No 412 6/17/13 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’
It’s Time To Impeach Obama
The time for words is over. Action must be taken. Obama has no regard for the American people. Obama has no regard for the rule of law. Obama has no regard for the Constitution.
Obama shoved socialized healthcare down the throat of America, a program that is driving up the cost of health insurance and is projected to cost almost two trillion dollars—just in the first decade! If the massive debt amassed from Obama’s trillion dollar Stimulus and multi-trillion dollar bank bailouts don’t bankrupt this country, ObamaCare surely will.
Obama has continually tried to disarm the American people, attempting to nullify the Second Amendment through a phony “assault weapons” ban, not to mention trying to sidestep Congress by planning to sign the United Nations Small Arms Treaty. This so-called “treaty” will put UN regulations above the Constitution.
Obama shipped guns to Mexican drug cartels in the Fast and Furious program in order to blame the increase in drug cartel violence on American gun dealers—specifically to limit our Second Amendment rights. Included in the thousands of guns shipped to Mexican drug cartels are the weapons used to murder Border Patrol agent Brian Terry and ICE agent Jaime Zapata. Obama is in the strictest sense of the term an accessory to murder.
Obama has targeted his enemies with the IRS—the Tea Party, pro-life Groups, any group or person that opposes his radical leftist policies.
Obama has targeted the press, including Fox News and the Associated Press. As we learned yesterday, CBS News’ Sharyl Attkisson’s work and home computer was hacked. Someone was “scrubbing” data—that is, stealing files—from her computer at the exact time that she was exposing Obama’s Benghazi cover-up. That it was an Obama operative is a forgone conclusion.
Obama has taken the Patriot Act to an unimaginable, Orwellian level. The NSA under a program we know now called PRISM is spying on every single American, ingesting literally everything that is communicated electronically: phone calls, email, text, Facebook posts, Skype, travel records—even credit card transactions and banking records!
The time for words is over. Action must be taken. Barack Hussein Obama should be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors. http://www.westernjournalism.com/its-time-to-impeach-obama/
Cheney: Obama Lacks Honesty, Credibility
By Audrey Hudson
Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Sunday that President Barack Obama has lost his integrity in the wake of numerous scandals that have rocked the administration including the Benghazi attack and IRS targeting of conservatives.
“The problem is the guy has failed to be forthright and honest and credible on things like Benghazi and the IRS, so he’s got no credibility,” Cheney told “Fox News Sunday.”
The IRS targeting is “one of the worst abuses of power imaginable” and was not guided by regional bureaucrats but from a “higher-up” in Washington, Cheney charged.
“It clearly was used for political purposes to go after a particular category of organizations,” Cheney said. “That is the kind of gross abuse of power that everybody is legitimately concerned about. I have trouble believing that two guys in Cincinnati dreamed this scheme up I just don’t think that’s true.”
The former defense secretary also questioned the Obama administration’s failure to send a military team to Benghazi to rescue the ambassador and other U.S. personnel during an attack by al-Qaida-linked terrorists last year.
“We should have been on that step before that ever happened,” said Cheney, who noted that armed forces were stationed an hour away and should have been deployed.
“If you’re not going to be ready in Libya of all places, then where are you going to be ready?”
Cheney criticized Obama’s recent pick of Susan Rice to be his national security adviser and said that she too suffered from a credibility shortage.
Rice was the U.N. ambassador to the United States when the Benghazi terror assault occurred, but delivered inaccurate information when she acted as the administration’s spokesperson about the cause of the attack.
“She appears to have been part of the cover-up. She went out and peddled the party line that had been put together at the State Department. I question … someone’s judgment who was so flawed that they took what was apparently very bad information and peddled it as aggressively as she did. I think what she did was a huge mistake,” Cheney said.
The Benghazi attack is further proof that the war on terrorism is not winding down as Obama insists, but continues to spread across North Africa, Cheney said.
“The threat is bigger than ever. So he is just dead wrong on the status of the threat,” Cheney said.
On the recent disclosures by a NSA employee that the Obama administration has been collecting millions of phone records on Americans, Cheney sided with the government and said the leaker should prosecuted and sent to jail.
However, on Obama’s statement that he had to “scrub” Bush-era surveillance programs with new safeguards, Cheney dismissed the president.
