his every need is attended to by butlers and maids and chefs and gardeners.

Oh, how I pity the president. Indeed, he is truly worthy of a vacation fit for a king.

I’m surprised the White House Travel Office hasn’t used the Priceline Negotiator. Utilizing William Shatner’s services is a sure-fire way to save the taxpayers a few dollars.

I was able to get online and found President Obama some great accommodations at the Best Western Hotel in Honolulu.

“Maid service was great, staff was friendly, the room most importantly was very clean and adequate,” wrote one guest.

For just $90 a night, the first family could get free Wi-Fi, a continental breakfast, an in-room safe to store the nuclear launch codes plus a rollaway bed for Valerie Jarrett.

Oh well. As they say in the islands, Mele Kalikimaka, America



Samitier: El motivo por el cual el comunismo no funciona— LEERLO ES MUY ÚTIL——–

Recibí este mensaje… el cual está muy bueno… pero no es más que una REITERACIÓN de el refrán muy corto y sabio “El Ojos Del Amo Engorda El Caballo”  que en 6 palabras RESUME  todo un experimento que costo miles de dólares…


El deterioro de toda Cuba se debe a la FALTA DEL DUEÑO DEL CABALLO… que controle y vigile las propiedades…


Ahora si leen el experimento espero que me den la razón…



En 1969, en la Universidad de Stanford (EEUU), el Prof. Phillip Zimbardo realizó un experimento de psicología social. Dejó 2 autos abandonados en la calle. Eran 2 autos idénticos: la misma marca, modelo y hasta igual color.  Uno lo dejó en el Bronx, por entonces una zona pobre y conflictiva de Nueva York y el otro en Palo Alto, una zona rica y tranquila de California. Dos autos idénticos abandonados en dos barrios con poblaciones muy diferentes y con un equipo de especialistas en psicología social estudiando las conductas de la gente en cada uno de estos sitios.

Resultó que el auto abandonado en el Bronx comenzó a ser “canibalizado”. En pocas horas perdió las llantas, el motor, los espejos, la radio, etc. Todo lo aprovechable se lo llevaron, y lo que no, lo destruyeron. En cambio el auto abandonado en Palo Alto se mantuvo intacto…

Es muy común atribuir a la pobreza las causas del delito. Es esta atribución en la que coinciden las posiciones ideológicas más conservadoras (las de derecha y de izquierda).  Sin embargo, el experimento en cuestión no finalizó ahí. Cuando el auto abandonado en el Bronx ya estaba deshecho y el de Palo Alto ya llevaba una semana impecable, los investigadores rompieron un vidrio del automóvil de Palo Alto…

El resultado fue que se desató el mismo proceso que en el Bronx y el robo, la violencia y el vandalismo redujeron el vehículo al mismo estado en que quedó el del barrio pobre.  ¿Por qué el vidrio roto en el auto abandonado en un vecindario  supuestamente seguro era capaz de generar todo un proceso delictivo?

Aquí no se trataba de pobreza.  Evidentemente, era algo que tenía que ver con la psicología humana y con las relaciones sociales.

Un vidrio roto en un auto abandonado transmite una idea de deterioro, de desinterés, de despreocupación que va rompiendo códigos de convivencia, como de ausencia de ley, de normas, de reglas, como que vale todo. Cada nuevo ataque que sufría el auto sin que alguien se preocupara del mismo, reafirmaba y multiplicaba esa idea, hasta que la escalada de actos, cada vez peores, se
Volvía incontenible, desembocando en una violencia irracional.

En experimentos posteriores, los profesores James Q. Wilson y George Kelling desarrollaron la “Teoría de las Ventanas Rotas”, la misma que desde un punto de vista criminológico, concluye que el delito es mayor en las zonas donde el descuido, la suciedad, el desorden y el maltrato son mayores.

Si se rompe el vidrio de una ventana en un edificio y nadie lo repara, pronto estarán rotos todos los demás vidrios del edificio. Si una comunidad exhibe signos de deterioro y esto no parece importarle a nadie, entonces allí se generará el delito.

Si se cometen “pequeñas faltas” (estacionarse en un lugar prohibido, exceder el límite de velocidad o pasarse una luz roja) y las mismas no son sancionadas, entonces comenzarán faltas mayores y luego, delitos cada vez más graves. Si se permiten actitudes violentas como algo normal en el desarrollo de los niños, el patrón de desarrollo será de cada vez mayor violencia y cuando estos niños sean adultos; ya que de niños “aprendieron” que esa actitud era “normal” y/o “correcta”; entonces actuarán de manera delictiva, pero teniendo la certeza de que esos actos NO SON ILEGALES.

Si los parques y otros espacios públicos deteriorados son progresivamente abandonados por la mayoría de la gente (que, muchas veces, deja de salir de sus casas por temor a las pandillas), esos mismos espacios abandonados por la gente son progresivamente ocupados por los delincuentes.

La Teoría de las Ventanas Rotas fue aplicada por primera vez a mediados de la década de los ´80 en el Metro de Nueva York, el cual se había convertido en el punto más peligroso de la  ciudad. 

Se comenzó por combatir las pequeñas transgresiones: graffitis que deterioraban el lugar, suciedad en las estaciones, ebriedad entre el público, evasiones del pago del pasaje, pequeños robos y desórdenes. 