“I don’t pay a lot of attention, frankly, to what Barack Obama says,” Cheney said. “I am obviously not a fan of the incumbent president.” http://www.gopusa.com/news/2013/06/17/palin-on-syria-let-allah-sort-it-out/?subscriber=1
CNN Poll: Majority Doesn’t Trust Obama, Approval Rating Suffers Severe Drop
President Barack Obama’s approval rating dropped a shocking 8 percentage points over the last month — one of sharpest, fastest plunges in his presidency, according to a new CNN poll released early Monday morning.
For the first time in Obama’s time in office, more than half of the public doesn’t feel that the president is honest and trustworthy, the CNN/ORC International poll showed.
Specifically, Obama’s approval rating stands at 45 percent, down from 53 percent in mid-May, CNN reported. A shocking 54 percent of respondents told pollsters they disapprove of how Obama is handling his job. That was up nine points in just a month. It’s the first time in CNN polling since November 2011 that a majority of Americans have had a negative view of the president, CNN reported.
The severe drop in Obama’s approval rating was fueled by a sharp 17-point drop among Americans under 30, according to the poll. That’s particularly discouraging heading into 2014 because Democrats have felt they have a lock on the youth vote after the 2012 elections.
“The drop in Obama’s support is fueled by a dramatic 17-point decline over the past month among people under 30, who, along with black Americans, had been the most loyal part of the Obama coalition,” CNN Polling Director Keating Holland said.
The president also dropped 10 points among independent voters, from 47 percent last month to 37 percent. Obama’s disapproval among independents jumped 12 points to 61 percent. Again, more bad news for Democrats because those independents are especially important in mid-term elections in which older, more conservative Americans predominate.
The network pointed to several major scandals as evidence for the drop.
“The White House has been under siege over telephone and Internet surveillance, the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups, its handling of the terror attack on the U.S. consular post in Benghazi, Libya, and the Justice Department’s collecting journalists’ phone records as part of the government’s investigation into leaks of classified information,” CNN reported.
“It is clear that revelations about NSA surveillance programs have damaged Obama’s standing with the public, although older controversies like the IRS matter may have begun to take their toll as well,” Holland told the network.
The poll also found:
- A slight majority disapproves of the actions of the man who leaked the NSA documents. A majority of respondents also believe Edward Snowden, who fled to Hong Kong, should be brought back to the United States and prosecuted.
- Six in 10 disapprove of how Obama is handling government surveillance of U.S. citizens. That’s higher than the 52 percent who disapproved of George W. Bush on the same issue in 2006, when government surveillance was also in the headlines.
- Obama’s approval rating on terrorism, although still above 50 percent, has taken a 13-point hit since mid-May.
- The president’s approval rating on domestic issues like the economy, immigration and the deficit dropped by two to four points, within the poll’s sampling error.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/cnn-poll-obama-approval/2013/06/17/id/510211?s=al&promo_code=13D78-1#ixzz2WTnZno3E
Mientras los países “Cristianos de Occidente” se desintegran
Ricardo Samitier firstname.lastname@example.org
Miren la diferencia de cómo van las cosas en el mundo:
En USA: Obama Nombra Un Embajador Homosexual A España…
El Cual Se Presenta En Todas Partes Con Su “Marido – Mujer”
¿Vamos a Ver Que Hace el Rey cuando presente sus credenciales?
¿Le besará la mano al que “OFICIALMENTE” hace de mujer??? (aunque
Es sabido que ellos cambian de posición)
En Otras Partes del Mundo…
Los Pueblos SE REVELAN…contra la Traición Homosexual…
436 a 0 – Votaron Los Diputados Rusos
Contra Difundir Propaganda Homosexual
A Las Empresas Incluyendo En Anuncios…
Cámara de Diputados de Rusia aprobó el martes un proyecto de ley para prohibir la gente de “difundir propaganda en las relaciones sexuales no tradicionales” a los menores de edad, en un movimiento que ha sido criticado por grupos de derechos como un ataque contra la población LGBT del país.
La ley prohíbe el suministro de información sobre las “relaciones sexuales no tradicionales” a los menores y establecer multas elevadas para violaciones (alrededor de $ 156 para una persona y $ 31,000 para una empresa).