Los resultados fueron evidentes. Comenzando por lo pequeño se logró hacer del Metro un lugar seguro… Es decir, si se combate un delito pequeño se evita el desarrollo de un delito mayor…

Posteriormente, en 1994, Rudolph Giuliani, alcalde de Nueva York, basado en la Teoría de las Ventanas Rotas y en la experiencia del Metro, impulsó una política de “‘tolerancia cero”. Es decir, combatir a fondo aún los delitos considerados menores…

La estrategia consistía en crear comunidades limpias y ordenadas, no permitiendo transgresiones a la ley y a las normas de convivencia urbana.

El resultado práctico fue un enorme abatimiento de TODOS los índices criminales de la ciudad de Nueva York.

La expresión “tolerancia cero” suena a una especie de solución autoritaria y represiva, pero su concepto principal es más bien el de la prevención y promoción de condiciones sociales de seguridad. No se trata de linchar al delincuente, ni de  incentivar la prepotencia de la policía, de hecho, respecto de los abusos de autoridad debe también aplicarse la “tolerancia cero”.

De lo que se trata NO es aplicar “tolerancia cero” frente a la persona que comete el delito, sino aplicar “tolerancia cero” frente al delito mismo. Se trata de crear comunidades limpias, ordenadas, respetuosas de la ley y de RESPETAR los códigos básicos de la convivencia social humana.

Frente a la cantidad de mentiras y mediocres explicaciones dadas por algunos de nuestros dirigentes sobre este tema, es bueno volver a leer esta Teoría y de paso, difundirla para llegar a los educandos ….






Duck Dynasty: A&E Commits an Act of Symbolic Bestiality

Written by Gary North on December 21, 2013


What A&E has done was best described by astronaut Gus Grissom half a century ago, as recorded for posterity in The Right Stuff. It has committed a deviant act: symbolic bestiality. A&E has screwed the pooch.

A&E has just lost a franchise that generates almost half a billion dollars a year in product sales.

Can you spell “dumb”? The only hope is that buyers do not figure out that they are making money for A&E.

Let’s see if Walmart follows A&E’s lead.

The Robertsons can cut a deal with Walmart or Target 12 months after the last Duck Dynasty show airs in a few months, if the family decides to start a new show. A&E will then get leftovers.

We see here a failure to honor a familiar principle: count the cost. Choose your tactics accordingly. Do not overplay your hand. The great master of this was the Leftist organizer, Saul Alinsky. He assessed his strength. He assessed his opponents’ strength. Then he adopted a plan of action. He understood what it takes for a tiny minority to gain leverage. In Rules for Radicals (1972), he wrote this:

We will start with the system because there is no other place to start from except political lunacy. It is most important for those of us who want revolutionary change to understand that revolution must be preceded by reformation. To assume that a political revolution can survive without a supporting base of popular reformation is to ask for the impossible in politics. Men don’t like to step abruptly out of the security of familiar experience; they need a bridge to cross from their own experience to a new way. A revolutionary organizer must shake up the prevailing patterns of their lives — agitate, create disenchantment and discontent with the current values, to produce, if not a passion for change, at least a passive, affirmative, non-challenging climate. “The revolution was effected before the war commenced; John Adams wrote. “The Revolution was in the hearts and minds of the people. . . . This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments and affections of the people was the real American Revolution.” A revolution without a prior reformation would collapse or become a totalitarian tyranny.

From day one, the people at A&E violated this tactical rule.


Phil Robertson is a curmudgeon’s curmudgeon. He is almost perfect. As the folks in Hollywood are said to say, it is as if he was sent by central casting.

If you have seen him on Duck Dynasty, you know that he is articulate. He has a peculiar way of speaking, which I noticed almost from the beginning. But his eloquence is unique. It is a strange eloquence. He grabs your attention, not simply because of what he says, but because of the way that he says it. It is no-frills speech. He does not waste a word. And he chooses his words carefully.

There is no question that A&E had no idea that this program would become the dominant cable show in history. There is no way that anybody could have predicted that. Robertson himself did not think it would work. But it did.

The producers of the show initially did their best to suppress its Christian overtones. As Robertson said before the recent flap, by removing references to Jesus whenever possible, the producers tried to make the family something it wasn’t. The editors bleeped out words, as if the men were using profanity. The story is here, posted in April 2013.




Samitier: INCREÍBLE…Los Amigos de Obama No Pagan Taxes…


La Verdad Es Que Ya Nada Nos ASOMBRA… Todo Comenzó Mal… Desde Que Obama Nombró Ministro A Timothy Geithner  Quien No Pagó Sus TAXES Por 7 Años… Y Para Colmo Fue Aprobado Por Todos Los Senadores Republicanos…  

Ahora Se descubre que 1,168 Suministradores Del IRS Deben $525 Millones En Impuestos… Mientras los “AMIGOS y CONOCIDOS” del IRS No Pagan… El IRS castiga al Tea Party, y la Prensa, se mantiene callada, por miedo al IRS! Esto en todas partes SE  LLAMA TERRORISMO DE ESTADO!