El proyecto fue aprobado con 436 votos en la Duma de 450 escaños. Un diputado se abstuvo y nadie votó en contra.
El proyecto de ley todavía tiene que ser aprobado por la Cámara Alta y firmada como ley por Putin, pero tampoco paso está en duda.
La nueva medida es el último esfuerzo para proteger los valores tradicionales de Rusia contra el liberalismo occidental, que el Kremlin y la Iglesia Ortodoxa Rusa consideran corromper a la juventud rusa e incitar a las protestas contra el gobierno de Putin.
“Las relaciones sexuales tradicionales son las relaciones entre un hombre y una mujer
Haga clic para leer la noticia
En Francia Donde Recién Aprobaron
El Matrimonio De Los Aberro sexuales
Un Alcalde Se Niega A Casar Una Pareja
Prefiere Ser Destituido e Ir a Cárcel
Haga clic para leer la noticia…
Mientras Obama Prepara A Los Burócratas
Como “Milicia” Para Atacar Al Pueblo…
Se “Horrorizan” cuando se dice que los maestros puedan armarse…
Pero Entrenan A Los Agentes del IRS
En El Uso De R-15…
Haga clic para leer la noticia…
America’s Defenses: Half Naked and Severely Hindered? By Linda McKinney / 16 June 2013 /
Shall I start with an understatement? Our government is out of control. We all know about the spying on the American people the administration has been doing, the AP reporters’ phone and e-mail records being requisitioned, and Sharyl Attkisson’s computer being hacked.
There’s rampant unemployment, thousands on Social Security disability (although a lot of it seems not really disabled), the government is advertising to get more people on food stamps while about 15% of Americans are receiving them!
The bad news? None of that is the worst part of this administration’s “out of control-ness”.
The worst part is that this administration is sending or has sent our troops to:
- Syria for NO reason (BTW, if you compare the reasons that Bush gave for going into Iraq and this administration’s reasons for going into Syria, they’re remarkably similar: where’s the lefts’ demands for proof from this admin of chemical weapon usage by Syria?)
- Uganda to advise them
- Jordan (ostensibly to check on Syria)
- Niger to support a French counterterrorism effort in Mali
- Congo and South Sudan
- Latin America to help fight the war on drugs
- Somalia allegedly to help in their fight against Al Qaeda
- Libya because of Benghazi
- Australia to show the Chinese we mean business
- Tunisia to protect our embassy
- Let us not forget that he has refused to bring all of our troops home from Afghanistan and Iraq as well.
- There are at least a few still in foreign countries at our U.S. military bases: Germany, Japan, Turkey, England, etc
- And at least a few of our troops are still here at home
How thinly spread must our military troops — the people themselves — be before they are totally ineffective?
Add to that thinly spread military the fact that this administration has or is:
- Cutting the defense budget to dangerous levels
- Cutting our missile defense spending by $550 million. (Some say he’s putting our nation at risk for a political win.)
- This administration has given away our missile defense secrets to foreign countries
- Sending our defense contracted weapons systems manufacturing to foreign countries, some with connections that could put our secrets at risk (why would a president do that?)
- Demoralizing our troops by cutting back on their hot meals (have you seen him cancel one of his family’s vacation plans yet?), and
- Cutting the pay and healthcare benefits for our soldiers in harm’s way
- Cutting tuition assistance for our troops
(Considering all of this, why any of our heroic military men and women re-up, I have no idea.)
“To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.” — George Washington, First Annual Address to Congress, January 8, 1790
The fact is that the U.S. military has been almost crippled by this administration.
With so many of our troops gone hither, thither and yon and those who remain at home having little to defend us with besides their own bodies and the few bullets the DHS and other admin departments haven’t snatched up (did you know that with all of the ammo this administration has on hand or ordered they have enough ammo to shoot each person in America at least ten times?), it’s no wonder China is surrounding us and North Korea’s little punk is beating his chest.
“Weakness provokes insult & injury while a condition to punish it often prevents it.” — Thomas Jefferson, To John Jay, August 23, 1785
The fallback position for most of us is that “We, The People” have the Second Amendment right to “keep and bear arms”. True. But (as you all know), that’s under attack from this administration, too.
But the number of recent purchases is at a record high: over 70 MILLION NICS checks since this administration took office.