He aqui la noticia: Altogether, 1,168 IRS vendors owed back taxes totaling $589 million as of July 2012, according to the report released Tuesday. Only 50 were in a payment plan to pay off their debt.
Read more: IRS Vendor Owed $525 Million in Back Taxes |



Samitier: todos sabemos que Hay ALGO que no funciona…

Un Análisis Del Obama Care Y Porque No Va A Funcionar

En El Gobierno Lo Único Que Funciona Bien… Es En Poner Multa Y Mandar A La Calle A Cientos De Bien Pagados Inspectores A Hacer Más Costosa La Operación O Cerrar

Los Negocios Privados…  los letreros más vistos en Todas las ciudades de Estados Unidos es: “FOR LEASE”  

Todo Eso Es Un Plan Bien Concebido  Por Los  “Comunistas Fabianos” La Mayoría De Ellos Primero Fueron Infiltrados… Pero Ya Hoy Controlan Totalmente El PARTIDO DEMÓCRATA Y Parte Del Republicano… Es Muy Fácil Probarlo… Con Solo Analizar los precios de los hospitales…  

Todos sabemos que una ASPIRINA en un hospital cuesta al MEDICARE Entre $100 y $125 dólares… ya eso es SUFICIENTE para saber que el Sistema esta TRUCADO… Pero ¿Como se LLEGÓ A ESTO???  

Eso requiere un análisis de cómo EVOLUCIONO EL SISTEMA MEDICO; Y para entenderlo es necesario una pequeña historia: 

No olvidemos que el primer socialista reconocido por todos que llegó a presidente;

fue Woodrow Wilson 1913 a 1921 y era un partidario de la Rusia Soviética y salvador

del comunismo cuando suspendió la ayuda al EJERCITO ROJO… pero eso es otra

historia… Después llegó a presidente Franklin DELANO Roosevelt… el nieto del

Traficante de Opio más grande de Hong Kong que tenía como Vice a WALLACE…

Reconocido Comunista que más tarde fue candidato oficial a presidente por el PARTIDO COMUNISTA de los Estados Unidos…    

La primera TRAICIÓN de Roosevelt fue en Cuba cuando financió la caída

De Machado y el triunfo de la PRIMERA SUBLEVACIÓN DE SOLDADOS

CONTRA OFICIALES que triunfo en el mundo… dándole $1,000,000.00 a

Batista para pagar el ejercito… lo que puso al “OBEDIENTE BATISTA”

Como MANDAMÁS quien SIGUIÓ OBEDECIENDO inclusive cuando desde

Washington le llego la orden de abandonar a Cuba… Lo cual es aceptado

Por todos y nadie discute…


Los Comunistas FABIANOS siguieron PROGRESIVAMENTE aprobando leyes

Socialistas… así el socialista demócrata que llegó a la presidencia gracias

al asesinato de Kennedy Lyndon Jonhson fue el que dio el primer paso para

SOCIALIZAR LA  MEDICINA… creando el MEDICARE, que en realidad fue un

AYUDA ECONÓMICA para los hospitales al permitirles cobrar lo que les diera

La gana… así cada ASPIRINA LLEGÓ A COSTAR HASTA $125.00 también fue

EL COMIENZO DE LA MEDICINA SOCIALISTA para los médicos… que en el

Léxico oficial pasaron a ser PROVEEDORES DE CUIDADOS MÉDICOS.


Después surgió el CUBANO RECAREY quien con la experiencia de las clínicas de

Cuba termino de acabar con la medicina privada, poniendo a todos, en un “Plan”

donde la medicina es centralizada y entregada de acuerdo al plan. Plan que fue

INMEDIATAMENTE APROBADO por los políticos socialistas pues se ajustaba a

sus planes… y además Recarey supo rodearse de políticos socialistas importantes

como Jef Bush…  Más tarde como RECAREY no era “CONFIABLE” o por otras cosas

no les convenía… lo persiguieron, LE INTERVINIERON SUS CLÍNICAS y se tuvo que

marchar a otro EXILIO… con su nombre mancillado… pero para que se fuera sin

problemas económicos… el IRS SE EQUIVOCO y le hizo 4 días antes de su “HUIDA”


Una operación cualquiera de corazón cuesta al MEDICARE $100 mil, quizás mas

Pero esa misma operación en la India o en Turquía, cuesta menos de $10 mil

y los cirujanos fueron entrenados en USA… y usan los mismos equipos…

Como verán, es parte del plan, secreto para llevarnos a la medicina socializada.

Nadie Puede Pagar 100 Mil Dólares… Pero Casi Todos Podrían Pagar 10 Mil.

En un mercado libre, los precios bajan al nivel necesario… para poder

Vender… En un mercado TRUCADO, en que el gobierno paga los precios


Como el pueblo NO PUEDE PAGAR… pide a gritos que pague el

Gobierno… lo que beneficia a los SOCIALISTAS… y sus propósitos

Por todo lo anterior; ya formamos parte del sistema médico-socialista.

Obama Care lo que hace es APRETAR MAS LA TUERCA de la esclavitud

Ahora Puedes cambiar de HMO o de SEGURO, pero no puedes cambiar

el sistema!

No Somos Libres!! 



Samitier: Ricardo Nieves, posible cubano se niega a prueba voluntaria..


¿Sera Cubano Ricardo Nieves? El Ciudadano En Pennsylvania Que Logró Que Se Descubriera Otra arbitrariedad De Las Autoridades Tratando De Conseguir

Pruebas de ADN… Defendió Sus Derechos constitucionales No Quiso Someterse A Una  rueba “Voluntaria”: Pero Respaldad Por la Presencia De La Policía Aquí la noticia…




Most Colorado Sheriffs Refuse to Enforce Gun Control Law

Written by Gary North on December 17, 2013


There are 62 sheriffs in Colorado, and 55 of them are challenging the law in a court case. Most are unwilling to enforce the state’s anti-gun laws. They refuse to arrest known violators, or else they let them loose. The voters in rural counties prefer it this way.