That tells us a lot about the American people’s trust of this administration, but does it tell us anything about what we will do if needed?
I’ve had my concealed carry permit for quite a while now and have made up my mind that if the situation arises, I am going to be the person walking away from a confrontation.
My life is precious to me and I will not be taken down without a fight. How many others who have purchased guns have made that “I will survive, no matter what I have to do” decision?
Will you be capable of defending yourself, your neighbor, your children; even from foreign armies if our military men and women are not there to do so for you?
So where does that leave U.S. defenses? Considering what the current administration has done — by conscious effort and choice — are we half naked and severely hindered?
Immigration Bill’s National ID System Raises Fears of Abuse
by Cowboy Byte
A workplace employment check tucked inside the Senate’s immigration bill has some concerned it would create a national ID system and another massive database containing the private information of most Americans that is ripe for abuse.
In order to verify an immigrant’s legal status, employers would be allowed to access the databases of drivers’ licenses in individual states through an expanded network created by the Homeland Security Department, The New York Times reports.
“Over time, this could become a single, national, searchable database of vital biographic information and photographs of nearly every American,” said Democrat Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware. “I want to make sure we embed privacy protections in the system, both in how it is built and administered so that data cannot easily be stolen, and also that the information is only used for legitimate purposes.”
The concerns for abuse come as the Obama administration wrestles with accusations it has abused the privacy of foreigners and U.S. citizens through access to phone and Internet records.
A spokesman for Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida defended the use of an E-Verify system as a needed tool to ensure American workers are legal citizens.
FBI director should hand in his badge now!
Exclusive: Joseph Farah demands resignation of official who ignores national security threat
Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators News Service.. He is the author or co-author of 13 books, including his latest, “The Tea Party Manifesto,” and his classic, “Taking America Back,” now in its third edition and 14th printing. Farah is the former editor of the
It’s not just that government collects so much data on Americans that bothers me.
It’s what the government does and doesn’t do with the data that makes it worse.
Take, for example, the feisty interchange between Rep. Louis Gohmert, R-Texas, and FBI Director Robert Mueller last week.
Gohmert was grilling Mueller over the FBI’s abject failure at preventing the April 15 Boston Marathon bombing by neglecting to investigate their mosque, founded by Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was convicted of supporting terrorism. He also pointed out the FBI had a tip from Russia that one of the Tsarnaev brothers had been radicalized in a visit to Chechnya prior to the attack.
“The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15 attacks,” Gohmert said. “If the Russians tell you that someone has been radicalized and you go check and see the mosque that they went to, then you get the articles of incorporation as I have for the group that created the Boston mosque where these Tsarnaevs attended and you find out the name Alamoudi.”
Mueller accused Gohmert of not having his facts straight, for which he should be cited for contempt of Congress. It is Mueller who didn’t have his facts straight – even admitting he didn’t know about who founded the mosque.
This little fact was reported in WND in 2003 – a full year before Alamoudi pleaded guilty for conducting illegal transactions with the Libyan government and playing a role in a conspiracy to assassinate Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah! Yet the FBI director didn’t know? Why didn’t he know? The FBI was conducted multicultural outreaches to the mosque prior to the attack, yet it was oblivious to its history? Incredible.
That’s an illustration of why too much information in the wrong hands – and make no mistake about it, the government’s hands are the wrong hands – is so dangerous. Too much information sometimes obscures the obvious.
Islamic Society of Boston Mosque was, and remains to this day, a breeding ground for the kind of Muslim extremism that represents a grave threat to national security and the safety of the American public.
What is Mueller doing about that?
If a church had that kind of history, its charter would have been pulled long ago and those responsible for aiding and abetting terrorism would be locked up in Guantanamo. You know it, and I know it. But the FBI closes its eyes to this kind of violent and explosive hatred when those responsible are followers of Muhammad.
I encourage you to watch the fiery exchange as it was captured on CSPAN last Thursday.
It’s time for Mueller to go. I know he is a short-termer and leaving office soon. But it’s not soon enough.
This guy is not exactly Elliott Ness.
He’s been in the job too long – since a week before Sept. 11, 2001.
He obviously didn’t learn enough from that experience.
It’s time for an immediate change.
It’s also good to know there are at least a few members of Congress who know what’s really going on in this country – people like Louis Gohmert.