One of them publicly carries a pair of banned 30-round magazines for rifles, called assault rifles by the media.

The state government is taking a hands-off position. “We’re not in the position of telling sheriffs and chiefs what to do or not to do,” said Lance Clem, a spokesman for the Colorado Department of Public Safety. “We have people calling us all the time, thinking they’ve got an issue with their sheriff, and we tell them we don’t have the authority to intervene.”

The New York Times adds this: “Sheriffs who refuse to enforce gun laws around the country are in the minority, though no statistics exist.” Let me translate: “We’re liberal. We like gun control laws, so we have decided to announce that anti-gun control sheriffs are in the minority. We will hold to this story until statistics exist to the contrary. We may decide to hold to it even after statistics to the contrary are available. It’s our call. It’s our newspaper. We get to do what we want.”




Amenper: Manhattan


Me encuentro en New York, celebrando unas pascuas anticipadas con la familia de mi hijo mayor que se encuentra diseminada por todo el país. ya los nietos ya tienen compromisos con sus nuevas parejas  y decidimos reunirnos en la gran manzana en una celebración de nochebuena adelantada en el Victor Café, para que puedan después cada uno cumplir sus obligaciones para con sus nueva relaciones familiares.


El espíritu pascual en Manhattan, a mi parecer es único en el mundo , y durante mis visitas esporádicas he visto las diferentes etapas porque ha vivido. 

Como de la capital del mundo, se convirtió en una ciudad de vagabundos con Manhattan como un lugar donde uno no se sentía seguro  en ninguna parte.

Pero llegó Guliani, y  New York pasó de la inseguridad a la serenidad.

Cuando pensamos  en un tema de actualidad es y pensamos en la inseguridad. Al buscar un nombre que sea sinónimo de seguridad el que viene a la mente es el de Rudolph Giuliani.

Ayer estábamos en el parque Bryant, tarde en la noche, un lugar de paz y tranquilidad, los jóvenes patinando las familias paseando.

Es difícil pensar que hace unos años no se podía estar en ese lugar porque era la residencia de vagabundos y suciedad, los mismo se puede decir del Parque Central..

-Siempre hay una relación entre política y seguridad, porque la seguridad en gran medida está provista por el Estado. Y como es lógico hay la diferencia entre conservadores y liberales.

Cuando Guliani estableció lo que llamaron “tolerancia cero” los liberales lo calificaron de fascismo.

Guliane llamó a su programa no como tolerancia cero, pero como un programa de la renovación de la Calidad de Vida.  

Pero tuvo mucha oposición de  la Prensa Liberal con el New York times a la cabeza.

Tuvo resistencia de los sectores de los barrios que consideraban que era una invasión excesiva, no de la privacidad de la gente, sino de su derecho a movilizarse y a estar libre de interferencia policial.

El programa para los desamparados también tuvo detractores políticos, porque hay todo un grupo en la ciudad que consideraba que  la gente tiene derecho a vivir en la calle.

La Constitución no dice en ningún lugar que haya un derecho a vivir en la calle pero decían que Guliani estaba violando la Constitución.

Como puede ser mejor para una ciudad estar como estaba New York llena de vagabundos.

Esto crea peligro, crea condiciones antihigiénicas, puede ser un peligro para la salud, tanto de la persona que vive en la calle como para otras personas. Y el Estado tiene que tener un rol y un derecho cuanto a evitar eso.

Los liberales se ponen  tan locamente ideológicos que no piensan con claridad.

Incluso la gente que es muy liberal, si lo pensaran seriamente, llega a la conclusión de que la seguridad es lo primero. No tendrían la posibilidad de ser liberales si no estuvieran vivos. Con un asesino, no se puede ser ni liberal ni progresista.

Pero Guliani y su programa está ahora aceptado por todo al que uno pregunte como lo que salvó a New York.

Fue posible por la tenacidad de Guliani frente a la oposición liberal.

Por eso hoy me pregunto intrigando con la conducta de New York, ¿Cómo con esta experiencia hayan escogido a un Alcalde declaradamente comunista?.-




Amenper: This article of Robert Grady in today´s Journal explains Obama’s new issue of inequality from the free enterprise point of view. 

The only thing I may differ with Mr. Grady is that this is not a new Obama’s obsession, so it is not misguided.

Obama’s  political philosophy is Marxist, the so called “equality” is a principle of marxism. 

One day in the future, like it happened with Fidel Castro, we will listen from his own words to declare “I am, and I have always been, Marxist Leninist”. 

Like he waited until the second term to present this socialist issue, he is waiting for the right moment to declare his true philosophy.

What he is presenting to the country now, during his second term, is what he always have believed and what he wants for this country,

“The Socialist United States of America”

Obama’s Misguided Obsession With Inequality

He uses statistics that ignore taxes and transfer payments. Faster growth is what the poor really need.

By Robert E. Grady

Dec. 22, 2013 6:07 p.m. ET

In his widely noted speech, President Obama said that “a dangerous and growing inequality and lack of upward mobility” is “the defining challenge of our time.” This belief makes Mr. Obama unique: Unlike the other presidents since World War II, he places inequality above economic growth as the organizing principle of U.S. economic policy. The president’s Dec. 4 speech, at an event hosted by the Center for American Progress, also stressed that increasing inequality is a “decades-long trend”—which carries with it the strong implication that the country needs to reverse the direction it has taken for the last three decades. But like so many of his other pronouncements, the assumptions behind his defining challenge are misleading.

Virtually all of the data cited by the left to decry the supposed explosion of income inequality, as Lee Ohanian and Kip Hagopian point out in their seminal paper, “The Mismeasure of Inequality” (Policy Review, 2011), use a Census Bureau definition of “money income” that excludes taxes, transfer payments like Medicaid, Medicare, nutrition assistance, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and even costly employee benefits such as health insurance.

Thus the data that is conventionally used to calculate the so-called Gini coefficient—the most commonly used measure of income inequality—ignore America’s highly progressive income tax system and the panoply of benefits and transfer payments. According to Messrs. Ohanian and Hagopian, once the effect of taxes and transfer payments is taken into account, “inequality actually declined 1.8% during the 16-year period between 1993 and 2009, when the Gini coefficient dropped from .395 to .388.”

In his speech, Mr. Obama cited a recent study from economists at Columbia University that found that already enacted benefits and tax programs have reduced America’s effective poverty rate by 40% since 1967—to 16% from 26%. But he ignores all this when he claims that inequality is increasing.

The Columbia study shows that Messrs. Ohanian and Hagopian’s research is hardly an outlier. The Congressional Budget Office released a study that came to a similar conclusion in October 2011. The CBO study picked an artificial starting point of 1979, amid a crushing period of stagflation. Yet it still showed that family income, including benefits, on average experienced a 62% gain above inflation from 1979 to 2007. It also showed that all five quintiles of the income distribution spectrum experienced real gains in family income.

The CBO study contradicts Mr. Obama’s claims in the 2008 presidential campaign and early in his first term that the middle class was “falling behind.” The real concern is that some people were getting too far ahead.

With respect to upward mobility, longitudinal studies conducted by the U.S. Treasury have found that there was “considerable income mobility” in the decades 1987-1996 and 1996-2005. For example, roughly half of those in the bottom income quintile in 1996 had moved to a higher quintile by 2005. The “median incomes of those initially in the lowest income groups increased more in percentage terms than the median incomes of those in the higher income groups” in that decade, while the real incomes of two-thirds of all taxpayers experienced an increase.

Here is the bottom line: In periods of high economic growth, such as the 1980s and 1990s, the vast majority of Americans gain, and have the opportunity to gain. In periods of slow growth, such as the past four and a half years since the recession officially ended, poor people and the middle class are hurt the most, and opportunity is curbed.

Consider the Census Bureau data, which measure only money income. The data show that median family income adjusted for inflation has not been on a steady or stagnating path since the 1970s. It fell, in real terms, by 5.7% from 1974-1982, when slow growth and high inflation ravaged the average family. Tellingly, in this period, real income fell for the bottom four quintiles, but held steady for the top 20%.

From 1983 to 2007, however, median family income grew substantially—by 21.6% above inflation—and real income grew for all five quintiles. Then, beginning in 2008, real income plunged again, both for the median family and for all quintiles.

The point is this: If the goal is to deliver higher incomes and a better standard of living for the majority of Americans, then generating economic growth—not income inequality or the redistribution of wealth—is the defining challenge of our time.

Regarding growth, Mr. Obama claimed in his speech that we should use some money “to create good jobs rebuilding our roads and our bridges and our airports, and all the infrastructure our businesses need.” Yet a recent analysis by BCA Research shows a sharp drop in real spending by the government on nondefense infrastructure since the president took office. When a Democratic Congress passed the president’s massive $800 billion stimulus bill, seven-eighths of the total went to transfer payments like Medicaid, food stamps and sending a check to millions of Americans who do not pay income taxes.

The president claims to be concerned about spurring private investment. But investors at home and abroad can readily see that his steadfast refusal to reform the country’s entitlement programs threatens spending on physical infrastructure, education, university research and other items that will contribute to the future productivity of the United States. That same unrestrained entitlement growth, and the debt that comes with it, will ultimately compromise the value of dollar-denominated assets. Public companies have trillions of dollars of cash to invest sitting on their balance sheets, but the Obama economy’s growth record is weak, and insufficient to attract capital investment.

Straining credulity, Mr. Obama also pointed in his income inequality speech to the Affordable Care Act as one of his initiatives to improve the economy, despite clear evidence that the law’s employer mandate is discouraging full-time employment. For most of this year, the overwhelming majority of jobs added to the U.S. economy have been part-time, not full-time. Gallup’s payroll-to-population ratio, the proportion of the American population working full time, has dropped almost two full percentage points in the last year, to 43.8%.

Mr. Obama said in his speech that “making sure our economy works for every working American” is what “drives everything I do in this office.” Accomplishing this worthy goal requires growth, not redistribution.

Mr. Grady, a managing director at the private-equity firm Cheyenne Capital Fund





Samitier: RESUMEN de los actos de TERRORISMO de los musulmanes en estados Unidos Miguel Uría send confidential report

A Year of Jihad in America: 2011 Chistofer Colton,

 There is mounting evidence that the global Jihadist insurgency is fully entrenched in the USA.

Note that it makes little difference if the perpetrators are members of a previously known terrorist organization (such as Al Qaeda or Hezbollah) or are lone actors. Actually, it DOES make a difference. It is difficult to combat a shadowy organization like Al Qaeda, but it is far more difficult to combat lone wolf actors. Al Qaeda may be difficult to infiltrate and gather intelligence on, but how do we “infiltrate” a lone Jihadist?