It’s also time to dismantle the surveillance state on general principle. It’s un-American to the core. But there’s another good reason to destroy it: Government not only ignores the vital information at its fingertips, it also misuses it, misinterprets it, fails to connect the dots and misses the forest for the trees because of the overwhelming amount of data it collects.
I don’t know what’s scarier – the fact that government collects information from every American surreptitiously or that it uses all the wrong criteria in figuring out who really represents a threat to the safety and security of our country and citizenry.
Toward a North American Union. Is it Possible Some in the Government want Illegal Immigration?
Br Dr. Harold Pease
Almost two decades ago I wrote a paper that outlined the process by which the European Union transcended from the European Coal and Steel Community to the European Economic Community to the European Community to the European Union. Never were the people told that the intended outcome—unification—was to slowly take away their sovereignty. The paper began with a call from General Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member, for “The United States of Europe” (“An Early Champion of Unity,” U.S. News and World Report, Oct 15, 1990, p. 65). I documented how the Marshall Plan money was handed out, not so much to prevent communism from making progress in Europe, as we had been told, but to consolidate Europe first economically than politically into a single country.
I did not publish the paper, although based upon numerous sources, it seemed out of reach for most Americans at the time. Imagine telling people that a group of wealthy Wall Street elites, through the use of tax-payer money, had something to do with the consolidation of Europe into a single country and planned the same for North America with the unification, first economically than political, of Canada, Mexico and the United States into a single country known as the North American Union, with a single currency called the “Amero” Dollar. Who would believe it until now? I was young in my career and decidedly not anxious to step too far out of political correctness.
I am now established in my career and have the respect of colleagues’ so such is more easily believed. I have also seen that foreign policy never changes from democratic to republican presidents with respect to foreign aid, military adventurism, perpetual war, the continued enlargement of the power of the United Nations, and never ending illegal immigration on our southern border.
I told my students 25 years ago that there would never be an effective deterrent to illegal immigration because the Council on Foreign Relations, from which all Secretaries of State, U.N. Ambassadors, Russian and Chinese Ambassadors, and a third of all Presidential Cabinets are drawn, is a strong advocate of globalism. They are easily the most powerful special interest group in the United States and they are clearly for open borders and trans-national agreements.
Extending amnesty in the Immigration Act of 1965 did not work because we did not seal the border. It just encouraged more to come. When offered again by President Ronald Reagan in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, with the promise that we would never need it again, I issued my warning that despite the promise to finally end illegal immigration we would repeat this a few decades down the road. And now here we are. I make the same promise thirty years from now. Those that have undue influence upon both the democratic and republican parties—the globalists—have no intention of actually sealing the border.
China built the Great Wall to keep barbarians out of their country centuries ago without bulldozers, giant trucks, cranes or any other heavy lifting and earth moving technologies that we have today. The truth is that we do not want to do so.
The truth is that The Council on Foreign Relations wants a generation or two of illegal immigration to help Mexico gain some measure of economic parity with Canada and the United States before assimilation can be a reality. Illegals tend to send money home and often retire in Mexico. The CFR 2005 publication, “Building a North American Community,” outlined “the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America.” They seek “cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America.” The featured article in the January/February 2004 issue of Foreign Affairs, the Council’s principle publication, has author Jerome Corsi identifying NAFTA, The North America Free Trade Agreement, as being “the first draft of an economic constitution for North America.”
This best explains the semi-secret meeting of George W. Bush in the somewhat obscure location of Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005, with Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and Mexican President Vincente Fox to formulate the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,” popularly referred to as SPP. Two years later in Montebello, Quebec, Mexican President Felipe Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper again came together with U.S. President George W. Bush. In that meeting Fox News reporter Bret Baier asked each, “Can you say today that this is not a prelude to a North American Union, similar to a European Union?” None denied it (Permanent Amnesty, Temporary Border, The New American, April 22, 2013, p.15). The very controversial Bush planned Super Highway running through the mid-west, allowing unrestricted use by both neighbors, seems to be currently on the back burner, but President Barack Obama does support open borders and trans-national agreements both of which undermine national sovereignty and strengthen regional governance.