This is symptomatic of a revolutionary Jihadist subculture metastasizing within the American Muslim community, especially within some of its mosques and organizations. This revolutionary subculture has produced an atmosphere in which Jihadis are inspired to act violently on their own, as well as part of organizations.

This is a very dangerous and volatile situation.

Over the last 12 months alone, we have been provided with a stack of evidence of the Jihadist insurgency inside America. Americans have largely ignored this evidence, or at least failed to “connect the dots.” Seemingly completely unrelated cases do in fact have common threads: they are acts of Jihad. And these are not in actuality isolated incidents, but rather are linked by a common ideology that animates and motivates Jihadis everywhere….it’s only some that respond with actual, overt violent action, but many others are inspired to support passively, with words only, or financially. This is a global movement with a unified core ideology and doctrine rooted in Islam.

It is not difficult to go back and research examples of Jihad in America over the course of a calendar year, such as 2011. What follows is a list of incidents, cases, actions, statements and plots which point to a Jihadist insurgency in our midst: (Keep in mind that insurgencies are 80% civilizational/political and 20% violent/militant.):


Embassy Bomber Sentenced to Life in Prison

Charlotte, North Carolina Hezbollah Financier Has Prison Sentence
Reduced By Federal Judge
Florida Professor And Mosque Leader Pleads Guilty To Tallahassee Attacks


Muslim-American Sentenced to Life in Prison for JFK Bomb Plot

Virginia Man Sentenced to 25 Years in Prison for Providing Material Support and Encouraging Violent Jihadists to Kill U.S. Citizens

Saudi Student in Texas Arrested on Charge of Attempted Use of Weapon of Mass Destruction

Former southern New Jersey resident to be tried for funding Hezbollah

MARCH 2011

Two New Jersey Men Plead Guilty to Trying to Join Al Qaeda Group

Colorado Woman Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy to Provide Material Support to Terrorists

Bridges TV Co-Founder, Muzammil Hassan, Receives Maximum Sentence For Beheading Of Wife

APRIL 2011

Virginia Man Sentenced to 23 Years in Prison for Plotting Attacks on D.C.-Area Metro Stations with People He Believed to Be Al Qaeda Members

MAY 2011

 Two Muslims arrested in NY synagogue bomb plot

 Six Muslims, Including Two Imams, Charged in Miami for Providing Material Support to the Pakistani Taliban

 Court Filing Alleges “Clear And Convincing ” Evidence Of Iran’s ”Direct Involvement” In 9/11 Attack

 JUNE 2011

 Two Iraqi Nationals Indicted on Federal Terrorism Charges in Kentucky

 Iranian Defector Reza Kahlili – Iran Runs “Large Network” Through U.S. Mosques And Islamic Organizations

 Muslim Man Charged With Shooting at Military Buildings in Northern Virginia

 Two Muslim Men Charged in Plot to Attack Seattle Military Processing Center

 3 Muslims convicted in plot to bomb NY synagogues, shoot down military planes sentenced to 25 years

 Ohio Woman Sentenced to Just 3 Years in Plot to Fund Hezbollah>

JULY 2011
 Obama Administration Moves To Release Convicted Al-Qaeda Financier Aldurahman M. Alamoudi From Prison

 Muslim Soldier Arrested In New Plot To Attack Ft. Hood


 4 Narco-Terrorists Indicted for Attempting to Fund the Taliban and Hezbollah

 Muslims Riot At Playland Amusement Park, NY – 15 Arrested


 U.S. Citizen Rezwan Ferdaus Arrested In Plot to Attack Capitol, Pentagon

 Insurance Giant Lloyd’s Sues Saudi Arabia for $215M Over 9/11 Claims; World’s 4th and 15th Largest Shariah Banks Named in Suit’s-sues-saudi-arabia-for-215m-over-911-claims-worlds-4th-and-15th-largest-shariah-banks-named-in-suit/

 3 Boston Islamic charity leaders convicted for support of jihad


Plot By Iranian American To Assassinate Saudi Ambassador Foiled By Feds

Kent State Professor Shouts “Death to Israel” at Israeli Bedouin’s Speech

Two Minnesota Women Convicted of Providing Material Support to al Shabaab


 Muslim Convert Muhammad Yusuf [aka Jose Pimentel] Arrested In Al-Qaeda Terror Plot

 Missouri man pleads guilty to attempting to finance Al Shabaab

 Man Convicted in US of drug-running for Al Qaeda

 Texas man caught on boat bound for Middle East stands trial for trying to smuggle money, GPS receivers and Army manuals to Al Qaeda


 Study Shows U.S. Mosques Are Repositories Of Muslim Brotherhood Literature And Preachers

 Georgia Muslim Woman Killed in Attack on Police Officer, Had Sent Threats to Congressman

 Christmas Day Massacre in Texas Was Islamic Honor Killing Carried Out By Muslim Dressed as Santa Claus

 DEA News: Civil Suit Exposes Lebanese Money Laundering Scheme For Hizballah



Samitier: The Cuba Embargo: A USA Foreign Policy Success Story…

In fact, few U.S. foreign policy measures in recent history have been as phenomenally successful as our limited sanctions against the Stalinist Robber-Barons who run Cuba. First off, for three decades the Soviet Union was forced to pump the equivalent of almost ten Marshall Plans into Cuba. This cannot have helped the Soviet Union’s precarious solvency or lengthened her life span. Secondly, the U.S. taxpayer has been spared the fleecing visited upon many others who reside in nations who eschew “embargoing” Cuba. To wit:

The U.S. has transacted almost $4 BILLION in trade with Cuba over the past decade. Up until two years ago, the U.S. served as Stalinist Cuba’s biggest food supplier and fifth biggest import partner. We’ve fallen a few notches recently, but we’re still in the top half. Nowadays the so-called U.S. embargo mostly stipulates that the Castro regimepay cash up front through a third–party bank for all U.S. medical and agricultural products; no Ex-Im (U.S. taxpayer) financing of such sales. Enacted by the Bush team in 2001 this cash-up-front policy has kept the U.S. taxpayer among the few spared fleecing by Castro. Here’s a few items regarding the so-called embargo studiously “side-stepped” by much of the MSM (especially those with Havana Bureaus):

Per-capita-wise, Cuba qualifies as the world’s biggest debtor nation with a foreign debt of close to $50 billion, a credit–rating nudging Somalia’s, and an uninterrupted record of defaults.

In 1986 Cuba defaulted on most of her foreign debt to Europe. Five years ago France’s version of the U.S. government’s Export-Import Bank (named COFACE) cut off Cuba’s credit line. Mexico’s Bancomex quickly followed suit. The Castro regime had stuck it to French taxpayers for $175 million and to Mexican taxpayers for $365 million. Bancomex was forced to impound Cuban assets in three different countries in an attempt to recoup its losses.

Just this week we heard from one of Castro’s latest suckers: “The Cuban regime has a long track record of failing to pay back our loans,” lamented South Africa’s Deputy Minister of Trade & Industry,Geordin Hill-Lewis. “In 2010, South Africa had to write off R1.1 billion in bad Cuban debt, and on Friday we wrote off another R250 million in bad debt. The time has come for South Africa to invest in strategic partnerships that deliver prosperity for our people.”

So U.S. taxpayers, if it’s true that “political pressure” by a “powerful” and sinister cabal of Cuban-American Republican string-pullers maintain the so-called embargo—then, well… you are quite welcome! Glad we could help… and SAVE MONEY TO THE USA citizens


Last week the media was flush with stories on the 50th Anniversary of the U.S. “embargo” of Cuba.

From the New York Times to USA Today, most are running AP and Reuters stories (from Havana) which begin and end with quotes from “academic experts” deploring the “embargo” as “failed,” “archaic,” “cruel,” “political pandering to Republican Cuban-Americans,” blah, blah…


First off, a totalitarian regime bestowed both Reuters and the AP with press bureaus. There was a day when Americans understood what this implied. For those who’ve forgotten, here’s a quote from Vicente Botin, who reported for Madrid’s El Pais from Cuba for years. “The Castro regime assigns 20 security agents to follow and monitor every foreign journalist. You practice self–censorship or you’re gone.”

And that’s lucky for those foreign journalists, because local Cuban journalists don’t get off so easily. They don’t get a discreet little note saying, “Dear foreign journalist, we need to talk. It appears that you have forgotten the code of conduct we so clearly stipulated upon your arrival in Cuba and the agreed-upon subject matters for your reporting. So let us remind you of these two: 1.) The diabolical Yankee blockade of our innocent little nation which makes us the world’s poster child for victims of wanton bullying. 2.) Our munificent and magnificent Health Care and Education, which makes us the world’s beacon of social-consciousness and charity.”

Cuban journalists who sidestep the above in order to expose human rights violation (by a regime that surpassed Stalin’s rate of political torture and jailings) can’t then tuck their tail between their legs, scamper onto a plane and zoom off. They can’t courageously grimace and shake their fists behind them after they’re 2000 feet aloft and 500 miles distant from Castro’s KGB-trained police.

Instead, a Cuban journalist who forsakes self-censorship gets grabbed by this KGB-trained police and thrown in a torture chamber. In fact, according to “Reporters Without Borders” (headquartered in Paris, not Miami), Cuba jails journalists at the highest rate of any nation on earth. Stunningly, the total number of journalists jailed in Cuba (a nation of 11 million) is only slightly behind that of China (a nation of 1.4 billion!).

With this data in mind, let’s revisit what some of America’s swankiest journalists and media moguls have to say regarding the world’s top jailer and torturer of journalists:

“Fidel Castro could have been Cuba’s Elvis!” That’s multiple-Peabody and Emmy award-winning Dan Rather (and yes, CBS has a Havana News Bureau).

“Fidel Castro is one hell of a guy!” Ted Turner gushed to a capacity crowd at Harvard Law School during a speech in 1997. “You people would like him! Most people in Cuba like him.” Within weeks of Turner’s eulogy, CNN was granted its coveted Havana Bureau, the first ever granted by Castro to a foreign network.

“Fidel Castro is old-fashioned, courtly — even paternal, a thoroughly fascinating figure!” That’s Andrea Mitchell, who won the Goldsmith Career Award for “Excellence in Journalism” (and yes, NBC somehow earned a Havana Bureau).

“Castro has brought very high literacy and great health-care to his country. His personal magnetism is powerful, his presence is commanding.” That’s multiple-Emmy-winning journalist Barbara Walters (and yes, ABC was somehow bestowed a Havana Bureau).
Back in 1996 Fidel Castro was hosted by media mogul Mort Zuckerman at his Fifth Avenue pad. The starting line-up of America’s reporters and pundits had also received the coveted invitations. This list of journalistic luminaries included Mike Wallace, Peter Jennings, Tina Brown, Bernard Shaw, Barbara Walters, and Diane Sawyer, who all stood in line for Castro’s autograph and jostled for a photo-op with the mass-murderer who had craved to nuke them.

But Diane Sawyer was so overcome in Castro’s presence that she lost control, rushing up, breaking into that toothy smile of hers, wrapping her arms around the Stalinist mass murderer and smooching him warmly on his bearded cheek.

“You people are the cream of the crop!” beamed the mass-murderer to the beaming throng he’d come within a hair of nuking in 1962.

“Hear, hear!” chirped the beaming guests, while tinkling their wine glasses in honor of the smirking agent of their near vaporization and world leader in jailing and torturing their Cuban counterparts.





Amenper:  The U.S. Police State



What’s your definition of a police state?
A bloated federal government that’s forever grasping after more power? We’ve got that.
State, local, and federal agencies that want a say in even the most mundane details of your life? Another check in the ‘yes’ column.
Armed police teams serving in every government agency, ready to carry out a forceful raid whenever they’re ordered to? Shockingly, this is also true.
My friend, it saddens me how much our nation has changed. Our government has quietly armed itself to the teeth and individual agencies are carrying out their own agendas through fear, intimidation, and the threat of violence.
We’re dangerously close to living in a de facto police state.

The incidents are piling up. In August 2013, a team of armed Environmental Protection Agency officers descended on the tiny town of Chicken, Alaska. In full body armor, the agents claimed to be responding to a possible violation of the Clean Water Act. Officers from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the NOAA also joined in the raid.
Also in August, federal agents from the Department of Homeland Security conducted a pre-dawn raid at the home of an investigative journalist. Their target? Documents she’d received legally through the Freedom of Information Act. The victim of this invasive raid believes she was targeted because she has raised some troubling questions about DHS in her writings.

In 2011, Gibson Guitar was the target of an armed federal raid. The cause was questions about whether or not imported wood for their guitars had been properly finished before being exported from India.
During the summer of 2013, armed Department of Natural Resources agents raided an animal shelter. The agency had been tipped off that the shelter was illegally housing an abandoned baby deer – obviously cause for a decisive show of force. The shelter was not licensed to care for wildlife, but had made arrangements to move the deer to a wildlife reserve. The raid happened one day before the move. The agents euthanized the deer rather than allow it to be moved to its new home.
Don’t even get me started on the raids of businesses carrying raw milk. Government agencies at both the state and federal level treat raw milk purveyors worse than drug dealers.
These agencies have been allowed to arm up, and it’s clear that they’re letting the power go to their heads.
Forty federal agencies employ teams of armed officers with arrest authority. It makes sense for the DEA and the FBI, but does the Fish and Wildlife Service really need more than 250 full-time armed officers? The National Institutes of Health also employ armed officers. Why? Your guess is as good as mine.
The Library of Congress… the Food and Drug Administration… the Internal Revenue Service… they all have their own armed officers.

If you count the offices of inspector general, the number of armed federal agencies is actually 73. That’s a lot of different bureaucrats authorized to use deadly force to advance their agendas.

The growing trend of armed officers employed by every federal agency is disturbing. It’s a sign of the shifting mindset of our government – from an entity that serves the people to one that wants to control them.
This newsletter is all about being ready for anything, but being ready for a federal raid… that’s one situation where an ounce of prevention really is worth a pound of cure.
You need to stay off the government radar as much as possible. For the average citizen, you are most likely to attract government attention through your finances, through zoning laws, or through your online behavior.
Financial: Keep a low financial profile by relying more on cash and less on credit cards. Avoid big cash withdrawals from your bank account whenever you can.
Zoning Laws: Before you build any new additions to your house or decide to install solar panels or add a rain catch to your home, drop by your local city hall, and ask about zoning regulations. No need to give your name. They should be able to provide the information you’re looking for based just on your zip code and your property type.

Online: Avoid unwanted attention online by thinking twice before you post anything to social media and by conducting your searches through a secure search engine like

It’s a shame to have to wonder if you’ll be the next target of some power-hungry government agency itching to put its armed officers to the test. But sadly, we have reached that point. Make sure you take steps to avoid becoming a target in the first place. In this case, avoidance is the best way to be ready for anything.

Yours in Self-Reliance,

Lee Bellinger, Publisher
Independent Living





Samitier: Estamos Viviendo En Un Estado Policial

La Paso Con Gusto… Pues Viene De Una Organización

De Ciudadanos NORTE-AMERICANOS Que Están Listos

Para Oponerse… No Estamos Solos Los Cubanos Exiliados

Que Identificamos A Obama y El Partido Demócrata Con

Solapados Comunistas…

Una de las cosas que más me revienta… de los jueces es que

PERMITEN Y JUZGAN…  a personas que los policías los han

Acusado de “RESISTIR EL ARRESTO sin VIOLENCIA” por solo

Preguntar cuál es el motivo del arresto…


Bueno aquí tienen la información… que está basada en que

OBAMA por primera vez le ha dado armas a los miembros

Del IRS…





Betty: obamacare???


“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD GOD WE TRUST  


One thought on “No 551 “En mi opinion” Dic. 23 2013

  1. Pet rescue saga hack

    We are a flock a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our
    community. Your website provided us with valuable information and work
    on . You a formidable activity and our whole neighborhood will
    thankful to you .
    Undeniably Account which you stated . Your favorite reason appeared to be on the net easy thing to be aware of .
    I tell you , i certainly get annoyed same as any
    other people think worries just do not realize about .
    You controlled well as out on all managed to hit the nail on the top no need side-effects , people could
    take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s