Will the so-called “Gang of 8,” and their 800-page immigration reform bill that seems to parallel “Building a North American Community” stop illegal immigration after we have extended amnesty once again? No, because there is a force greater than they, The Council on Foreign Relations of which John McCain, one of the “Gang of 8,” is a member as is Vice President Joe Biden, and past and present Secretaries of State, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry. The CFR plan is to make illegal legal. Should Americans go with their plan? No! Not unless there is enforceable resolve from both political parties to end all federal benefits enticing illegals to come to the United States in the first place and a “real wall” absolutely and totally backing this.
Dr. Harold Pease is an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He has taught history and political science from this perspective for over 25 years at Taft College. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit http://www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
~ JEFF FOXWORTHY ON MUSLIMS ~
1. If you refine heroin for a living, but you have a moral objection to liquor,
You may be a Muslim.
2. If you own a $3,000 machine gun and a $5,000 rocket launcher, but you can’t afford shoes, You may be a Muslim.
3. If you have more wives than teeth, You may be a Muslim.
4. If you wipe your butt with your bare hand but consider bacon to be unclean,
You may be a Muslim.
5. If you think vests come in two styles: Bullet-proof and suicide. You may be a Muslim
6. If you can’t think of anyone you haven’t declared jihad against, You may be a Muslim.
7. If you consider television dangerous but routinely carry explosives in your clothing, You may be a Muslim.
8. If you were amazed to discover that cell phones have uses other than setting off roadside bombs, You may be a Muslim.
9. If you have nothing against women and think every man should own at least four, You may be a Muslim.
10. If you find this offensive or racist and don’t forward it, You may be a Muslim. Enviado por Carlos Bringuier.
MI HOMENAJE AL PADRE DE LA PATRIA
Por, Marzo Fernández
Me embullo a escribir estas notas, para recordar y venerar, aquí en esta trinchera del lucha que es NUEVO ACCIÓN, a quien es el Padre de todos los cubanos dignos. El Padre de la Patria Carlos Manuel de Céspedes.
No voy a referirme a la historia de Céspedes, que todos los cubanos conocemos. Hombre de una fortuna incuantificable, grandes estancias de ganado, varios ingenios azucareros y varias fincas urbanas en Bayamo y Manzanillo, prácticamente la rica zona de la Cuenca del Cauto le pertenecía.
Solo voy a comentar, la grandeza de ese hombre que lo tenía todo desde la cuna, mucho más de lo que se puede soñar. Hablaba perfectamente Inglés, Francés, Italiano y desde niño Latín y el Griego. Un sentido musical privilegiado. A la primera canción de amor cubana, “La Bayamesa” de José Fornaris. le puso música Carlos Manuel de Céspedes. Lo tenía todo, menos Patria.
Como todos conocemos, el 10 de Octubre 1868, reunió a todos sus esclavos y los declaró libres, renunció a todo y se internó en el “monte” para iniciar su lucha redentora. Así eran nuestros mambises.
En Mayo de 1870 el Capitán General de La Isla, Caballero de Rodas, le envió un mensaje a Céspedes, donde le informaba, que su hijo menor Oscar; había sido capturado y condenado a muerte. Le ofrecía la vida de su hijo a cambio de un “arreglo personal” que posteriormente se discutiría. La respuesta de Céspedes no se hizo esperar: “OSCAR NO ES MI ÚNICO HIJO, SOY EL PADRE DE TODOS LOS CUBANOS QUE HAN MUERTO LUCHANDO POR LA PATRIA”.
El 12 de mayo de 1870 murió fusilado Oscar de Céspedes, hijo del Padre de La Patria, gritando “Viva Cuba Libre”.
Qué mejor homenaje le podemos brindar los cubanos dignos, un día como hoy, a nuestro Padre, que recordarlo y tenerlo siempre presente por habernos legado ese ejemplo de hombría y patriotismo. ¡VIVA CUBA LIBRE! ¡QUE ORGULLO ES SER CUBANO!
En caso de que usted no reciba “En mi opinión” en su e-mail porque [alguien] interfiera con nuestro deseo por favor lo puede leer con más calidad en cualquiera de estos dos blogs (Copie y pegue en el seach):
Copie estos links porque posiblemente los necesitara en un futuro para que pueda recibir esta información, si sigue esta Guerra contra este sitio web.
“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’